COMMENTS: 75
'Stealth' Bush Appointee Worries About Wayward Wives
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.
He teaches that there is a physiological cause [pdf link] for relationship failure and sexual promiscuity -- a hormonal cause-and-effect that can only be short-circuited by sexual abstinence until marriage. (Editor's note: The following images, except when otherwise noted, are from the PowerPoint presentation described and linked to above.)
He's the full-time medical director for A Woman's Concern, a chain of Boston area crisis pregnancy centers, where he spreads all the usual lies about abortion and uses ultrasound scans as a tool to influence the decisions of women who might be considering abortion.

He was one of the "experts" who determined that federally funded abstinence education programs must mention contraceptives only in relation to their failure rates and promote abstinence until marriage.
Now, in what has been characterized as a "stealth" appointment by the Bush administration, we hear that Dr. Eric Keroack is set to assume a new post as the deputy assistant secretary for population affairs. The DASPA oversees a number of Health and Human Services programs, including the Office of Family Planning.
Keroack works his heart out for the Christian right. And it appears that, as of Monday morning, he'll be working for us, too.
Last June, Keroack was a featured speaker at the 10th Annual International Abstinence Leadership Conference in Kansas City, where he provided his somewhat unorthodox insights into the role of hormones in relationship failure.
Oxytocin is a hormone whose actions are associated with pregnancy, breastfeeding, and maternal-infant bonding -- and, according to Keroack, it's the tie that binds in marriage, as well. People don't fall in love, but into hormonal bondage. Therefore, the most important rationale for sexual abstinence isn't faith-based at all, but purely physiological. Unfaithful men and promiscuous women are created by misuse of the "emotional glue" of attraction, an abuse leading to a "perpetual cycle of misery."

In his presentation at the 10th Annual Abstinence Leadership Conference in Kansas City earlier this month, Dr. Eric Keroack ... explained that oxytocin is released during positive social interaction, massage, hugs, "trust" encounters, and sexual intercourse. "It promotes bonding by reducing fear and anxiety in social settings, increasing trust and trustworthiness, reducing stress and pain, and decreasing social aggression," he said.
Forty percent of couples who live together break up before they marry and of the 60 percent that do marry, 40 percent of them divorce after 10 years. ... So why do so many adults continue in a cycle of sex without a marriage commitment, cohabitation, and failed relationships? This perpetual cycle of misery is due largely to the role of oxytocin. The following is Dr. Keroack's explanation of the cycle:
Emotional pain causes our bodies to produce an elevated level of endorphins which in turn lowers the level of oxytocin. Therefore, relationship failure leads to pain which leads to elevated endorphins which leads to lower oxytocin, the result of which is a lower ability to bond. Many in this increased state of emotional pain and lower oxytocin seek sex as a substitute for love, which inevitably leads to another failed relationship, and so on, the cycle continues.There is hope for the weary brokenhearted, Dr. Keroack said, but it requires abstinence and plenty of time for healing.
Keroack's fitting title for that novel presentation [PowerPoint link] was "If I Only Had a Brain." In an unpublished article that has become an established text of the abstinence movement, he wrote, "People who have misused their sexual faculty and become bonded to multiple persons will diminish the power of oxytocin to maintain a permanent bond with an individual." Keroack's teaching on the role of "God's 'super-glue'" is accepted as irrefutable in an article titled Fornication and Oxytocin.

In women, a more positive relationship with her mate is associated with higher levels of oxytocin. This suggests that a woman's previous sexual relationships can alter the release of the biochemical "super-glue." If a woman's sexual history is sufficiently adverse, she will lose her ability to bond in the current relationship. An interesting finding in oxytocin research is the likelihood that oxytocin inhibits the development of tolerance in the brain's opiate receptors. The excitement of sex is partly credited to endorphins exciting opiate receptors. As a human relationship matures, fewer endorphins are released. If sexual relationships are well bonded, though, the oxytocin response maintains the excitement despite how few endorphins are released. This keeps excitement present between oxytocin-bonded couples. In the same way, though, these studies reveal the rationale behind an inability of some to stay bonded in seemingly good relationships. People who have misused sex to become bonded with multiple persons will diminish their oxytocin bonding within their current relationship. In the absence of oxytocin, the person will find less or no excitement. The person will then feel the need to move on to what looks more exciting.
Medical Information provided by: "Bonding Imperative," (a special report from the Abstinence Medical Council) by Eric J. Keroack, M.D., FACOG and John R. Diggs Jr., M.D.The article speculates that "the science is still new, and more must be learned concerning the role of oxytocin in human bonding," but the inescapable conclusion is that keeping a woman abstinent until she walks down the aisle is the best way to keep her faithful after the honeymoon's over.
At Brandeis University's 2002 Christian Awareness Week, Keroack presented the grim vision of human sexuality that he brings with him to the agency that directs the Office of Adolescent Pregnancy Programs.
Eric Keroack, medical director of A Woman's Concern Health Centers, a pro-life counseling organization, said sexual activity today is comparable to warfare.
"Sexual activity is a war zone," he said. "What we have is this ongoing war. So we're constantly coming up with better equipment," he said, referring to contraceptive strategies and abortions.
"And the truth is that somewhere along the way people die in war," Keroack added. He acknowledged that deaths from abortion-related complications are rare, but that "they die emotionally."Knowing how Keroack feels about sex unsanctioned by marriage should have prepared us for his expert medical opinion of birth control. And he also has helped to pioneer the use of ultrasound as a high-tech weapon in the war on abortion.
Focus on the Family applauds Keroack's use of ultrasound to influence women whom Keoack describes as "abortion vulnerable." As medical director of five Boston-area crisis pregnancy centers, Keroack oversees ultrasound scans that he says help to provide "informed consent" for abortion procedures, even though their admitted purpose is to prevent those procedures from ever taking place.
[T]he odds that an unborn child will be brought to term, rather than aborted, can be very nearly inverted by an ultrasound examination, according to a study undertaken by A Woman's Concern, a group of crisis-pregnancy centers in eastern Massachusetts. Before introducing routine ultrasound examinations for the women who visited their centers, A Woman's Concern (AWC) found that 61 percent of the women classified by counselors as "abortion-vulnerable" would opt for abortion prior to an ultrasound examination, while 33.7 percent would choose to carry the pregnancy to term. Once ultrasound examinations were provided, 63.5 percent of the same "abortion-vulnerable" women decided to continue their pregnancies, and only 24.5 percent chose abortion.
Like most other CPCs, AWC was established to serve women who are alarmed by the prospect of pregnancy, and actively considering abortion. At the centers, trained counselors do their best to provide moral guidance and support to women who are often facing objectively horrific situations.
But in many cases, the best efforts of AWC counselors are not enough to change a woman's mind. For the first several years of the organization's existence, roughly two-thirds of the women who entered an AWC center planning to procure an abortion carried through with that plan.
The results of ... ultrasound examinations, beginning in 2000, were so impressive that AWC soon adopted "the medical model" for all five centers. ... The results of the ultrasound examination are assessed by AWC's medical director, Dr. Eric Keroack, a board-certified ob/gyn.
For crisis-pregnancy centers, the AWC study suggests that investment in ultrasound equipment -- and qualified medical personnel handle that equipment -- could be the most effective way to drive down the number of abortions. Women facing problem pregnancies have no reason not to accept the offer of a free ultrasound test, and the results of that offer could be dramatic.
As detailed in the article quoted above, the AWC centers directed by Keroack delay women's access to abortion care by suggesting to them that early miscarriages are common, that they could have an ectopic pregnancy or a blighted ovum, and that it would be best to wait a few weeks before making an appointment for an abortion: "For the CPC counselors, meanwhile, the extra two to three weeks provide another opportunity to persuade the woman that she should continue her pregnancy. And if the process calls for a follow-up ultrasound examination, there is one more opportunity for the mother to bond with her unborn child."
Aside from emerging evidence of the damaging effects of repeated, prolonged and unnecessary ultrasound exposure upon a developing fetus, professional medical organizations have ethical concerns about nonmedical uses of ultrasound technology.
Professional organizations such as the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), Society for Diagnostic Medical Sonography (SDMS), American College of Radiology (ACR) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have clarified statements on ultrasound's nonmedical use. "These statements support the use of sonography for medical diagnostic purposes," says Stephanie Ellingson, M.S., RDMS, RDCS, RVT, RT(R), director of the diagnostic medical sonography program at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics in Iowa City. "That is very different from a nondiagnostic image created and shared specifically with the purpose of influencing a patient's decision."
Not surprisingly, this same unpublished "study" by Keroack has been used to advance proposed legislation to purchase ultrasound machines for crisis pregnancy centers with federal funds -- bills such as the Pregnant Women Support Act inspired by the Trojan donkeys of Democrats for Life of America, whose legislative initiative boasts the full support of the Christian right. And why not, when its abortion-reducing initiatives consist of funding CPCs and imposing restrictive federal regulation upon doctors who provide abortion care, while excluding all support for access to contraception?
Dr. Eric Keroack has compiled quite a record as the Christian right's man in Boston. He now seems set to become their man in Washington, D.C. -- and ours as well, whether we want him or not.
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 16, 2006 2:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A WORD ABOUT DR. ERIC
Posted by: markusmark
» RE: A WORD ABOUT DR. ERIC
Posted by: Tamar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jaycubed on Nov 16, 2006 3:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bugs Bunny+drugs+energizer bunny.
Fred Flintstone=Good role model.
Zeus prevents Popeye from having a satisfying orgasm.
Nerve cells should have happy faces & umbrellas or they'll get run over by trains at RR crossings.
And why is Dino so happy?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: HUH?!
Posted by: Jaycubed
» RE: HUH?!
Posted by: elmarco
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwes on Nov 16, 2006 3:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Another Bush/Republican WingNut spouting fear and idiotic diatribe
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Nov 16, 2006 3:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am reading through this man's report... I don't even know where to start! I can't believe this person has an MD.
The "superior region of the hippocampus" is a "bonding center of the brain" and that "damage" can lead to "pornography"?!
There's no such thing as a "superior region of the hippocampus" and if there were, it certainly is not involved in "bonding"... it's a center for learning and memory consolidation!
I can't wait to sit down and read the whole thing, this is better than the comics or even the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Thank you. The reporter could not be bothered with evidence, pro or con.
Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: Neuroendocrinology?
Posted by: laoma
» RE: Neuroendocrinology?
Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Neuroendocrinology?
Posted by: Amy Alkon
» Some specifics
Posted by: fanny666
» RE: Some specifics
Posted by: insulaparadigm
» RE: Some specifics
Posted by: insulaparadigm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CMaciolek on Nov 16, 2006 3:54 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Abject Fear.
Posted by: swissliberal
» RE: Abject Fear.
Posted by: kenn
Comments are closed-
Posted by: anambrose on Nov 16, 2006 4:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: edith on Nov 16, 2006 4:23 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However I would rather take the advice of the many teenagers I know from a variety of background over any "medical" advice of this quack from Boston(usually a bastion of rational thought and top-rated medicine). Is there anything this weirdo has done that could trigger a complaint to state health regulatory authorities? His potatohead practice should be investigated file by file, speech by speech, PR release by PR release.
This is a test for the new Senate. Not only all the Democrats should vote against this witch doctor, but "common sense" (McCain's new self-definition) conservatives like McCain and Graham should demand this nomination of Dr. Wacko be withdrawn. Let him be White House physician for W's last two years.
If Harry Reid can't block this, he should quit as Majority Leader and just hand the Senate over to Dick Cheney.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is a Test
Posted by: dkm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sofla100 on Nov 16, 2006 4:54 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Nov 16, 2006 5:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. A pile of porn as high as the Eiffel Tower
or
2. An abortion in his past - that he paid for
or
3. 'Unnatural' sexually perverted thoughts on a very frequent basis
or
4. A penis the size of a miniature ear of corn
or
5. Insert your idea here.
It's simple folks. ANYONE who rails on sex this hard is doing some pretty disgusting things while we're not watching. Ted Haggard proved it in spades. ALL Christians who focus way too much on this topic are immediately suspect.
Who is doing the investigation into this man's past and present? Anyone? I hope someone drags his dirt out for us to see soon - before he fucks the rest of the nation up.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Closet Meet Skeleton
Posted by: edith
» RE: Closet Meet Skeleton
Posted by: markusmark
» RE: Closet Meet Skeleton
Posted by: pamelawy
» the louder the screecher
Posted by: goatini
Comments are closed-
Posted by: algodees on Nov 16, 2006 6:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Nov 16, 2006 8:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In other words... WOMEN are the ones we need to worry about... it is THEIR infidelity, THEIR promiscuity, and THEIR sexuality that we must see as a threat and that we must check.
Same old tired line. Same old tired misogynistic line.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SOS Same old shit
Posted by: kbiteye
» RE: SOS Same old shit -
Posted by: AdamSelene40
Comments are closed-
Posted by: not_the_preferred_nomenclature on Nov 16, 2006 8:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right wing and fakeLeft--part of the overclass team!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: fakeleftist media works hand in hand with the rightwing to keep social issues in focus
Posted by: kbiteye
» RE: fakeleftist media works hand in hand with the rightwing to keep social issues in focus
Posted by: mike1997
» RE: fakeleftist media works hand in hand with the rightwing to keep social issues in focus
Posted by: aerdrie
» RE: Troll CryOfan's sockpuppet strikes again. He hates an article on a very important subject
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob
» He doesn't want real change. He wants to make himself feel good.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lector on Nov 16, 2006 11:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lector on Nov 16, 2006 11:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lector on Nov 16, 2006 11:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mule17 on Nov 17, 2006 5:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: londonangel on Nov 17, 2006 6:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: londonangel
Posted by: Think!
» RE: Worth letting them know. If they sue, it could put these freaks out of business or at least call
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kwalls on Nov 17, 2006 6:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ignorance never changes... people who are ignorant and fear-ridden want everyone else to experience their miserable state because someone who is intelligent, reasoning, happy and self-determining shows them how f*@ked up they are!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Peasantwitch on Nov 17, 2006 7:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where is this fool finding statistics, not to mention hard biological research, to back up his insane ravings?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Brandeis Not So Jewish
Posted by: edith
» RE: Oxymoron...moron about oxytocin
Posted by: churchofone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: edith on Nov 17, 2006 8:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given that the population control issue has been politicized by the GOP at least since Reagan, the Democratic Congress should tack a mandate for Senate confirmation of the birth control population post on to some appropration bill much loved by W.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Contact your Congresspersons/Senators on Committees that oversee it. They will surely be
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob
Comments are closed-
Posted by: needlefoot on Nov 17, 2006 9:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In other words, Dr. Keroack uses his own bs to prove more of his own bs.
I turn my back on such mind-numbing crap.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lizzzarde on Nov 17, 2006 9:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THIS guy is more dangerous because if he has his way, The Handmaidens Tale will be our lifestyle. He has just been put in the powerful position of forcing women into pregnancy. And who will be the most vulnerable: poor women, women of color, illiterate women, teens, the uneducated. He gives groups like the Quiverfulls power for growth AND he has the power to influence our personal choices.
Again I say: lets spend our time focusing on the scary and dangerous things being forced on us by the government. Perhaps now is a good time to contact your elected officials and protest this appointment. The fact that it does not need Congressional approval doesn't mean your Congress men and women can't address it...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: See...
Posted by: aerdrie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: harpy on Nov 17, 2006 11:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» From Winthrop to Emerson
Posted by: edith
» RE: From Winthrop to Emerson
Posted by: goeswithness
» RE: From Winthrop to Emerson
Posted by: goeswithness
» RE: From Winthrop to Emerson
Posted by: ncdave4life
» With thanksgiving coming you forgot
Posted by: jwg
» The myth of George HW Bush's eugenics campaign
Posted by: ncdave4life
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 4Reality on Nov 17, 2006 6:21 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dkm on Nov 17, 2006 9:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only thing that will save us is something similar to what got Hanes or whatever his name was, publication of his sexual perversions. Maybe this guy doesn't go in for forced anal intercourse with his wife or monthly meetings with a gay prostitute, but it is sure and certain that he has some sort of sick perversion in his background. Sexual weirdos like him always do.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Taarak on Nov 17, 2006 10:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Department of Health and Human Services established the Office of Public Health and Science which established The Office of Population Affairs which established the Family Planning program and the Adolescent Family Life Demonstration and Research program. The Office of Population Affairs has a 2005 budget of $288,000,000 DOLLARS.
These funds are for 1) To pay the salaries and 2) To give GRANTS. Who gets the grants? Who gave the most contributions? No, really…the grants are distributed nationwide on a bid system, and mostly go to clinics giving out brochures on abstinence and (yikes!) condom usage.
These two programs alone have bids out for about 20 grants. That’s 28.8 MILLION DOLLARS for each grant for publishing brochures on abstinence? I would sure like to know, now that Dr. Keroack is in charge of where this money is to go – WHERE THIS MONEY IS GOING!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sparks56 on Nov 18, 2006 3:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Then What?
Posted by: Lily H.
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Think! on Nov 18, 2006 4:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did Energizer license the image? If yes, BOYCOTT!!! If no, then Keroack is breaking the law by using it. For all the teenagers who've been sued for music swapping, can it be seriously argued that this isn't a thousand times worse? In case they weren't aware, I'm sending them a tip right now.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Anyone see an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY problem?
Posted by: Think!
» Far Side
Posted by: Swatopluk
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jgdewey on Nov 18, 2006 9:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwg on Nov 20, 2006 3:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or would if there wasn't a war on drugs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Andy Lee Parker on Nov 23, 2006 10:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Christian soldiers to march onward to their perpetual war, and keep arms manufacturers and their investors perpetually wealthy. Disgusting. Wouldn't it be great if everyone in the world realized simultaneously that it was arms manufacturers who are the true enemy? And they who pay people to stir up trouble in order to sell arms to both sides, divide and conquer, so that puppet regimes can be installed to pillage the natural resources?t Too bad there isn't a deck of cards with the pictures of all the arms manufacturers/war profiteers on them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ncdave4life on Nov 28, 2006 3:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As you can see, the information that AWC gives women is balanced, accurate, and honest. But that's the problem. AWC tells women the truth, including the hard truths that anti-abstinence zealots refuse to admit, like the fact that women who rely upon condoms for protection against HPV will usually become infected anyhow, even though condoms are the most effective form of contraception for protecting against HPV.
Dr. Keroack has not been appointed to the position of cheerleader for artificial contraception. He is not against family planning. He is against letting people get hurt because they have been duped into thinking that contraceptives make sex "safe." There is nothing in the job description of the HHS Deputy Assistant Secretary of Population Affairs requiring that he help perpetuate dangerous myths about contraception.
If you want to know the actual job description, go to http://opa.osophs.dhhs.gov/opa.html.
It is the responsibility of those in authority, but especially of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, to be honest about the drawbacks of artificial contraception, as well as its usefulness.
The fact is that the drawbacks are many and serious.
One of the most widespread and deadly misconceptions about contraception is that condoms eliminate the risk of sexual transmission of STDs. Actually, condoms provide less than 100% effective protection against even those diseases that they are most effective against, and have little to no effectiveness against some others.
Consider HPV. Several studies have found that condoms offer no protection against transmission of HPV, though one small recent study (Winer et al) of 82 female U. Washington students found that condoms may provide 70% effective protection over an eight month period.
In other words, 70% effectiveness is the MOST optimistic result seen in any study so far, and it relied upon some questionable assumptions which, if erroneous, would most likely mean that the study over-estimated the protection afforded by condom use. For instance, the study authors made no attempt to identify the HPV infection status of the women's male partners, and assumed that men who use condoms have the same likelihood of carrying the disease as do men who don't use condoms - which is a particularly strange assumption for a study that purports to show that condoms reduce the transmission of HPV!
But even if we assume, for the sake of argument, that the Winer / U.Washington study's optimistic result is correct, it still means that it is folly to rely on condoms for protection against HPV. At first glance, 70% sounds pretty good. But it isn't, because the study length was just 8 months, and most sexually active people don't stop having sex after 8 months.
Consider an analogy. Removing 5 of the 6 bullets in a revolver is 83% effective at preventing death from Russian Roulette. Right?
Well, not necessarily. It depends on how often you play. If you will only play only once, removing 5 of the 6 bullets provides 83% effective protection.
But if you will play Russian Roulette more than once, removing 5 bullets is much less effective at protecting you.
If you play Russian Roulette 100 times, it does not matter how many bullets are in the gun. A person playing Russian Roulette 100 times with a six-shot revolver containing only one bullet has just one chance in 82 million of surviving.
[cont'd...]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ncdave4life on Nov 28, 2006 4:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's not a typo. "83% effective" protection equals ODDS OF EIGHTY-TWO MILLION TO ONE AGAINST SURVIVAL if you play the game 100 times.
Likewise, using the optimistic results of the Winer / U. Washington study, if condoms are 70% effective at preventing transmission of HPV for 8 months, one can calculate that they will be much less than 50% effective at preventing it for 3 years, and much less than 10% effective at preventing it for 10 years.
In other words, if a woman replies on condoms for long term protection against HPV, and she has sex with an HPV-infected partner, she is almost certain to contract one or more strains of the virus.
What's more, the Winer / U. Washington study found that most of the new HPV infections they detected were with "high-risk" strains (which cause cervical cancer). Worse yet, most of the new infections were with high-risk HPV strains which are NOT protected against by the new anti-HPV vaccine.
Dr. Keroack is pro-life. That follows naturally because Dr. Keroack is a Christian who practices his Faith. That means that he takes seriously the scriptures which identify unborn babies as living human beings beloved to God, and the scriptural command to "rescue those being led away to death," and Jesus' warning that "as you have done it to the least of them... you have done it to Me." So Dr. Keroack has worked for years to save children from slaughter, and prevent young mothers from making tragic mistakes.
Being pro-life doesn't mean that you care only about babies, and abortion is not the only tragedy associated with sex. Millions of teens and young adults are putting themselves at risk of a variety of tragic consequences due to their misplaced faith in artificial contraception, and their ignorance of the risks involved.
The anti-abstinence zealots might not care about them, but Dr. Keroack and President Bush do, and so do I.
I imagine that Dr. Keroack is comforted by Jesus' words: "If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first." -John 15:18
-Dave Burton
Cary, NC
dave at burtonsys dot com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rhrealitycheck on Jan 25, 2007 6:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheers,
Tyler
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 16, 2006 2:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A WORD ABOUT DR. ERIC
Posted by: markusmark
» RE: A WORD ABOUT DR. ERIC
Posted by: Tamar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jaycubed on Nov 16, 2006 3:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bugs Bunny+drugs+energizer bunny.
Fred Flintstone=Good role model.
Zeus prevents Popeye from having a satisfying orgasm.
Nerve cells should have happy faces & umbrellas or they'll get run over by trains at RR crossings.
And why is Dino so happy?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: HUH?!
Posted by: Jaycubed
» RE: HUH?!
Posted by: elmarco
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwes on Nov 16, 2006 3:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Another Bush/Republican WingNut spouting fear and idiotic diatribe
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Nov 16, 2006 3:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am reading through this man's report... I don't even know where to start! I can't believe this person has an MD.
The "superior region of the hippocampus" is a "bonding center of the brain" and that "damage" can lead to "pornography"?!
There's no such thing as a "superior region of the hippocampus" and if there were, it certainly is not involved in "bonding"... it's a center for learning and memory consolidation!
I can't wait to sit down and read the whole thing, this is better than the comics or even the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Thank you. The reporter could not be bothered with evidence, pro or con.
Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: Neuroendocrinology?
Posted by: laoma
» RE: Neuroendocrinology?
Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Neuroendocrinology?
Posted by: Amy Alkon
» Some specifics
Posted by: fanny666
» RE: Some specifics
Posted by: insulaparadigm
» RE: Some specifics
Posted by: insulaparadigm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CMaciolek on Nov 16, 2006 3:54 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Abject Fear.
Posted by: swissliberal
» RE: Abject Fear.
Posted by: kenn
Comments are closed-
Posted by: anambrose on Nov 16, 2006 4:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: edith on Nov 16, 2006 4:23 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However I would rather take the advice of the many teenagers I know from a variety of background over any "medical" advice of this quack from Boston(usually a bastion of rational thought and top-rated medicine). Is there anything this weirdo has done that could trigger a complaint to state health regulatory authorities? His potatohead practice should be investigated file by file, speech by speech, PR release by PR release.
This is a test for the new Senate. Not only all the Democrats should vote against this witch doctor, but "common sense" (McCain's new self-definition) conservatives like McCain and Graham should demand this nomination of Dr. Wacko be withdrawn. Let him be White House physician for W's last two years.
If Harry Reid can't block this, he should quit as Majority Leader and just hand the Senate over to Dick Cheney.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is a Test
Posted by: dkm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sofla100 on Nov 16, 2006 4:54 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Nov 16, 2006 5:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. A pile of porn as high as the Eiffel Tower
or
2. An abortion in his past - that he paid for
or
3. 'Unnatural' sexually perverted thoughts on a very frequent basis
or
4. A penis the size of a miniature ear of corn
or
5. Insert your idea here.
It's simple folks. ANYONE who rails on sex this hard is doing some pretty disgusting things while we're not watching. Ted Haggard proved it in spades. ALL Christians who focus way too much on this topic are immediately suspect.
Who is doing the investigation into this man's past and present? Anyone? I hope someone drags his dirt out for us to see soon - before he fucks the rest of the nation up.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Closet Meet Skeleton
Posted by: edith
» RE: Closet Meet Skeleton
Posted by: markusmark
» RE: Closet Meet Skeleton
Posted by: pamelawy
» the louder the screecher
Posted by: goatini
Comments are closed-
Posted by: algodees on Nov 16, 2006 6:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Nov 16, 2006 8:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In other words... WOMEN are the ones we need to worry about... it is THEIR infidelity, THEIR promiscuity, and THEIR sexuality that we must see as a threat and that we must check.
Same old tired line. Same old tired misogynistic line.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SOS Same old shit
Posted by: kbiteye
» RE: SOS Same old shit -
Posted by: AdamSelene40
Comments are closed-
Posted by: not_the_preferred_nomenclature on Nov 16, 2006 8:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right wing and fakeLeft--part of the overclass team!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: fakeleftist media works hand in hand with the rightwing to keep social issues in focus
Posted by: kbiteye
» RE: fakeleftist media works hand in hand with the rightwing to keep social issues in focus
Posted by: mike1997
» RE: fakeleftist media works hand in hand with the rightwing to keep social issues in focus
Posted by: aerdrie
» RE: Troll CryOfan's sockpuppet strikes again. He hates an article on a very important subject
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob
» He doesn't want real change. He wants to make himself feel good.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lector on Nov 16, 2006 11:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lector on Nov 16, 2006 11:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lector on Nov 16, 2006 11:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mule17 on Nov 17, 2006 5:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: londonangel on Nov 17, 2006 6:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: londonangel
Posted by: Think!
» RE: Worth letting them know. If they sue, it could put these freaks out of business or at least call
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kwalls on Nov 17, 2006 6:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ignorance never changes... people who are ignorant and fear-ridden want everyone else to experience their miserable state because someone who is intelligent, reasoning, happy and self-determining shows them how f*@ked up they are!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Peasantwitch on Nov 17, 2006 7:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where is this fool finding statistics, not to mention hard biological research, to back up his insane ravings?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Brandeis Not So Jewish
Posted by: edith
» RE: Oxymoron...moron about oxytocin
Posted by: churchofone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: edith on Nov 17, 2006 8:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given that the population control issue has been politicized by the GOP at least since Reagan, the Democratic Congress should tack a mandate for Senate confirmation of the birth control population post on to some appropration bill much loved by W.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Contact your Congresspersons/Senators on Committees that oversee it. They will surely be
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob
Comments are closed-
Posted by: needlefoot on Nov 17, 2006 9:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In other words, Dr. Keroack uses his own bs to prove more of his own bs.
I turn my back on such mind-numbing crap.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lizzzarde on Nov 17, 2006 9:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THIS guy is more dangerous because if he has his way, The Handmaidens Tale will be our lifestyle. He has just been put in the powerful position of forcing women into pregnancy. And who will be the most vulnerable: poor women, women of color, illiterate women, teens, the uneducated. He gives groups like the Quiverfulls power for growth AND he has the power to influence our personal choices.
Again I say: lets spend our time focusing on the scary and dangerous things being forced on us by the government. Perhaps now is a good time to contact your elected officials and protest this appointment. The fact that it does not need Congressional approval doesn't mean your Congress men and women can't address it...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: See...
Posted by: aerdrie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: harpy on Nov 17, 2006 11:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» From Winthrop to Emerson
Posted by: edith
» RE: From Winthrop to Emerson
Posted by: goeswithness
» RE: From Winthrop to Emerson
Posted by: goeswithness
» RE: From Winthrop to Emerson
Posted by: ncdave4life
» With thanksgiving coming you forgot
Posted by: jwg
» The myth of George HW Bush's eugenics campaign
Posted by: ncdave4life
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 4Reality on Nov 17, 2006 6:21 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dkm on Nov 17, 2006 9:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only thing that will save us is something similar to what got Hanes or whatever his name was, publication of his sexual perversions. Maybe this guy doesn't go in for forced anal intercourse with his wife or monthly meetings with a gay prostitute, but it is sure and certain that he has some sort of sick perversion in his background. Sexual weirdos like him always do.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Taarak on Nov 17, 2006 10:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Department of Health and Human Services established the Office of Public Health and Science which established The Office of Population Affairs which established the Family Planning program and the Adolescent Family Life Demonstration and Research program. The Office of Population Affairs has a 2005 budget of $288,000,000 DOLLARS.
These funds are for 1) To pay the salaries and 2) To give GRANTS. Who gets the grants? Who gave the most contributions? No, really…the grants are distributed nationwide on a bid system, and mostly go to clinics giving out brochures on abstinence and (yikes!) condom usage.
These two programs alone have bids out for about 20 grants. That’s 28.8 MILLION DOLLARS for each grant for publishing brochures on abstinence? I would sure like to know, now that Dr. Keroack is in charge of where this money is to go – WHERE THIS MONEY IS GOING!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sparks56 on Nov 18, 2006 3:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Then What?
Posted by: Lily H.
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Think! on Nov 18, 2006 4:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did Energizer license the image? If yes, BOYCOTT!!! If no, then Keroack is breaking the law by using it. For all the teenagers who've been sued for music swapping, can it be seriously argued that this isn't a thousand times worse? In case they weren't aware, I'm sending them a tip right now.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Anyone see an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY problem?
Posted by: Think!
» Far Side
Posted by: Swatopluk
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jgdewey on Nov 18, 2006 9:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwg on Nov 20, 2006 3:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or would if there wasn't a war on drugs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Andy Lee Parker on Nov 23, 2006 10:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Christian soldiers to march onward to their perpetual war, and keep arms manufacturers and their investors perpetually wealthy. Disgusting. Wouldn't it be great if everyone in the world realized simultaneously that it was arms manufacturers who are the true enemy? And they who pay people to stir up trouble in order to sell arms to both sides, divide and conquer, so that puppet regimes can be installed to pillage the natural resources?t Too bad there isn't a deck of cards with the pictures of all the arms manufacturers/war profiteers on them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ncdave4life on Nov 28, 2006 3:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As you can see, the information that AWC gives women is balanced, accurate, and honest. But that's the problem. AWC tells women the truth, including the hard truths that anti-abstinence zealots refuse to admit, like the fact that women who rely upon condoms for protection against HPV will usually become infected anyhow, even though condoms are the most effective form of contraception for protecting against HPV.
Dr. Keroack has not been appointed to the position of cheerleader for artificial contraception. He is not against family planning. He is against letting people get hurt because they have been duped into thinking that contraceptives make sex "safe." There is nothing in the job description of the HHS Deputy Assistant Secretary of Population Affairs requiring that he help perpetuate dangerous myths about contraception.
If you want to know the actual job description, go to http://opa.osophs.dhhs.gov/opa.html.
It is the responsibility of those in authority, but especially of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, to be honest about the drawbacks of artificial contraception, as well as its usefulness.
The fact is that the drawbacks are many and serious.
One of the most widespread and deadly misconceptions about contraception is that condoms eliminate the risk of sexual transmission of STDs. Actually, condoms provide less than 100% effective protection against even those diseases that they are most effective against, and have little to no effectiveness against some others.
Consider HPV. Several studies have found that condoms offer no protection against transmission of HPV, though one small recent study (Winer et al) of 82 female U. Washington students found that condoms may provide 70% effective protection over an eight month period.
In other words, 70% effectiveness is the MOST optimistic result seen in any study so far, and it relied upon some questionable assumptions which, if erroneous, would most likely mean that the study over-estimated the protection afforded by condom use. For instance, the study authors made no attempt to identify the HPV infection status of the women's male partners, and assumed that men who use condoms have the same likelihood of carrying the disease as do men who don't use condoms - which is a particularly strange assumption for a study that purports to show that condoms reduce the transmission of HPV!
But even if we assume, for the sake of argument, that the Winer / U.Washington study's optimistic result is correct, it still means that it is folly to rely on condoms for protection against HPV. At first glance, 70% sounds pretty good. But it isn't, because the study length was just 8 months, and most sexually active people don't stop having sex after 8 months.
Consider an analogy. Removing 5 of the 6 bullets in a revolver is 83% effective at preventing death from Russian Roulette. Right?
Well, not necessarily. It depends on how often you play. If you will only play only once, removing 5 of the 6 bullets provides 83% effective protection.
But if you will play Russian Roulette more than once, removing 5 bullets is much less effective at protecting you.
If you play Russian Roulette 100 times, it does not matter how many bullets are in the gun. A person playing Russian Roulette 100 times with a six-shot revolver containing only one bullet has just one chance in 82 million of surviving.
[cont'd...]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ncdave4life on Nov 28, 2006 4:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's not a typo. "83% effective" protection equals ODDS OF EIGHTY-TWO MILLION TO ONE AGAINST SURVIVAL if you play the game 100 times.
Likewise, using the optimistic results of the Winer / U. Washington study, if condoms are 70% effective at preventing transmission of HPV for 8 months, one can calculate that they will be much less than 50% effective at preventing it for 3 years, and much less than 10% effective at preventing it for 10 years.
In other words, if a woman replies on condoms for long term protection against HPV, and she has sex with an HPV-infected partner, she is almost certain to contract one or more strains of the virus.
What's more, the Winer / U. Washington study found that most of the new HPV infections they detected were with "high-risk" strains (which cause cervical cancer). Worse yet, most of the new infections were with high-risk HPV strains which are NOT protected against by the new anti-HPV vaccine.
Dr. Keroack is pro-life. That follows naturally because Dr. Keroack is a Christian who practices his Faith. That means that he takes seriously the scriptures which identify unborn babies as living human beings beloved to God, and the scriptural command to "rescue those being led away to death," and Jesus' warning that "as you have done it to the least of them... you have done it to Me." So Dr. Keroack has worked for years to save children from slaughter, and prevent young mothers from making tragic mistakes.
Being pro-life doesn't mean that you care only about babies, and abortion is not the only tragedy associated with sex. Millions of teens and young adults are putting themselves at risk of a variety of tragic consequences due to their misplaced faith in artificial contraception, and their ignorance of the risks involved.
The anti-abstinence zealots might not care about them, but Dr. Keroack and President Bush do, and so do I.
I imagine that Dr. Keroack is comforted by Jesus' words: "If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first." -John 15:18
-Dave Burton
Cary, NC
dave at burtonsys dot com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rhrealitycheck on Jan 25, 2007 6:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheers,
Tyler
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
ACORN Smear Collaborator Claims Persecution to Raise Money for Her Legal Troubles
Bad Policies Are Really What's Driving California's Huge Prison Costs




