Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Wolf As Underdog: Indy Media Journalist Needs Protection

By Amy Goodman, King Features Syndicate. Posted February 14, 2007.


Jailed journalist Josh Wolf has remained in prison so long because he lacks the backing of a large media organization that could agitate to protect his rights -- so Congress should step in.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Josh Wolf, videographer and blogger, is now the journalist imprisoned longest in U.S. history for refusing to comply with a subpoena. He has been locked up in federal prison for close to six months.

In July 2005, Wolf was covering a San Francisco protest against the G-8 Summit in Scotland (the G-8 stands for the Group of Eight industrialized nations: Britain, France, Russia, Germany, the U.S., Japan, Italy and Canada). He posted video to the Web and sold some video to a local broadcast-news outlet. The authorities wanted him to turn over the original tapes and to testify. He refused.

In a recent court filing, U.S. Attorney Kevin Ryan says it's only in Wolf's "imagination that he is a journalist."

The Society of Professional Journalists must be equally imaginative. Their Northern California chapter named Josh Wolf Journalist of the Year for 2006, and in March will give him the James Madison Freedom of Information Award. "Josh's commitment to a free and unfettered press deserves profound respect," SPJ National President Christine Tatum said.

The SPJ is also honoring San Francisco Chronicle reporters Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams, who are facing prison for refusing to reveal who leaked grand-jury testimony about steroid use in baseball. Williams and Fainaru-Wada remain free pending appeal.

The problem for Wolf? Independence. As Wolf observes, there is "definitely a divergence between how the government's handled my situation as an independent journalist and how they've dealt with the corporate media, which have also been found in civil contempt."

The First Amendment states: "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom ... of the press." By forcing journalists to hand over tapes, notes and other material, and to testify, the government is making just such a law. Whistle-blowers and others in dangerous situations will no longer come forward to provide information to reporters if they think their names will be divulged. Journalists must be free to protect their sources and to report the truth if our democracy is to function.

Wolf's lawyer, Martin Garbus, one of the nation's leading First Amendment attorneys, says the government has done an end run around California's shield law, which would have guaranteed Wolf protection. The authorities called on the Joint Terrorism Task Force, or JTTF, which moved the case to federal court, where no shield law exists (as reporters in the Valerie Plame case discovered).

The grand jury is investigating whether arson was attempted on a San Francisco police car, though the squad car was not damaged beyond a broken taillight. A police officer was injured after the squad car he was in was driven into the protest march (that case was investigated then dropped by the local district attorney); however, Wolf insists he was not videotaping either incident.

What is clear is that by focusing on the alleged attempted arson of the car, the JTTF can assert jurisdiction, as federal anti-terror dollars, they say, paid for part of the car. With these legalistic jurisdictional acrobatics, Wolf is stripped of California shield-law protections, and remains locked up without charge until he turns over his tape and submits to the Bush administration inquisitors.

The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a brief in his support, pointing out how JTTFs across the country, under the guise of investigating "terrorism," are targeting anti-war groups and compiling databases of law-abiding citizens critical of the Bush administration.

Wolf, who is 24 years old, is staying healthy in prison, reading a lot and learning from other inmates. He mails entries to be posted to his blog at joshwolf.net. Garbus expects him to remain in prison at least until the grand jury expires in July.

Freedom of the press means freeing journalists to do their work. Congress can insure that by passing a federal shield law.

(c) 2007 Amy Goodman
Distributed by King Features Syndicate

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: josh wolf

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
ACLU where the hell are you??????
Posted by: ccluelessfl60 on Feb 14, 2007 9:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is anyone out there. I have been reading this story for a couple of weeks and no one is doing anything. Where is the ACLU when they are needed. I guess I should cancel my membership. If you can not act on behalf of one lone reporter when can you act. Must not be glamorous enough.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Attorney in violation {my view}
Posted by: Slmncty on Feb 14, 2007 11:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The awards presented by journalist to Wolf clearly state not only is Wolf a journalist but held in high esteem. It must therefore be in the mind of the US attorney that he is not. The attorney has taken an oath to uphold, protect and defend the constitution. As stated NO LAW can be enacted infringing upon a free press. Founding fathers fearing abuse of STATE SECRETS provide a free press to prevent such abuse. The US attorney violated constitutional law and his oath.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Department of Homeland Insecurity
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 15, 2007 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I nominate renaming the DoJ the Department of Homeland Insecurity, as they work as shills for industry and oppose citizen interests and civil liberties.

BTW- Since when is a Lawyer qualified to determine who is a journalist?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where's the judge?
Posted by: DaBear on Feb 15, 2007 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems like some funky right-wing judicial activism going on to me. Judge's are required to reign-in out of control attys (even when they're the prosecution). Where's the judge? Oh, I forgot, playing Golf with the US Atty. The system works. god bless 'Merkuh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who is a journalist?
Posted by: davidbdr on Feb 15, 2007 1:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the government has decided there are some vague qualifications that make a person a journalist? I wonder what qualifications journalists and the press had when the Constitution was written? I doubt any were college graduates with degrees that proclaimed their status as official journalists. Since the state of journalism in the US is based on the college educated hacks I read and hear every day--I would rather stick with the average "citizen reporter."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This administration has played fast and loose...
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Feb 17, 2007 4:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... with the law from the beginning in it's pursuit of totalitarianism, ignoring the laws when it can get away with it, getting favorable "interpretations" from demagogues appointed to the bench or altering the law ex post facto, sometimes by fiat, or simply by writing new ones and passing them by stealth, blackmail or whatever else is needed. This is a predatory government, and they're also very good at setting precedents by going after the most helpless in a given legal area. Obviously, just as an illegal enemy combattant is waht Bush says one is on any given day, the same is going to go for journalists.

The American ideal of freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and those who protest and speak truth to power being the true patriots are all dangerous to the kind of government ehy want to be, so they'll go after anyone they can to see that this dangerous "freedom" concept goes out of style quickly. In my day, that fool senator who proposed hanging those of Congress who disagreed with the President would have found himself looking for work minutes after uttering such an obscenity. Nowadays, he has a good chance to retire from Congress after a long run or even die with boots on.

Back to the future, people: 1984 is coming closer and closer. From there, who knows? The 1300's maybe, which will put is on a par with the Middle East. Now THERE'S progress!

Makes me want to puke. Watching people I love die by slow pieces has been horrible; watching my country die the same way and knowing it's by poisoning is worse, because it takes hope for the future with it. Bush and the Neocons are burning the future like fanatic "Christians" burned the library at Alexandria, and if they are not put ont trial for sedition and treason and punished AS THE CRIMINALS THEY ARE, nevermind their manipulation of the law, there will be a Dark Ages to make the last look lke an eyeblink.

It would be the Inquisitions with modern technology against the poor, which we will all be if they get their way, and so far, so good. From their point of view.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement