CIVIL LIBERTIES  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 47

The U.S. 'War on Drugs' Is an Assault on South America’s Poorest

Cocaine may be considered a scourge in America's cities, but in the Andes, the plant from which it's derived is a way of life that provides food, shelter, healthcare and education.
April 12, 2007  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
Editor's note: This is excerpted from Dangl's new book,"The Price of Fire: Resource Wars and Social Movements in Bolivia.

I met up with coca farmer Leonilda Zurita and her colleague Apolonia Sánchez in the Chapare town of Eterazama in February 2006. Both of them wore the wide, pleated skirts and white, wide-brimmed mesh hats common to indigenous women in the Chapare. Zurita, a motherly but fierce social movement leader, answered my questions with enthusiasm. Her charisma and strength of spirit helped make her one of the most distinguished organizers in the country, as well as an alternate senator in the National Congress. Sánchez is a member of the union led by Zurita and, in addition to producing coca, sells clothes for a living. They brought me to the town coca market, which is organized and monitored by the local union.

The market in Eterazama, situated on a large concrete expanse underneath a corrugated metal roof, has been operating for the past 25 years. Inside, the air was thick with the rich, pungent odor of the coca leaf. Green piles of coca up to four feet high were spread across the floor. Farmers' children played in it, rolling around and throwing leaves at each other while families unloaded tightly stuffed sacks of coca from cars and bicycles to empty out onto the market floor.

Like elsewhere in the Chapare, Eterazama is surrounded by small coca farms. The tropical climate allows farmers to produce coca year-round, harvesting their crop every three to four months. Most of the region's coca is produced by small farmers who travel for miles by bike, car and on foot to sell their leaves at legal, union-controlled markets in towns like this. Coca purchased at town markets is usually resold in larger city markets. The union controls sales as tightly as possible, and those caught selling coca outside the legal, union-controlled markets are not allowed back.

For many farmers in the Chapare, the alternative to growing coca is unemployment and hunger. "We need to take care of our coca as if it were a child so that the whole family can survive," Zurita said. "The coca gives us food. It takes care of our education and healthcare because here education and healthcare are not free. When we sell coca, we are able to buy school supplies for our children so they can study."

After my trip to the Eterazama coca market, I took a bus to visit Zurita's home in the Chapare. The vehicle was teeming with sacks of rice, cooking oil, and children in white school uniforms. I squashed myself into the pile of people and bags as we barreled down the dirt road, past a military encampment where hundreds of security forces were stationed in tents for eradication efforts. We passed countless coca fields and homes with the green leaf drying in front yards.

Her house was one of the last before the road turned into jungle foot paths. Like other homes in the area, it didn't have electricity or running water. The two-story structure was about 10 by 20 feet wide and had no walls or floor. A loft constructed of logs lashed together and secured with wooden pegs was topped by a roof made of intertwined leaves. Though Zurita's family lives in conditions like thousands of other poor coca farmers, she still remains connected to the outside world. When we arrived, her cell phone was charging in her husband's car and rang constantly. As she spread out rice to dry in the sun, and her husband chopped wood, she answered interview questions on the phone. Afterward, I asked her who the call was from. "Someone from BBC, London," she replied nonchalantly.

The next day we bushwhacked through a thick forest behind the house to the family coca field. The main pathway was flooded, so we hacked through swampy areas, pushing through vines and clouds of insects. After a couple of miles, the shaded forest opened up to a wide, sunlit coca field. After packing golf ball-sized wads of coca in their cheeks, Zurita and her husband began to spray pesticides on the coca from plastic packs on their backs. Chewing coca, they explained, was something they did everyday to give them strength while they worked.

When Zurita had finished spraying a section of the crop, she sat down in the shade. Between gulps of water, she told me of the mobilizations she participated in as a union leader. She saw her life shaped by her struggle against militarization and coca eradication. In a women's march from Cochabamba to La Paz from December 1995 to January 1996, she told me, coca farmers demanded an end to the violence in the Chapare. They also demanded a meeting with President Sánchez de Lozada's wife, who refused. "They didn't understand our situation, and so we began a hunger strike, which lasted 12 days," she said.

Through coca unions, numerous blockades and protests have been organized to defend the farmers' right to grow coca. A highway that goes through the Chapare links the economically booming city of Santa Cruz to Cochabamba and La Paz. Blocking this important route puts pressure on the government to meet cocalero demands. Blockades constructed out of dirt, rocks, logs and tires are sometimes sustained for weeks, or are spontaneous and mobile, harder for security forces to break up. Blockade committees are developed by coca unions with a structure and leadership in place that allows blockaders to coordinate their work and activities.

Yet coca unions have done much more than protest. Zurita said that a goal of her work is "to bring the women ahead, by organizing, empowering and orienting them and setting up seminars. [Many] women in the Chapare don't know how to read or write. So the best school for the women is the union. There, we have empowered people. We learn about which laws are in favor of us and which are not. This has all shown us that the union organization is important to defend mother earth, defend the coca and defend our natural resources …"

The sun grew hotter. Her husband disappeared to another part of the coca field and Zurita reached for more coca. She knows the reality of the Chapare well, but she has a second life that also occupies her time. This other life is one of constant travel, union meetings, protests, speeches and interviews with the media. "Sometimes I go for weeks when the only housing I have is in the buses," she said. "I have to be in one meeting one day and have to travel by night to get to the next one the following day." In the coca field, this part of her life seemed distant. Somehow she lives with a foot in both realities: "I produce coca for my children, because if I die tomorrow, they will be able to continue to eat, thanks to this bit of coca."
Benjamin Dangl is the author of "The Price of Fire: Resource Wars and Social Movements in Bolivia" (AK Press, March 2007). For more information on his book and current book reading tour, visit www.boliviabook.com
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: bolivia, drug war, morales


Comments are closed-

Is the book's title a reference to Greek mythology?
Posted by: just john on Apr 12, 2007 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sometimes I like to describe the general clampdown -- that the War on (some) Drugs is a part of -- in terms of the Prometheus story.

Prometheus stole fire from the gods, and gave it to humankind. So, if we stick to that way of describing things, what we're experiencing is the gods' way of trying to steal fire back.

Seriously, now that smoking is being suppressed, what would any non-rich person need fire for? Best to outlaw it, eh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Los valles
Posted by: brasilaron on Apr 12, 2007 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the Chapare' was a contentious battlefield when i lived in Bolivia, funded almost solely by the US. The Bolivian gov't has/d little interest in spraying coca itself. On the other side of Amboro' NP, the Valles Crucenos where i lived, all coca was illegal to grow as it was not an historically active coca region, but people would still chide me when i disappeared into the campo for a few days saying "te fuiste pa' pisar la coca, he he", insinuating that i went to go turn coca into coca paste. I knew some people that had teeny tiny coca plots, but it was hush hush. If the US was serious about it's (bullsh!t) "War on Drugs" it would do 2 things; 1) legalize/decriminalize drugs in the US and then tax and regulate them and 2) guarantee coca-producing countries a real export market and/or develop an internal market for non-coca crops. These ideas have been put forth before so i'm not gonna go deep into why, but to continue to wage a war on small-time farmers and therefore continually marginalize millions of peasants is morally wrong and will certainly backfire (war in Iraq anyone?). Those who consume drugs finance violence, and alot of the perpetrators of that violence are politicians. Many of the high-level traffickers are politicians in these Andean countries (not sure how much so in Morales' new gov't) but most of the punishment falls on the peasants like the people in this story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

So
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 12, 2007 7:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we are basically doing is punishing others in other countries.. making them pay for our desire to have drugs... spraying herbicides over their countries... and theirp people.

How far is this from the logic to "fight the terrorists there, rather than here"? We'll put the costs in terms of lives and misery onto some brown people in another country so nice, wealthy Americans don't have to pay the price for their own actions.

But, then.. that is really what we have used to underwrite our consumerist economy as well. We want cheap goods, so we have them produced by people, including children in sweat shops in foreign countries, that way we can have even more junk really cheaply.

Its a frightening dynamic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So Posted by: Jimbo

Comments are closed-

Drugs the Chemical Connection....
Posted by: picket on Apr 12, 2007 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is an article today 4/12/07 by Wm R Doerner ..TIME/CNN

Third World poor provide the coca leaf and the rich industrialized countries provide the tons of chemicals and equipment for the labs to produce the addictive substance that destroys our citizens and puts them in cages for life.

In recent Lab seizures of 26 cocaine producing plants in Columbia, US produced chemicals by Dow Chemical Co and Union Chemical Corp were confiscated. One chemical, mentioned in the article, is against the law to produce in Columbia is worth $12,000 a barrel and is an essential chemical in the final production of the poison. [Sorry, our Drug Enforcement Agency, says it does have medicinal value]

Worth reading the complete article ...google Dow Chemical the cocaine connection.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The war on drugs or terror...
Posted by: JMorse on Apr 12, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...are wars forever and the wars of sloganeers. Designed to feed the machine, these 'wars' effectively keep people in their place, and under the boot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Of concern
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Apr 12, 2007 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are we really supposed to worry about the fate of growers of cocain and producers of other drugs??? Lets be real, do you worry about the fate of arms manufactures if/when Iraq ends????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» growers? Yes. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Of concern Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Of concern Posted by: Joshua Holland
» sorta Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Of concern Posted by: Conservasaurus
» once again, dumba55 Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: once again, dumba55 Posted by: Conservasaurus
» dumba55 Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: dumba55 Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: dumba55 Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: dumba55 Posted by: Conservasaurus
» straw Posted by: brasilaron

Comments are closed-

War on drugs really land grab
Posted by: Rod from Canada on Apr 12, 2007 4:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war on drugs has always been a complete fraud. The whole purpose of these arial spraying programs would seem to be to drive indigenous peoples from their land, so it can be subsequently taken over by wealthy ranchers or large multinatianal (usually American) corporations. A massive land grab, pure and simple. And with absolutely no concern for the adverse environmental impacts of spraying poisonous chemicals on plants, animals, etc., never mind the fact that native peoples are having their land stolen. Pretty despicable all round.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Prostitution and robbery is ok as long as you feed your family?
Posted by: Swedish liberal on Apr 12, 2007 5:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personally I a drug liberal, I think it is a shame that in the US and Sweden 50 % of prison inmates are in jail because of their own use. I am for legalising marijuana but not heavier drugs such as cocaine or heroin.

The product of the Coca plant is Cocaine and the purpose of the Coca growers is not to grow for traditional and cultural purposes it is to sell coca leaves for making cocaine.

I do not think that slave trade is ok despite it being allowed for thousands of years because of cultural traditions. I do not think that piracy is an acceptable way of life even large part of the Caribbean’s was built on piracy.

On the other hand I think that the large problem both in Sweden and in the US is that instead of hunting the large dealers and middle men the Swedish and US agencies go for the easy and defenceless little guy, the end user and the coca grower. However it does not mean that all four should be taken care of. Coca growing is not acceptable, it is understandable in the same way that poor mothers prostitute themselves to feed their children. Understandable but not an acceptable practise!

I do not like poststructuralist cultural relativity. It stinks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Coca and Andean Culture Posted by: moflard
» Swedish or not Posted by: brasilaron
» The UN has banned coca not the US Posted by: Swedish liberal
» fair enough Posted by: brasilaron

Comments are closed-

If coffee and caffeine were discovered today, they'd be banned
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 12, 2007 6:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Caffeine is a powerful drug, after all - probably more powerful, weight for weight, than cocaine. In Old England, it was actually banned by the King Charles II, who thought they were 'seminaries for sedition': see The King Bans Coffee

"By the King
A PROCLAMATION
FOR THE
Suppression of Coffee-Houses.

CHARLES R.

Whereas it is most apparent, that the Multitude of Coffee-Houses of late years set up and kept within the Kingdom, the Dominion of Wales, and the Town of Berwick on Tweed, and the great resort of Idle and disaffected persons to them, have produced very evil and dangerous effects; as well for that many Tradesmen and others, do therein mis-spend much of their time, which might and probably would otherwise by imployed in and about their Lawful Callings and Affairs; but also, for that in such houses, and by occasion of the meetings of such persons therein, diverse False, Malitious and Scandalous Reports are devised and spread abroad, to the Defamation of His Majesties Government, and to the Disturbance of the Peace and Quiet of the Realm; his Majesty hath thought it fit and necessary, That the said Coffee-houses be (for the future) put down and supressed, and doth (with the Advice of his Privy council) by this Royal Proclamation, Strictly Charge and Command all manner of persons, That they or any of them do not presume from and after the Tenth Day of January next ensuing, to keep any Publick Coffee-house, or to Utter or sell by retail, in his, her, or their house or houses (to be spent or consumed within the same) any Coffee, Chocolet, Sherbett or Tea, as they will answer the contrary at their utmost perils."


Some hundred years in the future people will look back on US drug policy with the same incredulous disbelief - a bunch of mobsters keeping drugs illegal for no reason other than to jack up the price - which, as in the era of Prohibition, has simply resulted in more concentrated products - people drank more during Prohibition than after, and the rumrunners only made the hard stuff, since beer took up too much volume.

Prohibition of drugs has also resulted in more potent and addictive drugs - instead of opium, there's heroin; instead of coca leaf there's refined cocaine.

Then you have tobacco - the most addictive and deadly drug of them all, responsible for more deaths per year than cocaine and heroin combined, and yet completely legal - as are the multitude of patented pharmaceutical knock-offs of heroin, meth and cocaine, from Oxycontin to Ritalin to Viagra. Ridiculous!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Banning Coffee Houses
Posted by: gellero on Apr 12, 2007 8:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like Sen. Joe Biden's ( that great 'liberal') ban on Raves..........Can't keep a good thing down, you know...............See you all at BurningMan......!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Coca, cocaine and what's right and what's stupid
Posted by: mizipi on Apr 13, 2007 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I lived in the Chaco area of Bolivia for most of 2002. Many Bolivians chewd coca leaf, yet I saw cocaine only once. It was a way of life there. A popular slogan was "Coca no es droga" (Coca is not a drug). Few people drank coffee. Anyway....that was Bolivia, this is America. I sure hope that when America is no longer the economic and political ruler of the world, that no other government uses its political and military forces to invade the US and change our culture and makes us adopt the culture of the invaders.
My opinion: Rich people, American or otherwise, are responsible for the huge international illegal drug trade. Rich people are responsible for the idiotic drug laws that permeate the entire world. Rich people make profits from the Drug War, just like rich people make profits from any war, including Iraq (take Rush Limbaugh's advice and follow the money). If the US Government would allow Bolivians to be Bolivians and Iraqis to be Iraqis, etc. the world would be a much safer and enjoyable place to be, but like some dude said a long time ago, "Money is the root of all evil." Coca and cocaine probably kill less people than Big Macs and Whoopers. Marijuana kills no one, yet............
We live in an illogical world and Kurt Vonnegutt died yesterday...............life goes on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» si Posted by: brasilaron
» well put Posted by: brasilaron
Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Is the book's title a reference to Greek mythology?
Posted by: just john on Apr 12, 2007 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sometimes I like to describe the general clampdown -- that the War on (some) Drugs is a part of -- in terms of the Prometheus story.

Prometheus stole fire from the gods, and gave it to humankind. So, if we stick to that way of describing things, what we're experiencing is the gods' way of trying to steal fire back.

Seriously, now that smoking is being suppressed, what would any non-rich person need fire for? Best to outlaw it, eh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Los valles
Posted by: brasilaron on Apr 12, 2007 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the Chapare' was a contentious battlefield when i lived in Bolivia, funded almost solely by the US. The Bolivian gov't has/d little interest in spraying coca itself. On the other side of Amboro' NP, the Valles Crucenos where i lived, all coca was illegal to grow as it was not an historically active coca region, but people would still chide me when i disappeared into the campo for a few days saying "te fuiste pa' pisar la coca, he he", insinuating that i went to go turn coca into coca paste. I knew some people that had teeny tiny coca plots, but it was hush hush. If the US was serious about it's (bullsh!t) "War on Drugs" it would do 2 things; 1) legalize/decriminalize drugs in the US and then tax and regulate them and 2) guarantee coca-producing countries a real export market and/or develop an internal market for non-coca crops. These ideas have been put forth before so i'm not gonna go deep into why, but to continue to wage a war on small-time farmers and therefore continually marginalize millions of peasants is morally wrong and will certainly backfire (war in Iraq anyone?). Those who consume drugs finance violence, and alot of the perpetrators of that violence are politicians. Many of the high-level traffickers are politicians in these Andean countries (not sure how much so in Morales' new gov't) but most of the punishment falls on the peasants like the people in this story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

So
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 12, 2007 7:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we are basically doing is punishing others in other countries.. making them pay for our desire to have drugs... spraying herbicides over their countries... and theirp people.

How far is this from the logic to "fight the terrorists there, rather than here"? We'll put the costs in terms of lives and misery onto some brown people in another country so nice, wealthy Americans don't have to pay the price for their own actions.

But, then.. that is really what we have used to underwrite our consumerist economy as well. We want cheap goods, so we have them produced by people, including children in sweat shops in foreign countries, that way we can have even more junk really cheaply.

Its a frightening dynamic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So Posted by: Jimbo

Comments are closed-

Drugs the Chemical Connection....
Posted by: picket on Apr 12, 2007 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is an article today 4/12/07 by Wm R Doerner ..TIME/CNN

Third World poor provide the coca leaf and the rich industrialized countries provide the tons of chemicals and equipment for the labs to produce the addictive substance that destroys our citizens and puts them in cages for life.

In recent Lab seizures of 26 cocaine producing plants in Columbia, US produced chemicals by Dow Chemical Co and Union Chemical Corp were confiscated. One chemical, mentioned in the article, is against the law to produce in Columbia is worth $12,000 a barrel and is an essential chemical in the final production of the poison. [Sorry, our Drug Enforcement Agency, says it does have medicinal value]

Worth reading the complete article ...google Dow Chemical the cocaine connection.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The war on drugs or terror...
Posted by: JMorse on Apr 12, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...are wars forever and the wars of sloganeers. Designed to feed the machine, these 'wars' effectively keep people in their place, and under the boot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Of concern
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Apr 12, 2007 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are we really supposed to worry about the fate of growers of cocain and producers of other drugs??? Lets be real, do you worry about the fate of arms manufactures if/when Iraq ends????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» growers? Yes. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Of concern Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Of concern Posted by: Joshua Holland
» sorta Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Of concern Posted by: Conservasaurus
» once again, dumba55 Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: once again, dumba55 Posted by: Conservasaurus
» dumba55 Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: dumba55 Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: dumba55 Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: dumba55 Posted by: Conservasaurus
» straw Posted by: brasilaron

Comments are closed-

War on drugs really land grab
Posted by: Rod from Canada on Apr 12, 2007 4:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war on drugs has always been a complete fraud. The whole purpose of these arial spraying programs would seem to be to drive indigenous peoples from their land, so it can be subsequently taken over by wealthy ranchers or large multinatianal (usually American) corporations. A massive land grab, pure and simple. And with absolutely no concern for the adverse environmental impacts of spraying poisonous chemicals on plants, animals, etc., never mind the fact that native peoples are having their land stolen. Pretty despicable all round.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Prostitution and robbery is ok as long as you feed your family?
Posted by: Swedish liberal on Apr 12, 2007 5:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personally I a drug liberal, I think it is a shame that in the US and Sweden 50 % of prison inmates are in jail because of their own use. I am for legalising marijuana but not heavier drugs such as cocaine or heroin.

The product of the Coca plant is Cocaine and the purpose of the Coca growers is not to grow for traditional and cultural purposes it is to sell coca leaves for making cocaine.

I do not think that slave trade is ok despite it being allowed for thousands of years because of cultural traditions. I do not think that piracy is an acceptable way of life even large part of the Caribbean’s was built on piracy.

On the other hand I think that the large problem both in Sweden and in the US is that instead of hunting the large dealers and middle men the Swedish and US agencies go for the easy and defenceless little guy, the end user and the coca grower. However it does not mean that all four should be taken care of. Coca growing is not acceptable, it is understandable in the same way that poor mothers prostitute themselves to feed their children. Understandable but not an acceptable practise!

I do not like poststructuralist cultural relativity. It stinks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Coca and Andean Culture Posted by: moflard
» Swedish or not Posted by: brasilaron
» The UN has banned coca not the US Posted by: Swedish liberal
» fair enough Posted by: brasilaron

Comments are closed-

If coffee and caffeine were discovered today, they'd be banned
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 12, 2007 6:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Caffeine is a powerful drug, after all - probably more powerful, weight for weight, than cocaine. In Old England, it was actually banned by the King Charles II, who thought they were 'seminaries for sedition': see The King Bans Coffee

"By the King
A PROCLAMATION
FOR THE
Suppression of Coffee-Houses.

CHARLES R.

Whereas it is most apparent, that the Multitude of Coffee-Houses of late years set up and kept within the Kingdom, the Dominion of Wales, and the Town of Berwick on Tweed, and the great resort of Idle and disaffected persons to them, have produced very evil and dangerous effects; as well for that many Tradesmen and others, do therein mis-spend much of their time, which might and probably would otherwise by imployed in and about their Lawful Callings and Affairs; but also, for that in such houses, and by occasion of the meetings of such persons therein, diverse False, Malitious and Scandalous Reports are devised and spread abroad, to the Defamation of His Majesties Government, and to the Disturbance of the Peace and Quiet of the Realm; his Majesty hath thought it fit and necessary, That the said Coffee-houses be (for the future) put down and supressed, and doth (with the Advice of his Privy council) by this Royal Proclamation, Strictly Charge and Command all manner of persons, That they or any of them do not presume from and after the Tenth Day of January next ensuing, to keep any Publick Coffee-house, or to Utter or sell by retail, in his, her, or their house or houses (to be spent or consumed within the same) any Coffee, Chocolet, Sherbett or Tea, as they will answer the contrary at their utmost perils."


Some hundred years in the future people will look back on US drug policy with the same incredulous disbelief - a bunch of mobsters keeping drugs illegal for no reason other than to jack up the price - which, as in the era of Prohibition, has simply resulted in more concentrated products - people drank more during Prohibition than after, and the rumrunners only made the hard stuff, since beer took up too much volume.

Prohibition of drugs has also resulted in more potent and addictive drugs - instead of opium, there's heroin; instead of coca leaf there's refined cocaine.

Then you have tobacco - the most addictive and deadly drug of them all, responsible for more deaths per year than cocaine and heroin combined, and yet completely legal - as are the multitude of patented pharmaceutical knock-offs of heroin, meth and cocaine, from Oxycontin to Ritalin to Viagra. Ridiculous!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Banning Coffee Houses
Posted by: gellero on Apr 12, 2007 8:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like Sen. Joe Biden's ( that great 'liberal') ban on Raves..........Can't keep a good thing down, you know...............See you all at BurningMan......!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Coca, cocaine and what's right and what's stupid
Posted by: mizipi on Apr 13, 2007 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I lived in the Chaco area of Bolivia for most of 2002. Many Bolivians chewd coca leaf, yet I saw cocaine only once. It was a way of life there. A popular slogan was "Coca no es droga" (Coca is not a drug). Few people drank coffee. Anyway....that was Bolivia, this is America. I sure hope that when America is no longer the economic and political ruler of the world, that no other government uses its political and military forces to invade the US and change our culture and makes us adopt the culture of the invaders.
My opinion: Rich people, American or otherwise, are responsible for the huge international illegal drug trade. Rich people are responsible for the idiotic drug laws that permeate the entire world. Rich people make profits from the Drug War, just like rich people make profits from any war, including Iraq (take Rush Limbaugh's advice and follow the money). If the US Government would allow Bolivians to be Bolivians and Iraqis to be Iraqis, etc. the world would be a much safer and enjoyable place to be, but like some dude said a long time ago, "Money is the root of all evil." Coca and cocaine probably kill less people than Big Macs and Whoopers. Marijuana kills no one, yet............
We live in an illogical world and Kurt Vonnegutt died yesterday...............life goes on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» si Posted by: brasilaron
» well put Posted by: brasilaron
 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS