Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

Media Finally Discovers Army of Pat Robertson Acolytes in Bush Administration

By Max Blumenthal, Huffington Post. Posted April 13, 2007.


When Monica Goodling's name erupted into the news last week in the attorney scandal, the mainstream press suddenly realized that Pat Robertson's Regent University exists -- and that it's got a big footprint in the Bush admin.
bridge
Advertisement

Monica Goodling on her Regent University homepage: "If I only had two seconds to tell you why I'm here, I'd have to say this: I want to leave the world a better place than I found it. Tough assignment, but, worth a try."

When Monica Goodling's name erupted into the news last week, the mainstream press discovered suddenly that Pat Robertson's Regent University exists. Not only that, the press learned that it has made a deep footprint in George W. Bush's Washington.

Since Robertson's failed presidential campaign, coverage of him has largely focused on his mercurial and bizarre personality. He seemed only to appear in the news when one of his many entertainingly outrageous gaffes or false prophecies earned publicity. While Robertson's hysterical episodes deserved all the coverage they generated, with a few notable exceptions, the mainstream press habitually ignored his political machinations. Robertson and his cadres exploited this lack of scrutiny to quietly erect a sophisticated and far-reaching political network that today propells the Christian right's ongoing march through the institutions.

The right has exploited the mainstream press's ignorance about Robertson to avoid weathering the blowback from his most embarassing gaffes. Case in point: Two years ago, after Robertson called for the assassination of Hugo Chavez, Fox News' Brit Hume introduced what would become a central talking point for spinning the controversy. On the August 23, 2005 episode of Fox News' Special Report, Hume declared, "The televangelist Pat Robertson's political influence may have been declining since he came in second in the Iowa Republican caucuses 17 years ago. And he may have no clout with the Bush administration."

Morton Kondracke echoed Hume, exclaiming that "Pat Robertson's day has long since passed."

Predictably, the right's spin seeped into the mainstream press. The day after Hume and Kondracke's exchange, Knight Ridder asserted that Robertson's influence "has waned." As evidence, the news service quoted one "leader" of the "evangelical movement" claiming, "He's an old man and there's a group of old women and old men who watch him." Old men can't be influential, don't you know?

The usually sagacious John Green, a University of Akron professor who has emerged as the go-to guy for virtually any reporter covering the Christian right, swooped in to join the parrot jungle chirping about Robertson's death knell. In an interview with the National Review's Byron York (who recently blew his wad trying to discredit the jury that convicted Scooter Libby), Green concluded that while Robertson is "certainly a consequential figure," he is "more in tune with what was happening with evangelicals 20 or 30 years ago" than his contemporaries.

But in the wake of Goodling's hotly publicized resignation, the mainstream press suddenly -- and correctly -- decided to judge Robertson by the fruits he has borne. In the Washington Post-owned Slate Magazine, Dahlia Lithwick published a penetrating look at "How Pat Robertson's law school is changing America." Lithwick notes that as early as 1997, when Goodling was enrolled at Regent and working as a spokesperson for the school's Office of Government, she was ducking pointed questions from reporters.

The Boston Globe also ran a insightful look at Regent Law's impact on public policy. The Globe cited (as I did days earlier right here) Kay Coles James as the key link between Regent and the Bush White House. The Globe's Charlie Savage wrote, "In 2001, the Bush administration picked the dean of Regent's government school, Kay Coles James, to be the director of the Office of Personnel Management -- essentially the head of human resources for the executive branch. The doors of opportunity for government jobs were thrown open to Regent alumni."

The sudden interest in Robertson's political network spread to the L.A. Times on April 6 when it profiled Christian Broadcasting Network's star political reporter and blogger, David Brody. The Times correctly notes that despite his affiliation with the supposedly discredited reverend, Brody has "developed a real web base among followers of the presidential races." Indeed, Brody's blog has become a critical window into evangelical opinion on candidates from both parties. In the process, Brody has lent newfound credibility to Robertson's flagship news network.

The Christian right is far more than a pantheon of charismatic backlashers with automatonic followers of "old men and women." It is also a sophicated political operation with a coherent long-term strategy. Goodling may be out of a job, but thousands of capable Christian right cadres remain, waging the culture war from inside the White House, federal agencies and Republican congressional offices. Together they will continue to inflame conflicts that were previously unimaginable.

Anyone insisting in spite of continuously mounting evidence that the Christian right is going to simply shrink into oblivion because the Democrats control Congress, or because evangelical leaders are prone to scandal, should learn from Goodling's example and take the fifth.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: pat robertson, attorney scandal, monica goodling

Max Blumenthal has a blog at Max Blumenthal.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The good times for the Christian right in Washington will soon be their end times.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 13, 2007 2:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alarmist Blumenthal wrote, “Goodling may be out of a job, but thousands of capable Christian right cadres remain, waging the culture war from inside the White House, federal agencies and Republican congressional offices.”

So what? In two years, they’ll be looking for jobs as America’s unstoppable political pendulum swings back to center.

I can’t imagine anything more embarrassing than submitting an employment application in 2009 that says the person worked for the most corrupt and incompetent administration in U.S. history -- with a special notation in the remarks section, “I never took the Fifth,”

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why only 5% atheist? Posted by: Edward George
» RE: Why only 5% atheist? Posted by: aussidawg
» Nonsense. Posted by: justaguy
» RE: Nonsense. Posted by: Philip Newton
» Hope you're right Posted by: Philip Newton
Do you really think so ?
Posted by: zipper696 on Apr 13, 2007 3:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These people are deeply entrenched at ALL levels in many agencies and can effectively slow or block any attempts by subsequent Administrations to mollify or modify the extreme steps taken by Bushco.
Let's not assume that ousting Bush or even a GOP Presidency will inhibit these ideologues from their "Sacred Mission"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Do you really think so ? Posted by: Bozwell
Ah come on....
Posted by: reval on Apr 13, 2007 4:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...the mainstream press suddenly realized that Pat Robertson's Regent University exists -- and that it's got a big footprint in the Bush admin." Surely Blumenthal is joking.

The Goodling story, her affiliation with Reagent "University" and her special kind of "employment" in the BushCo regime has to be the most under-reported story of the year so far.

The facts surronding this scandal deserve considerably more attention than that given by either the MSM or the blogs. When it is, we'll also discover the role of such "schools" as Liberty "University" as well. And yes, I put the word "University" in quotes whenever I mention these institutions of lower learning. They're schools all right - schools that have managed to obtain their accededation only through the good grace of King George's Office of Faith-Based initiatives!

The MSM has missed this story entirely. As usual, it's been way too busy with the likes of Anna Nicol Smut, Don Imus and the NC "rape" case to be bothered with reporting on something that has sucked our tax dollars and liberties into the black hole of godly "faith" for the past 6+ years.

Remember Diderot: Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with entrails of the last priest.

Rev. El Mundo
WVCSR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ah come on.... Posted by: aussidawg
» Madrassa USA? Posted by: Philip Newton
The Laser Beam Is Misdirected
Posted by: mrtshw on Apr 13, 2007 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reval has it right regarding Blumenthal's misplaced concerns.
Delusional idiots which abound among the anti-christian Robertson/Falwell/Dobson/Colson homophobic fascists are but the unfotunate "droppings" of the evils spewed and spawned for decades by these 'Christian' cretins.
Robertson is among the most vile human beings on the planet. He hordes a vast personal fortune amassed from inherited wealth, media, hellish diamond mines, fake charities, fake "nutrition' drinks, fake religion. He has called for the assassination of world leaders such as Hugo Chavez, anti-christs lurking in Israel, and probably most episcopalians alive today. Robertson pronounced Katrina as God's revenge for the wickedness in New Orleans, prayed God would erase Dover,PA for rejecting creationism. Robertson denounces abortion in the US but is okay with mass abortions in China where he curries their favor regarding his vast business interests. May Robertson's entrails be the first used to strangle the whordes of criminals thriving within our government, MSM, and corporate swine herds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't forget Jesuit and Catholic schools and the Mormon schools!
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Apr 13, 2007 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Historically the Jesuits have a much longer history in meddling in governmental affairs, militaristic colonialism, and political intrigues. Many in government have attended undergraduate (or even law) in Jesuit schools where they are indoctrinated into the order or, simply, get brainwashed into thinking how the Jesuits wish. The other Catholic schools are less dangerous BUT one must always be careful of schools/religions which teach blind obedience to a single person (who speaks directly with God). Especially when this person is head of a foreign nation with its own intelligence service and major bank, The Vatican. Lastly, let us not forget the Mormons who are having a major influence in politics and, unlike most Christian religions, is growing around the world. They have some weird religious views and single-minded of purposes in their quest for world expansion of Mormonism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pat Robertson: $460 Million income a year -- TAX FREE!
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Apr 13, 2007 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the Bush Administration was recommending charities in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina ... Pat Robertson's OPERATION BLESSING was #2 on the list -- right next to the American Red Cross. Famously, OB got caught staging a photo op with relief supplies for the Liberian civil war, then offloading the food and blankets and restocking the plane with mining supplies consigned to Charles Tayolor's gold mining operation.

Then, of course there's the Christian Broadcasting Network ... a $2 BILLION dollar endowment frees it from the need to sell advertising or garner contributions, at all.

And of course there's Liberty University and the grad school cum think-tank American Center for Law and Justice ...

So, like the persecution of Christians in Godless Liberal America, the 'fading away' of Pat Robertson is very much overstated !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Real Pulitzer stuff
Posted by: Knowmad on Apr 13, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Media Finally Discovers Army of Pat Robertson Acolytes in Bush Administration"

That headline is the real story here. If it's true that the media just realized/discovered/figured this out, then your fourth estate is in even more trouble than it seemed.

Perhaps it's just that, with chushrovian minions crashing and burning at every turn, your stalwart journalists are brave now - like chipmunks gingerly peeking out to see if the horrible doggie has gone away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

right wing "universities" place the most interns in Washington
Posted by: counterpoint on Apr 13, 2007 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't look find the source for this right now but I heard Chris Hedges recently and he claimed - and I probably don't have the facts straight - that Falwell's "Liberty University" places the highest number of interns in the the Bush administration, more than all the Ivy League combined.
If someone else can confirm/correct this please post, I'll look for it myself.
The accreditation process of higher education in the US is murky. I for one would not allow a religious doctrinal outfit to carry the name university unless the sciences are taught according to modern standards in the core curriculum, i.e. including evolution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» For more on PHC and HSLDA, Posted by: eddie torres
So now our collective heads
Posted by: peritonlogon on Apr 13, 2007 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are just a little less further up our arses...yippee!

Until pragmatism becomes a strong movement in this county all we're doing is trying to walk up an icy hill. Until "faith based initiatives" in the context of government becomes a dirty word that people are embarassed of and "culture war" becomes a phrase that only lamers and idiots use (no offese to idiots) we will simply have to be patient (I hear Congress 2.0 is supposed to start beta testing in 2-5 years, but then again isn't that always the story, in a few years, maybe reasonable people will prevail.)

The next time someone says "well that's just my opinion" or "I've got a right to my own opinion" or any of the various phrases people use to try to shield their wrong ideas from examination, tell them "no, in fact, opinions can indeed be objectively wrong, for example, the one you just expressed. Some opinions are arived at through faith and some through reason and they are not equally valid, an opion arived at through faith is simply a string of empty words if it is applied to the rest of the world."

Faith and religion are superhighways of corruption. Not only do they coax people into disbelieving their better judgement, but the religious organizations come with a mobilized and well trained core of individuals to sieze and consolidate the power they are grabbing for. This is their business...the model is simple, it goes like this.

Relax intellectual standards of the group --> Convice the group that the world as it is is disappointing and frustrating ---> Hold up tight-knit social organization and dogma as a way to combat frustration and disappointment ---> Position tight-knit social organization in power, and invent magical, unqestionable rules that prevent the leaders from losing power.

This business has been around for thousands of years and has proven quite resilient. Other than simply converting the faithful to another dogma, the only serious way of combating religious intrusions and corruptions is through pragmatism and education or in other words, serious intellectual discipline and high standards. If someone testifying before congress, or speaking on a major network is voicing opinions less well reasoned that a highschool student, they do not deserve to be granted an audience or a response, they should simply be shunned from the public spotlight until they are able to think and speak as well as a highscholl student and they should not be given any serious attention until they reason as well as a college graduate (that's right, a 22 year old, low standards for deserving serious public attention.)

And remember, if, while interviewing or reviewing a candiate for public office, you ever start feeling "I don't think this guy is up to the task" or even just questioning "Is this guy really up to the task?" eliminate him or her from your list of potential candiates. It's that simple, if half the country thinks a man isn't bright enough to run the country, they are not simply being pretentious, (as so many media networks tried say in 2000 and 2004) they are bringing up legitimate concerns of competence. And if the candidate runs on not being well informed or civic minded, but knowing some important and well connected people, he should receive nothing but contempt, cerntainly not national coverage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So now our collective heads Posted by: counterpoint
» RE: So now our collective heads Posted by: counterpoint
» I think you're projecting Posted by: peritonlogon
Imagine My Complete Lack of Surprise
Posted by: freethink7 on Apr 13, 2007 9:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
about Pat Robertson's little Christian crusading soldiers permeating the White House. Our duplicitous mainstream media conveniently forgot to mention this fact. Bu$h Cheney Inc. would dearly love to impose theocracy onto this country, but it will never happen. I believe the majority of people in this country are repulsed by even the concept/idea of a theocracy government. But the Bu$h Cheney Rove propaganda mind control machine love to play psychological head games with the citizens of this country trying to make them feel intimidated by all their Christian crusading soldier b.s.

I don't think the majority of people in our country are buying it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Worker apathy Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Worker apathy Posted by: truthteller
Our worst nightmare
Posted by: willymack on Apr 13, 2007 10:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is uncomfortably close to coming to fruition. Can you imagine a figurehead "president" with his strings being pulled by a gang of religion-besotted crazies like Pat Robertson?Want a preview of that kind of future? Read Margaret Atwater's "A Handmaid's Tale".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Small correction Posted by: HeroesAll
It's about time...
Posted by: Sunfell on Apr 13, 2007 10:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's about time that the mainstream media catches on to what many of us have been writing and warning about for years- decades, even. It's been a slow-growing, but malignant blight in our midst, wrapping themselves in the cross and the flag and pretending to be 'good patriots' but intending exactly the opposite for our country.

When I first started writing and talking about the Christian Right and their more extreme beliefs and goals of undermining our Constitution and replacing it with some Orwellian Biblical horror, people thought I was being an alarmist, or was reading too much into their 'mission statements' and articles posted in their own circles and communities.

People don't say that to me any more. I've been vindicated, but I did not want to see their stealth movement go this far or get this deep into our government. It'll take years to flush them all out- if that is possible. We might be able to salvage our country, but I fear for the worst- even with these revalations. After all, the mainstream media is more interested in the spoutings of shock jocks, or the death of airheaded starlets or what is going on on "American Idol" than the actual newsworthy destruction of our Constitution by religious fanatics.

By the time they do wake up, it'll be too late- and we'll read about it from Der Spiegel or BBC, because our own media will be totally muzzled.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The mountain of evidence continues to grow...
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Apr 13, 2007 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that Christianity is a purposeful deception. Religion is the opposite of truth, justice, and wisdom.

Though many of its followers want to do and be good, Christian leaders, whether we're talking about the Papacy, evangilists, or political leaders, are some of the most amoral, hypocritical, and deceptive people to be found. The time has finally arrived for the blind to open their eyes and understand that religion is purposeful deception and strong delusion.

Here is Wisdom !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Goodly? Godly??!
Posted by: Gisele on Apr 13, 2007 11:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"But as scrutiny of her actions intensifies, the evangelical Goodling must resort to the 5th Amendment -- man's law -- to avoid breaking the biblical commandment against lying. Only the goodly and godly Pat Robertson could have prepared her to make such a decision."

No doubt Ms. Goodling's education included being obedient to Pat Robertson's ideals of Christianism, that man's law takes precedence - his law in particular. They've both forgotten that she should obey God's law first - a "Christian" obeys man's law as long as it doesn't contradict God's law. If it does, then God's comes first. Go ahead Ms. Goodling, tell it the way it really is - you have nothing to fear. Do you? It's that time dear lady, decide who you're going to serve. God or Mammon.

If you fear Mr. Robertson, then he obviously isn't the man of God he would have America believe he is. In which case his empire must be taxed to the fullest (as ALL religions must be if they interfere with politics), and the truth about his empire, teachings, and life style should become front page news for his followers to digest.

The maddening part of this is - the evangelicals and Christianist Right hold up men and women like these two as being what a good Christian should aspire to!

Jesus weeps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Evangelicals and the Right Posted by: Philip Newton
Zappa
Posted by: WhatNow? on Apr 13, 2007 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"My best advice to anyone who wants to raise a
happy, mentally healthy child is: Keep him or
her as far away from a church as you can."

Frank Zappa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Zappa Posted by: counterpoint
belief?
Posted by: wleming on Apr 13, 2007 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why not look at what the Robertson people believe: its a check list that would make the National Enquirer appear reasoned discourse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: belief? Posted by: animalleaderisgreat
Sinclair was right!
Posted by: keefus55 on Apr 13, 2007 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sincliar Lewis was right when he said that, "When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sinclair was right! Posted by: shhazam4
Unqualified
Posted by: Jeanne on Apr 13, 2007 2:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the point is that true-believer status seems the only qualification to serve in the Justice Dept. as a Bush appointee. Hell, that criteria is the only one to be a Bush appointee anywhere. Unfortunately, these position demand people who know a thing or two, and not just about the Bible. Incompetence, and a poorly run ship of state on every level and in every area is the hallmark of this administration. I wouldn't trust them to change the oil in my car.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

neocons--> Christian right= fascism
Posted by: danielet on Apr 13, 2007 5:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The neocons are not all the people said to be (Strausians are NOT neocons). Neocons are really just a handfull of one time Commies who were kicked out by Stalin because they were born as Jews. The CIA came to them in the 50s and said: stay in the left; we'll fund dummy orgs, publications, books, radio shows etc so you can undemine the left from within. By the time Lowenstein exposed the CIA op, they shifted to high paying strategic weapons manufacturers through Sen. Jackson. Their second generation were both Zionazis and crooks. Both generations wanted money but were desperate to be seen as "mensch." Towards that end they made a coalition with Christian Right (CR) for Israeli domiation of Mideast. But the CR's domestic agenda calls for a Fundamentalist Christians only America. Step #1 was "intelligent design" as obligatory topic in high school biology books. Through their AEI think tank the neocons smashed the pseudoscientists of CR using all Jewish scientists. CR will never forget. As Mideast policies tragically fail, the CR leaders will blame the Jews. Since so many Jews are labled "neocons," now we may see anti-Semitism flurish thanks to neocon wish to be seen as "mensch" by Likudniks. We must protect real American Jews against the CR revenge against neocons. We must show Americans that neocons don't speak for Jews. We can't shut-up in fear of being called "anti-Semite" or "self hating Jew" by these mad men. Expose a neocon today, save a Jew from CR hate tomorrow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pat Robertson's holy zombies are just the window dressing
Posted by: eddie torres on Apr 14, 2007 8:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blumenthal: "John Ashcroft is currently cooling his heels at Regent as the school's "Distinguished Professor of Law and Government."

Well, that's what he's doing to pick up hot coeds. But he pays his bills with income from his National Security infrastructure clients. Ashcroft Group LLC is a lobbying operation hired by datamining and defence groups like Oracle, AT&T, General Dynamics, Exegy Inc, Dulles Research and Nanodetex Corp.

The cream of the Ashcroft Group's stable is ChoicePoint Inc: "... a data marketer that gathers public records and sells access to them." (Washington Post, 8/12/06).

Ashcroft Group's motto: "Leadership, Integrity, Results." Uh-huh. Get ready for "arbeit macht frei" you heathens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ashcroft's Motto... Posted by: aussidawg
From an evangelical
Posted by: Philip Newton on Apr 15, 2007 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article. Normally I sniff treatises on the religious right with suspicion. This one rang true, based on what I know of the Robertson organization.

He wouldn't be the first madman to gather and direct a goodly following of True Believers.

That a goodly number of these have law degrees is even greater cause for concern.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The TRUTH about the "Holy" Bible and ALL Religious Documents
Posted by: Mr. Terrific on Apr 15, 2007 1:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ancient Beliefs:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8ekRAvke9o&NR=1

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whats difference Christian nut or Islamic nut?
Posted by: shhazam4 on Apr 15, 2007 6:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None!

Don't let them get into our government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Truth About Evangelicals.
Posted by: aussidawg on Apr 15, 2007 6:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that the majority of those who call themselves evangelical "Christians" are among the most amoral, self serving folks in our society. The fact that these folks are chronically putting themselves sbove everyone else on the moral high ground is enough to make any sane person go postal. They preach of the evils of "secular liberals" (that would be anyone that doesn't hold their belief system to be the absolute, unwaivering truth) who favor such sinful deeds such as withdrawing our troops and ending our pre-emptive war in occupied Iraq, abolishing the war on drugs, universal healthcare, the separation of church and state, allowing people who care about one another to enter into a permanant relationship with whomever they desire, preserving a livable global environment, helping those who can't help themselves both financially and psychologically, and abiding by laws and treaties passed, both domestically and internationally, yet have no problem with invading sovergn nations so as to plunder their natural resources, lieing to both the public and congress to initiate said invasion, killing hundreds of thousand of innocent people, ignoring those in their own country whose lives have been destroyed by a natural disaster, defrauding the American pubic to enrich the corporate coffers of their already grossly wealthy cronies while many in the country are drowning in debt from just trying to feed their families, imprisoning innocent people (many of whom suffer from severe chronic pain or diseases) for choosing to use a particular substance they deem to be immoral, disregard established law, force people into financial hardship because of their greed, ignoring the physical and psychological needs of soldiers who have been injured or the famiies of those killed in their pre-emptive and imperialistic war, etc. etc. They speak of being persecuted while filling the ranks of our government with their "soldiers", and creating laws and/or public policy such as "Faith Based Initiatives" so as to impose their belief system on everyone. They bash any religion other than their own and even bash members of the same belief system that don't hold their exact same views. They wish to impose laws on us that they don't follow themselves. The list is seemingly endless.

Look, I'm not trying to say that people shouldn't have the right to practice their belief, whether they happen to be Christian or not, and in fact, whollheartedly support their right to do so. I am saying however that (what they apparently perceive to be persecution) I do not want their viewpoints on what is or isn't moral, what is or isn't science, or for that matter, what is or isn't anything forced on me by law or any other means, nor do I wish to hear about their superstitious belief system from those who are elected to public office to serve everybody, regardless of belief. The evangelicals have to be the absolute definition of hypocrite as what they say compared to what they do are typically exact opposites, and exact opposite of what their leader taught. If they feel persecuted, perhaps they should learn to live and let live, and quit stepping on the toes of anyone who isn't a right wing evangelical "Christian". Then and only then, when they quit pissing eveyone else off, will they get the respect they believe they so richly deserve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

From the Heart of the Bible Belt
Posted by: Lwrightman on Apr 19, 2007 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have found that the war against America and our Constitution is in full swing, not just at the political level, but in the local hardcopy and online newspapers. Here in Spartanburg, South Carolina, I have had to wage a constant battle in the Goupstate.com forums (under another handle) and in the Letters to the Editor section regarding the constant and pervasive lies that the Religious Fundamentalists are publishing to openly deceive the public. Their target is the children. Their intent is to abuse their minds and brainwash them to the dark side of religious fundamentalism, just as happens in the Islamic states of religious fascism.

It's important for everyone to take the war to them in the local public square as well as the national blogs, because they have an incredible grassroots operation going on out here to destroy our Constitution and our American way of life. Please don't limit yourselves and your voices to the net blogs if you are so doing.

Please carry the battle to them in a reasoned, rational manner and debate to convince that silent majority of Christians in the communities not to veer to the extreme right in which the zealots like Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, and their extended family gang of fundamentalists are seeking to deceive them. Fundamentalists need to be marginalized because they are the same worldwide, regardless of what religion from whence they derive their fanaticism. The majority of people within every religion are decent and honorable people who are just trying to live good lives but are constantly being deceived by the extremes of fundamentalists in their ranks.

The truth is that Pat Robertson has the blood of the innocents on his hands. While the genocidal maniac Charles Taylor in West Africa was committing mass murder and raping children and lopping off women's breasts in his bloodlust of tribal genocide, Pat Robertson was proudly proclaiming Taylor to be a good and decent leader and honorable man. It turned out that Robertson and his religious corporation, with all their tithing wealth, had investments in Taylor's natural resources, particularly gold.

Robertson has no moral authority to talk to anyone about anything Godly. In fact, he and other fundamentalists worships a much darker force, because they seek to promote their zealotry and religious authoritarianism above all others.

Please, folks, carry the battle to the heartland of small town America with reasoned debate and honesty, and without the same heated rhetoric and hateful messaging that eschews from the bowels of the beasts of the extreme religious fundamentalists in those venues.

The empirical truths of history about the dark dominions of church-state empires and the creations of the two main religions by men are on the side of secularism. It's why our Founding Fathers, with their strong faiths in Christianity, sought to protect all of us from those who would use religion as a weapon against us for the state sponsorship of oppression. That is why they created a secular Constitution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]