COMMENTS: 47
The U.S. 'War on Drugs' Is an Assault on South America’s Poorest
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.
I met up with coca farmer Leonilda Zurita and her colleague Apolonia Sánchez in the Chapare town of Eterazama in February 2006. Both of them wore the wide, pleated skirts and white, wide-brimmed mesh hats common to indigenous women in the Chapare. Zurita, a motherly but fierce social movement leader, answered my questions with enthusiasm. Her charisma and strength of spirit helped make her one of the most distinguished organizers in the country, as well as an alternate senator in the National Congress. Sánchez is a member of the union led by Zurita and, in addition to producing coca, sells clothes for a living. They brought me to the town coca market, which is organized and monitored by the local union.
The market in Eterazama, situated on a large concrete expanse underneath a corrugated metal roof, has been operating for the past 25 years. Inside, the air was thick with the rich, pungent odor of the coca leaf. Green piles of coca up to four feet high were spread across the floor. Farmers' children played in it, rolling around and throwing leaves at each other while families unloaded tightly stuffed sacks of coca from cars and bicycles to empty out onto the market floor.
Like elsewhere in the Chapare, Eterazama is surrounded by small coca farms. The tropical climate allows farmers to produce coca year-round, harvesting their crop every three to four months. Most of the region's coca is produced by small farmers who travel for miles by bike, car and on foot to sell their leaves at legal, union-controlled markets in towns like this. Coca purchased at town markets is usually resold in larger city markets. The union controls sales as tightly as possible, and those caught selling coca outside the legal, union-controlled markets are not allowed back.
For many farmers in the Chapare, the alternative to growing coca is unemployment and hunger. "We need to take care of our coca as if it were a child so that the whole family can survive," Zurita said. "The coca gives us food. It takes care of our education and healthcare because here education and healthcare are not free. When we sell coca, we are able to buy school supplies for our children so they can study."
After my trip to the Eterazama coca market, I took a bus to visit Zurita's home in the Chapare. The vehicle was teeming with sacks of rice, cooking oil, and children in white school uniforms. I squashed myself into the pile of people and bags as we barreled down the dirt road, past a military encampment where hundreds of security forces were stationed in tents for eradication efforts. We passed countless coca fields and homes with the green leaf drying in front yards.
Her house was one of the last before the road turned into jungle foot paths. Like other homes in the area, it didn't have electricity or running water. The two-story structure was about 10 by 20 feet wide and had no walls or floor. A loft constructed of logs lashed together and secured with wooden pegs was topped by a roof made of intertwined leaves. Though Zurita's family lives in conditions like thousands of other poor coca farmers, she still remains connected to the outside world. When we arrived, her cell phone was charging in her husband's car and rang constantly. As she spread out rice to dry in the sun, and her husband chopped wood, she answered interview questions on the phone. Afterward, I asked her who the call was from. "Someone from BBC, London," she replied nonchalantly.
The next day we bushwhacked through a thick forest behind the house to the family coca field. The main pathway was flooded, so we hacked through swampy areas, pushing through vines and clouds of insects. After a couple of miles, the shaded forest opened up to a wide, sunlit coca field. After packing golf ball-sized wads of coca in their cheeks, Zurita and her husband began to spray pesticides on the coca from plastic packs on their backs. Chewing coca, they explained, was something they did everyday to give them strength while they worked.
When Zurita had finished spraying a section of the crop, she sat down in the shade. Between gulps of water, she told me of the mobilizations she participated in as a union leader. She saw her life shaped by her struggle against militarization and coca eradication. In a women's march from Cochabamba to La Paz from December 1995 to January 1996, she told me, coca farmers demanded an end to the violence in the Chapare. They also demanded a meeting with President Sánchez de Lozada's wife, who refused. "They didn't understand our situation, and so we began a hunger strike, which lasted 12 days," she said.
Through coca unions, numerous blockades and protests have been organized to defend the farmers' right to grow coca. A highway that goes through the Chapare links the economically booming city of Santa Cruz to Cochabamba and La Paz. Blocking this important route puts pressure on the government to meet cocalero demands. Blockades constructed out of dirt, rocks, logs and tires are sometimes sustained for weeks, or are spontaneous and mobile, harder for security forces to break up. Blockade committees are developed by coca unions with a structure and leadership in place that allows blockaders to coordinate their work and activities.
Yet coca unions have done much more than protest. Zurita said that a goal of her work is "to bring the women ahead, by organizing, empowering and orienting them and setting up seminars. [Many] women in the Chapare don't know how to read or write. So the best school for the women is the union. There, we have empowered people. We learn about which laws are in favor of us and which are not. This has all shown us that the union organization is important to defend mother earth, defend the coca and defend our natural resources …"
The sun grew hotter. Her husband disappeared to another part of the coca field and Zurita reached for more coca. She knows the reality of the Chapare well, but she has a second life that also occupies her time. This other life is one of constant travel, union meetings, protests, speeches and interviews with the media. "Sometimes I go for weeks when the only housing I have is in the buses," she said. "I have to be in one meeting one day and have to travel by night to get to the next one the following day." In the coca field, this part of her life seemed distant. Somehow she lives with a foot in both realities: "I produce coca for my children, because if I die tomorrow, they will be able to continue to eat, thanks to this bit of coca."
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: just john on Apr 12, 2007 6:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prometheus stole fire from the gods, and gave it to humankind. So, if we stick to that way of describing things, what we're experiencing is the gods' way of trying to steal fire back.
Seriously, now that smoking is being suppressed, what would any non-rich person need fire for? Best to outlaw it, eh?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: brasilaron on Apr 12, 2007 7:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 12, 2007 7:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How far is this from the logic to "fight the terrorists there, rather than here"? We'll put the costs in terms of lives and misery onto some brown people in another country so nice, wealthy Americans don't have to pay the price for their own actions.
But, then.. that is really what we have used to underwrite our consumerist economy as well. We want cheap goods, so we have them produced by people, including children in sweat shops in foreign countries, that way we can have even more junk really cheaply.
Its a frightening dynamic.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So
Posted by: Jimbo
» Doesn't change anything I had to say. nm
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Apr 12, 2007 8:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Third World poor provide the coca leaf and the rich industrialized countries provide the tons of chemicals and equipment for the labs to produce the addictive substance that destroys our citizens and puts them in cages for life.
In recent Lab seizures of 26 cocaine producing plants in Columbia, US produced chemicals by Dow Chemical Co and Union Chemical Corp were confiscated. One chemical, mentioned in the article, is against the law to produce in Columbia is worth $12,000 a barrel and is an essential chemical in the final production of the poison. [Sorry, our Drug Enforcement Agency, says it does have medicinal value]
Worth reading the complete article ...google Dow Chemical the cocaine connection.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Drugs the Chemical Connection....
Posted by: JMorse
» It's called potassium permanganate - essential to cocaine production, produced in the USA
Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» Dream On...........Narco Propaganda
Posted by: gellero
» RE: Drugs the Chemical Connection....
Posted by: lessbread
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JMorse on Apr 12, 2007 8:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The war on drugs or terror...
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Apr 12, 2007 11:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» growers? Yes.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Of concern
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Of concern
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Yes. Coca Mate' is quite good... and legal, I might add. nm
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» sorta
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Of concern
Posted by: Conservasaurus
» once again, dumba55
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: once again, dumba55
Posted by: Conservasaurus
» I expect the book has a broader view since we oppress everyone and everything south of the border.
Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: I expect the book has a broader view since we oppress everyone and everything south of the borde
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» dumba55
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: dumba55
Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Talk to Bush, his neice, his daughters, his daddy who helped ship and sell the stuff in Iran Contra
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: dumba55
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: dumba55
Posted by: Conservasaurus
» straw
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Of concern/we all need our crutches
Posted by: Itsthewater
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Rod from Canada on Apr 12, 2007 4:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: War on drugs really land grab
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Swedish liberal on Apr 12, 2007 5:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The product of the Coca plant is Cocaine and the purpose of the Coca growers is not to grow for traditional and cultural purposes it is to sell coca leaves for making cocaine.
I do not think that slave trade is ok despite it being allowed for thousands of years because of cultural traditions. I do not think that piracy is an acceptable way of life even large part of the Caribbean’s was built on piracy.
On the other hand I think that the large problem both in Sweden and in the US is that instead of hunting the large dealers and middle men the Swedish and US agencies go for the easy and defenceless little guy, the end user and the coca grower. However it does not mean that all four should be taken care of. Coca growing is not acceptable, it is understandable in the same way that poor mothers prostitute themselves to feed their children. Understandable but not an acceptable practise!
I do not like poststructuralist cultural relativity. It stinks!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Coca growing is not acceptable: Why don't you ask Evo Morales about it?
Posted by: YinRising
» RE: Coca growing is not acceptable: Why don't you ask Evo Morales about it?
Posted by: Swedish liberal
» Coca and Andean Culture
Posted by: moflard
» Swedish or not
Posted by: brasilaron
» The UN has banned coca not the US
Posted by: Swedish liberal
» fair enough
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Prostitution and robbery is ok as long as you feed your family?
Posted by: xgroverx
» RE: Prostitution and robbery is ok as long as you feed your family?
Posted by: Swedish liberal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 12, 2007 6:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"By the King
A PROCLAMATION
FOR THE
Suppression of Coffee-Houses.
CHARLES R.
Whereas it is most apparent, that the Multitude of Coffee-Houses of late years set up and kept within the Kingdom, the Dominion of Wales, and the Town of Berwick on Tweed, and the great resort of Idle and disaffected persons to them, have produced very evil and dangerous effects; as well for that many Tradesmen and others, do therein mis-spend much of their time, which might and probably would otherwise by imployed in and about their Lawful Callings and Affairs; but also, for that in such houses, and by occasion of the meetings of such persons therein, diverse False, Malitious and Scandalous Reports are devised and spread abroad, to the Defamation of His Majesties Government, and to the Disturbance of the Peace and Quiet of the Realm; his Majesty hath thought it fit and necessary, That the said Coffee-houses be (for the future) put down and supressed, and doth (with the Advice of his Privy council) by this Royal Proclamation, Strictly Charge and Command all manner of persons, That they or any of them do not presume from and after the Tenth Day of January next ensuing, to keep any Publick Coffee-house, or to Utter or sell by retail, in his, her, or their house or houses (to be spent or consumed within the same) any Coffee, Chocolet, Sherbett or Tea, as they will answer the contrary at their utmost perils."
Some hundred years in the future people will look back on US drug policy with the same incredulous disbelief - a bunch of mobsters keeping drugs illegal for no reason other than to jack up the price - which, as in the era of Prohibition, has simply resulted in more concentrated products - people drank more during Prohibition than after, and the rumrunners only made the hard stuff, since beer took up too much volume.
Prohibition of drugs has also resulted in more potent and addictive drugs - instead of opium, there's heroin; instead of coca leaf there's refined cocaine.
Then you have tobacco - the most addictive and deadly drug of them all, responsible for more deaths per year than cocaine and heroin combined, and yet completely legal - as are the multitude of patented pharmaceutical knock-offs of heroin, meth and cocaine, from Oxycontin to Ritalin to Viagra. Ridiculous!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gellero on Apr 12, 2007 8:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mizipi on Apr 13, 2007 6:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My opinion: Rich people, American or otherwise, are responsible for the huge international illegal drug trade. Rich people are responsible for the idiotic drug laws that permeate the entire world. Rich people make profits from the Drug War, just like rich people make profits from any war, including Iraq (take Rush Limbaugh's advice and follow the money). If the US Government would allow Bolivians to be Bolivians and Iraqis to be Iraqis, etc. the world would be a much safer and enjoyable place to be, but like some dude said a long time ago, "Money is the root of all evil." Coca and cocaine probably kill less people than Big Macs and Whoopers. Marijuana kills no one, yet............
We live in an illogical world and Kurt Vonnegutt died yesterday...............life goes on.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» si
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Coca, cocaine and what's right and what's stupid
Posted by: Bobb
» well put
Posted by: brasilaron
Comments are closed-
Posted by: just john on Apr 12, 2007 6:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prometheus stole fire from the gods, and gave it to humankind. So, if we stick to that way of describing things, what we're experiencing is the gods' way of trying to steal fire back.
Seriously, now that smoking is being suppressed, what would any non-rich person need fire for? Best to outlaw it, eh?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: brasilaron on Apr 12, 2007 7:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 12, 2007 7:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How far is this from the logic to "fight the terrorists there, rather than here"? We'll put the costs in terms of lives and misery onto some brown people in another country so nice, wealthy Americans don't have to pay the price for their own actions.
But, then.. that is really what we have used to underwrite our consumerist economy as well. We want cheap goods, so we have them produced by people, including children in sweat shops in foreign countries, that way we can have even more junk really cheaply.
Its a frightening dynamic.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So
Posted by: Jimbo
» Doesn't change anything I had to say. nm
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Apr 12, 2007 8:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Third World poor provide the coca leaf and the rich industrialized countries provide the tons of chemicals and equipment for the labs to produce the addictive substance that destroys our citizens and puts them in cages for life.
In recent Lab seizures of 26 cocaine producing plants in Columbia, US produced chemicals by Dow Chemical Co and Union Chemical Corp were confiscated. One chemical, mentioned in the article, is against the law to produce in Columbia is worth $12,000 a barrel and is an essential chemical in the final production of the poison. [Sorry, our Drug Enforcement Agency, says it does have medicinal value]
Worth reading the complete article ...google Dow Chemical the cocaine connection.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Drugs the Chemical Connection....
Posted by: JMorse
» It's called potassium permanganate - essential to cocaine production, produced in the USA
Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» Dream On...........Narco Propaganda
Posted by: gellero
» RE: Drugs the Chemical Connection....
Posted by: lessbread
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JMorse on Apr 12, 2007 8:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The war on drugs or terror...
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Apr 12, 2007 11:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» growers? Yes.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Of concern
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Of concern
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Yes. Coca Mate' is quite good... and legal, I might add. nm
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» sorta
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Of concern
Posted by: Conservasaurus
» once again, dumba55
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: once again, dumba55
Posted by: Conservasaurus
» I expect the book has a broader view since we oppress everyone and everything south of the border.
Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: I expect the book has a broader view since we oppress everyone and everything south of the borde
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» dumba55
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: dumba55
Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Talk to Bush, his neice, his daughters, his daddy who helped ship and sell the stuff in Iran Contra
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: dumba55
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: dumba55
Posted by: Conservasaurus
» straw
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Of concern/we all need our crutches
Posted by: Itsthewater
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Rod from Canada on Apr 12, 2007 4:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: War on drugs really land grab
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Swedish liberal on Apr 12, 2007 5:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The product of the Coca plant is Cocaine and the purpose of the Coca growers is not to grow for traditional and cultural purposes it is to sell coca leaves for making cocaine.
I do not think that slave trade is ok despite it being allowed for thousands of years because of cultural traditions. I do not think that piracy is an acceptable way of life even large part of the Caribbean’s was built on piracy.
On the other hand I think that the large problem both in Sweden and in the US is that instead of hunting the large dealers and middle men the Swedish and US agencies go for the easy and defenceless little guy, the end user and the coca grower. However it does not mean that all four should be taken care of. Coca growing is not acceptable, it is understandable in the same way that poor mothers prostitute themselves to feed their children. Understandable but not an acceptable practise!
I do not like poststructuralist cultural relativity. It stinks!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Coca growing is not acceptable: Why don't you ask Evo Morales about it?
Posted by: YinRising
» RE: Coca growing is not acceptable: Why don't you ask Evo Morales about it?
Posted by: Swedish liberal
» Coca and Andean Culture
Posted by: moflard
» Swedish or not
Posted by: brasilaron
» The UN has banned coca not the US
Posted by: Swedish liberal
» fair enough
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Prostitution and robbery is ok as long as you feed your family?
Posted by: xgroverx
» RE: Prostitution and robbery is ok as long as you feed your family?
Posted by: Swedish liberal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 12, 2007 6:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"By the King
A PROCLAMATION
FOR THE
Suppression of Coffee-Houses.
CHARLES R.
Whereas it is most apparent, that the Multitude of Coffee-Houses of late years set up and kept within the Kingdom, the Dominion of Wales, and the Town of Berwick on Tweed, and the great resort of Idle and disaffected persons to them, have produced very evil and dangerous effects; as well for that many Tradesmen and others, do therein mis-spend much of their time, which might and probably would otherwise by imployed in and about their Lawful Callings and Affairs; but also, for that in such houses, and by occasion of the meetings of such persons therein, diverse False, Malitious and Scandalous Reports are devised and spread abroad, to the Defamation of His Majesties Government, and to the Disturbance of the Peace and Quiet of the Realm; his Majesty hath thought it fit and necessary, That the said Coffee-houses be (for the future) put down and supressed, and doth (with the Advice of his Privy council) by this Royal Proclamation, Strictly Charge and Command all manner of persons, That they or any of them do not presume from and after the Tenth Day of January next ensuing, to keep any Publick Coffee-house, or to Utter or sell by retail, in his, her, or their house or houses (to be spent or consumed within the same) any Coffee, Chocolet, Sherbett or Tea, as they will answer the contrary at their utmost perils."
Some hundred years in the future people will look back on US drug policy with the same incredulous disbelief - a bunch of mobsters keeping drugs illegal for no reason other than to jack up the price - which, as in the era of Prohibition, has simply resulted in more concentrated products - people drank more during Prohibition than after, and the rumrunners only made the hard stuff, since beer took up too much volume.
Prohibition of drugs has also resulted in more potent and addictive drugs - instead of opium, there's heroin; instead of coca leaf there's refined cocaine.
Then you have tobacco - the most addictive and deadly drug of them all, responsible for more deaths per year than cocaine and heroin combined, and yet completely legal - as are the multitude of patented pharmaceutical knock-offs of heroin, meth and cocaine, from Oxycontin to Ritalin to Viagra. Ridiculous!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gellero on Apr 12, 2007 8:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mizipi on Apr 13, 2007 6:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My opinion: Rich people, American or otherwise, are responsible for the huge international illegal drug trade. Rich people are responsible for the idiotic drug laws that permeate the entire world. Rich people make profits from the Drug War, just like rich people make profits from any war, including Iraq (take Rush Limbaugh's advice and follow the money). If the US Government would allow Bolivians to be Bolivians and Iraqis to be Iraqis, etc. the world would be a much safer and enjoyable place to be, but like some dude said a long time ago, "Money is the root of all evil." Coca and cocaine probably kill less people than Big Macs and Whoopers. Marijuana kills no one, yet............
We live in an illogical world and Kurt Vonnegutt died yesterday...............life goes on.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» si
Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Coca, cocaine and what's right and what's stupid
Posted by: Bobb
» well put
Posted by: brasilaron
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
ACORN Smear Collaborator Claims Persecution to Raise Money for Her Legal Troubles
Bad Policies Are Really What's Driving California's Huge Prison Costs




