Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

America's Veterans Left in the Lurch

By Jeanine Plant, AlterNet. Posted March 7, 2007.


Chronic under-funding, communication breakdowns and nightmarish paperwork have left the VA system woefully unprepared for future veterans: the tens of thousands currently deployed in the war on terror.
03072007story
03072007Story
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Two years ago, Lorin Bannerman, a 43-year-old Sergeant in the Army National Guard, came home to his wife saddled with baggage from Iraq. He didn’t receive a full mental health screening from a veterans’ hospital for seven months and wasn’t diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, or PTSD, for months after that. Two years later, Bannerman and his family bear the lingering scar. He and his wife are now separated.

Jon Town knows he incurred short-term memory loss and severe hearing damage from the shrapnel that struck his neck in Iraq in 2005. Yet he’s been deprived of a signing bonus, disability pay, and medical support because his discharge papers state he had a personality disorder before he enlisted in the Army. Ever since, he’s been in a vicious struggle with the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). For now, he is unemployed and lives with his wife and son at his parents’ home in Findlay, Ohio.

This January, Jonathan Schulze requested admission to a Minneapolis VA. The former marine was haunted by the many casualties he had witnessed and deaths of close friends. But the VA’s waiting list extended through March. Schulze knew he couldn’t wait that long, so he went to a different VA in St. Cloud, Minnesota. He told a staff member there he was suicidal but was met with a similar response: He was number 26 on their waiting list. Four days later, Schulze committed suicide.

In the wake of stories like Schulze’s tragic demise, which got ample media coverage, more commonplace stories like Bannerman’s and Town’s emerge. And recent coverage of the decrepit conditions at Walter Reed, the military’s flagship hospital outside of Washington, D.C., has prompted a wave of enraged veterans with similar experiences to speak out. Though Walter Reed is run by the Department of Defense, all of these stories call attention to the VA’s appalling ineptness to adequately care for returning veterans. Chronic under-funding, nightmarish paperwork, and a cumbersome transition from DoD payroll to the VA system are hampering the VA’s ability to provide basic healthcare and dispense benefits to recent veterans.

While the VA has been traditionally under-funded over the years, a number of recent studies show that the department is increasingly ill-equipped to deal with the veterans in the system in spite of the rosy rhetoric of VA Secretary James Nicholson. And by such accounts, the VA is woefully unprepared for the possible influx of future veterans: the tens of thousands currently deployed in the war on terror.

“Before this war, during peacetime, the VA was staffed for a peacetime military,” Steve Robinson, director of government relations at Veterans for America, said during testimony in January before Senate Veterans Affairs Committee. “When the nation surged to this war, the VA did not surge with it. Now the VA finds itself playing catch up and in many states, they find themselves overwhelmed.”

Chronic Funding Shortfalls

Many critics attribute the VA crunch to lack of adequate funding. Chronic funding shortfalls happen year after year because much of the VA budget is beholden to the vagaries of federal discretionary spending -- a system through which the VA healthcare system competes with such programs as education and air and space travel.

This appropriations process has left the VA in a consistently vulnerable position, Carl Blake, the National Legislative Director of Paralyzed Veterans of America, said before the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs to advocate for the 2008 budget in mid-February. “No Secretary of Veterans Affairs, no VA hospital director, and no doctor running an outpatient clinic knows how to plan and even provide care on a daily basis without the knowledge that the dollars needed to operate those programs are going to be available when they need them.”

And despite a $2.8 billion increase in the VA’s budget for Fiscal Year 2007, which officially started on October 1, 2006, VA hospitals are only seeing that money now because, up until mid-February, it has been held up by Congress. Such delays force VA hospitals to hold off on hiring much-needed medical staff and to postpone long overdue construction projects.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: war, iraq, veterans, va, walter reed

Jeanine Plant is a New York-based freelance writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Of course
Posted by: socialpsych on Mar 7, 2007 3:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the Bush regime does'nt provide adequate care for casualities. Remember Katrina? It's all part and parcel of the paradigm: "Us first!" And by "us," they don't mean you and me.

While failed care for military casualties is a heinous crime, from a primary prevention perspective, filling these young people's heads with nonsense about "serving your country" and "defending our freedom" and then sending them off to get blown up or psychologically traumatized for the benefit of Exxon-Mobil is the most unconscionable crime of all.

Impeach the bastards. Now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Impeachment? Posted by: distancebiker23
the va problem is not new
Posted by: ellie on Mar 7, 2007 4:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
because my husband has waited 10 months to get an appt with the local va for viet nam ptsd etc... we moved to a rural area for a year so he could get treatment but we had to move back to the 'city' because commuting for other needs, like my job, was killing us at the gas station... he has been off his va supplied meds since june, which has created a man who can be off the charts... to get into the local system, he has had to visit the va emergency room 3 times and scream for psych services to be continued...

ironic that today is the day he has his first va appt...

my heart breaks for the kids coming back damaged and distroyed by an apathetic system such as the va... it's not the docs and nurses that are apathetic, it's the buerocracy...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Our Government is Disgraceful Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: the va problem is not new Posted by: Conservasaurus
Rich white Christian and Jewish elitists
Posted by: lorenwrigley on Mar 7, 2007 4:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If American veterans were the children of the corporate, christian and right-wing Jewish elite they would enjoy the best healthcacre and pampering money couild buy. And they woud probably recieve millions in taxpayer compnsastion for their heroism. Instead, we send billions of dollars to corporations to steal and keep. We send billions a year to Izrael, who spies on us, to keep their instituitonalized Apartheid against the Palestinians afloat. Not to worry though, more tax cuts for the rich will be handed out by those reformist democrats who just took over the reigns of corruption let down by Tom Delay.
What a country!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Military medicine is a disaster
Posted by: Derek Maddox on Mar 7, 2007 4:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and always has been. The problems are not (generally) with the practitioners, but rather with the administration. When I was active duty 20 years ago, we paid out of pocket to take our kids to a "real" doctor rather than sit for hours in a waiting room, only to be assigned to a PA. You never knew what doctor you were going to get, and could never develop a relationship with your health care provider. Getting access to even the most trivial health care was tremendously tedious. If we are to have socialized medicine in this country, and I sincerely hope we do NOT, we sure as hell don't want to use the military version as a model.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

VA is a Victim, Not a Perpetrator
Posted by: pharmawatcher on Mar 7, 2007 4:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article, while an excellent presentation of how the VA is being overwhelmed by the Bush administration's failure to prepare for the "surge" of Iraqi War veterans who've been physically and psychically devastated, fails to remind readers that the VA was the exemplar of low-cost, efficient and effective medicine until this war. It was a leader in adopting information technology for computerizing charts, which have significantly reduced medical errors in VA facilities. On every quality measure for standards of care, the VA surpasses private sector and non-profit hospital systems. Indeed, until the administration failed to prepare for the aftermath of this war, just as it lied to get us into and then failed to prepare for the war itself, the VA was a shining star for those of us who believe a single-payer health system is the only way to solve the financial and insurance crises facing American medicine.

You can read about this in my recent posts at GoozNews, which includes links to other sites that have been discussing the VA issue in recent days. I think the proper metaphor is FEMA and Katrina. Before Bush took over the White House, that, too, was an excellent agency. Everything these people touched turned to shit, and the American people are paying the price.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Killing Our Troops Slowly: Deja Vu All Over Again
Posted by: michaelo on Mar 7, 2007 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is pathetic: First Katherine van Strudel appears on Scarborough to join with Pat Buchanan and some other creep to spew this apologee. Now Alternet reguritates this reformist crap. The malfeasance within the military/VA medical delivery system is endemic to this government; its systemic to the economic system that sends poor and working class people to fight its wars and then discards them like old weaponry. I know. READ: http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/19244.

Killing Our Troops Slowly: Deja Vu All Over Again: There is a basic right owed to the men and women who serve to protect the integrity of this nation’s democratic promise. As said by the only great Republican:

“… to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.” Abraham Lincoln, second inaugural address, March 4, 1865

Twenty-five years ago, March 14, 1981 Jim Hopkins, Marine veteran of Vietnam, born on the Marine Corps birthday of November 10, drove his army Jeep through the glass doors and into the lobby of the multi-million dollar, showcase edifice of Wadsworth VA hospital, at Los Angeles, California. He did so to protest the gross, willfully negligent treatment given US veterans within the VA system. In specific, those veterans of the US war in South East Asia, aka, the Vietnam War.

He fired rounds from his AR 14 into the official pictures of then Republican President Ronald Reagan and Ex-President Jimmy Carter. For emphasis he then fired his .45 caliber handgun and a shotgun screaming that he was not receiving the medical attention needed. Hauled from the hospital by law enforcement, he screamed into the cameras that his brain was “being destroyed by Agent Orange.” That sent both a shock wave and a wake up call through the US and became a clarion call to thousands of veterans who felt the very same as did Hopkins.

Ron Bitzer, director and founder of the LA based Center for Veteran’s Rights and I took up his case. My specialty was vets suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, (PTSD) who had come into conflict with law enforcement due to their illness.

Hopkins’ case gave national voice to three major issues for vets:

1- The failure of Reagan’s administration to investigate the damage caused by Dow Chemical’s dioxin based defoliants spread all over Southeast Asia known as Agent Orange, Blue and other quaint names. And its refusal to treat vets and their families for its damaging effect on both, (especially the obvious appearance of birth defects of children born to the vets.)

2- The refusal to acknowledge the illness of PTSD and to investigate its damage on vets and to provide appropriate treatment.

3- The callous and insulting disrespect shown the vets by Reagan and his efforts to cut both the benefits of the vets and to close their outpatient treatment centers.

After being released from in-hospital treatment from the VA hospital where we had him transferred from the LA County Jail Hopkins went on a speaking tour to vets. Despite our best efforts to help him Hopkins died of mysterious causes on May 17. The news of his death, now a hero to Vietnam veterans, spread across the country sparking a sit-in the same lobby by veterans. As Reagan alternately ignored and then ridiculed the veterans, as the VA proclaimed its innocence of neglect, the protest grew until it became a hunger strike led by highly decorated Vietnam combat veterans.

The hunger strike drew mass coverage by the US and world news. In the face of the aroused public, Reagan ignored calls for investigation, but held off forced eviction. When we rejected the government’s poor faith negotiations, Reagan called in the Federal forces. ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not Our Army Posted by: socialpsych
» Corporate Model Posted by: socialpsych
Soldiers ARE expendible ... it's in the job description.
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Mar 7, 2007 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's one very good reason for being anti-War : it's not very NICE thinking of people as 'expendable.' Probably doesn't pass the "WWJD" test, either.

Yet:
You are paid to stop a bullet
That is a soldier's job they say
Then you goes and stops your bullet
And they goes and stops your pay

And in every war since 1865, everyone is "shocked I tell you shocked" when the Brave Boys are used and discarded.

Word War II was not the prototype of the virtuous war ... it was the UNIQUE example of a 'virtuous war.' -- and the fact that 12% of American families had someone actually IN the fighting ... not to mention the political and economic clout of Organized Labor -- gave the Greatest Generation's the greatest , never-to-be-repeated, Veteran's Benefits package.of all time.

Frankly, THIS Empire does a better job of patching up its Troopers than most, if only because the benefits to medical science (and industry) more than repay the investment. When England France and Germany were still going in for discretionary wars of advantage, they weren't nearly so advanced in their surgical skills ... but they did set some tax money aside to provide for the 'mutiles en guerres"

But the paying of pensions and the providing of mental health services ... that's pretty much dead loss. Ex soldiers have been 'begging their bread' and filling the Skid Rows of the industrial world, at least since the Civil War -- that we know about.

It should not come as a suprise that Don Rumsfield's "Mean Lean Fighting Machine" style Army would not spend 'to no purpose.' If you admit the Project for a New American Century's values-neutral approach to intitiating a war, you must also expect rigorous cost-benefit calculation to be applied to the way it is waged.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are the "Support our Troops!" people now?
Posted by: zooeyhall on Mar 7, 2007 7:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is there such a deafening silence on this issue from the people with the yellow stickers on the backs of their SUVs? Maybe the "support our troops" stickers they have plastered on their cars actually meant "Support our NeoCons!"

I am curious as to what kind of spin that Fox, OReilley, et al are putting on this story.

It wouldn't surprise me that they somehow end up blaming it on the anti-war movement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: blaming it on the anti-war movement. Posted by: dangerouslysane
FUBAR, BushCo's MO
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 7, 2007 7:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a former soldier and a former Medical Corps member, I have been following this with great interest and still am not hearing a lot of questions being asked, either by the press or the Congress. Not caring for wounded veterans is criminal and immoral by any standard.

The US Army operates large regional Medical Centers at Ft Lewis (Tacoma, Wa), Tripler (Honolulu, HI), Ft Bliss (El Paso, TX), Ft Sam Houston (San Antonio, TX), Ft Gordon (Augusta, GA) and Ft Bragg (Fayetteville, N.C.) in addition to Walter Reed in Washington. These hospitals have similar specialized staff to Walter Reed and should be able to care for all or most all of these troops and have established relationships with local civilian hospitals for enhanced care. The Navy operates similar facilities in San Diego and at Bethesda. Very few troops would require care not available at these hospitals. Why are all the troops being concentrated at Walter Reed, Bethesda and to a lesser extent Brooke Medical center (handling severe burns)? Closer to home and family should be the order of the day unless medically necessary.

The Army operates large community hospitals at many larger bases such as Ft Hood (TX), Ft Campbell (KY), Ft Carson (CO), Ft Riley (KS), Ft Huachuca (AZ), Ft Knox (KY) and Ft Leonard Wood (MO) that should also be able to handle outpatient Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy and Psychiatric care. The Navy has similar facilities in places like Jacksonville and Pensacola (FL). Once wounded troops are stable and are beginning the road to recovery, they should be able to get the care they need at these facilities. Spreading the outpatient follow up care, therapy and counseling across the system will give the troops faster and more personalized care and support in addition to keeping them closer to family and friends.

We now find out that BushCo has contracted out services at Walter Reed to the same company responsible for the ice supply fiasco after Katrina, headed by a former Halliburton Executive. The contract was issued despite the fact that it cost the government more than doing the same work with the existing Civil Service staff. Employing less than half as many people for more money, is it any surprise that performance and quality of services have suffered?

Beyond the VA, which has been cut repeatedly under BushCo and his NeoCon enablers, lies TriCare. TriCare is the DoD insurance program introduced under Clinton to replace CHAPMUS for care outside the DoD healthcare system. If the DoD or VA does not have the facilities to deliver timely care, the troops should be able to go to the facility of their choosing and let Uncle Sam pick up the tab-- NO QUESTIONS OR QUIBBLING BY THE GOVERNMENT ALLOWED.

People need to go to jail for some of this and Civilian and military staff in licensed medical professions who knew of this and ignored it should lose their license.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dick
Posted by: rtmyth on Mar 7, 2007 8:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After the despicable conditions were reported by two diligent, responsible columnists, only then did our comandeer-in-chief quickly take action by fireing two scapegoats. Just like scapegoat Libby, when both Bush and Cheney are obviously involved.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

VA Watch
Posted by: fanny666 on Mar 7, 2007 8:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good source to keep up on this issue:

VA Watch

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corruption the Republican Way
Posted by: shangrilalad on Mar 7, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush political appointees run every branch of the federal government. None of his appointees were chosen on the basis of their professional qualifications for the job, not unless you count loyalty and willingness to engage in criminal behavior as qualifications. As long as they were staunch conservatives, dog-groomers could be appointed to head the VA, or any other agency of government. Don’t blame the organizations, blame the criminals Bush appointed to head them.

Truth be told, Bush’s appointees have carried out their secret instructions to privatize, subvert, corrupt and loot their allotted fief-dooms with fanatical gusto.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Easy problem - Easy answer.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Mar 7, 2007 9:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush Administration has three answers for any problem. Tax breaks, privatization, and outsourcing. The obvious answer is to hire a big company, let them make huge profits by sending our servicemen overseaas for treatment, and give the owners of the company a huge tax break.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiaitive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

VA Healthcare Inadequate
Posted by: Rochelle_Weber on Mar 7, 2007 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is interesting that this article arrived the day I discovered that the VA told the student loan people that I am no longer disabled. You see, all such paperwork has to be dropped off in the "release of information" office, which forwards it to the patient's doctor. I used to be able to give the paperwork directly to my psychiatrist and discuss it with her as she filled it out. I'm not even sure the paperwork went to my psychiatrist. If it went to my primary care physician, they may not consider me to be disabled, since my disability is based on my bi-polar disorder.

I, too, have had the experience of having to wait several days to be admitted to the psych ward. In fact, I went to the ER at the Chicago Lakeside VA Hospital (when it was still open) around ten p.m. I was transferred to the Westside VA (now the Jesse Brown VAMC) around midnight, where I was seen by an intern and a med student who decided that I wasn't suicidal enough to admit, and released me at two a.m. I am a woman with more than one disability, and I did not have cab fare. I walked four blocks in a bad neighborhood to the el station and discoverd that the el stopped running at two. I had missed the last train by twenty minutes. I did not have money on my fare card for a bus. I had counted on being able to pay my fare at the el station, which had fare-card machines. I walked a mile (still in a bad neighborhood), before I found an all-night gas station where I was able to get change. Then I walked four more blocks to another el line which was open. I waited almost an hour (it seemed) for a train, and had to walk the last half-mile home, as the bus was not running. I suppose I was lucky that it was winter. The gang-bangers were probably home keeping warm.

I saw my psychiatrist the next day, who said that I should, indeed, have been admitted. However, there was now a three-day wait for a private room. Women often have to wait longer for a room than men, as we cannot be put into a four-bed room unless there are three other female patients. I managed not to commit suicide during that time, but it was close. My heart goes out to the family of the young man who did not survive a similar wait.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People! You Don't Want The Truth.
Posted by: mite on Mar 7, 2007 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
War Is A Racket. Rich Men's War That Poor Men Fight.

We (people of these U.S.) haven't fought a war for freedom since the Revolutionary War-period. It is a fact folks-research history!

These Bankers-Corporations that own our government and media-press make Trillions of dollars from war and conflict abroad.

The following WEB site is simple but true, 'WAR is A Racket.'

http://lexrex.com/enlightened/articles/warisaracket/htm

These Bankers of the U.S. Congress became CEO's of this country on March, 1913 with the Federal Reserve and IRS Acts, and 'The Bankruptcy of 'The U.S. Government' on March 9, 1933. All of 'We-The-Peoples' Gold was shipped over-seas to Europe to back future loans of our government.

Search www.google.com "Money Masters Part 1&2":
"Freedomtofascism"
"terrorstorm"
These Bankers-Corporations once they use our women-men to fight their conquests in foreign land to get the resources and ship our jobs over-what makes us think they give a shit about them- 'Our Veterans', they don't.

Our veterans have been begging for help since WW 1, and Congress has known since then. Veterans need to educate our 18-42 year olds, because the draft is on its way.

But I'm sure someone will receive an award for the story!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Quid Pro quo
Posted by: qidproquo on Mar 7, 2007 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The U.S.V.A. hospitals, for at least 50 years to my knowledge, have given third-rate care to their vets. As a young R.N., I was appalled at the quality of the staff (nurses AND doctors), and the semi-custodial care given the patients. During WW2, congress promised faithfully to give "every G.I. the same care as the congressional members" THEN, they reneged, and it has been a constant fight for the men to get any semblance of what was promised AND owed to them. Bush's actions to outsource care is only the tip of the iceberg. The entire problem is a national disgrace. Cheney's talk about Democrats contributing to bad morale is a joke. What do those poor damaged kids think when they hear about Walter Reed.? The callous unconcern of the U.S.Army AND congress MUST be investigated AND acted upon, rather than ignored as were other inqueries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NOT really NEW "NEWS folks...
Posted by: Bozwell on Mar 7, 2007 11:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has grabbed attention..once again, but this is NOT NEW NEWS...The immediate medical care and ability has improved, but the aftercare situation has long been abysmal and so many cracks that even when previously brought to attention have never been addressed. This is NOT merely a BUSH BRIGADE problem..but in part, due to improvements of immediate medical tech and care, more are "surviving" where previously would NOT . THe problem has magnified for the injuries sustained but "survived" have LIFE LONG CONSEQUNECES yet there is NOT long term care and support provided. There are injuries that previously were NOT recognized, but just as delibilitating and often lifelong but denied coverage for treatment and support. Even as recent as the first Gulf war, our military suffered injuries but were DISMISSED and sent off and away as if the "out of sight, out of mind and OUT OF RESPONSBILITY" was THE GOLD RULE to deal with such issues. Brain injuries and mental problems that come from UN DIAGNOSED injuries has been a constant plague..they too are life long causes for dysfunctionability yet get short shrifted. (guessing to hard to note the numbers from the Nam era who suffered PTS, and their consequential disabiities that left so many adrift..all the while procliming and vowing never would "we"/the nation , allow such NON SUPPORT of those that served would ever be allowed to occur again. Since the start of the Iraq instigation, thou many did NOT support the WAR INSTIGATION but did claim to support the troops doing the grunt work, fighting and dying and being maimed and injured..so many CLAIM to support the troops but have done little more than MOUTH EMPTH REFRAINS. Frankly, if one truly supported those that have been called upon in their volunteer'd duty signup to serve, IF TRUE SUPPORT and care were to be shown for their well being we would see the forces of the citizenry arise and DEMAND A HALT to the continued madness that has even MORE being tragically sacrificed and having their lives "wasted" for an ILL CONCIEVED instigation and one that has been ILL PREPARED for and incompetently "managed" from the executive crew we have helming this nation.
Claim to support the boots, but try to REALLY do so with something more than mere voicings of outrage and indignation. Make a REAL effort to bring about ACCOUNTABILITY and RESPONSIBILTY and CHANGE of direction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

how long do they think we will let this go on.
Posted by: greggwyck on Mar 7, 2007 12:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
whats changed... nam vets are walken around and have the highest percent of homeless. now that i have come home from the iraq war, whats for me. i am not allowed to see doctores at the va. or any medical facility(without insurance). it is a dayley strugle to not end it all. i am lucky that i have a loving girlfriend and good friends. because at one point i loaded my gun, i sat on the end of the bed with the pistol in my mouth and the barrol of the gun restin on the soft pallet of my mouth. i had a desision to make, is death better than life? some days the thaughts pop in my head. like stearing the car into oncoming traffic or a telephone pole and other bad things like that. i have been diagnoced by 10 diffrent doctors with ptsd. but the va and disability turned me away when i went to 4 appointment that their doctor didnt show up for. they called and rescedualed several times. i missed the 5th appointment because after driving more than an hour and a hafe. i didnt go. then they denied my claim. then they denied my claim a second time because when i sent in my medical record "the package is to thick" and returned my medical record along with a letter that said i am denied medical care. shit i was about to kill my self and i couldnt even get in to see a doctor. and now that our leaders have not given us help. what are they going to do the day we snap and decied to kill them all and anyone who stands in our way. you think the hollywood shot out was bad. when we band together and decied to overthrow our govenment because we love our country so much. we as people can only take so much before rage turns to conspirecy, anger turns to a list, and finally all that military training well put back in use and just take out as meny as possable. i am the the nightmare that my country created.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

brother- after 34 years of pain-
Posted by: mite on Mar 7, 2007 3:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know your pain and disappointments with this country and its ignorant people. We brothers of arms must educate our young and hoefully create a movement to stop this deceit.

God bless your family and self and remember: we did our duty and no has a right too judge us or our deeds except our creator.

'OooHoh'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here we go again
Posted by: bookwoman on Mar 7, 2007 3:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again we have the President doing an McCauley Culkins imitation with his "oh my, how did this happen". Its a wonder he didn't do a teary eyed press conference. Maybe that will come later.

At any rate, what's with the surprise. The VA hasn't been in good shape for years. The pittance budget they have always gotten "from a grateful nation" is a joke. Then you add all the casualties from Afghanistan and Iraq coming home with injuries which can never be fully cured. In each of six years the Administration and the Republican Congress has cut back on the monies for the VA, and now they stand open mouthed and shocked that Walter Reed and other facilities are in such poor shape. Where did everyone think the money to run these sites was coming from - car washes and tag sales?Come on guys and gals!!! I bet this is going to go down in the book right behind "why I voted for the Iraq War" in many Congressional memoirs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"An Army of One"; what recruiters would get if there were any civilian jobs. . .
Posted by: monkeywrench on Mar 7, 2007 8:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Knowing what we know today, I'm amazed that ANYBODY joins the military. Boy! To keep the supply of cannon fodder coming, things must be a lot worse out there in Bush's "great economy" than anyone realizes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is Caring for our Vets?
Posted by: rogus on Mar 8, 2007 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Veterans tend to take a dim view of the way they are treated by the Department of Veterans Affairs. In fact there seems to be a growing mantra among veterans oriented blog sites concerning the VA: Delay, Deny, Hope that I die.
This of course is based on their perception of how the VA bureaucracy functions in assigning health care and benefits.

But is there any real evidence that might support their view? I think there is.

On health care;

(The AP 7/28/2006)
Veteran, suffering from heart condition, dies after showing up to Spokane VA Hospital and is denied treatment. Why? Because he arrived at 4:35 pm and the hospital urgent care closes a 4:30.

(The Star Tribune 1/27/2007)
Iraq veteran Jonathan Schulze, after suffering from thoughts of suicide requested that the St Cloud VA hospital admit him into their mental health unit. However the veteran is informed that there is a waiting list and that there were 26 other veterans trying to gain access. Jonathan Schulze commits suicide 4 days later.

(Times Union 12/5/2006)
Widows sue the VA for wrongful death of veterans who died in a corrupt cancer research program at the Stratton VA Medical Center.

Hospital researcher, Paul H. Kornak, posed as a doctor at Stratton, including carrying the title "M.D." on his VA-issued business cards and being introduced to patients as "doctor" even though he never finished medical school. His supervisors knew about his lack of credentials and Kornak was hired even though he had a felony conviction.

The hospital earned thousands of dollars for each patient enrolled in the programs, in which pharmaceutical companies tested new drugs on cancer patients to obtain approval for them from the Food and Drug Administration.

The VA’s record on disability benefits must be better right?:

(VAOIG semi-annual report to Congress Oct. 1, 1999 to March 2000)
VAIG finds VA attorneys destroying veteran’s records to claim pay bonus.

Investigation disclosed the individual knowingly allowed …(1300 veterans claims)… to accumulate in and around his office and he falsified weekly reports in order to conceal the existence of these unprocessed materials including 500 items containing evidence related to veterans' appeals

(ABC - 20/20, 7/2/2000)

VA attorneys destroyed records to deny veterans claims and earn cash bonus.

The attorneys …worked for the Board of Veterans Appeals, and each drew prison time for separately committing outright fraud in 1994 and ’95. Destroying records that were sent to them for review then rejecting the veterans’ cases on the grounds that the records were missing.

The attorneys said they believed the quick denials would make them appear more productive and eligible for bigger bonuses. A belief some say has encouraged denials in the past.

(By Alison Young, Knight Ridder Newspapers)
After 55-year wait, veteran faces new delays in getting compensation

A Board of Veterans Appeals judge ruled Sept. 20 that Fong was entitled to disability payments for the 47 years the VA had wrongly denied his claim. At the time of writing Mr. Fong is still awaiting payment.

(AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES)
(Joel Waldman VA Regional Office, Cleveland, 2005)

VA Denies Veterans Due Process

Individual veterans and Veterans Service Organizations as a whole should have no confidence in receiving a technically correct, legally accurate, and an equitable rating decision when the entire system contains institutionalized, unaddressed fundamental flaws in applying Due Process under law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHEN I CAME HOME
Posted by: Support the vets on Mar 9, 2007 5:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it any wonder why over 1000 iraq war veterans have ended up homeless? If you havent seen the film WHEN I CAME HOME - watch the one-minute trailer at:


www.whenicamehome.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is how it is
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Mar 9, 2007 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you enlist or are drafted you MUST die for your country!!!
If you survive,with wounds,you're treated in the worst possible way to help you die for your country.
That's what the military is all about.Killing and Die-ing for your country.
Now ask yourself this.If your Gov't is corrupted,your air is poisoned,you can't drink from a stream,there's a toxic landfill in your backyard and only the very rich have any say in things.....Do you want to be 'their' Vet. I was in Vietnam,I will never again, in any lifetime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Answer Me This??????
Posted by: TruthBeTold on Mar 9, 2007 1:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can the soldiers or veterans posting here please explain why the members of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the American Legion and other groups continue support and invite George Bush and Dick Cheney to speak at their gatherings. Who makes the decision to allow people like Cheney to speak at their gatherings?

George Bush and his Republican minions and syncopants in congress have made huge cuts in veterans benefits over the last five years, they have sent soldiers to war without the proper equiptment, have paid private contractors to serve sub-standard food and water to the soldiers, rescinded on paying them bonuses from reupping, etc., etc., etc.

And yet Bush and Cheney still receive overwhelming support from members of the military and their families.

Not one of any of Bush's children or his nieces and nephews have volunteered for service in any branch of the military or volunteered to serve in any capacity in Iraq. Not one of them has felt the cause was noble enough to put his or her life on the line. The same for draft dodgers Dick Cheney and Karl Rove.

Joe Lieberman, William Kristol, Rudi Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Arnold Schwarzenegge and all the Republicans in congress who supported invading and destroying Iraq have military age children, but except for one or two exceptions, their sons and daughters have not seen fit to join the military and really support the troops. And yet groups such at the AL and the VFW slobber all over themselves flocking to these people.

It makes me sick to see how the soldiers allow themselves to continue to be used as props for photos, especially when they know the harm that has been caused by Bush, Cheney and the republicans.

What is the explanation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Answer Me This?????? Posted by: greggwyck
Dav fighting to return veterans to second class citizens
Posted by: rogus on Mar 10, 2007 11:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last year, Congress passed "Attorneys for Veterans" legislation that would have allowed vets to hire an attorney to represent them in the VA claims process after the VA issued an initial denial of claim.

Now, the repealer legislation has been introduced by Rep. Ron Lewis (R-KY). The bill is HR 1318.

The biggest foe of "Attorneys for Veterans" is the DAV. They have fought it tooth-and-nail and helped set up the deal to get repealer legislation introduced.

http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/nf07/nfMAR07/nf030807-8.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]