COMMENTS: 10
The 'Leave My Child Alone' Movement
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.
The almost 100 people who turned out in the San Diego region, a heavily militarized area home to a Marine base and Navy Seals, were part of a nation-wide call to meet on the first day of June, put out by MMOB, The Main Street Moms Operation Blue. MMOB, a relatively new grassroots group, is taking a page out of the Howard Dean playbook and rallying people though a well-orchestrated internet campaign.
According to Charlie Imes, chair of the local chapter of Democracy for America (DFA), the MMOB contacted him and asked him to put the Military Recruiter discussion at the top of the night's agenda. "They asked and I said great," said Imes, who was enthusiastic about the night's turnout.
Twenty miles north in Carlsbad, dozens of people turned out to hear speakers and to fill out opt out forms, according to Jeeni Criscenzo, a member of the North County Peace and Justice Coalition who coordinated the event with MMOD.
The opt out form is provided for in section 9528, A, 1. of the No Child Left Behind Act, in part, because school receiving federal funding are required to provide the following:
"1) ACCESS TO STUDENT RECRUITING INFORMATION- Notwithstanding section 444(a)(5)(B) of the General Education Provisions Act and except as provided in paragraph (2), each local educational agency receiving assistance under this Act shall provide, on a request made by military recruiters or an institution of higher education, access to secondary school students names, addresses, and telephone listings..." in addition to granting recruiters physical access to the campus or lose much needed federal funds. (http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg112.html)
The opt out form makes the child's information unavailable to military recruiters and puts the child on a do not call list. Federal law requires school districts to inform parents about the opt out form. While some school districts list the form on either the school district website or the high school website, the San Diego school district does not.
A brief glance at MMOB's website showed at least 20 such meetings planned for June 1, from Bakersfield to Boston. More are listed throughout the month of June.
In addition to falling recruitment numbers and the rising casualty list in Iraq, it appears that military recruiters are now facing a new, aggressive force on the home front: Mom and Dad. Moms like Jane Doe, 55, who asked that her real name not be used because she works for a government firm. She strenuously objects to the presence of military recruiters on high school campuses. "Every parents needs to know what's in the No Child Left Behind Act," she says, referring to section 9528. "They [minors] can't vote, can't make a legal decision and yet the government has access to them before the age of consent!" She shakes her head, incredulous. "This is private information; no one should be releasing this."
Gabe Sandoval, 33, and his mother Lynn, are more blunt about their dislike of recruiter access. "It's a backdoor way of getting recruits," says the younger Sandoval, "An alternate to the draft."
"I am really against this," adds his mother. "They [recruiters] mislead young people and don't fulfill their promises."
"Especially towards minorities," her son adds.
Recent news stories have reported that military recruiters are targeting young minorities, especially Latinos and African-Americans. In some cases, recruiters have been accused of sexual misconduct, including sexual harassment and rape.
Mernie Aste of the local Ya No Project, which counsels young people on the military and educates them on their options, feels meetings like this are especially important. "It's not about just my child, it's about everybody's child," she says. "There's a real need to counteract the recruiter's presence," she adds. Aste plans to attend additional public events as well as parents meetings and tell others about the opt out option.
That's exactly what Imes wants to hear. "This administration has been increasingly stepping on the Constitution," he says. "It's really important to use our voices and our willingness to be heard." He looks at the people still inside at the meeting. "We're already having some impact and it will pick up steam over time," Imes predicts.
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jazzyjer on Jun 29, 2005 3:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Andrea on Jun 29, 2005 6:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope every school in the nation will have an "opt out" organizer soon, as well as teaching about conscientious objection as a right.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kym525 on Jun 29, 2005 10:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwg on Jun 29, 2005 1:24 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 'No child left behind' misnomer
Posted by: davidt
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davidt on Jun 29, 2005 1:24 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the Leave No Child Left Behind act a certain representative David Vitter R-LA was upset that the military was not getting its fair share of fresh recruits so he attached a little rider that made this scandal possible.
He opened up impressionable high schoolers, some of whom are enthralled by violent video games, to the well-trained recruiters to "seduce" our students into signing up for a tour.
How? By making their private information available to ALL recruiters!
But, ha-ha-ha the tide is turning--savvy principals and librarians brought this up at thousands of PTA meetings and sent letters home to the parents about this sneak thievery.
Most of the parents were clueless and incensed. They shut the door fast, since many of the Dads were vets themselves and knew the score.
Now, you would think that this sneaky little Louisianan would be drummed out of politics BUT think again--He was elected Senator last year and he is sitting in DC. I watched his debate against his opposition--he is a complete idiot in the Bush tradition.
I wonder what he is planning now?
Wake up, America!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Debbie on Jun 29, 2005 5:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nevermind on Jun 30, 2005 5:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: seek on Jul 1, 2005 4:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: truthteller on Jul 7, 2005 11:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I made this suggestion on Thom Hartmann's show yesterday, but he said it wouldn't work because the only people joining have no other employment choices. I think there is a lot of truth to that, but I'm sure there are those high school/college age people who are persuadable and for whom military service is one of several options. It is those people we need to reach to help further strangle the administration's ability to conduct these military misadventures. Let's "Starve the Beast" of the war machine!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jazzyjer on Jun 29, 2005 3:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Andrea on Jun 29, 2005 6:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope every school in the nation will have an "opt out" organizer soon, as well as teaching about conscientious objection as a right.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kym525 on Jun 29, 2005 10:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwg on Jun 29, 2005 1:24 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 'No child left behind' misnomer
Posted by: davidt
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davidt on Jun 29, 2005 1:24 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the Leave No Child Left Behind act a certain representative David Vitter R-LA was upset that the military was not getting its fair share of fresh recruits so he attached a little rider that made this scandal possible.
He opened up impressionable high schoolers, some of whom are enthralled by violent video games, to the well-trained recruiters to "seduce" our students into signing up for a tour.
How? By making their private information available to ALL recruiters!
But, ha-ha-ha the tide is turning--savvy principals and librarians brought this up at thousands of PTA meetings and sent letters home to the parents about this sneak thievery.
Most of the parents were clueless and incensed. They shut the door fast, since many of the Dads were vets themselves and knew the score.
Now, you would think that this sneaky little Louisianan would be drummed out of politics BUT think again--He was elected Senator last year and he is sitting in DC. I watched his debate against his opposition--he is a complete idiot in the Bush tradition.
I wonder what he is planning now?
Wake up, America!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Debbie on Jun 29, 2005 5:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nevermind on Jun 30, 2005 5:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: seek on Jul 1, 2005 4:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: truthteller on Jul 7, 2005 11:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I made this suggestion on Thom Hartmann's show yesterday, but he said it wouldn't work because the only people joining have no other employment choices. I think there is a lot of truth to that, but I'm sure there are those high school/college age people who are persuadable and for whom military service is one of several options. It is those people we need to reach to help further strangle the administration's ability to conduct these military misadventures. Let's "Starve the Beast" of the war machine!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
ACORN Smear Collaborator Claims Persecution to Raise Money for Her Legal Troubles
Bad Policies Are Really What's Driving California's Huge Prison Costs




