Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

The Immigrant Gold Rush

By Forrest Wilder, Texas Observer. Posted May 22, 2006.


Private prison companies are salivating after the billions in public money that will be spent on new superjails to hold immigrants for trial or deportation.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For the savvy investor looking for a growth industry, South Texas offers a sure thing. The business calculus is simple: More immigrants than ever are being apprehended. That means the federal government needs more detention centers and more people to run them. No matter how the national debate on immigration plays out in Congress, the corporations that have moved into the business of building and operating detention centers are likely to see a steady stream of revenue for years to come.

The United States Marshals Service, for example, is now soliciting bids from private companies to build, own, and operate a 2,800-bed detention facility near Laredo. The "superjail," as it has come to be called, will serve the federal criminal court in downtown Laredo, which is loaded up with immigration-related cases in what the Marshals Service calls an "emergency [detention] situation." The $100-million superjail is expected to be one of the largest private detention centers in the nation, and will join a growing chain of county and local jails and private detention facilities all over Texas that coordinate with federal agencies to hold immigrants -- some destined for trials or hearings, others for deportation.

From downtown San Antonio to the banks of the Rio Grande in South Texas, for-profit companies run seven detention facilities for the Marshals Service and for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a division of the Department of Homeland Security. ICE (formerly the Immigration and Naturalization Service) holds noncitizen detainees waiting for a hearing in the civil immigration courts, or facing immediate deportation. The Marshals Service is responsible for housing both citizens and noncitizens awaiting trial or sentencing in federal criminal court.

"It's the immigrant gold rush in South Texas," says Bob Libal, co-director of Grassroots Leadership, an Austin-based nonprofit that monitors the private prison industry. "In Texas, almost all of the current prison expansion is occurring to house immigrant detainees, and that's primarily located in South Texas along the border." There are at least 7,000 newly built or proposed ICE and Marshals Service beds in Texas for immigrant detainees, according to Corrections Professional, an industry journal. In the early 1980s, ICE (then INS) operated zero beds in Texas; the Marshals Service, no more than 3,000 in the entire country.

Nationwide, the number of ICE detainees went from 7,444 in 1994 to about 23,000 now; during the same period, the Marshals Service's population more than doubled to an estimated 63,000. Just in the last two years, Congress has authorized 40,000 new ICE beds over the next five years and given the Marshals Service funding for another 4,000 to 5,000. And the President's proposed 2007 budget calls for a $452 million increase in ICE funding, including money for another 6,700 beds. One of the companies to benefit from the government's building -- and privatizing -- binge is KBR, a Halliburton Co. subsidiary, which in January was awarded a contract worth up to $385 million to build temporary immigrant detention facilities for the Homeland Security Department in case of an "emergency influx of immigrants," according to a KBR press release. The top companies running South Texas detention centers are the Corrections Corp. of America (CCA), GEO Group Inc., and Emerald Correctional Management.

Libal says a "perfect storm" explains the growth in the detention industry. "First, you have this kind of anti-immigrant sentiment coming out of Washington at the federal level; second, you have increased zealotry from the U.S. Attorney's office to prosecute people criminally for extremely minor immigration crimes; and third, you have these private prison companies that are cashing in on the immigration incarceration boom."

The origins of the modern immigrant detention complex can be traced to the mid-1990s, when Silvestre Reyes, then-head of the El Paso Border Patrol Sector (now a Democratic congressman from El Paso), initiated "Operation Blockade" -- a strategy of concentrating enforcement agents to snag immigrants once they cross the border. This drove up the number of apprehensions and set in motion a militarization of the southwestern border. The budget for border enforcement went from $1.2 billion in 1995 to $4.7 billion in 2006, and the number of Border Patrol agents doubled. In addition, sweeping immigration reform laws passed in 1996 by Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton allowed the deportation of any noncitizen convicted of such crimes as drunk driving, hot-check writing, and shoplifting -- even if the crime occurred before the law went into effect. The 1996 legislation also required mandatory detention of any illegal immigrant deemed a "criminal alien," a noncitizen convicted or even suspected of illegal activity.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Detention Centres B/S
Posted by: Abushite on May 22, 2006 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At what point will America call a spade a spade . " Detention Centers" they are CONCENTRATION CAMPS - As is Guantanamo is a concetration camp. During the US incarceration of the Japanese and Germans during the 2nd World war - they were held in Concentration Camps in the USA. The Mexicans will be kept in Concentration Camps - Men, women and children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Detention Centres B/S Posted by: hotlipsin61
» Just for immigrants? Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Just for immigrants? Posted by: chica
» RE: Just for immigrants? Posted by: alicelillie
detaining illegals provides jobs for americans and cuts the labor supply, thus raising wages
Posted by: cry0fan on May 22, 2006 4:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as long as we can raise the tax rate on the upper class to pay for it, this is a pure boon for working class americans.

If you overstay your visa by ONE DAY in Switzerland, the next morning you will have their police knocking on your door. And Switzerland just might be the world's best country....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Just a few observations Posted by: blingnet88
Judge and Punish
Posted by: ChristopherLL on May 22, 2006 4:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A recent report revealed the enormous expansion of the prison population for American citizens and the top five states were all in the south, including Texas. And it is the South that has controlled politics in Washington the last six years. Mandatory sentences for non-violent drug offenses have swelled the ranks of prisons in the south and now 1 in 136 of our citizens are imprisoned. Now we can add the war on immigration with our war on drugs and of course our crowning endeavor war on terrorism. The problem is those in power remain ignorant and unconcerned about the humanity of why a person takes drugs, or why a person crosses a border to find work or why a few individuals commit terrorist acts. Their resopnse to all these complex issues is simple: judge and punish. Understanding, compassion, acceptance and forgiveness is not in their characters. How sad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

williehorton
Posted by: willie.horton on May 22, 2006 4:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Expedited removal" makes sense to me.
If you are caught entering a more enlightened country without a visa -- Switzerland (above) is an excellent example -- you will not be released with a court date... you will be removed. Immediately.
If we're going to have immigration laws, enforce them. If we can't enforce them, then repeal them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh my gosh--here is where corporations get their labor from!
Posted by: gh on May 22, 2006 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hate to say I see the future but I do.

You know those prison road clean-up crews? Think of this expanded 1000 fold, and prison pick-the-grapes crews are born, along with prision pick-the-rest-of-the-crops crews. No pay. Just work.

yipes!gh

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Already happening Posted by: peterharrell
» RE: Already happening Posted by: aussidawg
This just in: America corrupt!
Posted by: LMNOP on May 22, 2006 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This just in: America whores itself once again. It turns out that America has essentially one value that plays in most national discussions and decisions, and that is profit. Collectively, America has no moral compunctions to interfere with profit-making except hate which seldom gets in the way of profitablity and often helps. But here, America is divided between its xenophobia and its shameful greed. How funny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the ugly rising tide of American totalitarian practices
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 22, 2006 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prison labor - this is Bush's notion of a "guest worker" program - you can be a guest in our private prisons, and work in the prison factory for no pay. On the plus side, you won't be charged for your funeral.

There is a word for this kind of thing; some call it fascism (Aushwitz was as much a slave labor camp for Nazi chemical production as it was a death camp) and some call it communism (as in all those 'employees' of Siberian work camps - worked to death building railroads, etc.) and some use that old-fashioned term, "Evil". I can hear Rumsfeld and the PNAC crowd now: "We must go beyond notions of good and evil - yet we must cherish the soul of the American people - and lead them around by the nose, too".

If American citizens don't like this, they will likely be invited to stay as "guests" in these facilities, all expenses paid. One great misrepresentation of the Holocaust is that it was all about the Jewish people - no, not true. Gypsies, blacks, homosexuals, political dissidents, Russian POWs - the Nazis weren't that selective.

Big agribusiness relies on cheap labor, as do all those manufacturers, some small, some very big, who have moved their factories to the US-Mexico border zone (where wages are cheap and employee health care costs as well as environment regulations are non-existent). It is the logic of empire - send the centurians out to capture slaves to do all the work. While Bush is behind the current manifestation of this practice, it is worth noting that NAFTA was the legal precursor that set the stage - just as the 1996 TeleCon bill set the stage for the total takeover of the US mainstream media by big business interests.

Welcome to Germany, ~1937. Don't forget that Hitler was Time's "Man of the Year" in 1933.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars
Posted by: mite on May 22, 2006 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Total Control of ALL societies is a WAR against all world populations by members of the Illuminati- (The Council On Foreign Relations, Federal Reserve Systems, Trilateral Commision, UN, Skull and Bones, Travistock Institute).
They need to destroy one last country to enslave the people of the world, and that is the U.S. To control the revolt against total monarchy they will need a place to confine those individuals that are not murdered that are of value to them.
If we look at the laws over the past 100 years that have given control to the elite, blue-bloods, OLD money upper class their control over our lives is FACT.
Look at the money made from prisons or better yet the so called justice system. If someone is arrested the money begins with Bail money, attorney's, judges, and process to imprisionment. Then these individuals have a record that controls their lives and is tracked until death not to mention his right to vote or run for office.
Have we ever noticed that ONLY the rich or money backed individuals ever hold public office. If you are connected you can kill anyone or even millions of people and get away with it if you have the money. Lady justice may not see but she sure can smell the money. If we look at the whole system and how it controls us our ignorance is what will lead us into our future home-PRISON-CONCENTRATION CAMPS- Hitler was created by these Illuminatis' along with his mission. It never ended it only has been fine tuned over the years. Soon our names and personality will be gone replaced by #'s. We deserve our future because we refuse to read about history, keep open minds, and explore new ideas. It is a lot easier to watch TV, and play video games then work hard keeping an eye on our law makers and company executives.
It takes a lot of research to uncover the truth they designed the system to rule us by secrecy. Think about the real reason why there is a so called war on terror, and why we have to give our Constitution and Bill of Rights up. I know if I wanted to create a good reason to declare marshall law or a national emergency all I have to do is kill some Americans and brainwash the population through the media that I control, we must avenge this act of terror.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars Posted by: peacefulaim
You think that's bad ? Wait until the Bankruptcy Overhaul's full effect kicks in !
Posted by: NDnative on May 22, 2006 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Already, the North Dakota legislature is endorsing the ideas given to them by the South Dakota legislature to increase the budget two-fold for debtors' prisons. Already many farmers and small business owners are trying to win the war against the business terrorists especially agri-business in trying to save our lands. These same private prison companies are also joining the war against us by siding with the already mean-spirited legislature and BIG Agri-business. Sure, that'll make North Dakota even worse than it already looks but don't think they'll stop there. Unless you fight to end this kind of tyranny, your state will be next too !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Then Why Does 'Left' Oppose Employer Sanctions?
Posted by: fairleft on May 22, 2006 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously enforced employer sanctions would mean NO detention centers (except for a few fat cat employers hahaha?). Everyone who deals in facts recognizes that employer sanctions would free up jobs for and decrease illegal competition with two classes of US citizens: those without high school diplomas and young high school graduates. But does the 'left' support those two natural constituencies? No. Instead it whines about the latest Bush showboating and refuses to offer the obvious real solution to the illegal immigrant problem.

Because 12-20 million illegal workers here is not a problem to the ethno-centered fake left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's enough of a prison mess in need of real reform already !
Posted by: maxpayne on May 22, 2006 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1 in 136 U.S. Residents Behind Bars
U.S. Prisons, Jails Grew by 1,000 Inmates a Week From '04 to '05; 1 in 136 Residents Behind Bars

by Elizabeth White

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0522-03.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's like drugs...
Posted by: adp3d on May 22, 2006 9:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...reduce/eliminate the demand, and the problem will go away. Anybody want to buy a bridge?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

notfree
Posted by: losingmyliberties on May 23, 2006 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just like this corprate goverments sulective substance war. Why do the select few get by breaking the law, because the rich get richer. It's all about profit and piss on your rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have a friend...
Posted by: Burton on May 25, 2006 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...who is trying have his mother move into this country legally from Poland. He is having some difficulty since she has a medical condition and he can not get her on Medicare. The point he makes is why should he be penalized for playing it by the rules when other people enter the country illegally (or undocumented, if you like) at no penalty?

One can always say if we lived in an ideal world, we would all have "free" healthcare but it does not come down to that in the real world. The resentment many Americans have is that they play it by the rules and see themselves penalized, while others break the rules at no cost.

Thoughts on this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Once They Build Them
Posted by: annlambert on May 26, 2006 4:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would not be good "business" to build a "temporary" detention center, so why don't we call it what it is? When the current flood of illegal detainees slows, who will fill those beds? WE, Americans will!

The government has met with much resistance to building more prisons to warehouse people in, so this is merely a side-step to that inconvenience. If we allow them to continue building prisons for ANY reason, you can plan on the legislative manipulations that will ultimately fill those gulags with Americans---i.e. you and me, our family and friends, co-workers, neighbors, etc...

If another immigrant never crosses our borders again, there will be a new reason to build prisons found...if you build it---they will fill it.

Sixpack

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]