Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

The Contraception Museum

By Cynthia L. Cooper, Women's eNews. Posted May 20, 2005.


A new museum reminds us that contraception devices are as old as sex itself.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Sheep intestines fashioned into a condom; crocodile dung with acidic properties for vaginal insertion; and hundreds of metal and plastic swirls, squiggles, loops and bows that form various intrauterine devices are some of the artifacts in the 11 display cases in the History of Contraception Museum in Cleveland, the nation's only museum dedicated to the world of birth control.

The museum was quietly inaugurated into the Dittrick Medical History Center of Case Western Reserve University with a March opening reception. The museum had been under consideration as a site since 2003.

"It's pretty amazing. You can tell there was a lot of struggle through time to prevent pregnancy and people would try anything they could get their hands on," said dental student Mark McCormick, who gazed into the display cases with the only other visitor, his father-in-law, a salesman of medical supplies from Utah.

The contraceptive exhibit was donated by Percy Skuy, past president of Ortho Pharmaceutical (Canada), maker of contraceptive products and pills, who began building the collection 40 years ago as what began as a trade show novelty.

Now retired and living in Toronto, Skuy is still on the lookout for new items to add to the display

While called a museum, the contraception collection is contained in 11 handsomely-designed cabinets that, at present, snake around in an oval, allowing viewers to circulate around and view its contents, including a video, artifacts and minimal textual explanations. Contained within the 1920s university building that houses the medical museum, a separate room is being fitted to house the contraception display in an area adjacent to a re-created 1930 pharmacy and an 1870 doctor's office, complete with a skeleton in a closet.

Not Yet a Major Attraction

So far, the museum is hardly a tourist attraction to rival the Rock 'n Roll Hall of Fame and Museum, which is a mere five miles away.

"I've never heard of such a thing," said an operator for 10 years at the Convention and Visitors Bureau of Greater Cleveland.

The collection of ingenious products to prevent pregnancy extends to cervical caps, diaphragms, sponges, amulets and condoms of all sorts, from the manufactured to the homemade candy wrapper and saran wrap.

"These are intimate articles. People don't tend to save them, and for that reason, they are extremely rare," said James Edmonson, chief curator of the Dittrick Medical History Museum, who says that he wants to continue to refine the museum to add retrospective social context and descriptions to the items.

The exhibit and its 650 artifacts--ranging from beaver-testical tea believed to prevent pregnancy to tiny pills in circle packaging--may serve as a reminder to U.S. politicians that the 93 percent of U.S. women who are at risk of pregnancy and who use contraception have plenty of historical precedent.

"Some of the American political debate comes from an absence of appreciation of this long, long history of contraception practice across the globe," said Andrea Tone, a professor in the social studies of medicine at McGill University in Montreal and an advisor to the museum. She also has written a book about contraception, "Devices and Desires," published in 2001. "American society still has to come to terms with sexuality and women's sexuality and the possibilities of a society that doesn't think twice about their rights to safe, quality and affordable birth control."

Skuy added: "If people think no one should use contraception, they are entitled to their opinion. But this is the history, this is what people did."

The history, he said, shows not only technique and motivation, but attitude. "The political struggle manifests itself," he says. "When we consider how this has now become an everyday item, the answers should come through better education, better use of the products, not negative legislation."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Cynthia L. Cooper, a journalist living in New York, writes frequently about reproductive health and justice.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Inconsistencies...
Posted by: Lathor on May 20, 2005 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny, the inconsistency of those who believe that birth control devices are somehow contrary to God's plan, yet death-causing devices are not. Of course, it's also inconsistent to believe that we are created in God's image, yet are inherently inferior. And then there's the inconsistency of trying to decree what's "natural" and "against nature" in human behavior despite the evidence that both behaviors exist...in nature.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Inconsistencies... Posted by: Talon
History
Posted by: Word Lackey on May 20, 2005 10:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I often forget that Roe v. Wade had Griswold v. Connecticut as a direct precedent. Without the right to privacy in contraception set out in Griswold, I'm not sure Roe could have been, well, Roe v. Wade. Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Busybody
Posted by: Michiganman on May 21, 2005 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It never ceases to amaze me how one person or group of persons could have the gall to presume to dictate personal sexual decisions on others. "Mind your own business", a phrase which is as old as contreception and is a basis for our constitution. Sometimes I think we live in the United States of Amnesia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bugger Off
Posted by: sourpuss on May 24, 2005 3:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is too bad that it requires a Supreme court ruling to get law enforcement and pesky citizens' squads to "mind their own business". Now if only insurance companies and medicaid would stop shelling out millions for viagra for, in some cases, sexual offenders and begin covering birth control. When are people going to see this as big government interfering with individuals' lives? Does anyone see Big Brother?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bugger Off Posted by: luzmejor
Tyrants like to demonize
Posted by: luzmejor on May 26, 2005 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are many reasons for the war against ensuring women's citizenship rights.

First, the Christian church is in decline everywhere. Unfortunately, this is happening more rapidly in the mainline "reformed" churches who tend to be more socially conscious and liberal.

People are still flocking to the radical authoritarian churches because they like to be ruled by an individual pastor who is somewhat of a lone dictator in the independent churches.

People going to those churches are there for the children's "programs" as well as the sense of belonging to a large and influential and wealthier kind of church. They truly believe the old adage "spare the rod and spoil the child."

Also, they seem to need a father figure who will tell them how to act.

They assume that everyone needs to be told what to do, just like they do. They are fundamentally afraid of grownups who are able to govern their own behavior.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes, but... Posted by: Sojourner