Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Need a Safe Abortion? Go to Mexico City

By Kavita N. Ramdas and Maria Luisa Sanchez, AlterNet. Posted April 23, 2007.


On Tuesday Mexico City, one of the most progressive governments in Latin America, may make a dramatic policy shift to legalize abortion.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It is easier to access contraceptive services in Iran, an Islamic theocracy, than it is in Mexico or other Latin American countries. In the U.S. the pro-choice movement is reeling from last Wednesday's Supreme Court ruling to uphold a ban on partial-birth abortions.

U.N. data shows that in countries where women have access to safe contraception, reproductive health care, and legal abortion, the actual abortion rates are much lower than in countries where women do not have such rights.

Mexico's state-by-state abortion laws are among the most restrictive, and the abortions available for poor women are often life threatening. It is estimated that somewhere between 200,000 and 500,000 illegal abortions occur annually across the country, making abortion the fifth-leading national cause of maternal mortality and the third-leading cause in Mexico City.

This is why those who can afford it leave the country for abortions in Texas or California. There is hope: On April 24, Mexico City's opposition legislators of the left-leaning Democratic Revolutionary Party and the centrist Institutional Revolutionary Party, and smaller parties such as Alternativa, PT and Convergencia, will vote to fully legalize abortion in the first 12 weeks of a woman's pregnancy (abortion is now only permitted for rape victims or when a mother's life is endangered).

This dramatic policy shift in the world's second largest Catholic nation is due, in part, to the valiant and persistent efforts of a well-organized feminist movement in Mexico. It also stems from Mexico City's liberal majority which gave same-sex unions almost all the rights of marriage last month and recently granted homosexual conjugal visits in prison.

The Mexico City legislature is among the most progressive governments in any Latin American city today. The conservative leadership of the Catholic community is rallying against the April 24th vote, so much so that the Vatican has sent its main anti-abortion campaigner to Mexico to help coordinate activities and media.

The social conservatives who dominate the Mexican political landscape outside the city have also demonstrated sustained opposition to overturning the ban in public protests.

Despite and in response to these obstacles, local women's organizations have led nuanced, vocal campaigns to educate the public on abortion and modify existing laws. A sturdy coalition of these groups called Alliance Pro-Choice includes three long-time Global Fund for Women grantees: Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir (Catholics for a Free Choice) or CDD, Equidad de Género: Ciudadanía, Trabajo y Familia (Gender Equity: Citizenship, Employment and Family), and Grupo de Información en Reproducción Elegida (Reproductive Choice Information Group) or GIRE.

Recently, in Mexico's La Jornada, CDD, which provides Catholic pro-choice education on reproductive and sexual health and rights, publicly called for church leadership to "follow the Constitution" and not interject religion into public policy discussions. For such a group, that takes pluck.

Meanwhile, GIRE, an advocacy group for reproductive policy, has established strategic relationships with policy makers to expand reproductive rights for women, while Equidad has mobilized pro-choice advocates.

Historically, Mexico has played a leadership role in Latin America; its laws, policies and practices were frequently emulated regionally. This influence has lessened in recent years, however, due to Mexico's close ties to the U.S.

Abortion is clearly on the legislative dockets of many countries in the region -- last year Colombia relaxed its total abortion ban while Nicaragua expanded its own. Assuming the vote on April 24 overturns the Mexico City ban, the question remains whether other progressive governments such as those in Argentina and Chile, where women's groups have helped to improve women's access to sexual and reproductive rights, will follow suit.

If so, women -- and all of us -- will have much more to celebrate.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: abortion, choice, mexico

Kavita N. Ramdas is President of The Global Fund for Women. Maria Luisa Sanchez is the Executive Director of Grupo de Información en Reproducción Elegida.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Anti- abortion law and The Third Worldization of America
Posted by: LMNOP on Apr 23, 2007 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wouldn't you just love to see Daddy Warbucks' little debutante swimming across the Rio Grande in her prom dress to get a safe abortion so that she didn't have to get hacked up illegally in the alleys of some developing* nation like this one?

*America would like to develop some decency and guts like they have in Mexico, but must settle for church dogma and superstition instead. Who's headed into the 21st century, and who's still in the middle ages? This nation is already halfway to third-worldization. The wages will follow. So how long do you think it should take before Baltimore, Philadelphia and Detroit complete their transformations under Republican rule to become Calcutta or Darfur?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As usual, Church clings to the cruelist and most inhumane policy
Posted by: Moonray on Apr 23, 2007 5:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Catholic Church -- and religion in general -- continues to be the source of enormous pain and suffering. Will humanity ever be able to rise above this superstition and stupidity? And most churches are just political organizations masquerading as religious entities, or are just gangster operations sucking money from the pockets of the ignorant and gullible.

One aspect of abortion laws is particularly strange and distasteful -- namely, the "except for rape and incest" clause in some laws. Isn't the foundation of anti-abortion law the belief that a fetus is a full-fledged human from the moment of conception? If so, how can abortion foes allow the "murder" of an innocent child who just happened to be conceived through rape or incest? That's not the child's fault and certainly no justification for murdering it.

Of course, terminating the growth of an unformed fetus isn't murder, or even close. But the Church must insist that it is murder, because Christian dogma is based on the silly premise that a "soul" is injected into the human egg at the moment of conception. Nonsense.

In any case, those "except for" laws are more evidence that most abortion foes are less interested in protecting the fetus than in preserving the power of the Church and the establishment in general. Typical conservatives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Abortions will always be available to the rich and middleclass -- Roe v Wade or not.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 23, 2007 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back in the early 70's when I was a pilot for Continental Airlines and abortions were illegal, I flew a Saturday morning nonstop from LAX to El Paso that was popular with pregnant middleclass teenagers whose families paid for D&Cs across the border in a popular Jaurez medical clinic.

Because of the expense, less fortunate daughters crossed the border at San Diego for abortions with a much great health risk. More commonly, teens from poor families took their chances in Los Angeles at underground clinics.

If, someday, the Supreme Court outlaws abbortions, pregnant daughters of middleclass and wealthy families, even anti-abortionists, will fly to Mexico to eliminate their “problem.” Magically take away that option and I predict Roe v Wade would be declared constitutional again.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption. AlterNet readers who object to my NON-PROFIT campaign to expose President Bush as a lying crook can email me through the website rather than comment here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about free or low cost vasectomies and tubal ligations?
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Apr 23, 2007 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about free or low cost vasectomies and tubal ligations? That would be even better than access to abortions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Red Brown and Blue Party comment
Posted by: redbrownandblueparty on Apr 23, 2007 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mexico City heads up while Washington City goes down. A Catholic based country shows more sense than a Protestant-secular one. For all their excesses, the pro-life stance holds on to a grain of truth: the sanctity of life. Nature herself does plenty of aborting but most often in the early stages when something is "not right." The 12 week rule and the obvious "exceptions" follow nature's lead. The social irresponsibility of rich teens streaming across the border on their parents money lends credence to the pro-life concerns. As the pregnancy progresses the fetus assumes more "soul," and therefore the reasons for abortion become more demanding until in the last stages of pregnancy quite difficult to justify, baring deformity or stillbirth. Religion is not the point; reason is. RBB advocates for old fashioned character building which would reduce the need for abortion in the first place, and given unwanted pregnancies, a reasonable, responsible and caring social policy. As the consciousness of people rises, they see less reason to "increase and multiply," regardless of their religious persuasion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MEXICO PROGRESSIVE??? COME ON YOUR KIDDING!!!
Posted by: poppop_schell on Apr 23, 2007 2:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only someone who is simply focused on women's rights to abortion would call Mexico progressive. Mexico is one of the most plutocratic countries in the world. IF Mexico was so progressive, why is America being invaded by illegal immigrants? Stop being so self centered on "women's rights" to killing the unborn and start smelling the real world. Abortion is simply a rationalization for selfishness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mexico is no more a "Catholic" country than the U.S. is a "Baptist" one
Posted by: richmx2 on Apr 23, 2007 7:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My only quibble with the piece was the assumption that because the majority of Mexicans claim membership in the RC church, that makes the country a "Catholic" country. Yes, the hierarchy has -- and continues to have -- more influence than it probably should, but this is no different really than the situation in the U.S. where Baptist leaders (and evangelical protestants in general) have undue influence in law and society.

Besides, Mexico has a much stricter separation of Church and State than most countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just watch out you don't get kidnapped on the way to the clinic!
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Apr 26, 2007 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abortion might be legal now but I would not suggest traveling there to get one (unless you are a member of the 1% of Mexican population that controls the majority of the wealth and can afford an armoured car and bodyguards.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

don't go swiming just yet
Posted by: Premalata H de Matesanz on May 2, 2007 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the fight isn't over the mex federal gov. has forbiden all federal hospitales to offer the procidure and the federal government is tring to get the d.f. law declared unconstitucional oh well it was a good try. by the way no born again is less rabid or more so then our opus dei and the legioners of christ two very, very right wing orgs that are flooding the tv and print with some very murderous "pro life" proproganda

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement