COMMENTS: 27
Need a Safe Abortion? Go to Mexico City
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.
U.N. data shows that in countries where women have access to safe contraception, reproductive health care, and legal abortion, the actual abortion rates are much lower than in countries where women do not have such rights.
Mexico's state-by-state abortion laws are among the most restrictive, and the abortions available for poor women are often life threatening. It is estimated that somewhere between 200,000 and 500,000 illegal abortions occur annually across the country, making abortion the fifth-leading national cause of maternal mortality and the third-leading cause in Mexico City.
This is why those who can afford it leave the country for abortions in Texas or California. There is hope: On April 24, Mexico City's opposition legislators of the left-leaning Democratic Revolutionary Party and the centrist Institutional Revolutionary Party, and smaller parties such as Alternativa, PT and Convergencia, will vote to fully legalize abortion in the first 12 weeks of a woman's pregnancy (abortion is now only permitted for rape victims or when a mother's life is endangered).
This dramatic policy shift in the world's second largest Catholic nation is due, in part, to the valiant and persistent efforts of a well-organized feminist movement in Mexico. It also stems from Mexico City's liberal majority which gave same-sex unions almost all the rights of marriage last month and recently granted homosexual conjugal visits in prison.
The Mexico City legislature is among the most progressive governments in any Latin American city today. The conservative leadership of the Catholic community is rallying against the April 24th vote, so much so that the Vatican has sent its main anti-abortion campaigner to Mexico to help coordinate activities and media.
The social conservatives who dominate the Mexican political landscape outside the city have also demonstrated sustained opposition to overturning the ban in public protests.
Despite and in response to these obstacles, local women's organizations have led nuanced, vocal campaigns to educate the public on abortion and modify existing laws. A sturdy coalition of these groups called Alliance Pro-Choice includes three long-time Global Fund for Women grantees: Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir (Catholics for a Free Choice) or CDD, Equidad de Género: CiudadanÃa, Trabajo y Familia (Gender Equity: Citizenship, Employment and Family), and Grupo de Información en Reproducción Elegida (Reproductive Choice Information Group) or GIRE.
Recently, in Mexico's La Jornada, CDD, which provides Catholic pro-choice education on reproductive and sexual health and rights, publicly called for church leadership to "follow the Constitution" and not interject religion into public policy discussions. For such a group, that takes pluck.
Meanwhile, GIRE, an advocacy group for reproductive policy, has established strategic relationships with policy makers to expand reproductive rights for women, while Equidad has mobilized pro-choice advocates.
Historically, Mexico has played a leadership role in Latin America; its laws, policies and practices were frequently emulated regionally. This influence has lessened in recent years, however, due to Mexico's close ties to the U.S.
Abortion is clearly on the legislative dockets of many countries in the region -- last year Colombia relaxed its total abortion ban while Nicaragua expanded its own. Assuming the vote on April 24 overturns the Mexico City ban, the question remains whether other progressive governments such as those in Argentina and Chile, where women's groups have helped to improve women's access to sexual and reproductive rights, will follow suit.
If so, women -- and all of us -- will have much more to celebrate.
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LMNOP on Apr 23, 2007 5:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
*America would like to develop some decency and guts like they have in Mexico, but must settle for church dogma and superstition instead. Who's headed into the 21st century, and who's still in the middle ages? This nation is already halfway to third-worldization. The wages will follow. So how long do you think it should take before Baltimore, Philadelphia and Detroit complete their transformations under Republican rule to become Calcutta or Darfur?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Moonray on Apr 23, 2007 5:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One aspect of abortion laws is particularly strange and distasteful -- namely, the "except for rape and incest" clause in some laws. Isn't the foundation of anti-abortion law the belief that a fetus is a full-fledged human from the moment of conception? If so, how can abortion foes allow the "murder" of an innocent child who just happened to be conceived through rape or incest? That's not the child's fault and certainly no justification for murdering it.
Of course, terminating the growth of an unformed fetus isn't murder, or even close. But the Church must insist that it is murder, because Christian dogma is based on the silly premise that a "soul" is injected into the human egg at the moment of conception. Nonsense.
In any case, those "except for" laws are more evidence that most abortion foes are less interested in protecting the fetus than in preserving the power of the Church and the establishment in general. Typical conservatives.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: As usual, Church clings to the cruelist and most inhumane policy
Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: As usual, Church clings to the cruelist and most inhumane policy
Posted by: EagleMB
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 23, 2007 5:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because of the expense, less fortunate daughters crossed the border at San Diego for abortions with a much great health risk. More commonly, teens from poor families took their chances in Los Angeles at underground clinics.
If, someday, the Supreme Court outlaws abbortions, pregnant daughters of middleclass and wealthy families, even anti-abortionists, will fly to Mexico to eliminate their “problem.” Magically take away that option and I predict Roe v Wade would be declared constitutional again.
Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption. AlterNet readers who object to my NON-PROFIT campaign to expose President Bush as a lying crook can email me through the website rather than comment here.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Apr 23, 2007 6:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Good, But Not Total Solution
Posted by: ZPaul
» RE: How about free or low cost vasectomies and tubal ligations?
Posted by: richmx2
» RE: How about free or low cost vasectomies and tubal ligations?
Posted by: Anna_McGovern
Comments are closed-
Posted by: redbrownandblueparty on Apr 23, 2007 6:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ed Brown and Blue Party comment
Posted by: LMNOP
Comments are closed-
Posted by: poppop_schell on Apr 23, 2007 2:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Most of us who have had kids did it out of total selfishness
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Most of us who have had kids did it out of total selfishness
Posted by: poppop_schell
» This misreading of things must be deliberate
Posted by: Beck
» RE: This misreading of things must be deliberate
Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Human fetuses, although human, don't rate as selves or as citizens yet.
Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Human fetuses, although human, don't rate as selves or as citizens yet.
Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Human fetuses, although human, don't rate as selves or as citizens yet.
Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MEXICO PROGRESSIVE??? COME ON YOUR KIDDING!!!
Posted by: ra1n
» RE: MEXICO PROGRESSIVE??? COME ON YOUR KIDDING!!!
Posted by: poppop_schell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richmx2 on Apr 23, 2007 7:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Besides, Mexico has a much stricter separation of Church and State than most countries.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Apr 26, 2007 10:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Premalata H de Matesanz on May 2, 2007 10:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LMNOP on Apr 23, 2007 5:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
*America would like to develop some decency and guts like they have in Mexico, but must settle for church dogma and superstition instead. Who's headed into the 21st century, and who's still in the middle ages? This nation is already halfway to third-worldization. The wages will follow. So how long do you think it should take before Baltimore, Philadelphia and Detroit complete their transformations under Republican rule to become Calcutta or Darfur?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Moonray on Apr 23, 2007 5:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One aspect of abortion laws is particularly strange and distasteful -- namely, the "except for rape and incest" clause in some laws. Isn't the foundation of anti-abortion law the belief that a fetus is a full-fledged human from the moment of conception? If so, how can abortion foes allow the "murder" of an innocent child who just happened to be conceived through rape or incest? That's not the child's fault and certainly no justification for murdering it.
Of course, terminating the growth of an unformed fetus isn't murder, or even close. But the Church must insist that it is murder, because Christian dogma is based on the silly premise that a "soul" is injected into the human egg at the moment of conception. Nonsense.
In any case, those "except for" laws are more evidence that most abortion foes are less interested in protecting the fetus than in preserving the power of the Church and the establishment in general. Typical conservatives.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: As usual, Church clings to the cruelist and most inhumane policy
Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: As usual, Church clings to the cruelist and most inhumane policy
Posted by: EagleMB
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 23, 2007 5:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because of the expense, less fortunate daughters crossed the border at San Diego for abortions with a much great health risk. More commonly, teens from poor families took their chances in Los Angeles at underground clinics.
If, someday, the Supreme Court outlaws abbortions, pregnant daughters of middleclass and wealthy families, even anti-abortionists, will fly to Mexico to eliminate their “problem.” Magically take away that option and I predict Roe v Wade would be declared constitutional again.
Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption. AlterNet readers who object to my NON-PROFIT campaign to expose President Bush as a lying crook can email me through the website rather than comment here.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Apr 23, 2007 6:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Good, But Not Total Solution
Posted by: ZPaul
» RE: How about free or low cost vasectomies and tubal ligations?
Posted by: richmx2
» RE: How about free or low cost vasectomies and tubal ligations?
Posted by: Anna_McGovern
Comments are closed-
Posted by: redbrownandblueparty on Apr 23, 2007 6:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ed Brown and Blue Party comment
Posted by: LMNOP
Comments are closed-
Posted by: poppop_schell on Apr 23, 2007 2:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Most of us who have had kids did it out of total selfishness
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Most of us who have had kids did it out of total selfishness
Posted by: poppop_schell
» This misreading of things must be deliberate
Posted by: Beck
» RE: This misreading of things must be deliberate
Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Human fetuses, although human, don't rate as selves or as citizens yet.
Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Human fetuses, although human, don't rate as selves or as citizens yet.
Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Human fetuses, although human, don't rate as selves or as citizens yet.
Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MEXICO PROGRESSIVE??? COME ON YOUR KIDDING!!!
Posted by: ra1n
» RE: MEXICO PROGRESSIVE??? COME ON YOUR KIDDING!!!
Posted by: poppop_schell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richmx2 on Apr 23, 2007 7:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Besides, Mexico has a much stricter separation of Church and State than most countries.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Apr 26, 2007 10:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Premalata H de Matesanz on May 2, 2007 10:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
ACORN Smear Collaborator Claims Persecution to Raise Money for Her Legal Troubles
Bad Policies Are Really What's Driving California's Huge Prison Costs




