Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Libby Trial: Smoking Gun for Impeachment?

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. Posted February 1, 2007.


The Libby case testimony, centered on the chicanery of the vice president, certainly suggests that impeachable offenses occurred at the highest level of the White House.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Not all lies are created equal. It is understood that there is a chasm of importance between little white lies and big black ones. Most would agree that lying about a consensual sexual affair, even by the president, is of significantly lesser concern than lying about the proliferation of nuclear weapons as an excuse to take the nation to war.

How then is it possible that a Republican-controlled Congress impeached President Bill Clinton over his attempt to conceal marital infidelity but that a Democratic-led Congress will not even consider impeaching this president for far more serious transgressions against the public trust? That is the question that arises from early revelations in the trial of Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff.

This case's importance lies not in the narrow charge that Libby committed perjury in testifying about his role in the outing of CIA operative Valerie Wilson; that was merely one facet of a far-ranging plot to deceive Congress and the public about perhaps the most important issue of our time: the prospect of terrorists obtaining a weapon of mass destruction.

The infamous 16-word State of the Union claim by President Bush that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had sought to obtain enriched uranium from the African country of Niger was known to be based on fraudulent documents at the time Bush used this and other false evidence to make his case for war.

The Libby case testimony, centered on the chicanery of the vice president, certainly suggests that impeachable offenses occurred at the highest level of the White House. Just how conscious the president was of the deceits conducted under his authority, what he knew and when he knew it, is precisely what an impeachment trial would determine.

Consider the testimony concerning White House use of former CIA Director George Tenet in the cover-up of the president's distortions. The record is unmistakably clear that the CIA and other intelligence sources warned the White House before the president's speech not to make the bogus Niger claim, and that the reference had been voided out in a previous speech. Yet, after Ambassador Joseph Wilson exposed this fact more than a year after the invasion, Cheney orchestrated a new deception to shift the blame to Tenet.

That is the smoking-gun revelation in the testimony of Cheney's former spokeswoman, Cathie Martin, a Harvard-educated lawyer who still works in the White House. Her word is that of a sophisticated and top-level White House insider and, as described by the Washington Post, one that offers a devastating glimpse into the moral depravity of this administration:

At length, Martin explained how she, Libby and Deputy National Security Adviser Steve Hadley worked late into the night writing a statement to be issued by George Tenet in 2004 in which the CIA boss would take blame for the bogus claim in Bush's State of the Union address that Iraq was seeking nuclear material in Africa. After 'delicate' talks, Tenet agreed to say the CIA 'approved' the claim and 'I am responsible' -- but even that disappointed Martin, who had wanted Tenet to say that 'we did not express any doubts about Niger.' " Tenet later was awarded the nation's highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Certainly this deliberate corruption of the integrity of the CIA, the nation's premier source of national security information, rises to the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors," which the Constitution holds out as the standard for impeachment. And can there be any more egregious example of betraying the oath of office of the president to uphold the Constitution than his deceiving Congress from the very well of the House on the reasons for going to war?

The Constitution clearly delegates to Congress, and not to the president, the exclusive power to declare war, and deceiving our representatives in making the case for war is a far more important crime than the perjury charge against Libby.

Testimony already has established that Libby was nothing more than a pawn used by Cheney in the vice president's constant and ferocious campaign to trick the nation into war -- not a totally surprising quest for a man who had served as CEO for a corporation that has profited so obscenely from the Iraq agony.

Cheney, like some Daddy Warbucks cartoon character of old, has been so blatant in his corruption of the nation's second highest office that we seem to have become inured to further revelations of his evil influence. Instead of being shocked, we are more likely jaded by even more examples of the man's use of his office to persistently undermine our democratic heritage. Too bad he wasn't cursed by an overactive libido.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: impeachment, dick cheney, george w. bush, scooter libby

Robert Scheer is the co-author of The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq. See more of Robert Scheer at TruthDig.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Impeachment
Posted by: kgs1947 on Feb 1, 2007 3:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impeachment of George Bush and his cronies (vice-president and attorney general) is ethical and a moral responsibility. However, I don't see this Congress or this Nation's citizens coming forward with the guts/courage to do so. Would that not leave Nancy Pelosi as the next President?! Would that not put this nation in a moral leadership position that has been seen in 6 years?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It makes one wonder. Posted by: johngary66
» RE: It makes one wonder. Posted by: Jennahluv
No way....
Posted by: mizipi on Feb 1, 2007 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if the House of Represenatives impeached Bush and/or Cheney, it would take a 2/3 majority of the Senate to convict either of them. To imagine that there are 67 senators with integrity.............just a dream.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No way.... Posted by: willymack
» Dream on........ Posted by: mizipi
Iraq = 140.000 smoking guns for impeachment!
Posted by: Ullern on Feb 1, 2007 4:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.
Fuck this. Get real. The Iraq war has some 140.000 US soldiers, each with a smoking gun for impeachment. (And there's about to be added 21.500 more reasons for impeachment.)

Bush starting an unprovoked war of aggression - there are no more powerfully smoking guns for impeachment than that.

Fiddling with the Libby-case seeking reasons to impeach under these circumstances is like prosecuting the mafia's godfather for jay-walking. Or blowing out a candle when the house is on fire.

Get real. How many reasons does it take to impeach? Lying about getting a blow-job was one. Then why doesn't lying about getting a war started and wrecking a whole country count?

GET REAL someone - pleeeze.

Ole Ullern

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I am so with you, man. NM. Posted by: Aimleft
» That's right Posted by: fifthworld
THIS COMBAT VETERAN IS ALL FOR IMPEACHMENT!
Posted by: kc10ken on Feb 1, 2007 5:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
13 years time in service including 3 tours in the middle east.

I've seen most of the world and how beautiful it is and how horrifying it can quickly become.

The human shitwave in Washington masquerading as an administration is far beyond the impeachable phase. We the people not only must DEMAND IMPEACHMENT of the President AND ole "5 deferrment" Dick Cheney, we must also DEMAND FULL INVESTIGATIONS into EVERY aspect of what brought us to this point of insanity inside dumbya's QUAGMIRE in Iraq. We MUST DEMAND prosecution of the current offenders for crimes that go FAR BEYOND what Nixon did to warrant his resignation. We MUST DEMAND IMPRISONMENT of the GOP PNAC warmongering criminals that pervade Washington today.

The "surge" is a done deal...whether you like it or not, YOU the American citizen have NO SAY in it. The equipment has already been shipped and the units notified of their mobilizations and the first units have already arrrived in Kuwait.

NOW we're sending ANOTHER carrier battle group to the Persian Gulf in order to provoke Iran. HAVE WE NO SHAME? Has faux cable news completely diluted our memories about how we were LIED to about WMD's in Iraq and dragged into an unwinnable QUAGMIRE in Iraq?

STOP THESE PNAC MADMEN NOW!

It's not too late. DEMAND IMPEACHMENT!

I've buried too many of my military compratriots in the past four years. It's pure insanity to ever have thought we could "win" a war in Iraq and plant the seeds of democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are so right. Posted by: Aimleft
Ugh
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Feb 1, 2007 5:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea of Dick Cheney with an overactive libido . . . please, not before breakfast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ugh Posted by: surfreality
The 5 "I's"
Posted by: markusmark on Feb 1, 2007 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
INVESTIGATE, IMPEACH,INDICT, IMPRECATE, INCARCERATE.
Peace!
Mark
"Truth never damages a cause that is just." - Mahatma Gandhi

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The 5 "I's" Posted by: fifthworld
» RE: The 5 "I's" Posted by: tap17x
The Left has left
Posted by: LMNOP on Feb 1, 2007 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"How then is it possible that a Republican-controlled Congress impeached President Bill Clinton over his attempt to conceal marital infidelity but that a Democratic-led Congress will not even consider impeaching this president for far more serious transgressions against the public trust?"

With all due respect, is the author kidding? Let's see, we've got a well-oiled, lavishly funded, spiteful and vindictive nest of neocons with no concern for the country controlling both the Republican Party and the media; a political left that left and is currently nonexistent or on life support (they were assassinated with bullets in the 60's and unrestrained, unopposed media smears since the 90's and beyond); and an electorate dead from the neck up with no voice anyway.

Worse, the muck that filled the vacuum that formed when the progressive left was eliminated, but still calls itself the Democratic Party, seems at times complicit with the neocons, such as when they the nation that impeachment is "off the table".

How else could it be?

The author expresses hope for impeachment by pointing out how appropriate and winnable an impeachment proceeding might be. But you've got the same problem: the left has no voice and no national political apparatus. The will for impeachment resides in a core group of American progressives who, all together, aren't powerful enough to weigh in on ANY DECISIONS AT ALL in American government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not the best reason though
Posted by: Kate_24 on Feb 1, 2007 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder whether the Libby-case (funny how it all changed characters over ... what ... the last three-and-a-half years) is the best road to impeachment. That whole scandal/gate/case/whatever is such a huge quagmire all by itself, but what actually really happened is still all muddied. And I doubt we will ever find out.

I'm not American, and I don't think I can judge whether or not Bush should be impeached. I'd say the government had to face consequences for what has happened in Iraq etc, and also for the Plame leak, but because it's so opaque (and there are some good guys involved, too) I don't think that this is the proper cause for impeachment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wonder if it will truly make any difference......
Posted by: Prophit on Feb 1, 2007 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our Congress has already turned a blind eye to their blatant violations of the law, the Constitution and international conventions. What make us think this small issue in comparison is going to make one iota of difference. I certainly hope everyone is right about it, but frankly, I don't hold out much hope.

We have had hard evidence, witnesses and admissions to all of that and yet nothing. I keep thinking of Bush's signing statement where he admits he has no intention of honoring the law if he deigns to ignore it and that alone is in writing with his signature. Clear, documentable, violations of the law and Constitution.

So, what more do we really need???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting
Posted by: WhatNow? on Feb 1, 2007 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Tenet later was awarded the nation's highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medal of Freedom."

You had to know something was awry when the bush administration would give a clinton appointee a medal? I could not understand it until I saw it was a reward for deceit.

"Certainly this deliberate corruption of the integrity of the CIA"

That's funny! Did/does the CIA have integrity? I never would have guessed that they did.

"Too bad he wasn't cursed by an overactive libido."

Why would we want that? More dicks for the future? Here's a better wish. "Too bad he did not have to rely on a faith based solution for his heart instead of modern medical science and taxpayer dollars for his insurance."

They need to be impeached. They need to be tried. They are war criminals. Anybody that orders, condones, or allows the use of DU is a war criminal. That crime may pale in comparison to others they have committed.

Maybe there is hope:
Land of Enchantment and Impeachment

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Calling for Impeachment
Posted by: jwc on Feb 1, 2007 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder what the odds are of a presidential candidate calling for impeachment. That'd be the day. Besides that thought, has the American media given any attention to anyone (political) who has talked about impeachment?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

another reason to impeach
Posted by: kellysgarden on Feb 1, 2007 8:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about reopening the 9/11 investigation? There is so much new evidence about the lying and covering-up of the real cause for the 9/11 attacks. It is pretty evident that Cheney is complicit in those attacks as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

impeachment yes, conviction no way in hell
Posted by: gerdhansel on Feb 1, 2007 8:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The House may indeed pass articles of impeachment. This only requires a simple majority vote (50 percent plus one), and the Democrats could do this hands-down.

But the Senate will never summon the two-thirds majority needed to convict a president of high crimes and misdemeanors and remove him from office, because 49 of the 100 members of the Senate are Republicans. Of the 51 Democrats in the Senate, one is still incapacitated with a stroke.

Without conviction and removal from office, what you’d get is a replay of the Bill Clinton impeachment and trial. Such an outcome would certainly give Democrats a measure of revenge for what happened to Slick Willy, but at what cost? The country would wind up even further divided than it already is.

The only possible motive for impeaching the President when you don’t have a hope in hell of convicting him and removing him from office? Remember the line from Khan in the second Star Trek film: “I’m not going to kill you Admiral Kirk. I’m going to hurt you. I’m going to make you suffer as I suffered.”

So if you can’t stop Bush or remove him from office, just whack him with the biggest hammer you’ve got and cripple his Presidency. Make him suffer until Hillary pries the Presidency from his cold, dead fingers.

Will that make you feel better?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» yes, it would make me feel better Posted by: kellysgarden
clinker
Posted by: cottontail on Feb 1, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When will you good people realize it's over. What we don't know is what will emerge from the ashes of this sick, sick six years of criminal governance. Will it be even more fascist?
A military dictatorship? The dumb bunnies out here in television land think they live in a democracy. They haven't a clue as to the essence of the constitution. Most young are not taught civics, history and the importance of critical thinking. So the future is grim indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: clinker Posted by: Jennahluv
Right on, Bob Scheer!
Posted by: namewon on Feb 1, 2007 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This wraps it all up in a neat and compact package and delivers it to the House of Representatives' door--concise and eloquent and totally on point! Thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think impeachment has a real chance.
Posted by: sasha40 on Feb 1, 2007 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think there's any reason to believe that the Republican Senators will close ranks and refuse to impeach. When Bush & Cheney get out of office, they're done (and hopefully imprisoned for war crimes). It will only take 17 or 18 Senators to assert some backbone, and I imagine there are 49 who would like to keep their jobs.

The Republicans in Congress will only see Americans getting more and more furious over the lies, the handling of the war, and being ignored by the president, over the next few months. By the time we get to the war's four-and-a-half-year anniversary, if things aren't a whole lot better, I predict impeachment WILL be on the table.

Republicans may be forced to conclude that to save their own precious hides, and maybe even the GOP itself, they have to cut Bush & Cheney loose. Especially if citizens who live in states with Republican Senators (I do not happen to be one) start calling them up and demanding it.

I believe that's the key to impeachment, and saving our democracy. Don't wait for them to get around to giving it to you; tell them we want it now! We have the power, if we have the will to use it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This investigation nothing but coverup
Posted by: ng1944 on Feb 1, 2007 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Libby was just a bone thrown to Us.
This investigation was nothing but coverup

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tenetive
Posted by: famouspipeliner on Feb 1, 2007 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The resignation of George Tenet was a farce played out on the political stage for the benefit of the administration. By having Mr. Tenet resign due to 'intelligence failures', the White House was able to side-step the question as to whether or not Mr. Bush had deliberately lied to congress when in actuality the only failure was that they (the admin) were caught.
The forthrightness of ambassador Wilson and his wife Valerie Plame marked them for retribution by the White House. Mr.Libby, like Mr. Tenet, is about to be sacrificed to protect those at the top of the pyramid.
We know that the PResident lied to congress...and many congressmen/women voted for war based on those lies. We know that they tried to cover up those lies by claiming they themselves had been deceived by intelligence failures. We know it's all an act.
Why would anyone choose to let Mr. Bush off the hook? How long until the final act of this farce is played out?
It's over Mr. Bush. Resign now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tenetive Posted by: Jennahluv
They may be crooks, but....
Posted by: willymack on Feb 1, 2007 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're OUR crooks. This seems to be the opinion of far too many people in the USA. Of course, the "therefore" or followup to that rationalization never happens, probably because that may require THINKING and its inevitable conclusions. Anyone with even a minimal amount of curiosity, perspicacity, or reasoning ability can clearly see that this crooked regime would make the Capone gang look like choir boys, and are a real threat to our democracy and world peace. The evidence of wrongdoing is a mountain that dwarfs Mt. Everest-far more than enough to indict, try, convict, and imprison the sorry lot, yet NOTHING is done, and they continue to inflict their outrages on us and the world on a daily basis. Maybe we've caught their virus and accepted the rampant corruption among those elected to protect our Conatitutional rights and liberties. Maybe we think "not to worry; somebody will do something, sooner or later". Well it's later-much later and nobody's done a goddam thing. Maybe it's too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Smoking Guns Abound Already
Posted by: fanny666 on Feb 1, 2007 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read Article 6 Section 2 of the US Constitution. This states that international treaties into which we have entered are "The Supreme Law Of The Land".

That means the UN Charter, the UN Convention Against Torture, the Non-Proliferation Treaty, the 4th Geneva Convention are all "The Supreme Law Of The Land" in the US.
Bush has broken all of these treaties.

These are the specific facts we ought to be trying to spread. Rhetoric about how evil he is, he's worse that Hitler, etc. useless. The case is there, it is solid, now we need to be taken seriously.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeachment:
Posted by: surfreality on Feb 1, 2007 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not just for blow jobs anymore!

Best bumper sticker I've seen in a while. But realistically, until a LOT more Dems grow a backbone fuggedaboudit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeachment- Sh*t; Treason
Posted by: mite on Feb 1, 2007 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Article I, Sec: 4, the President, Vice President and 'ALL' civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Article III, Sec: 3, treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of (2) 'TWO' Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in Open Court.

Treason, by Law, is punishable by the Death Penalty!

Treason against the United States is; failure to honor your 'Sworn Oath of Office' as one owing Allegiance to the united States and "We the People."

For 93 sessions of Congress (1913) and 'All' elected and appointed officials we the people have been controlled by both domestic and foreign bankers with Congress surrendering our Constitutional protections under the Law.

To name the most important acts of treason, I direct you to The Federal Reserve Act and Internal Revenue Service Act (16th Amendment). Congress surrendered our nations security, life, liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. Through these acts of treason Congress and Presidents have declared 'WAR' against all of us through letting these 'Private' bankers to start wars, control the value of money, and force inflation upon the country and our children for generations to come.
Article I, Section 8...

To re-enforce the previous acts of treason I direct the people of this republic to the Bill of Rights.
Amendment I-
Congress shall make 'NO' Law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people to peaceably to assemble, and to petion the Government for redress of grievances.

So what charges has Congress and the President- Vice President not committed against this nation (U.S.) and its People? I can not think of any! I honestly believe we have enough charges-documented proof-facts to file treason aginst members of Congress, President, and appointed officials for the past 93 years. I would say even those individuals who go-along to get-along which lead to tyranny and Government the Master.

Stand up people of this republic start filing charges against these traitors.

www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org/form-noticetreason.htm

search freedomtofascism and theft-by-deception at video.google.com and watch proof of treason against us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nancy should put impeachment back on the table.
Posted by: Democritus on Feb 1, 2007 1:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't buy the argument that the House shouldn't impeach Bush because the Senate won't convict. That's not the concern of the House. Besides, if Bush had to fight an impeachment case, he wouldn't have time to send more of our men and women to kill and be killed in the Middle East. Were Bush to be convicted in the Senate, Cheney would justly fear the same fate. His approval numbers are pretty close to zero.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vote Green!
Posted by: Alan8 on Feb 1, 2007 3:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republicans and Democrats are both financed by the same corporations. www.opensecrets.org

There's only one solution: Vote for the Green Party! www.gp.org

The Green Party doesn't accept ANY corporate money, and is the fastest-growing party in America. Although the corporate media, as a rule, doesn't report Green-Party election wins, Green-Party candidates won 68 elections in 2006, and currently have over 200 members in elected offices in 29 states.

The Green Party is the largest non-corrupt party in America. See the difference: www.therealdifference.org/issues2.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lets take a clear look at where we are.
Posted by: SENILEBIKER on Feb 1, 2007 3:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The new congress has been sitting for less than one month and what has so far been achieved in the struggle to turn back the Bush/Cheney dictatorship.

1) The wiretapping program is now subject to FISA
2) Gonzales has agreed to turn over documents concerning the above program
3) Ther Libby trial is opening up all sorts of windows on how the Admininstration manipulated data
4) Bolton/Rumsfeld/Wolfowitz are gone
5) There is about to be a resolution in the Senate which will crticise the "surge", including substantial repub support.


All this in three weeks (plus the 6 legislation in 100 hours).

But what this really means is that the reins of power are unravelling. Congress will be emboldened by their success on the oversight issues, will press harder, and more dirty shit will come out, leading to more investigations.

I believe that they should be impeached, but there needs to be public support. In the same way it took the Joe Public a time to get behind the Liberals ( Secular Progressives, Peaceniks, anti-patriots etc etc etc) in opposing the war, it will take some time for him to get behind impeachment - but with more dirty laundry being aired every week, this will come.

For my money, take a look at Halliburton and the Cheney energy policy - sticking it to Cheney for personal greed is an easier sell than ripping the flag from his hands.

Final point for fun - US costs in Iraq $400bn plus
GNP of Syria $75bn .pa

For the same money, the US could have bought Syria.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeachment No, Crimes Against Humanity Yes
Posted by: sofla100 on Feb 1, 2007 6:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impeachment: Authorizing Torture, Illegal Wiretaps, Guantanamo, Extraordinary Rendition and Valerie Wilson
Number killed or impacted: Several thousand

Crimes against Humanity: Supporting Sectarian Violence, and Illegal War/Invasion
Number killed or impacted: At least 1,000,000 dead
At least 60,000,000 impacted

Kill Comparisions: Joseph Stalin, 20 million
Adolph Hitler, 12 million
Pol Pot, 1.5 million
GW Bush, 1 million
Rwanda, 800,00
Milosevich, 600,000

It seems to me the Crimes Against Humanity argument wins out over impeachment. However, we are likely to see nothing. The primary reason is the political considerations of those in power, I am afraid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Admitting fault
Posted by: phindrup on Feb 1, 2007 6:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is time that Americans did something about ousting Bush and his cronies.
You can no longer claim that 'they' stole the election, that 'we' voted otherwise!
Listen to your Democrats speaking, they are still on about Americans, in relation to the Iraq war. They are taking part in the rhetoric that cis claiming that it is the fault of the Iraqis that the outcome of the invasion is not more to the liking of the US.
You, the Americans, need to stand up and own the fact that the invasions was, and is illegal. That the administration committed war crimes. That your president is a war criminal.
You need to demand, force, compel your government to own this fact.
Will it happen?
Never! Simply because the Americans believe that they have the right to dictate how the rest of the world lives. The right to take whatever any other country has, that they want.
They think that the 9/11 smack in the mouth gives them the right to destroy the world. That American lives are more important than those of any other.
Until real bombs are exploding in your cities Americans will never stand up.
If it makes you feel any better, neither will the Australians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Special
Posted by: special1k on Feb 1, 2007 7:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this something new to ANYONE? I honestly doubt it. The times that we live in now are slipping out of our own control and into the hands of those that love money, and are run by greed more than anything else. What, or better yet when will we stop just talking about "impeachment" and actually actively do something to make it a reality? If anyone has any suggestions or advice as to how to get this ball rolling, I'm all ears and willing to lend my voice to change. veryspecialy2k@yahoo.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What goes around.....
Posted by: COcowboy on Feb 1, 2007 9:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The national budget must be balanced. The public debt must be reduced; the arrogance of the authorities must be moderated and controlled. Payments to foreign governments must be reduced, if the nation doesn't want to go bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living
on public assistance."
-- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 55 BC

It would seem that this has happened before??? Can we get it right this time? Are we really an educated electorate? Do we have the time to fix all these maladies? Interesting questions asked long ago and the people failed to step up and make their leaders toe the line. I leave you with two final quotes;

When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.
-- Thomas Jefferson

Benjamin Franklin once said, "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. "Liberty," he said, "is a well-armed lamb, contesting the vote.”

With Bush and Cheney playing the wolves it is the American people that must stand up and contest the vote via impeachment. If we don't the next batch of wolves will just eat us again...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drunkin',smokin',thinkin',tok'en
Posted by: famouspipeliner on Feb 1, 2007 10:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Faced with the criminality of his regime, Mr. Bush, like Mr. Nixon before him, should face the facts and resign from office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And then,
Posted by: famouspipeliner on Feb 1, 2007 10:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Cheney, having been implicated in the Plame case, must also resign, and the Presidency falls to America's first female president, Nancy Pelosi.
The nomincation process proceeds as per usual, with Ms. Pelosi absenting herself from the selection process.
Congress proceeds with investigations into the actions of the White House and the courts carry out their function.
No more Bullshit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keith Gore Wiseman
Posted by: hughcrossan on Feb 2, 2007 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfowitz, and all their family members. should be declared enemy combatants, detained at Guantanamo in solitary confinement with no right of habeus corpus, and no access to courts for life. They should also be treated to interrogation including pain just short of what they would suffer if their organs were damaged. They proclaim an "eye for an eye" and should be judged by the measure they use to judge others. They are too stupid to realize that this is exactly what the next adminstration may now do to them since they have destroyed America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Mean, Another Smoking Gun?
Posted by: ladyjustice on Feb 2, 2007 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who needs another smoking gun? Aren't we on number 27 or so by now?

simpleimpeach.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Backfire
Posted by: DeeOhGee on Feb 2, 2007 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the reason Dems don't want to impeach is because it will give the GOP too much free [hot] air time. It will also possibly sour a bunch of people against them for wasting gov't money on a doomed prosecution, and it will distract from the candidates in 2008. Even if they win, it will give the new Republican president or VP time to win over the masses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America is not immune to a military coup d’etat
Posted by: gerdhansel on Feb 5, 2007 2:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America is not immune to a military coup d’etat. Or do you really believe the masters of the Pentagon will sit idly by and watch their precious volunteer Army be destroyed by our misadventures in Iraq?

How do the generals and admirals feel about the privatized armies of Kellogg, Brown and Root? Are these mercenaries getting more than their rightful share of the public treasury? Soldiers they trained are selling their skills to the highest corporate bidder. What would MacArthur say about such an abomination? Duty, honor and country my ass!

Will we one day witness the Military District of Washington seizing the White House and installing a “unity” government, live on CNN? Will Abrams tanks and Bradleys camp out in DuPont circle and Foggy Bottom?

We’re becoming a banana republic like Chile or Argentina, run by ever-greedier oligarchs. The middle class is fast disappearing. What if the children of the poor are growing tired of spilling their blood to make Exxon and Halliburton filthy rich? Will these citizen-soldiers rise up against their corporate masters? That’s how banana republic soldiers like Juan Peron came to power.

Remember Burt Lancaster and “Seven Days in May?” Betcha we’ve got a few true-believer officers just like this character who secretly plot scenarios for restoring “honor and justice” to American government at the point of a bayonet.

Why are so many soldiers being sent to the sand box right when this administration is in the most political trouble? Perhaps Cheney and company are afraid that their own “troops” will turn on them and throw them in chains where they belong.

Of course all these paranoid musings beg an obvious question – will the legions crossing the Rubicon (or the Potomac from nearby Fort Bragg) be led by a Julius Caesar or a Francisco Franco?

Think this nightmare scenario can’t happen right here in the USA? Well, nobody ever expected the Spanish Inquisition. Never forget the soldiers’ proverb, “The Army takes care of its own.”

If the Democrats don’t grow a spine and fix this problem soon, I greatly fear our generals and admirals will “take care of their own” and impose their own solution.

Perhaps all the King’s horses and all the King’s men can do a better job with broken Humpty Dumpty than King George the Shrub. But I doubt it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Beats a blow job denial
Posted by: shhazam4 on Feb 6, 2007 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GWB is killing Americans because of his lies, deceptions and misrepresentations of fact.

Impeachment proceedings against GWBush are warranted, demanded, necessary and needed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

W
Posted by: ImSwiss on Feb 7, 2007 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After the impeachment congress must pass a law removing the letter 'W' from the alphabet. Replaced with a '^'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Not Impeach?
Posted by: JDorsch on Feb 7, 2007 3:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The last thing this country needs right now is a further diversion. The Democrats see this practically and not for any lack of guts or will. The country is in terrible shape and there are far too many issues to be addressed: from the war to the numbing amount of money that is being spent. There's no question this administration should be impeached, and much more so than the idiotic reasons they gave for Clinton's impeachment.

We're falling further into the trap el quada has set for us. They have already won if you realize how the Taliban enticed Russia into that war, helping to break the USSR's economy. How long will the US economy hold up under this strain? 164 billion for the next two years, huh? It'll be twice that amount when it comes down to it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's get started
Posted by: blitzmesser on Feb 7, 2007 6:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of talking about impeachment, forever, let's get started to impeach.
What do we need to do?
I am not a politician... I don't know the procedure. I am enraged and want to get rid of this group of criminals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Two More Years
Posted by: mistery509 on Feb 7, 2007 6:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When prosecutor Ken Starr was out to get Clinton he was out there with a vengence. Nothing was going to stop that man. The media had nothing but Starr and Clinton's misdemeaners on the air for months. The whole sad story was on the internet and on TV constantly until finally they were able to find a lie about an affair. Starr brought out witnesses to testify and women where coming out of the woodwork and falling over themselves to be paid and to testify.

But now... What has George Bush got that is so frightening or so hypnotic that no one wants to touch a hair on his poor head. What happened? He is leading the world into a Third World War and no one can stop him. When USA can't even control their own president and his cronies then we wonder what America has become. A dictatorship. He is thumbing his finger at the world and his own country. It's a joke to him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement