Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Eighties Surveillance Revival

By Peter Dale Scott, Pacific News Service. Posted January 5, 2006.


Illegal eavesdropping and detentions of U.S. citizens may have grown from a secret program in the 1980s that planned to suspend the U.S. Constitution in the event of a national emergency.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Revelations that the National Security Agency (NSA) has engaged in warrantless eavesdropping in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act prompted President Bush to admit last month that in 2002 he directly authorized the activity in the wake of 9/11.

But there are reasons to suspect that the illegal eavesdropping, and the related program of illegal detentions of U.S. citizens as well as foreign nationals, began earlier. Both may be part of what Vice President Dick Cheney has called the Bush administration's restoration of "the legitimate authority of the presidency" -- practices exercised by Nixon that were outlawed after Watergate.

In the 1980s Richard Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld discussed just such emergency surveillance and detention powers in a super-secret program that planned for what was euphemistically called "Continuity of Government" (COG) in the event of a nuclear disaster.

At the time, Cheney was a Wyoming congressman, while Rumsfeld, who had been defense secretary under President Ford, was a businessman and CEO of the drug company G.D. Searle. Overall responsibility for the program had been assigned to Vice President George H.W. Bush, "with Lt. Col. Oliver North...as the National Security Council action officer," according to James Bamford in his book, "A Pretext for War."

These men planned for suspension of the Constitution, not just after nuclear attack, but for any "national security emergency," which they defined in Executive Order 12656 of 1988 as: "Any occurrence, including natural disaster, military attack, technological or other emergency, that seriously degrades or seriously threatens the national security of the United States." Clearly 9/11 would meet this definition.

As developed in the mid-1980s by Oliver North in the White House, the plans called for not just the surveillance but the potential detention of large numbers of American citizens. During the Iran-Contra hearings, North was asked about his work on "a contingency plan in the event of emergency, that would suspend the American constitution." The chairman, Democratic Senator Inouye, ruled that this was a "highly sensitive and classified" matter, not to be dealt with in an open hearing.

The supporting agency for the planning and implementation was the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA was headed for much of the 1980s by Louis Giuffrida, whose COG plans for massive detention became so extreme that even President Reagan's then Attorney General, William French Smith, raised objections.

Smith eventually left Washington, while COG continued to evolve. And in May 2001 Cheney and FEMA were reunited: President George W. Bush appointed Cheney to head a terrorism task force and created a new office within FEMA to assist him. In effect, Bush was authorizing a resumption of the kind of planning that Cheney and FEMA had conducted under the heading of COG.

Press accounts at the time claimed that the Cheney terrorism task force accomplished little and that Cheney himself spent the entire month of August in a remote location in Wyoming. But this may have just been the appearance of withdrawal; as author James Mann points out in "The Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush's War Cabinet," Cheney had regularly gone off to undisclosed locations in the 1980s as part of his secret COG planning.

As to the actual role of Bush, Cheney and FEMA on 9/11 itself, much remains unclear. But all sources agree that a central order at 10 a.m. from Bush to Cheney contained three provisions, of which the most important was, according to the 9/11 Commission Report, "the implementation of continuity of government measures."

The measures called for the immediate evacuation of key personnel from Washington. Both Cheney and Rumsfeld refused to leave, but Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz was helicoptered to a bunker headquarters inside a mountain. Cheney also ordered key congressional personnel, including House Speaker Dennis Hastert, to be flown out of Washington, along with several cabinet members.

During Cheney's later disappearance from public view for a long period after the attack, he too was working from a COG base -- "Site R," the so-called "Underground Pentagon" on the Maryland-Pennsylvania border, according to Bamford.

Many actions of the Bush presidency resemble not only what Nixon did in the 1970s, but what Cheney and Rumsfeld had planned to restore under COG in the 1980s in the case of an attack. Prominent among these have been the detention of so-called "enemy combatants," including U.S. citizens, and placing them in special camps. Now as before, a policy of detentions outside the Constitution has been accompanied by a program of extra-constitutional surveillance to determine who will be detained.

As Cheney told reporters on his return last month from Pakistan, "Watergate and a lot of things around Watergate and Vietnam, both during the '70s served, I think, to erode the authority" of the president. But he defended as necessary for national security the aggressive program he helped shape under President George W. Bush, which includes warrantless surveillance and extrajudicial imprisonment -- in effect, a new Imperial Presidency.

At least two Democrats in Congress have suggested that Bush could be impeached for his illegal surveillance activities. The chances of impeachment may depend on whether Congress can prove that planning for this, like planning for the Iraq War, began well before 9/11.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Peter Dale Scott is author of "Drugs, Oil, and War: The United States in Afghanistan, Colombia, and Indochina" (Rowman & Littlefield, 2003) and is completing a book on "Deep Politics and the Road to 9/11."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
BUSHITLER: FUHRER OF AMERIKA
Posted by: Bushhater on Jan 5, 2006 4:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush, in his own word, "running the government would be easier in a dictatorship, as long as I'm the dictator". They were NOT kidding. Bush also said that in response to an outbreak of bird-flu that he would "declare martial law". The administration has also hinted at postponing the Nov '04 election because of a "terrorist threat". The domestic spying on Quakers, peace activists, critics, and the detention of Jose Padilla(an American citizen, arrested on American soil) as an "enemy combatant" are, I believe are just precursers of what is in store for all of us before the '08 elections. This administration, will, I am sure will find an "emergency" by 2008 to rip up the Constitution, abolish the Bill of Rights, eliminate Congress, and establish "people's courts" ala Nazi Germany. Concentration camps will be set up for "disloyal" citizens, perhaps even gas chambers for anyone who is suspected of opposing them. Remember, Bush said that" you are either with us or against us". Alito seems to have no problem for unchecked executive power. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutley. WAKE UP AMERICA!!! WE ARE ON THE VERGE OF LIVING IN A FASCIST POLICE STATE LIKE NAZI GERMANY!!! Imagine, if you will, Ann Coulter, or her clone, deciding who is loyal or treasonous. This whole scenerio scares the hell out of me, so be afraid,l BE VERY AFRAID. If, what I suspect does come to pass, we MUST take up the gun and overthrow these fascist pigs. Restore the America we grew up in and love.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BUSHITLER: FUHRER OF AMERIKA Posted by: paul_revere
» Insurrection anyone? Posted by: truthteller
» RE: Insurrection anyone? Posted by: kww355
1984
Posted by: I_Love_NY on Jan 6, 2006 11:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Guess Orwell wasn't to far off after all. These people are traitors to the United States. I can't believe for one minute that any one who calls themselves American is not outraged by Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the rest of the cabal's actions. Impeach!!!

Making conservatives cringe since 1977

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop getting hysterical!
Posted by: charlief on Jan 7, 2006 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a European - living in New York for some years. In my much more radical past, I've been followed by our local political police, wiretapped by who the hell knows and watched. And I know I have a lengthy file held by my government for my affiliations with various radical organisations. And I mean radical in the European sense [not the watered-down, tepid American sense].

But, really... the stuff being described above as we're 'on the verge of...' in the US is adolescent, hysterical nonsense. Get a grip. Strong governments have been around since there have been governments. Suspension of habeus corpus has been used on and off since forever, practically.

Nothing lasts forever, they'll get their day. But please, if you're going to talk about 'going underground' and buying up automatic weapons to 'fight them back'. I'd suggest - from long years of experience and given recent stories in the NYT - I wouldn't be announcing it out in the open for all the world to read.

That is just plain dumb.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stop getting hysterical! Posted by: jenbeca
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement