Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

What Really Happened at Guantanamo Bay?

By Laura Flanders, AlterNet. Posted May 24, 2005.


A former detainee talks openly about what he saw and heard, from abuse of prisoners to offensive treatment of the Qu'ran. And it couldn't be further from what the Bush administration is telling us.
Advertisement

In their first article in Newsweek since the magazine received a dressing-down by Scott McClellan, Michael Isikoff and Evan Thomas quote Defense Department spokesman Lawrence Di Rita, who alleges that Guantanamo commanders changed prison rules in response to prisoner complaints about treatment of the Qu'ran. But Di Rita's claims couldn't be further from the experience of Martin Mubanga, a recently freed Guantanamo Bay detainee who spoke to U.S. media for the first time this weekend.

Mubanga, a 32-year-old Londoner who was arrested in Zambia in 2002 and taken to Guantanamo, was released without charge in January 2005, after 33 months in captivity. He says that offensive treatment of the Qu'ran was ongoing, even routine, over the three years he was a prisoner. Mubanga says complaints by inmates about the desecration of the Qu'ran fell upon deaf ears, and often resulted in severe punishment, including pepper-spraying of prisoners.

Laura Flanders' exclusive interview with Martin Mubanga was produced by Christabel Nsiah-Buadi and broadcast on The Laura Flanders Show on Air America Radio on Sunday, May 22. What follows is an edited transcript of the interview.

Laura Flanders: Did Newsweek lie about abuse of the Qu'ran? What did you see?

Martin Mubanga: From my own personal experience and from what I know of what occurs in Guantanamo Bay, this is actually an ongoing thing for the past three years, so we don't need Newsweek to corroborate or substantiate these accusations. We who have been in Guantanamo Bay know that these and other things occur in degradation of our religion.

You described a situation where your cell was searched by six or seven military police and a Qu'ran was thrown to the ground. Can you explain why that was so offensive to you?

In our religion, firstly, the Qu'ran is believed to be the word of God, who we refer to as Allah in our religion. Basically the Qu'ran is supposed to be treated with respect and most people believe that the Qu'ran should be placed in a high place in a house or only taken with respect in a certain condition of purification or ablution. It's never to be placed on a floor, on a dirty floor or to be treated or to be mishandled in any way.

What did those six or seven military police do?

At the time, there was a story going around that I was supposed to be a top-notch fighter, as they said, and they tried to provoke me in many ways to see what I could do. This was one of the methods that was used to see if I would fight and I believe that's why they chose me on this particular occasion and threw the Qu'ran on the floor.

So, they came in, they threw the Qu'ran on the floor, then what happened?

Well, as I was saying, there were two on either side of me, holding my wrists as I was kneeling down, and they had me in wristlocks. And one of the three that were searching took my Qu'ran. And instead of replacing it, to its place, he threw that on the floor... Rahul [Ahmed, a former Guantanamo Bay detainee, who was returned to Britain on March 9, 2004] from Tipton witnessed this and he was in the cage next to me. And he remonstrated the soldier, the MP who did this, which they ignored. They wanted to see if they could provoke a strong reaction from me. And obviously, I was not able to do anything at that time.

So what happened after that?

If you report it to the bloc MCO, like the commanding officer on the block or to the captain, it's maybe just words. They say that they will look into the matter and discipline will be taken, but you will not be informed of any particular action that has been taken. So you know, even after that, another brother from Saudi [Arabia], who is also a British resident from South London, tried to organize various brothers to take a stance and try to get the general -- at the time who was General Miller -- to have placed at each and every bloc, a notice stating that no MP should touch or search the Qu'ran. This, however was refused point blank by General Miller and the hierarchy in Guantanamo Bay. Subsequently, this brother and other brothers thought that they should do some sort of actions to show their anger and to try and reverse this decision, which resulted in many people being "earthed."


Digg!

Laura Flanders is author of Bushwomen: Tales of a Cynical Species. For more upbeat, progressive talk about the issues that matter, tune into the Laura Flanders Show every weekend evening between 7-10pm EST on Air America Radio.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
They must be stopped.
Posted by: illyia on May 24, 2005 2:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is tragic.
illyia

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They must be stopped. Posted by: SgtTed
He said, she said
Posted by: 42Years on May 24, 2005 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has been impossible to crack the surface of the White House spin machine. Whenever a story appears that the Bush administration doesn't like or which makes them look bad, they deny, deny, deny. There is never any factual rebuttal. Take for example, Bush's military career (or lack thereof). Stories abound about his AWOL status and so far there are no documents that prove Bush was not AWOL. Yet, he denies any truth to the stories and they go away. Why is anything going to change now? The information in this article will quickly go into a black hole because it cannot be proven by credible witnesses and because the media is afraid to follow up and investigate it further.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: He said, she said Posted by: markitup137
Koran Scmoran
Posted by: RoguebotV on May 24, 2005 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for continuing the tradition of journalism excellence.
The efforts to give an understanding to the perils our current govenment's actions continue to risk is successful despite all efforts.
I just read the Bill Maher( funny guy, smashmouth politics), for you that do not know of him, has been cited of Treason by a senator for remarks against the future of the U.S. military.
In short, he stated that enlistment numbers are down and that the supply of lower I.Q. inductees had already been consumed.
He was much more funnier.....
Aside from the fact that the senator "requested" the show be pulled from the air it should stand as a milemarker to the slide we have taken as a society.
Once before, men of ALTERnative thinking were persecuted for thought-crimes.
They will get my brain when they pry it from my cold, dead, hands......;>

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Koran Scmoran Posted by: marrieah
» RE: Koran Scmoran Posted by: marrieah
» RE: Koran Scmoran Posted by: LMNOP
Other ex prisoners etc. agree with this account
Posted by: dearkitty on May 24, 2005 10:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See here: guard writing "f***" in koran etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dumb and Dumber
Posted by: dlf on May 24, 2005 4:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I expect as much from the dumb being led by the dumber.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dumb and Dumber Posted by: SgtTed
Foul Scum
Posted by: paschn@comcast.net on May 24, 2005 5:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess it's human nature to heap even more disgust and hatred upon a man of god whom you discover to be violating children than a dirty child molester. Reason? the filthy child molester has done what is expected of him,....he's done an evil disgusting thing, but we weren't all that surprised by it, just angry. When a "man of God" does things like that, we want his head on a stake. So I guess that's why I want to put my hands 'round the throats of all our "fine boys" who have been and continue to perpetrate foul acts against a nation they invaded and it's people at the behest of a pig like Bush. All the American Sheeple continue to stroke themselves with visions of all their benevolent deeds, yet things like this are common to our fine nation. A nation of sheep, lead by a cartel of whores, controlled by American corporations. Welcome,...to the REAL Evil Empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Foul Scum Posted by: markitup137
American's "religion"
Posted by: nise52 on May 24, 2005 7:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The thing about genuine spirituality is that it
isn't used as a weapon to control people.

When religion runs amok, it's always in the interest of these things:

-Money-
-Power-
-Fame-
-Control of the masses-

America has been "programmed" by this Administration's
fostering of a fear and paranoia campaign. It's all propaganda designed to instill an "us versus them" attitude on the part of American citizens.

The human race has never learned to ACCEPT other peoples, races, cultures, and religions because we've been told by the powerful that the U.S. is chosen by GOD (can you say "manifest destiny"?). And anyone who doesn't believe as we do needs to stay the hell out of our way or they will be bombed out of existence.

This has trickled down to the troops in Iraq and other countries. They are frustrated and angry at being put in harm's way for another "Crusade" by American extremists who want to bring non-believers into the great Capitalistic system. (Notice that no mention of converting other cultures to Christianity has been mentioned in the media? Even though our "leaders" equate freedom & democracy with godliness?)

I don't condone disrespecting another's sacred texts and this is unforgiveable. But I do understand why so many other peoples hate us and our country.

We do NOT practice what we preach!

However as American citizens we DO have the right to protest the wrongs that our so-called "leaders" are fostering.

Contact your local elected officials!

D Holmes

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: American's "religion" Posted by: BlueStateBitch
Proud to be an American????
Posted by: BlueMan on May 25, 2005 12:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How in the world do people expect loyalty, patriotism, and pride for the United States government when such acts are taking place? We detain people for years at a time with no charges ever pressed; we invade, bomb, destroy, and colonize countries; disrespect religion and humanity; and rather than make medicines and food available to people, we go to war.
I struggle with this question, and wonder how anybody can profess unbending "patriotism" to the U.S.? They must either be: very ignorant, in staunch denial, or accepting of the role our country has taken in the world. Myself, I am none of the three, therefore I am stuck.
What really bothers me is the question of, "Where did the integrity of our politicians go?" "Where did the pride of our military go?" "How do we claim to be the leaders of the free world, yet OUR leaders have flushed their morals down the toilets..."

Disgruntled American

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Proud to be an American???? Posted by: markitup137
All-American Barbarism
Posted by: hagwind on May 27, 2005 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While reading this interview, along with disgust, anger, and a really depressing lack of surprise, I thought how the MPs' behavior recalled all the stories I've heard and read about boot camp, and fraternity hazings, and the torture of Abner Louima, etc. Whether this behavior was encouraged or tolerated at Guantanamo I don't know, but I do believe that men, especially young men, in our (U.S.) society are encouraged -- and sometimes trained -- to degrade and humiliate even men on their own side. (Set aside, for the moment, their behavior toward women.) Add in our society's general (and often willful) ignorance of "the other" -- any "other" -- and whip it up with "war on terrorism" hysteria, and these horrors are going to keep happening, not just in prisons but on the streets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Former Gtmo soldier
Posted by: wildcats on May 27, 2005 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amazing, here we are listening to someone who is trained to tell of abuse. It amazes me that you pple believe him. Have you ever bothered to try and find out the other side of the story. I know it cause I was there....working every day with these detainees, many of which are extreme terrorist. They would spit in our faces, throw feces and urine on us, constantly call us names, etc, and we could do NOTHING. And we did nothing. We gave them more medical care then they ever had! They were fed the SAME FOOD that we were fed. Did we ever knock over a Koran...yes. This happened occasionally while extracting a detainee because they did not follow the camp rules, like giving up their utensils (which they made into weapons) or allowing us to search their cell for weapons. We NEVER searched the Koran. If we had to move it then asked them to move it. We treated that thing better than our own bible!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Former Gtmo soldier Posted by: wildcats
» RE: Former Gtmo soldier Posted by: markitup137
Questions left out
Posted by: josh26 on May 27, 2005 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if it ever occured to ask the man if prisons in islamic countries allow prisoners to even have a bible/torah, etc. Or how about the ability to pray, worship, or practice.any other form of religious expression. I'm sorry but we are talking about placing a Koran on the floor, not driving bamboo shoots up fingernails or beheading people. I would simply like to hear a muslim viewpoint on how other faiths would be treated in reverse rolls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Questions left out Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Questions left out Posted by: dlf
A Soldiers's Story
Posted by: dlf on May 28, 2005 6:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like for one soldier to explain to me how a country can embargo another for 40? years for "human rights" violations, extract a piece of their territory, build a prison on it, violate human rights at that prison, then talk about our higher moral purpose? If any of you can do that without making yourself laugh at the ridiculousness of it all, please do so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Soldier's Story Posted by: hagwind
I don't get it.
Posted by: scottzak on May 28, 2005 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm looking for a reality check.

A copy of the Koran was probably treated with disrespect. Newsweek mentions this in passing. So what are the real consequences?

Radical Muslims get more radical? They're already over the edge.

Moderate Muslims get insulted? They're already insulted.

American political right and center? 'Not my book.'

American left and Europeans? Outrage because a foreign culture has been symbolically insulted. Even though most of them wouldn't care if someone deep-sixed a copy of the bible in front of them at breakfast.

There are no real consequences to flushing the Koran at Gitmo. Paper and ink. That's all it is. Just like a newspaper or a candy wrapper.

McClellan's job is to control the news. In this case, he is blaming Newsweek for the death of American soldiers (treasonous behavior) to raise a negative emotional response in Newsweek's subscriber base. He wants to hurt their bottom line so they will think twice about reporting bad news in the future.

To combat this I would recommend the following response when the question is raised:

1. Point out that there are no real consequences to either the flush or to reporting the flush.

2. Point out McClellan tactic and declare him to be full of sh*t.

3. Change the subject.

4. Buy a copy of Newsweek, if you feel so inclined.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I don't get it. Posted by: scsmith
» RE: I don't get it. Posted by: dlf
you people have no idea
Posted by: markitup137 on May 29, 2005 7:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it is a shame when people use their power in vulgar ways, but it's the exception not the rule. and to blame president bush every time an individual acts out of line isn't really feasible either. in other words, it's not a problem with policy, yet it is continually framed that way. you're denegrating the fighting force of america every time you lump these bad seeds in with the whole and use these instances as if they refelect on the military and america as a whole. just remember they are out there in harms way whether you agree with going to war in iraq or not, and MOST of them are treating their enemies with more respect than you give them. just think about that for a minute.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To War or Not To War
Posted by: davidt on May 29, 2005 11:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's take the gloves off, shall we?

America is an empire. Pure and simple. What we need and don't have we force nations who have it to give it to us. If they resist they are convinced to do otherwise. Just ask the Philippines, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Chile, Cuba, Panama, Grenada and Iraq. Who do you think manufactured the Butcher of Baghdad?

Right now we are deficient in oil and water. The country of Iraq has both, and in a strategic area of the world that contains the rest of the oil reserves.

US Oil companies have already drained our reserves and now they have joined consortiums to roam the world for more oil reserves. Plus Iraq has the added attraction of the confluence of the Tigris & Euphrates rivers...WATER!

The US has been the bully-boys on the block for about 50 years:

FDR, seeing the flaccid British Empire on the ropes went to the Saudi royalty and proposed US protection for the Saudis in return for amenable oil prices for the US.

Now, who must fight wars? Why those whose function it is the serve the Masters--the Slaves. How are they convinced to fight the wars? They are convinced that their livelihoods, families, sovereignty are threatened and it is THEIR patriotic duty to fight for their country. Even though they have a very small share of the riches and privileges that their country has to offer--it being siphoned off to perpetuate the aristocracy.

Answer this. Has Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowicz (an Israeli citizen, by the way), O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Hannity, Murdoch (an ex-patriate Australian, by the way) Rice, Rove, Novak, Dobson, Frist ever been in uniform?

This was a MAJOR criticism of Bill Clinton at every occasion when he reviewed the troops at military functions but these chickenhawks just get applause.

Read Confessions of an Economic Hitman by John Perkins and see if it doesn't answer some qustions about why our people are admired around the world but our Government is so Hated.

You see the difference don't you?

If not, watch Bush on TV and pledge your allegiance, but don't bend over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: To War or Not To War Posted by: markitup137
» RE: To War or Not To War Posted by: SgtTed
Law of Physics
Posted by: dlf on May 30, 2005 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. I've witnessed our actions in VietNam and now Iraq, I don't blame the soldiers for policy, but for individual acts they are and should be held accountable. Abu Ghraib was a policy debacle yet our government, not those who oppose the war, have chosen to hold the soldiers responsible. Whether it is policy for people to pee on the Qur'an, as is now being reported has not been determined. Until there is credible evidence that orders came from above we must assume that, just as in our prisons, there are individuals capable of finding their own ways to humiliate and torture captives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Law of Physics Posted by: markitup137
» RE: Law of Physics Posted by: dlf
» RE: Law of Physics Posted by: markitup137