Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Racism Rebooted

By Gary Younge, The Nation. Posted June 23, 2005.


Forty years after the fact, Edgar Killen is finally convicted of manslaughter in the killings of three civil rights workers. But the system that produced him remains alive and well.
Advertisement

For Buford Posey, a white man raised in Philadelphia, Mississippi, the Second World War had a civilizing influence. "When I was coming up in Mississippi I never knew it was against the law to kill a black man," he says. "I learned that when I went in the Army. I was 17 years old. When they told me, I thought they were joking."

For several decades Posey's assumption about the relative value of black life was effectively borne out by the state's judiciary. Among others, the murders of 14-year-old Chicagoan Emmett Till, in Money in 1955; the state's NAACP chairman Medgar Evers, in Jackson in 1963; the three young civil rights workers--James Chaney (21), Andrew Goodman (20) and Michael Schwerner (24)--in Philadelphia in 1964; and civil rights supporter Vernon Dahmer, in Hattiesburg in 1966 all went unpunished.

But recently history has been catching up with the Magnolia State. Over the past decade state authorities have been picking up aging white men one by one and parading them down history's perp walk of shame, complete with orange jumpsuits and handcuffs.

Mississippi is by no means alone in this. Since 1989 twenty-three murders have been re-examined in the South, resulting in twenty-seven arrests, twenty-one convictions (now twenty-two), two acquittals and one mistrial, according to Mark Potok of the Intelligence Project, a branch of the Southern Poverty Law Center, based in Montgomery, Alabama. But given that Mississippi was home to some of the most notorious race crimes during segregation, it stands to reason that it would be home to many of the most high-profile cases. In 1990 69-year-old Byron de la Beckwith was indicted for the murder of Evers, who was shot dead on his doorstep; four years later Beckwith was convicted. In 1997 the case of Dahmer, who died when his house was firebombed by the Klan, was reopened. In 1998 the Klan's Imperial Wizard, Sam Bowers, was convicted of the murder. And earlier this year Edgar Ray Killen was formally charged with the murders of Chaney, Goodman and Schwerner. His trial ended on June 21 with a jury verdict of manslaughter.

These developments should, of course, be welcomed. Beyond the importance of the prosecutions to the families of those who died and the communities in which the murders took place, they have a broader symbolic significance. They show that the struggle for justice, while long and arduous, can bear fruit in the most barren soil. They also show that these men, along with the scores of others who perished in the same cause, did not die in vain.

But while symbols are important, they should not be mistaken for substance. In June the Senate issued an apology for its failure to enact an anti-lynching law. Its chief GOP sponsor was Virginia Senator George Allen, who referred to the legislative inaction as a "stain on the history of the United States Senate." Allen, who used to display a Confederate flag at his home and a noose in his law office, scored an F on the NAACP's report card in the last session of Congress. Both Mississippi senators, Thad Cochran and Trent Lott, refused to co-sponsor the resolution.

So while the crimes that occurred during segregation were rarely systematic--the individuals who carried them out and the manner in which they carried them out were far too crude for that--they were systemic. They were born from a system of segregation that worked to preserve white privilege in the face of a concerted progressive onslaught--a system in which the white community had to collude in order for it to function. While the scale and nature of those privileges may have changed, the privileges themselves still exist. You can see them in the racial disparities in health, employment and poverty; you can watch their physical incarnation in the segregated academies to which so many whites send their children; and you can observe them on death row, where so many black parents see their children being sent.

The work that Chaney, Goodman and Schwerner aimed to do--break the hold of white supremacy--has yet to be completed. Those who hope it never will be would like to use these trials to draw a line under the past and move on, shifting the burden of racist history from the institutional to the individual and traveling light, without the baggage of its legacy. So long as the likes of Killen and Beckwith are held up as the poster boys of that time and place, the mission to rebrand the South as the region that conquered not just racism but history will succeed--distorting our understanding both of what happened then and also what is happening now.


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What about racism in South Afrika?
Posted by: paschn@comcast.net on Jun 23, 2005 3:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why not toot your tired whistle about the Mandela backed racism in S.A.? Where the Husband of a convicted murderess is turning a blind eye to the slaughter of white plantation owners so he can nationalize them? or how about this?...make some sense over that dildo Bush's promise of $100,000,000 to fight aids in Africa where for some reason it's the #1 killer of blacks because they haven't the money to educate? Footnote; It's also the #1 killer of blacks in America too...........guess that shoots hell outa that logic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Justice needs to be done
Posted by: Lathor on Jun 23, 2005 3:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shame on Thad Cochran and Trent Lott...and especially shame on Barney Shephard and his ilk. So he doesn't think his nice old 80 year old neighbor should be bothered, after all these years? How about, there's no statute of limitations on murder? Because that's what it was, the manslaughter conviction notwithstanding. And at least he's alive to stand trial--his victims have been dead and gone for all these years that he's been a "good neighbor."

That the anti-lynching law has not been passed is indeed a "stain on the history of the U.S. Senate" as George Allen has said. It may seem merely symbolic, and therefor unnecessary to many people (after all, who's lynching anyone these days?), but I believe it is an important step in the evolution of this country. That this happened ONLY FORTY YEARS ago--that people who perpetrated and supported and profited from the system that made this possible are still alive and (in many cases) still in positions of power--is appalling!

Yes, we have made great strides against racial discrimination...but the battle is far from won. Anyone who thinks that the playing field is officially level is not taking into account the decades of damage that were done in the name of white supremacy. As long as there are people still alive who believe that non-white people are inferior, and as long as there are people alive who were victims of segregation, there will still be a need for action. For anybody who thinks that racism doesn't happen anymore, and black people all have equal opportunity and should just shut up and stop whining, just consider that ONLY FORTY YEARS AGO they were getting shot and burned and bombed for...TRYING TO GO TO SCHOOL. Not too far removed from slaves being whipped (and worse) for trying to learn how to read. Can't imagine how this might have an effect? The slave culture demanded a pretense of ignorance as a means of survival, since to show learning could mean death. Those effects still linger even now (remember what Bill Cosby got in trouble over?).

And it was only forty years ago....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Justice needs to be done Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: Justice needs to be done Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: Justice needs to be done Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» Remember Rachael Corrie Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: Justice needs to be done Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» Please put things in perspective. Posted by: ben tillman
MT_Guy
Posted by: MTguy on Jun 24, 2005 9:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thad Cochran and Trent Lott = "Whitey" at his worst

It's amazing to me that people who believe as they do reach any kind of position of power in Congress. It just goes to show you that racism isn't confined to the south ...just as the article pointed out.

The article also made me think of Reagan's recent passing and all the outpouring of goodwill surrounding it. Nothing like exalting a racist to make your heart warm, that's what I say. Reagan's kicking off his election campaign in Philadelphia and then touting States' Rights in the speech that day made me physically ill. In America, the white race has the power and so often it uses that power to remind the people of color just where they think their place in life ought to be.

America ...still a place where a racist can grow up to be president. Amazing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: MT_Guy Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: MT_Guy Posted by: stewer
» RE: MT_Guy Posted by: berrygoldwater
» Reagan was not a racist Posted by: wargammer2005
» He didn't kick off his campaign there. Posted by: Stupendous_Man
» RE: MT_Guy Posted by: PECKERWOOD
Very Little has Changed
Posted by: Kym525 on Jun 24, 2005 6:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, some folks feel that poor Mr. Killen shouldn't have to account for his crimes because he's 80 years old and has been 'a good neighbor'? Typical of the breed. Who cares if the families of the slain civil rights workers ever have closure, or are given some sense of justice, as long as we don't 'bother' this poor old white guy.

And what was the mayor thinking when he said on the stand that as far as he knew, the Klan was just a nice social organization? Are we living on the same planet? Statements like this are exactly why everyone thinks southerners (especially white southerners) are a burnch of inbred yahoos. This brilliant man also said that the civil rights workers 'forced' the south to accept something (integration) that they weren't ready to accept? So, pray tell, when were white southerners EVER going to accept the equality of blacks?

To me personally, the only good Klansman is a DEAD one - and that goes for Sen. Byrd as well. I'm not exactly the forgiving type when it comes to that terrorist organization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Very Little has Changed Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: Very Little has Changed Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» What about the Shawnees? Posted by: DavidTbone
» RE: What about the Shawnees? Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: What about the Shawnees? Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: Very Little has Changed Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: Very Little has Changed Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: Very Little has Changed Posted by: berrygoldwater
Wonderful analysis!
Posted by: philame on Jun 27, 2005 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is a great analysis of the issues suurounding the trial. The posters' responses affirm that the legacy of slavery is still an explosive issue - no surprise there!

This was an opportunity for dialogue and I really regret that the conversation got hijacked!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wonderful analysis! Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: Wonderful analysis! Posted by: Kym525
» RE: Wonderful analysis! Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: What Wonderful analysis! Posted by: neilemac
» RE: What Wonderful analysis! Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: What Wonderful analysis! Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: What Wonderful analysis! Posted by: PECKERWOOD
An outsiders perspective, By Tim Tufuga, Brisbane, Australia
Posted by: timtufuga on Jul 2, 2005 2:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been interested in the "Mississippi Burning" trial. I have read about the systematic culling of Aborigines in places like Tasmania, that would leave just a hand full of natives in the island, to be populated no less by freed convicts, one of these convictry descendents is now a Danish royalty. The first and only truly Australian royalty is a Tasmanian Cinderalla. The Incas, Mayans, and Aztecs, have all become analogous historical examples of Eurocentric genocides and replacement by European races, we now call it colonialism, empire building and the "blackman's burden". Which must include every other non-European race that has been subjected to Aryan supremicist tyranny. Not that I would deny the beneficial legacy of Anglocentric empire which included the American 13 colonies some four hundred years earlier in American history, which now brings me up to date, just as rapid as the judiciary process is in sentencing the killers of the three civil rights workers murdered, manslughtered or whatever, from 1964. The issue of racial conflict seems impervious to the legacy of history, the 'blackbirding' of African slaves onto slave ships has not diminished the overt disdain of WASPS of Afro-Americans throughout American history, even after the Gettysburg Address in 1863 and a century later with the Lincoln memorial address in 1963 by Martin Luther King jr. we can see that people can deny inalienable human rights as much as people can deny the holocaust of the Jews during world war two, and these people including the sentencing jury and the judiciary process of American justice stands to be scrutinised by the rest of the world, as the hegemonic leader of the present world order. The United Nations HQ is situated in American soil, making all delegates from the world politically captured by American spheres of influence. It is undeniable to refute or to challenge American resolve, even within the security council. American hegemony is supreme, its justice system is also being monitored by member nations. The arrogant examples of present day human rights and racialist atrocities are not being committed within these third world nations, or in Balkan states, these atrocities are being committed right in the heart of the most powerful nation in the world, the justice system of America.
It is like the example of "the speck in ones eye", in terms of punishing 'evil doers', when you can not even see justice being served justly in your own country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same old lies about Ronald Reagan
Posted by: Stupendous_Man on Jul 13, 2005 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When will the left learn?

The truth about Reagan's appearance at the Neshoba County Fair.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ADDENDUM:
Posted by: PECKERWOOD on Jul 16, 2005 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One Man's Terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.~Menachem Begin--Irgun Terrorist/Nobel Peace Prize Laureate-----------

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Wonderful Analysis???
Posted by: PECKERWOOD on Jul 16, 2005 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was no analysis of the court-goings-on in Mr. Killen's trials from these born-again zionist posters--just a cacophony of schoolboy name calling and Zionist gobbledygook. One yokel even said that Senator Byrd-- often described as the Conscience of the US Senate-- should be dead!There was never a discussion of whether the jurors even understood the "presumption of innocence".Or, whether they understood that there was a gross violation of Mr. Killen's seventh amendment protection against "re-examining facts tried previously by a jury in any court in the United States." Apparently, most posters on this board are oblivious of that seventh amendment protection, too? I guess that "double jeopardy" went down the memory hole with "just compensation."There was no outcry against being tried twice-- the second trial commencing forty years after the first "hung" jury.Nothing about"witness testifying from the grave."Nothing about the hanging judge, "Pigmeat" Gordon, continuing the trial, while the defendant was lying in a hospital bed unable to face his accusers.Shades of Nuremberg!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What Wonderful Analysis??? Posted by: dcothern
When did racism need a beboot?
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jul 17, 2005 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This lower case line of thinking has never gone away.It just became more refined.Instead of mere color it became ALL aspects of human existance. How's this for refined racism. A
10 cent a minute phone company is passing around a dime in the ad,it's handed to everyone white,tossed into a black Man's
water and laid on the change counter for a latino. That's just T.V. In Business you have to dress in the 'right' dark suit,
speak the 'right' version of english,and present the'right' social image. No color scheme here,you just have to be with the 'Right' crowd. Racism is the foundation of enemy-making.
Enemy-making is the tool those in power use to force the people into long working hours, defense spending,and the Patriot Act. The truth is,left alone,without any help,95% of everybody can get along pretty well. We naturally do the things necessary to keep life keeping on and we're just social enough to not be afraid of eachother.The problem is the 5%.
That's always been the problem.They think they can bend the rules,decide for others,and govern over all by any means necessary.That's why the masses have always been t6he real power.Because these 5% ers are not only the lowest form of human-being,in the fullness of time they become the richest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Nation of Hypocrites
Posted by: PECKERWOOD on Jul 18, 2005 2:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those that did not see The Nation's publisher, Victor Navasky, inteviewed by Neo-con spinmeister, David Frum on C-SPAN's BookTV, Navasky said that Bolshevik communism was never a threat to the World.He defended the so-called Jewish intelligentsia's infatuation with Bolshevik communism and world revolution.Revolution--not ending voter disenfanchisement--was what Michael Goodman and Andrew Schwerner were "preaching" in Neshoba County, Mississippi.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Nation of Hypocrites
Posted by: PECKERWOOD on Jul 18, 2005 2:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those that did not see The Nation's publisher, Victor Navasky, inteviewed by Neo-con spinmeister, David Frum on C-SPAN's BookTV, Navasky said that Bolshevik communism was never a threat to the World.He defended the so-called Jewish intelligentsia's infatuation with Bolshevik communism and world revolution.Revolution--not ending voter disenfranchisement--was what Michael Goodman and Andrew Schwerner were "preaching" in Neshoba County, Mississippi.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Younge conceals the truth about Emmitt Till. Of course.
Posted by: ben tillman on Aug 12, 2005 6:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For several decades Posey's assumption about the relative value of black life was effectively borne out by the state's judiciary. Among others, the murders of 14-year-old Chicagoan Emmett Till, in Money in 1955....

Emmitt "Bobo" Till sexually assaulted a married woman and was subsequently killed by the husband.

Like father like son. Till's father was executed by the U.S. Army after he raped a couple of women in Italy.

Good riddance to them both.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why did Alternet...
Posted by: jbeeso on Aug 19, 2005 9:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...choose a New York Brit to do an article on racism in the deep South?

Was it really necessary to import an opinion?

Couldn't they have gotten a well thought-out opinion piece from someone who had lived in the South for (at least) a large part of their lives?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To keep their readers comfortable, that's why. (1 of 2)
Posted by: Kneel on Sep 28, 2005 4:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's worth noting that in searching for the remains of the three victims, several other bodies were found - blacks lynched while not in the company of whites, and thus there was no national coverage and not much investigation of those cases. Even the more progressive papers up north didn't think those cases were as interesting.

If you watch FOX today, you'll see that a white person still seems to have more value than a black person: look at the coverage of the cases of Natalie Holloway (the real loser in the Katrina disaster, according to Fox) and Taylor Behl.

As for why they brought in a Brit from New York, it wasn't Alternet, but the Nation that did that.

And the reason is the same reason as always: so they can use the anthropologist-studying-an-alien-society approach. This keeps such issues comfortably remote from themselves and their readers. (Philadelphia, Mississippi is a place their readers never have and likely never will see first hand... but it's so interesting to read about those people.)

That way, they don't have to look at themselves as perpetrators. They get to feel a little superior, and attitude which seems to be behind far, far too much progressive writing: Those people are Other, not like us, not like our society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To keep their readers... (2 of 2)
Posted by: Kneel on Sep 28, 2005 4:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While many in the South maintain their denial by saying, "That's all in the past," in the North they keep themselves comfortable by saying, "That's all in the South."

Neither is true, of course. And this article does point out a few stats to contradict that comforting notion, but then bizarrely adds the statistic (which I think is slightly inaccurate) that blacks, though making up only 36 percent of Mississippi's population, make up 75 percent of its prison population.

This, the author says, indicates Mississippi still has a big problem with race.

Now, someone in New York could read this and think, Wow, they've got a big problem down there in Mississippi. Those damn ignorant rednecks. Good thing we enlightened New Yorkers don't behave like them.

Of course, such a racial disparity does indeed indicate a big problem, a huge one. And so does New York's vastly, vastly worse racial prison population disparity.

But that's not something polite progressives talk about; it's not comfortable for smug blue-staters to look at their own prison populations, their own de-facto segregation, just like it's not comfortable for those from upper-middle-class backgrounds to admit to their own immense privileges.

(Most people in the media are from this a background - able to afford things like elite universities and unpaid internships - and thus it remains as transparent to them as the privileges of race do to others.)

Progressives to often avoid issues of class. Racism is more comfortably remote.

But much of the problem is really economic, and that's largely the issue in Mississippi today. (And in Louisiana, and in Alabama, and in Massachusetts, and in New York...)

At least so says a man I know, one who's studied the issue quite a bit, one whose brother was killed by, among others, a Mr. Edgar Ray Killen, in Philadelphia, Mississippi, in the summer of 1964.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not sure why this was on my screen.
Posted by: Kneel on Sep 28, 2005 4:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just noticed this is an older article. Hmmm. Oh well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]