Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Wal-Mart Has No Plan B

By Liza Featherstone, Women's eNews. Posted June 30, 2005.


Wal-Mart continues to keep Plan B, the "morning-after pill," off its shelves. The megastore's policy, catering to its rural base, complicates its pursuit of new markets.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The political battle over the "morning after pill" is raging, with proposed legislation in 15 states that would protect a pharmacist's right to refuse to fill prescriptionS on "moral" grounds.

Wal-Mart has already laid down its own law. America's largest retailer and one of its largest pharmacies doesn't stock emergency contraception at all.

Emergency contraception, known as Plan B, is 89 percent effective in preventing pregnancy if taken within 72 hours of intercourse, according to its manufacturer, the Women's Capital Corporation, which last year was acquired by Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Woodcliff Lake, N.J. It is even more effective if taken within 24 hours of unprotected intercourse.

"For many rural women, Wal-Mart is their only pharmacy," says Ted Miller, a spokesperson for NARAL Pro-Choice America. "That's what makes Wal-Mart's refusal to carry emergency contraception so disconcerting."

While some large chain pharmacies, such as Rite-Aid and Winn-Dixie, allow individual pharmacists to refuse to fill prescriptions, Wal-Mart, based in Bentonville, Ark., is the only one to bar Plan B. Wal-Mart refers every customer seeking emergency contraception to another pharmacy.

But as the retailing behemoth pushes into urban and coastal markets--retail analysts say it has virtually saturated rural and small-town America--its position on Plan B may become increasingly awkward as pro-choice groups continue to protest stores that hinder access to emergency contraception.

Political battles over proposed Wal-Mart stores in New York City, Los Angeles and Chicago have demonstrated that what's acceptable in Arkansas isn't necessarily embraced everywhere. While the objections focused on the retailer's low wages, hostility to unions and damage to small businesses, the discount giant's antagonists also pointed to its stance on Plan B as an issue.

"The company's indifference to their workers is increasingly well-documented," says Tracy Sefl of Wal-Mart Watch, a Washington, D.C., group. "But this indifference to women's health adds insult to injury."

Eager to Expand

Wal-Mart officials say they are eager to expand far beyond Wal-Mart's traditional rural base and they are not backing down from these fights.

Pro-choice groups, meanwhile, are pressing the Plan B-access issue.

Washington, D.C.-based NARAL and Planned Parenthood Federation of America are targeting Wal-Mart and other major pharmacy chains that aren't doing enough to ensure Plan B access.

Planned Parenthood is conducting a "Fill My Pills" letter writing and picketing campaign designed to pressure companies and spread the word about their policies.

In June NARAL celebrated the 40th anniversary of Griswold v. Connecticut--the Supreme Court decision that barred states from making contraconception illegal--picketed stores in 45 states and those protests will be ongoing, says NARAL's Miller.

Lawmakers have also entered the fray. This spring, responding to Wal-Mart's refusal, as well as that of individual pharmacists, congressional representatives Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL), Christopher Shays (R-CT) and Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) introduced the Access to Legal Pharmaceuticals Act, requiring pharmacies to fill prescriptions for all forms of legal birth control, including emergency contraception.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Liza Featherstone is a New York City-based journalist. She is the author, most recently, of "Selling Women Short: The Landmark Battle for

Workers' Rights At Wal-Mart (Basic)," a book about sex discrimination at Wal-Mart.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Legalizing Consciences
Posted by: wobuzhidao on Jun 30, 2005 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess I'm fine with Wal-Mart allowing their pharmacists to refuse to fill contraceptives and not stocking Plan B IF they stop filling erectile dysfunction prescriptions and take all the condoms out too (especially if they can't guarentee the condoms as 100% effective).

Then they have to allow their vegetarian cashiers to refuse to ring up products with meat in them.

Wal-Mart's refusal to provide (while running other businesses out of town) is just one of many reasons I'll never shop there and why I convince others not to as well.

As far as referring to other pharmacies I read that they might suggest an alternative but not always and it is just a suggestion to try the alternative. It doesn't mean the alternative works.

Wal-Mart's stance further illustrates why emergency contraceptives need to be over-the-counter and not require a pharmacist or corporations to make our decisions for us.

Until then every woman should have a dose on hand just in case. You never know when your friend or daughter might get raped. 25% of relationships in this country are abusive and sexual violence is common in those relationships.

As far as taking my decision away from me in the censorship of what they sell, why do Wal-Marts in China sell PORN? I guess there are no right-wing groups there to make a scene and the profits are just too good.

Go Robert Greenwald --
Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price MOVIE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NO WAL MART IN VANCOUVER!
Posted by: canuckistani on Jun 30, 2005 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just an upbeat note to say that Vancouver, BC (Canada) council members just passed a rule to not allow Wal Mart (or other box stores) to set up shop in Vancouver proper. Wal Mart was heavily lobbying for 4 years and was unsuccesful. Reasons cited by Council were all the reasons you would hope to hear (loss of small businesses, poor labour conduct here and abroad etc.) This is a fairly significant blow for walmart as it is a direct response to their business actions and basically cuts out a direct market of several million urban Vancouver residents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NO WAL MART IN VANCOUVER! Posted by: mstenger
How far can we go?
Posted by: wobuzhidao on Jun 30, 2005 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could a Christian Scientist become a pharmacist and then refuse to dispense anything?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How far can we go? Posted by: canuckistani
» RE: How far can we go? Posted by: ZylogZ80
Wal-Mart, pharmacies, Plan B etc
Posted by: CJC on Jun 30, 2005 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am NOT fine with Wal-Mart or any other pharmacy or pharmacist deciding what drugs to stock and whom to dispense them to under what circumstances. While making Plan B an over-the-counter drug is a good idea it won't help customers who have to depend on Wal-Mart because it's the only retailer in their area. Who cares if Wal-Mart doesn't carry Jon Stewart's book or certain periodicals. They can easily be obtained online or by mail order. But Plan B needs to be available immediately.

I don't think any registered pharmacy or pharmacist has the right not to perform their professional functions. Pharmacists who think they are entitled to practice medicine or want to impose their morality on their customers should find another line of work. It is, in that way, a free country. No one has to continue in the line of work they first selected if they don't like the conditions of the work. Customers and patients have the right to get any and all medications prescribed for them, no questions asked.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Help me get sued by WalMart!
Posted by: Aaron on Jun 30, 2005 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Help me get sued by WalMart! Posted by: sheherezade
WalMart is so Anti-Female
Posted by: Mountaineer on Jun 30, 2005 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recently in West Virginia a WalMart manager added a rule that when schedules were posted, the employees had to accept any schedule that could have them working any shift from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight. This meant that a person working a day shift up until now might have to work 4:00 p.m. to Midnight. If they could not work the schedule then they would be fired.

Who does this affect? The care providers for children. The people who have arranged baby-sitting for their children during the day. The people who take the children to day care. Who are the majority of care providers for children? Mothers.

These women would have to arrange child care from 8:00 a.m. til 12:00 midnight to be sure to be able to work any shift.

I know that their are fathers that handle this job because I did until my kids were grown. This was a VERY anti-female and anti-family rule.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hypocritical Wal-Mart
Posted by: Kym525 on Jun 30, 2005 10:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wal-Mart are such hypocrites. They won't stock the morning after pill. They won't carry George Carlin's book. They won't carry anything by Eminem, all because of their 'values'.

They may not sell magazines like Cosmo in their stores, but you ought to see what they DO carry in their romance section.

The Harlequin Blaze line of series romances is basically soft-core porn for women. The publisher is riding the trend (and trying to preserve their market share, which has slowly decreased over the years) of what is called 'romantica' or romantic erotica. The Silhouette Desire and Harlequin Temptation lines are also in that category, and Wal-Mart keeps all those series in stock. Now keep in mind the characters in these books are having sex BEFORE marriage, and in the case of the Blaze line, there is use of 'coarse' language for genitalia, light bondage, masturbation scenes, and other such interesting 'kinks'. But Wal-Mary won't distribute birth control...

That's why I know this company is highly selective in their so-call 'morality'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hypocrisy
Posted by: Pete29 on Jun 30, 2005 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can Wal-Mart claim that refusing to sell Plan B is a "business decision", while giving away the first chapter of "Left Behind" for free? Wouldn't the latter be subject to business considerations too? If they don't make any money off of the "Left Behind" giveaway, then why are they doing it? And if they can make money off of selling Plan B, then why aren't they doing it? Clearly they are exploiting their monopolistic market position to promote their conservative social views. Appalling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hypocrisy Posted by: vic121581
Hypcrites!
Posted by: mstenger on Jun 30, 2005 12:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's right--Walmart IS supposed to be a konservative kristian kult operation. They ARE violating the Sunday sabbath which is a violation of the Ten Commandments! Ohmigod! Why haven't the courts shut them down? Afterall, they want to post them in their courtrooms. Ohmigod! What about giving divorced people marriage licenses? Ohmigod! Jesus himself said if a man divorces and remarries he commits adultery! That's breaking a Commandment too! Ohmigod....I think my head is about to explode!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sign the petition!
Posted by: wobuzhidao on Jun 30, 2005 11:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Wal-Mart executives,

Wal-Mart's policy of refusal to dispense prescriptions for Emergency Birth Control -- or birth control at all if the pharmacist who receives the prescription is opposed to it -- is appalling and should be revoked immediately.

We, as customers, believe medical decisions are between a physician and his or her patient. Pharmacists are directed to dispense prescriptions based on a doctor's orders, and the personal belief system of the pharmacist should play no role in whether or not a particular medicine is dispensed or withheld. We would prefer to pick up our prescriptions without a side order of someone else's morality or discrimination. Birth control pills aren't just for pregnancy! Some women are prescribed the pills to control heavy periods/bleeding or hormonal imbalances, while other women use the pill to assist in clearing up acne, for instance.

It is ironic that your pharmacists readily dispense Viagra -- a medication that assists a man in obtaining an erection for the purpose of having sex (which can lead to making a woman pregnant) -- and yet you have the audacity to claim that any of your pharmacists may decline to fill a prescription for birth control pills! That is the height of hypocrisy.

Without consumers and loyal customers, Wal-Mart would not exist. Your company would not be as large or as pervasive as it is today. By alienating the largest majority of your customer demographic (women), as well as insulting them and treating them as if they have no right to make their OWN decisions about their OWN bodies (and dictating that an employee CAN make arbitrary decisions about a woman customer's reproductive system), Wal-Mart is treading a dangerous path that could result in a widespread boycott across this nation.

We urge you to revisit your archaic stance on Emergency Birth Control and the dispensation of birth control pills. Women are NOT children, and we are definitely not YOUR children. The decisions about our bodies are private and we choose to discuss them with our health professionals. Your pharmacists have a primary directive -- that is to serve the customer in a courteous, professional manner. Personal biases or religious beliefs are better left in the parking lot when employees come to work...

Sincerely,
The Undersigned

PETITION

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sign the petition! Posted by: LizB
» RE: Sign the petition! Posted by: wobuzhidao
Pharmacists in general
Posted by: poulsbo on Jul 1, 2005 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where do pharmacists themselves get away in the first place with refusing to fill prescriptions based on moral grounds?

Say I'm a pharmacist and a morbidly obese person comes in to fill meds to help them recover after they've had a gastric bypass. Now, I don't think it's right to get that fat in the first place, so I refuse to fill their prescription. Is this acceptable?!?!???

Also, when you are choosing your career, and you decide to be a pharmacist, do you just have no idea what the job entails? You are the doctor's bitch - if he prescribes it, you effing fill it.
In any other field this would not fly. Secretaries cannot refuse to type letters for their boss because they disagree with the content. Garbage men cannot refuse to pick up the trash of an AIDS victim because they disagree with the fact that he/she got the disease in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ignorant and incorrect!!! Posted by: keribear120
» RE: Pharmacists in general Posted by: vic121581
There's more than ONE reason to take "Birth Control"
Posted by: wobuzhidao on Jul 1, 2005 11:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One more comment:

When I was rear-ended a couple years ago by a cell-phone chatting pick-up driver (and I believe he was on Meth) that didn't see 4 blocks of stopped cars in two lanes... I ended up with back & neck injuries and YIKES, a brain injury. The pain was INTENSE yet somehow I was supposed to deal with 3 insurance companies (can't even explain it all here) and find another car as well as go to countless doctor appointments and physical therapy AND still pay all my normal bills. The stress of it all; the pain, losing my job, not being able to care well for my daughter and home, the pick-up driver refusing ANY responsibility so fighting and trying to get MY insurance to pay him, etc; caused my period which had always been regular as the moon, to go out of whack. Stopped having it for months then when it did come it never ended (for more than 3 weeks) which only added to my stress. My doctor prescribed hormones to get it back to regular. The meds were pretty expensive.

The PIP on my insurance refused to pay for it saying it was birth control. WHO THE HELL ONLY TAKES BIRTH CONTROL FOR JUST 2 WEEKS? Real birth control is only effective after an entire month.

Secondly, my neice was having extreme abdominal pain. They did surgery thinking it was her appendix. Turned out to be severe ovarian cysts. They put her on "The Pill" to control the cysts.

Who gets to refuse ANY reason a women (of ANY age) might be taking contraceptives?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Envi
Posted by: Envi on Jul 1, 2005 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This sets a very bad precedent. Suppose you're one of those nutcase gay-bashers who believes AIDS was sent here to eradicate gays? Does that mean the pharmacist can withhold meds from an AIDS patient? This thing of allowing people to pick and choose how they do their job based on their moral convictions is bullcrap. Those who don't want to perform all functions of a position shouldn't apply for that position. Although I do believe in the right of a business to not carry products they don't believe in, such as pornographic materials, that's their perogative. But to not carry a prescription medicine because of their moral beliefs means they shouldn't be in the pharmacy business. What goes on between me and my doctor really isn't any of their business. The last place they need to be is in my crotch. This seals Walmart's fate as far as my shopping habits are concerned...they won't be getting any more of my money. Their store in my area is getting pretty trashy looking and disorganized anyhow.

So how does Target measure up, anybody know?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Envi -- Target... Posted by: wobuzhidao
» RE: Envi - Wal-Mart Posted by: wobuzhidao
» RE: Envi -- Costco Posted by: wobuzhidao
Good News! Walmart Rejected in Vancouver
Posted by: ragmachine on Jul 1, 2005 4:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just thought I would pass on the news that Walmart's proposed new mega-store on Marine Drive in Vancouver BC was not given approval at a contentious city council meeting held a few days ago. There are Walmarts in outlying burbs of the Greater Vancouver region, like Surrey, but so far Vancouver hasn't let this camel stick its nose into their tent. I think most people would agree that Surrey probably has a lot more in common with Arkansas than has the City of Vancouver, one of the most diverse and international cities in North America, if not the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More motivation not to shop at Wal Mart.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jul 1, 2005 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not that I really needed any more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

About the Plan B pill
Posted by: Melanie on Jul 13, 2005 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why am I not suprised that Wal-Mart will not fill Plan B pills (Emergency Contraception Pill)? They obviously lack compassion in that they run out small businesses, change the local color of small towns, and use low prices to gain constiuents, thus allowing the first two things to happen. Don't even get me started on the low-pay, unfair pay to women, and lack of union. Refusing to fill Plan B would be like not selling condoms, or filling birth control pills. These pharmacists (I'm assuming) are educated in such matters and would know that ECP's are not abortion pills, but hormonal. Not allowing the egg to leave the uterus, therefore not getting fertilized. What if the condom broke, or worse, what if the woman is raped? Should she ever be judged and denied such access? Wal-Mart, as a super-power, you have a responsibility to consider everyone... not just the Christian Conservatives who have taken over our government and airwaves...EVERYONE! Shame on you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rural Girl
Posted by: vic121581 on Aug 22, 2005 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay, so just to set things straight....I live in a rural area and have always...I live in the middle of Nebraska. It should not be such a MAJOR issue that Walmart doesn't carry Plan B b/c Walmart is the only pharmacy that we have. That's BS...in some places we have to go like 100 miles to get to the nearest Walmart...I'm not saying there aren't a lot of Walmarts. There are, but in REAL small, rural towns or parts of the country, the only pharmacy we have is our town pharmacy. Whoever wrote that it's a major concern for rural women is obviously from the city. Talk all you want but only talk what you know about dude.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]