Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

'Enemy Combatant' Languishes in a South Carolina Brig

By A.C. Thompson, The Progressive. Posted January 15, 2007.


Three-and-a-half years ago, the Bush Administration effectively disappeared an al-Qaeda suspect, and even the Pentagon’s own internal report finds fault with his treatment there.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

How to describe Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri? The basic bio is easy. He’s a native of Qatar, a member of a prominent Arab tribe. Forty-one-years-old with a mess of coal hair and a beard speckled with gray. Married with five children. Holds a degree in business administration from a small university in Illinois.

And since 2001, when U.S. government agents grabbed al-Marri and accused him of plotting heinous crimes against America, he’s been one of the Bush Administration’s prize prisoners, a trophy captured during the War on Terror.

After reciting these facts, rendering a portrait of the man becomes a challenge -- the U.S. government has thrust him into a vortex, a place from which only minuscule fragments of information dribble out.

Some three-and-a-half years ago, the Pentagon effectively disappeared al-Marri, dubbing him an "enemy combatant," confining him to a solitary cell in the military brig at the Charleston Naval Weapons Station in South Carolina. For seventeen interrogation-heavy months, they barred him even from talking to his attorneys. Now they are the only ones he can talk to.

Citing security concerns, the Defense Department refused to let this reporter interview al-Marri, or even visit the brig to get a sense of how the facility operates. "There are no media visits due to the unique circumstance that an alleged Al Qaeda operative is being held there," says Defense spokesman Navy Lieutenant Commander J. D. Gordon. "There are a wide variety of operational security concerns."

Thus we know very, very little about al-Marri. What does his voice sound like? Is it smooth or raspy? Is it a deep baritone or whiny and high-pitched or somewhere in between? What about his eyes? Do they flit around anxiously? Do they lock onto the person he’s conversing with? Does he cast them sullenly towards the floor?

We can’t tell you.

Is he, as the government contends, an Al Qaeda operative connected to the 9/11 attacks, a guy who surreptitiously moved around money for jihadists and cooked up chemical warfare recipes on his home computer?

We can’t tell you.

Could he be innocent, a victim of this paranoid age?

We can’t tell you.

Despite the informational blackout, we can tell you this: Experts outside the armed forces characterize the conditions of al-Marri’s incarceration -- along with those of a handful of better known prisoners, including alleged dirty-bomb schemer Jose Padilla -- as a subtle brand of torture. Pentagon investigators found problems with the treatment of enemy combatants at the South Carolina brig, according to an internal report obtained by The Progressive.

Now, thanks to recent moves by the administration of George W. Bush -- moves that reflect a drastic restructuring of the American justice system -- al-Marri could languish in this purgatory for decades to come without facing any sort of trial.

The Defense Department has "never admitted that he has any rights, including the right not to be tortured," says Jonathan Hafetz, one of al-Marri’s lawyers. "They’ve created a black hole where he has no rights."

The Arrest

With the government gagging al-Marri and disseminating little information about him, we've got to rely heavily on the court record -- hundreds of pages of paperwork filed in four different federal courthouses -- to tell his story.

One key document is an affidavit written up days after September 11, 2001, by Nichols Zambeck, a special agent with the FBI. That document makes for chilling reading, accusing al-Marri of running a sophisticated credit card fraud operation, and implying he may have somehow been involved in raising or circulating money for the world’s most notorious terrorist group.

At the time in question, al-Marri was dwelling in Peoria, Illinois, and working on a master’s in computer science at Bradley University, the same school he’d attended while earning a BA in business in the 1991.

While he claimed to be studying, al-Marri was actually living in a motel and using a fake name to open a trio of bank accounts for a fake company called AAA Carpet, according to Zambeck and the FBI. The bureau also alleges that al-Marri opened an account with a credit card processing firm, allowing AAA Carpet to conduct credit card transactions. That account was purportedly used to siphon money from twelve stolen credit cards, although agents reportedly discovered evidence of a much larger scam -- more than 1,000 credit card numbers on al-Marri's laptop computer.

When digital analysts with the FBI scrolled through the files on al-Marri’s computer they came across a host of unsettling material, according to Zambeck: audio lectures by Osama bin Laden and his fellow jihadists; photos of the 9/11 attacks; a folder marked "chem" filled with data on deadly chemicals; bookmarked websites about weaponry, computer hacking, phony IDs, and satellite equipment.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: torture, terrorist suspect

Based in San Francisco, A. C. Thompson is a staff writer with SF Weekly, and co-author, with Trevor Paglen, of "Torture Taxi: On the Trail of the CIA’s Rendition Flights."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I have a special file folder.
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Jan 15, 2007 3:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's labeled "Evil", and this is the type of story that goes into it.

This is another place where our "new Democrats" are falling down badly. I don't give a rat's ass WHAT Gonzales and Bush's other pet lawyers say, or how they twist, spin and interpret the law. This is totally against our core document, the Constitution, and it should be declared so, everyone involved with it arrested, orders or not, and the people 'disappeared' freed. This is as un-American as it gets. It is, as I said at first, EVIL. There can be no justification.

The people doing all of this, especially the Pentagon, have made it clear that they regard being held responsible for illegally, immorally and unethically torturing people as a threat to National Security, and that too is a crock. It's no different than a Mob member making a cement anchor around the feet of a murder victim and tossing the corpse overboard to get rid of the evidence. It's self-defense for what is indefensible.

Innocent until proved guilty is gone; "...better to free a hundred guilty men than to hang one innocent man" is gone. Everything we believe in is under threat, and THAT, damn it, IS a threat to National Security. Every lawyer, concerned citizen, cop and anyone else who actually knows what America is about should be screaming in the faces of those responsible, using their police powers, or their legal expertise and anything else necessary to get these people out of where they are being held and tortured. Just barely secondary to that is holding those responsible accountable, NOW. Not years from now, not after some series of debates that allows a few slick, connected shysters to slither out from under. NOW!

The Japanese internment camps were bad enough, and we have admitted what we did, and paid what we could. Now, here we are doing something a thousand times worse! This is the military out of control, this is Jack the Ripper on the damned Supreme Court, and nobody's doing anything! This is a president who would knowingly APPOINT Jack the Ripper, for that matter.

If it were your father being held, beaten, driven insane there in the dark, and they wouldn't release him because they knew damned well he was innocent and they had mistreated him so badly they'd be in serious trouble if he ever got out alive, how would you feel? What would you do? Well, I've got some news for you: if we don't fix this ASAP, one day it WILL be your father - or brother, or someone else you love, or you yourself! Evil feeds on itself, and if no one fights it, it just keeps growing.

Haven't you noticed how the law keeps getting changed, often retroactively (which is also supposed to be illegal) to make it easier to disappear someone, or even execute them, with nothing but someone's suspicion that this person MIGHT have done something wrong? It's getting easier too, for the military to fix up whatever bullshit "evidence" to accuse someone with, and then declare it "classified" so no one can actually check it. Braids and stars, two thousand dollar Brooks Brothers suits and all the other sociopaths in government's asses are covered, and that seems to be all that matters.

And how many convictions have we gotten? How many guilty people have we done this to? I mean REALLY guilty, not framed by the government. NONE, as far as I can tell.

We've become a nation of cowards. This is so illegal that, especially with the legal mechanisms in the hands of the perpetrators, who are knowingly torturing innocent people (CHILDREN, for God's sake!), what is there left to do but show up and physically rescue them?? Really, what is left when they keep changing the law to suit themselves?

Our Founding Fathers would have shown up, weapons in hand. And sadly, their like is not in America today.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I have a special file folder. Posted by: sigridfroid
» RE: I have a special file folder. Posted by: Ian MacLeod
The dude has a mullet, isn't that reason enough to keep him in jail?
Posted by: mat38 on Jan 15, 2007 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Bush's Nazi America anyone and everyone whos

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NeoCons
Posted by: mizipi on Jan 15, 2007 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yep, back when Clinton was prez, the right-wing-nuts said over and over again how Clinton was a serial liar and hider of the truth. I once asked an ex-good buddy of mine to tell me one lie Clinton told that did not involve smoking reefer or sex, and my ex-neo-con friend could not name one lie. Now, Bush & Co. lie and hide the truth and all of these neo-cons feel so patriotic. These people are scared of Saddam, Osama, the Truth. That's why they all stay here in the US and holler and shout, they do not have the guts to practice what they preach. Jesus called these people hypocrits and prayed for them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When the Devil Creates a Devil by Becky Akers
Posted by: rwa on Jan 15, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A US district judge sentenced notorious terrorist, Shahawar Siraj, to 30 years in prison this past Monday for agreeing to blow up a subway station in Manhattan. The next day, his family was arrested on immigration charges.

No doubt you’re scratching your head, trying to recall who Shahawar Siraj is. If he’s dangerous enough to merit 30 years in the slammer and a deported family, why haven’t you heard of him? Likely because his case doesn’t pass the laugh test. The usual suspects are bragging that their jihad against him has saved civilization, but it’s shamefaced bragging of the kind you hear when a 10th grader beats up a kindergartner.

Siraj was a 22-year-old Pakistani working in Brooklyn at an Islamic bookstore – located, ominously enough, next to a mosque. Both Siraj’s family and his attorneys have described him as "witless and impressionable." His uncle admitted, "He’s my nephew, but he’s not too bright".

Siraj’s hours in the bookstore, as well as his lack of sophistication recommended him to 50-year-old Osama Eldawoody. An Egyptian immigrant who became a US citizen, Eldawoody is also a "paid police informant." For several years after 9/11, he and an undercover cop prowled the bookstore. Eldawoody collected $100,000 of our taxes for chatting up "radical young Moslem men," a.k.a. customers at the bookstore, and for reporting the license-plate numbers of cars parked at the mosque. Wouldn’t it be easier if we simply required Moslems to wear yellow crescents on their sleeves?

The snitch and his undercover sidekick honed in on Siraj, and another dim wit as well. James Elshafay is 21; his short life has been nasty and brutish. His Irish mother and Egyptian father separated when he was a toddler. He suffers from schizophrenia and depression, as do other members of his family. He drank to excess, sniffed glue, and dropped out of the ninth grade. He volunteered for the Army, but he was so damaged even they wouldn’t have him. In short, Elshafay and his friend Siraj sound more like threats to themselves than to the American Way of Life.

Enter Eldawoody, the NYPD, the FBI, and the whole aparatus fighting a largely invented but highly useful "War on Terror."

Eldawoody showed Siraj and Elshafay pictures of their fellow Moslems’ torture at Abu Ghraib and told them US soldiers were raping Iraqi girls. He claimed he belonged to a terrorist organization – well, OK, he does collaborate with the Feds – and could supply explosives. According to Siraj, Eldawoody suggested "blowing up the buildings and blowing up the Wall Street places." Unfortunately for Siraj and Elshafay, the man pretending to be their friend and Moslem mentor was wearing a wire. When Siraj exclaimed, "That [US soldiers’ raping Iraqi girls] was enough for me. I'm ready to do anything. I don't care about my life," Eldawoody’s tape caught it. Trying to impress the older man, Siraj also mentioned blowing up the subway stop. He and Elshafay allegedly possessed crude drawings of the station when they were arrested.

Siraj was tried and convicted in May. The chief witnesses against him were the drugged Elshafay, the corrupt Eldawoody, and his own words, taped without his knowledge. Siraj has no criminal record. He was a member of no terrorist organization. He possessed no explosives or other means of carrying out the scenarios Eldawoody concocted. Nevertheless, Judge Nina Gershon sentenced him to 30 years. Ray Kelly, New York’s police commissioner, called this travesty "an important milestone in safeguarding New York against terrorist plotters whether home-grown or foreign." But Siraj’s attorney described it truthfully: "In essence, what we have is the NYPD creating a crime so they can solve the crime and claim a victory in the war on terror. What the government has done... is really creating a devil so that they can lock up the devil."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ask mommy! Posted by: IanA
» Tune In Posted by: rwa
Isn't it time?
Posted by: badkitty on Jan 15, 2007 8:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't it time to abolish our military? These are our soldiers (or sailors, I'm not clear), committing human rights violations with our tax dollars. Support our troops, Country Joe and all you other faux patriots? I say, dismantle the military. And as for the people (using the term loosely, of course) involved in this man's mistreatment, they need to go to jail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Isn't it time? Posted by: Ian MacLeod
Why this kind of secrecy?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jan 15, 2007 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "War On Terror" was initiated largely because of the September 11 hijackings/suicide bombings and the following anthrax attacks on the American people (which were first sent to three media outlets: a Florida tabloid, the NY Post and NBC news, and when that failed to get much attention, a high-tech weaponized form was sent to Leahy and Daschle, which did get attention).

There is ample evidence that the Bush administration had prior warning about major terror plot involving the hijacking of airliners; there is the primary evidence of the Aug 6th PDB which said this: "patterns of suspicious activity consistent with preparations for hijackings..."; there was also Coleen Rowley's memo to the FBI, quote: " In the day or two following September 11th, you, Director Mueller, made the statement to the effect that if the FBI had only had any advance warning of the attacks, we (meaning the FBI), may have been able to take some action to prevent the tragedy." - in fact, there was ample evidence and 9/11 could have been prevented.

So, why the secrecy surrounding the capture of people connected with the 9/11 attacks? Why was Khalid Shiek Mohammed, the 'mastermind of 9/11', shoved down a dark CIA hole? Why wasn't he put on trial? Could it be that he would have revealed information that was extremely embarrassing to the Bush Administration, such as the fact that Saudi oil money was the primary fund conduit to Al Queda and Osama bin Ladin? That whole story is well told in Forbidden Truth: U.S.-Taliban Secret Oil Diplomacy, Saudi Arabia and the Failed Search for bin Laden by Jean-Charles Brisard, Guillaume Dasquie and Lucy Rounds

It's worth remembering what initiated the whole CIA secret prison / enemy combatant / Iraqi torture program. It's also worth remembering that the anthrax attacks created at least as much fear in this country as the 9/11 terror attacks did; they shut down the Congress at the very moment that the US Patriot Act (i.e. the domestic spying act) was being debated; and that the FBI has stalled the anthrax investigation, replaced the investigation heads several times, and refused to look into the real connections between the anthrax attacks and a number of secretive programs run by the US Army, SAIC, the CIA and Battelle Memorial Institute - projects whose names were "Bacchus", "Clear Vision", and "Project Jefferson" - projects that produced weaponized anthrax spores identical to those used in the Leahy and Daschle letters, among other products. (see the blue box in the above link to the Arms Control Association).

Note also the massive expansion of the US biowarfare program under the rubric of "Project Bioshield" and Battelle Memorial's new contracts to build massive new biowarfare research facilities at USAMRIID, Fort Detrick, MD and also at Lawrence Livermore Labs, Tracy, CA. Needless to say, this is sheer insanity.

A blind idiot could have done a better job then the FBI with respect to the anthrax investigations.

Similarly, the 'enemy combatant' program with its secret military tribunals is just another attempt to keep extremely embarrassing and potentially incriminating information from the American public. Part of that campaign has included straw man smear propaganda (which has been responsible for the "bombs in the WTC, missles in the Pentagon", "it was the Zionists", "It was the Illuminati", 911truth.org, etc.).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Land of the free and home of the brave?
Posted by: daro on Jan 15, 2007 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No way, not any more.

Guantanamo, rendition and incidents such as this put paid to any notion of "free".
The mass hysteria following 9/11 and the pumped-up "War on Terror" make a mockery of "brave".

And still it remains a close call between those who support Bush and those who oppose him with the vast, supine, ignorant and uncaring majority content to get on with their comfortable lives and look the other way.

How far your country has sunk since 2000. How much further will this freefall take you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We are the guilty ones.
Posted by: WitchyNy on Jan 15, 2007 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not about if this man or any man is guilty or innocent. It is about us ...We the People of The United States of America and what we stand for and believe in.
Do we believe in 'Innocent until proven quilty' anymore-or not?
Do we believe in the right to a speedy trial anymore-or not?

These issues were among the reasons for our revolution against England and the founding of our flawed but dream filled country.
King George after all, had the power of God.
Now we have our own King George.
Do we believe in our dreams anymore-or not?
Today is MLK day. Dreams and the Persuit of Happiness..where have they gone?

The question is not.... is this man guilty or not...the question is- are we? What drove Arab people to hate us so that they would willingly fly planes into our buildings?

We all know our government just saw this an a great excuse to steal oil. (And the Presidents brother just happened to be head of security for the 911 building? COME ON).

Add to this the insane idea that Christians are somehow closer to God than Muslims...well then Bush can justify anything.
"Just an old scrap of paper'.
They never think that is also true of their precious bible.

Somehow we the people need to come together and stop this.
Remember the Seattle 3 day strike in 1919? The whole city just stopped going to work.
If we slaves just all stopped working for this system-Imagine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to Remember the Beginning...
Posted by: Rathan47 on Jan 15, 2007 11:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some wise words here...

Seems to me they have mostly been forgotten...

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776

And so, most Americans sit...and suffer...rather than right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. What abuses and usurpations will be required before the populace takes action? I fear the answer is far too many, and far too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

History
Posted by: Falang on Jan 15, 2007 4:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
History teach us that everytime leaders are pushing themself over the law or think they are over the law, those regime are coming back to bite the a.. of their own citizen one way or the other. When they do that, when they are coming to bite you they are telling that is for your own good that they are doing that.

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Benjamin Franklin

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jose Padilla cont.
Posted by: World Can't Wait on Jan 15, 2007 8:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Case of Jose Padilla: A Nightmarish Farce of Legal Proceeding

Unbelievable that these things can really be happening in this country. Fascism is creeping in and not enough seem to notice...
Those that do, however, are making noise...listen for it. JANUARY 27 will be loud. UFPJ, World Can't Wait, and many more...

If not us, who? If not now, when?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time To Ask Yourself The Unthinkable About McCain...
Posted by: Carl Street on Jan 17, 2007 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do we REALLY know McCain is a Vietnam Vet and/or POW?

Sounds insane, but, the truth is we ONLY know what we have been told. And we DO know that we are often told lies -- big lies; lies so outrageous that at the time it seems impossible that they are not true.

This is the Hitler propaganda technique personified -- "if you say something so absolutely outrageous; people naturally assume it must be true for they believe, quite naturally, that no one would tell such a lie..."

For all we know McCain is NOT even a Vietnam veteran; much less a former POW. Unfortunately, we live in times and with a government that makes ANY assumption regarding the truth of what we are told to be risky; and the wise person questions ALL and accepts NONE.

In these times the honest person is at a distinct disadvantage -- most of us limit our untruths to telling telemarketers we already own a product, etc. but since we NEVER would tell huge, damaging lies, we make the misguided assumption that others also would not. AND, that is just the state of mind the PIPS (People In Power) are counting on to get away with their lies.

It only stands to reason that people who would not hesitate for a minute to engage in mass killing on an industrial scale and risk the existence of the entire human race to make a buck would have absolutely NO hesitation to tell lies on an industrial scale as well -- especially since they control the records, sources of information; threaten and kill those who do not go along; as well as the mass media.

The truth is I do NOT REALLY know McCain is a Vietnam Vet and/or POW; and neither do you. NOT even his family REALLY knows; any letters he wrote could easily have been faked and he could have been sunning himself in some CIA resort during his "POW" Days.

Witnesses??? Do you mean fellow "POW's" who could easily have been at that SAME resort??

Military records??? Do you mean those same military records that gave us the "Gulf of Tonkin Incident"??? Or those military records that gave us "Weapons of Mass Destruction In Iraq"???

At a minimum we must confront the fact that McCain is a roper -- a person who is used to compromise and mislead the public on a grand scale. I find it hard to believe that anyone who purports to be what McCain claims to be would advocate putting American Service Personnel at risk in "Iraq-nam".

So I feel it is my duty to ask, "What is wrong with this picture?" and personally I must adopt the Sherlock Holmes premise:

"When all other explanations have been elminated; what is left; no matter how unlikely; MUST be the truth."

And, based on that, I feel the probability that McCain claiming to be a Vietnam POW to be right up there with him claiming to be an alien abductee. I may NOT be right; but you must admit it IS a distinct possibility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LANGUISHES??
Posted by: packer29 on Jan 17, 2007 3:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Put this human predator in the conditions of any third world prison and see if "LANGUISHES" is the right word for a South Carolina Brig. When is the last time Amnesty International or the Red Cross inspected the prisons in Chad, Sudan, even Mexico, or Iraq in the days of Sadaam? Let's put some perspective on criticisms of our own country. Yes we must do better--but the rest of the world lags far behind u.s. in human rights protections. Bigger fish to fry!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: LANGUISHES?? Posted by: levp
War on Terror long over, release pow's
Posted by: jmonday on Jan 21, 2007 1:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Face it, wars over, we lost. It was over long ago, right after 911 when instead of standing by our superior principals and society, fiercely fighting back against assaults on our way of life, Bush surrendered, eagerly giving up our most precious freedoms like free speech, privacy and rule of law to sink to the level of slimebag terrorists and fight them on their terms. When questioning this became "un-american" and helping "the terrorists" it was over, when "freedom" became the Allah of our own jihad, an incitement for the masses offered up to the carnage by both sides for reasons far baser than god or country he had sold us out. They won, he won, Halliburton won, Carlyle groupies won, we lost, Humanity that is. This defunct war on terror pays too handsomely to ever admit its loss,this charade of Bush's will rage on forever, or as long as we let it, ever shifting, morphing reasons and enemies but with us always ending up with less money, more work and robbed of the rights to stop it and the wealthiest will, of course do their part by getting wealthier.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why?
Posted by: jmonday on Jan 21, 2007 3:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How did we get to being what this story confirms? Why wasn't Bush stopped long ago? GOP such a cohesive party it went along with the most indescribably bad ideas on loyalty to an Administration led by a petulant bully and born-again dry drunk with a wealthy bunch of family and friends whose role to W was pulling strings for him to ease his rise to the top, avoiding that bootstrap bullshit he now tells poor people to get their ass up and do. A regime staffed top to bottom with extreme neo-cons and fundamentalist would be theocrats, "well, what can we do? he's party leader? Did the party so vigilant of threats in the oval office they spent years and millions to save our nation from the certain destruction that Bill Clinton threatened us with by lying about a blowjob, really think that lying about damn near everything to start a bloody unnecessary war is not nearly as bad, certainly not grounds for inquiry or even oversight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]