COMMENTS: 23
The Mother of Masturbation Speaks
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.
How was Liberating Masturbation received when you first published it in 1974?
Basically, I was overwhelmed at the success, particularly because I was publishing it myself because no one would touch it. The book was seen as a joke so I had to get accustomed to being everyone's favorite joke. The concept of talking about masturbation -- men thought it was hysterical and women though it was repulsive.
Have your workshops changed in the last decade to keep pace with changing trends?
I stopped doing workshops in the early 1990s. I now do sex coaching -- it is like a workshop, only with one person. It's very successful. The women who come are usually professional women. They are all ages - 30s, 40s, 60s. I get a lot of phases -- for example, women in their 50s, who say they are breaking free and now want some sexual pleasure, or women in their 20s. I don't see as many women in their 30s. Maybe they are off having babies. ...
The big thing I promote is the direct use of vibration, which I've done from the very beginning. For myself, I discovered vibration in the early 1960s. Rachel Maines, in her book [The Technology of Orgasm], says that feminists brought back vibrators. Excuse me, it wasn't feminists -- it was me!
Forty years after your first workshops, do you think you've been successful in getting across your message?
Women tell me I've been successful. I'm grateful that I've been able to reach as many women as I have. I'll go out somewhere and I'll be at a party and a woman will throw her arms around me and tell me I changed her life!
But I'm sad that I am censored by the culture that I live in. Goddess bless the internet because I've had a web site since '97 or '98, and for the first time I have a forum for communication so I won't be censored.
What are you working on now?
This next video I'm doing, "Orgasmic Woman," will show vaginal penetration using a vaginal barbell and clitoral stimulation. A lot of women hate penetration because it's too hard or fast or because of friction. "Orgasmic Woman" shows me working hands-on. I work with a woman who doesn't think she is having an orgasm. Some orgasms are like hiccups or a sneeze and some are huge and profound. But, if a woman doesn't recognize that she's having an orgasm, then what happens? How would you intensify it? That would be by taking more time after you have that first orgasm. Don't stop! Keep going! Women are not like guys. We are so ignorant about female sexual pleasure.
What role do sexual pleasure and expression play in the current political climate, when we are simply trying to hold on to our basic reproductive rights?
Obviously, it's been the same all along -- there is some pending disaster so we can't get around to sexual pleasure. What is that all about? If we are always fighting the battle, we never really get to pleasure.
I marched for abortion rights. At the time we thought that that would be it and we could move on. But we've spun into a downward spiral, which has thrust us into a more repressive, stringent time than when I grew up in the 1950s. I even had an illegal abortion. It was horrible. It was literally on a cold metal table. You don't know if you're going to die or get an infection. I started bleeding. I called a friend who was a doctor and he said to go to the emergency room because he didn't want to get in trouble. So I know how terrible it is for a woman to go through this.
What about the impact of abstinence-only sex education on the sex lives of future generations of women in the United States?
Very few women know anything anyway, but now they are really going to know nothing. It's a big fat zero. And we are going to have a lot of unplanned pregnancies. I grew up in Kansas. A lot of girls ended up getting married in high school. I think we might see that again.
The idea that talking to young people about birth control will encourage partner sex is ridiculous. What would help is a discussion of masturbation.
Any final thoughts?
We have to be strong. My attitude is I've got to have more orgasms to get through these times. It's the only antidote to violence.
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Iamnotafruittree on May 3, 2005 2:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Robba29 on May 3, 2005 3:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: crossword on May 4, 2005 3:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: more obesity and less sex?
Posted by: AmyZ
» RE: more obesity and less sex?
Posted by: Ivan_K
» RE: more obesity and less sex?
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: more obesity and less sex?
Posted by: nickptar
» RE: more obesity and less sex?
Posted by: Chiron
» RE: more obesity and less sex?
Posted by: negrita7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jules_siegel on May 4, 2005 4:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LMNOP on May 4, 2005 5:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yeah for the slang
Posted by: Ivan_K
» RE: Yeah for the slang
Posted by: Kym525
Comments are closed-
Posted by: US Person on May 4, 2005 11:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
**###*??*****Haaaa.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Liberal on May 4, 2005 11:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kym525 on May 4, 2005 11:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Florence on May 4, 2005 6:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Wine improves........
Posted by: Needy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thirdmg on May 5, 2005 8:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In spite of the promised sexual revolution a few decades ago, far too many Americans still seem to have severe anxiety attacks over sex and sexuality. In fact, whenever the word "morality" comes up, it usually refers implicitly to the need to restrain sexual behavior. That's what religious right extremists mean when they rail against "immorality" in the media and the culture in general, or against safe sex or gay rights. Even the right to abortion is condemned by them as a right to sexual licentiousness without responsibility for the results. To them, morality is a code word for keeping sexuality firmly restrained within the narrow confines of abstinence (including a ban on masturbation) or heterosexual marriage, and paying a severe price for breaking the rules.
But the religious right is only the most extreme example of our sexual fears. As the nation's over-the-top reaction to Janet Jackson's bared breast proved, many other Americans are no less prone to irrational priggishness. Common sense, rationality and objectivity should have downplayed the incident as a silly triviality. But many viewers tried to disguise and underplay their own fears by shifting attention to concerns for their children. In spite of their many protests that children were watching, I have yet to hear anyone explain exactly how children could be traumatized by seeing a bare breast. If they are, maybe we ought to ban breast feeding.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Talon on May 5, 2005 9:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellen on May 5, 2005 2:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Betty Ann on May 6, 2005 9:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.bettydodson.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» How to enjoy your body
Posted by: Violetflame11
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Iamnotafruittree on May 3, 2005 2:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Robba29 on May 3, 2005 3:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: crossword on May 4, 2005 3:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: more obesity and less sex?
Posted by: AmyZ
» RE: more obesity and less sex?
Posted by: Ivan_K
» RE: more obesity and less sex?
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: more obesity and less sex?
Posted by: nickptar
» RE: more obesity and less sex?
Posted by: Chiron
» RE: more obesity and less sex?
Posted by: negrita7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jules_siegel on May 4, 2005 4:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LMNOP on May 4, 2005 5:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yeah for the slang
Posted by: Ivan_K
» RE: Yeah for the slang
Posted by: Kym525
Comments are closed-
Posted by: US Person on May 4, 2005 11:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
**###*??*****Haaaa.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Liberal on May 4, 2005 11:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kym525 on May 4, 2005 11:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Florence on May 4, 2005 6:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Wine improves........
Posted by: Needy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thirdmg on May 5, 2005 8:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In spite of the promised sexual revolution a few decades ago, far too many Americans still seem to have severe anxiety attacks over sex and sexuality. In fact, whenever the word "morality" comes up, it usually refers implicitly to the need to restrain sexual behavior. That's what religious right extremists mean when they rail against "immorality" in the media and the culture in general, or against safe sex or gay rights. Even the right to abortion is condemned by them as a right to sexual licentiousness without responsibility for the results. To them, morality is a code word for keeping sexuality firmly restrained within the narrow confines of abstinence (including a ban on masturbation) or heterosexual marriage, and paying a severe price for breaking the rules.
But the religious right is only the most extreme example of our sexual fears. As the nation's over-the-top reaction to Janet Jackson's bared breast proved, many other Americans are no less prone to irrational priggishness. Common sense, rationality and objectivity should have downplayed the incident as a silly triviality. But many viewers tried to disguise and underplay their own fears by shifting attention to concerns for their children. In spite of their many protests that children were watching, I have yet to hear anyone explain exactly how children could be traumatized by seeing a bare breast. If they are, maybe we ought to ban breast feeding.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Talon on May 5, 2005 9:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellen on May 5, 2005 2:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Betty Ann on May 6, 2005 9:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.bettydodson.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» How to enjoy your body
Posted by: Violetflame11
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
ACORN Smear Collaborator Claims Persecution to Raise Money for Her Legal Troubles
Bad Policies Are Really What's Driving California's Huge Prison Costs




