Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

"Treat Them Like Dogs"

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted October 26, 2005.


Col. Janis Karpinski, the highest-ranking officer demoted in connection with the torture scandal, speaks out about what happened at the Abu Ghraib prison.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In April 2004, a secret Pentagon report concluded that U.S. soldiers had committed "egregious acts and grave breaches of international law" at Abu Ghraib. Since the photos first appeared, no senior Bush administration officials have been reprimanded for what happened at Abu Ghraib. Seven soldiers have been convicted for their role in the detainee abuse. Last month Lynndie England was sentenced to three years in prison. In January, Specialist Charles Graner was sentenced to 10 years. The highest ranking military officer reprimanded was Brigadier General Janis Karpinski who was commanding officer at the prison. She was demoted to colonel in May. She oversaw all military police in Iraq and was the first female ever to command soldiers in a combat zone. This is an abridged transcript of her interview.

AMY GOODMAN: Col. Janis Karpinski has just published a book about her experience. It's called One Woman's Army: The Commanding General of Abu Ghraib Tells Her Story. How did you end up at Abu Ghraib?

COL. JANIS KARPINSKI: Abu Ghraib was one of 17 prison facilities that we were responsible for in Iraq. The units deployed from January throughout 2003 up 'til about April of 2003 to conduct a prisoner of war mission. The units are trained to do prisoner of war operations, and a prisoner of war camp was established in Iraq, very close to the Kuwait border. So, the units -- the unit members, the soldiers, all believed that they were going to come home after victory was declared on the First of May when the President arrived on the aircraft carrier. They allowed me to deploy to Iraq to join my units, to take command of the units, although I was told that the majority of the units, the soldiers, would be coming back home because the mission was complete.

When I arrived in Kuwait, I was told that the units were going to be staying for an additional two months, because we were assigned a new mission for prison restoration and training, assisting the prison's experts up at Ambassador Bremer's headquarters in Baghdad, with training Iraqi guards to conduct prison and detention operations. So we relocated. There was never any discussion about whether we were properly equipped or prepared to take on this mission. It was simply assigned to us, and very quickly the two-month extension became a four-month extension, and then it became 365 days, boots on the ground, for all of the units that were deployed.

So, soldiers were sent to war with the full expectations that they would be home in six months or less, as they were repeatedly told at the mobilization stations in the United States, and once they were there, they couldn't get out. The extension took them six additional months, tremendous impact on reserve and National Guard soldiers, in particular, but nonetheless, this was the mission. They went forward to different locations in Iraq and took on this new detention operation -- mission.

Abu Ghraib was the largest of our facilities. It was located in the Sunni Triangle. It was never a good location for any kind of detention operations, let alone the largest detention operation and then, subsequently, the interrogation center for Iraq. We were being mortared every night at that location. We received no combat support for force protection to prevent any of those attacks from occurring, and the unit that was out there doing that mission, that particular mission at Abu Ghraib, was not equipped with any kind of combat platforms to give adequate protection to prisoners or soldiers.

It was -- Abu Ghraib, there was long discussions about using Abu Ghraib at all, because of its notoriety, because of the history, because of the thousands of Iraqis who lost their lives there under Saddam. But we did agree to use it as an interim facility and holding Iraqi criminal prisoners. And that was our introduction to Abu Ghraib.

AMY GOODMAN: How many M.P.s, military police, were under your command?

COL. JANIS KARPINSKI: 3,400 soldiers were under the 800th Military Police Brigade, and probably 2,400 of them, 2,500 of them were military police personnel.

AMY GOODMAN: And how many prisoners were there?

COL. JANIS KARPINSKI: At Abu Ghraib alone, the prisoner population did reach over 7,000 by the end of -- nearing the end of 2003, but we processed over 40,000 prisoners during the course of the time that the 800th M.P. Brigade was responsible for prisoner operations. In 16 other facilities and at Abu Ghraib, while it was under the control of the 800th M.P. Brigade, there were no infractions. Interrogations were not being conducted. They were basically interviews that were being conducted by the military intelligence interrogators at that time, and it changed considerably during and after General Miller's visit.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yeow
Posted by: Nheduanna on Oct 27, 2005 12:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope Col. Karpinsky's testimony will be among those that convict Donald Rumsfeld when he is brought up on war crimes charges.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Abu Ghraib
Posted by: ekeim on Oct 27, 2005 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will this information be enough to bring down any of the leading administration officials? I think not. Too many people think "the only good Iraqi is a dead Iraqi" and support, with shocking enthusiasm, this behavior.
When our nation falls, we will look back on this as an early example of our descent into barbarism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spit On Them!
Posted by: Mycos on Oct 27, 2005 5:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You all heard the old stories about the anti-war protesters during the Vietnam war? Well, it turns out that the only documented case of anyone spitting on someone else at these confrontations was a vet spitting on a "hippie". All the rest are "well, I heard from a guy who's brother was in the army that...blah, blah, blah. Turns out that was an early version of "swift-boating" in American political rhetoric.

Anyhow! We have soldiers returning from Abu Ghraib and Gitmo who, although they may be under orders not to say anything about what they saw or did, are in fact enabling in the torture of human beings who have never been convicted of anything. They are torturers. They are scum. They are the type of vermin who deserve no respect whatsoever. They deserve to be spat upon the moment anyone learns they served at GITMO.

"Hey. You served at GITMO?" Launch a "Civilian Rocket". A big fucking horkie in the face. Do it!

Mycos

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Spit On Them! Posted by: sixpack
» RE: Spit On Them! Posted by: fullavit@hotmail.com
Torture
Posted by: rafey on Oct 28, 2005 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our disregard for the facts in these seemingly endless cases of torture (that is to fail to prosecute those who were ... and are ... truly responsible for these unconscionable acts) has not gone unnoticed by the Iraqi or Afghan population, et. al.! It is important to remember that their culture thrives on a very long memory; there will be repurcussions long standing for many generations to come. there will be consequences !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Torture Posted by: Barbara