Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Nixon, Wiretaps and Government Secrets

Democracy Now!. Posted May 2, 2006.


John Dean and Daniel Ellsberg remember Watergate and other abuses of presidential power, from Nixon to Bush.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

[Editor's Note: This is the edited transcript of an interview between Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez of Democracy Now! and John Dean and Daniel Ellsberg. The interview originally aired on Democracy Now! on Thursday, April 27, and the full transcript and audio of the interview are available from Democracy Now!.]

Amy Goodman: We are joined by two figures who played central roles in the fall of President Richard Nixon and the Watergate scandal of a generation ago, John Dean and Daniel Ellsberg. Dean served as President Nixon's chief counsel. He exposed the government-sanctioned break-in of the psychiatrist of Daniel Ellsberg, the government analyst who leaked the Pentagon Papers and earned himself a spot on Nixon's enemy list. Dean and Ellsberg join us in our firehouse studio to discuss Watergate and the abuse of presidential power from Nixon to Bush.

John Dean has become a vocal critic of the Bush Administration. Daniel Ellsberg remains an advocate for greater openness in government and supported other government whistleblowers. They both join us in the Firehouse studio. We welcome you both to Democracy Now! So, it was 33 years ago that you were in court, Dan Ellsberg. Explain what happened.

Daniel Ellsberg: Well, we had been in court for four-and-a-half months at that point. A fairly boring trial. A lot of documents to go over for the press and [inaudible]. And on one morning, an announcement came in from the judge in the courtroom, a memo from Earl Silbert, the Watergate prosecutor, saying that burglars, on the orders of the White House, had broken into my former psychiatrist's office to get information on me. Well, this came from John Dean, though some ten days earlier, twelve days earlier, the President had sat on that information for that period of time, forbidding Peter -- the acting Attorney General to send it on to the judge.

But finally, they threatened to resign, because they would be involved in obstruction of justice if they didn't send it on. So when that announcement was read in court, it was quite electrifying. For once the reporters who had been stuck in Los Angeles, while their colleagues were doing exciting things on Watergate in Washington, envisioned headlines "Watergate Meets the Pentagon Papers Trial." That was the headline they all wanted. And they dashed from their seats during the court for the payphones in the hall. It was just like the movie Front Page for the first time in the trial, and not the last time.

And three days later, Ehrlichman testified about the existence of the Plumbers, the -- supposedly to stop leaks, although another of their jobs was to leak what the President wanted out, classified information, just like Bush's selective leaking of the National Intelligence Estimate recently.

Juan Gonzalez: And John Ehrlichman then was --

DE: Ehrlichman was the domestic counsel, and Haldeman was his chief counsel. So Karl Rove kind of combines the jobs -- or until recently. So they -- three days later it was announced that they had been involved in this. And President Nixon that night announced the resignation of "two of the finest public servants I have ever known," Haldeman and Ehrlichman -- and John Dean, who wasn't included in those adjectives, and Richard Kleindienst, the acting Attorney General at that point. I lost several Attorney Generals, actually, in the course of that trial.

AG: And you were on trial because?

DE: I was on trial on the same kinds of charges that are being brought up today for unauthorized possession of copies of documents relating to the national security. There are several such trials coming at us now. Mine was the first in our history, prosecution of someone for a leak. As a matter of fact, I was reminding a Yale man last night there is a statue of Nathan Hale outside Yale and outside C.I.A. headquarters, which is staffed with Yale people. Nathan Hale, our first spy. And I remember saying at Yale once that it occurred to me that I'm the first American prosecuted -- he was hanged -- for giving secrets to Americans.

AG: You were a government official.

DE: I had been a government official. And I was now back at the Rand Corporation and consulting with the government, doing research on lessons from Vietnam. And I thought that the lessons in these 7,000 pages deserved to be known by the Senate, as well as by executive branch employees or contract employees. So I gave them to the Senate in 1969, and then to the newspapers in 1971, 35 years ago this year.

JG: And John Dean, your recollection of your involvement and revelations about Dan Ellsberg's situation?

JD: Let me correct just a minor point in the setup, where I'm involved in the Watergate break-in. I had no knowledge of the Watergate break-in.

DE: I meant to say "cover-up."

JD: It was the cover-up, yes. And what was [inaudible] when we were covering up was what they had done to Dan Ellsberg, which had somewhat a color of national security. That was the way it was cast. In fact, I was forbidden to talk to anybody about what I knew about the Ellsberg break-in. At one point after I had told the President, when no one else seemed willing to tell him how serious this was, that there was a cancer on his presidency and he was going down fast, and I had hoped he would pound on the table and say, "Hey, we've got to stop this!" Instead, he asked me, "Well, how much is it going to cost?" I knew I hadn't been persuasive that morning.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Nixon & Bush
Posted by: rsaxto on May 2, 2006 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nixon was not worthy of the presidency and Bush is not worthy of the presidency and Cheney is not worthy of the presidency. Cheney and Bush and others should have the sense to resign. If they do not have the sense to resign they should be impeached. If the congress does not have the sense to impeach Cheney/Bush then those members without sense should be impeached. Most of the members of house/senate are worthy of impeachment for super corruption even without the Cheney/Bush situation. Throw the worst of the bums out!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nixon & Bush Posted by: rusrus
ECLECTICIST SEEKER, S JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on May 2, 2006 3:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BUSH "SILVERFOOT" 43 HAS WASTED HIS "POLITICAL CAPITAL", THE CREDIBILTY OF THE PRESIDENCY, THE RESPECT OF HIS COUNTRYMEN AND ALLIES, AS WELL AS THE KNOWN WORLD... THERE MAY BE SOME CREDENCE TO THE FOLLOWING THOUGHT ABOUT SILVERFOOT :

"You are a primary existence. You are a distinct portion of the essence of God, and contain a certain part of Him in yourself. Why then are you ignorant of your noble birth? You carry a God about within you, poor wretch, and know nothing of it." -Epictetus



YET HE CONTINUES TO SPOUT TRUCKLOADS OF "TURD BLOSSOMS" TO AMERICANS ABOUT THE WAR, IMMIGRATION REFORM, SSA, ETC ACTING LIKE DR. FEELGOOD: "EVERYTHING IS GOING TO BE ALRIGHT..." BUT WE KNOW BETTER...AND , WE WONDER HOW BUSH "SILVERFOOT" 43 EVER BECAME PRESIDENT ... REMEMBER RICHARD "TRICKY DICK " NIXON :

By the time Richard Milhous Nixon goes on trial in the Senate, the only real reason for trying him will be to understand how he ever became president of the United States at all ... and the real defendant, at that point, will be the American Political System. -- Hunter S. Thompson, 1973.

AND, THE BEAT GOES ON...."

S+JIM+RODRIGUEZ+++ECLECTICIST SEEKER+++

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Please, say no to drugs. Posted by: fanny666
Specifics
Posted by: fanny666 on May 4, 2006 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read Article 2 Paragraph 2 of Nixon's Letters of Impeachment.

Compare to Bush's NSA Programs.

Mention this in letters to editors and when discussing impeachment.

Also, look up Article 6 Section 2 of the US Constitution and remember that the invasion of Iraq was illegal according to the UN Charter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A president above the law is a dictator. That makes Bush-supporters happy.
Posted by: Sojourner on May 4, 2006 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until a dictator's loyalists break ranks, opposition can only also break the law. That's the whole point of Thoreau's "Non-violent Resistance." It's the difference between 'good' law and 'bad' law, a distinction that too many people are unwilling or unable to make.

The laws that were supposed to make a repeat of Watergate impossible have failed. The US has no way to prevent a president from becoming a dictator. The sad part of it is that many of those who voted for Bush are happy with that.

It's the same psychological dynamic as Erich Fromm's analysis of Nazi Germany called "Escape from Freedom." We can trade our freedom for a dogmatic certainty. What does such 'happiness' tell you about such people? Patriotism also can be merely an addiction.

Nothing is free from abuse except goodwill, the philosopher Kant told us. In the absence of goodwill, even happiness can be corrupted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]