Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

No Abortion, No Exceptions

By Stephanie Poggi, Center for American Progress. Posted April 28, 2005.


For most low-income women, the "rape exception" that allows them to get funding to terminate pregnancies that are the result of rape or incest is a myth.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

What rights do poor women and girls have in the United States when they want to end a pregnancy that is the result of rape or incest?

Very few. Despite laws protecting the right to assistance in these circumstances, poor women and girls who have been raped are routinely refused funding for abortion under Medicaid, the government program that is the primary source of health care for those with the fewest resources. Like other poor women seeking abortion, they are often unable to get the care they need.

The history of withholding abortion funding from poor and vulnerable women began in 1976, just three years after the Supreme Court legalized abortion. That year, Congress passed the Hyde Amendment, which prohibited federal Medicaid funding for abortion unless a woman's life was in immediate danger. In 1993, an exception was added to permit coverage if the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest. More than 30 state Medicaid programs have followed the federal model and only permit funding for poor women in the case of life endangerment, rape, or incest. There are 17 states that currently use their own funds to cover abortion in most cases.

So, what happens today when a woman or girl who has been sexually assaulted seeks Medicaid funding for abortion in one of the many states that pay only in the case of rape/incest or life endangerment? The reality is that she is almost always denied coverage for the abortion.

At least 9,100 abortions each year are attributed to pregnancies that occur because of forced sexual intercourse, according to the Alan Guttmacher Institute. Yet, the vast majority of states that only cover abortion under the narrow exceptions report zero payments in any given year. In fiscal year 2001, the most recent year for which we have statistics, the number of abortions paid for by both federal and state Medicaid under the narrow exceptions totaled 81. This figure includes payments in cases of rape/incest, as well as in cases of life endangerment.

Denied funding by Medicaid in most states, poor women who have nowhere else to turn seek help from the National Network of Abortion Funds. This organization of 104 grassroots groups in 42 states and the District of Columbia helps 20,000 poor women and girls to pay for abortion each year, including many who have been raped but are unable to obtain Medicaid coverage.

Member funds share similar stories of women and girls who have been refused assistance from Medicaid, often after fulfilling laborious reporting requirements in the aftermath of a traumatic assault. In some cases, state Medicaid officials simply assert that they never cover abortion, either because they do not understand the rape/incest exception or because they do not believe in assisting women and girls with abortion under any circumstances. In other cases, the burdensome paperwork requirements on the part of the woman needing assistance, the police, and doctors ensure that payment is never made - or will never come in time for the woman to obtain an abortion. In still other cases, the reimbursement from the state to abortion providers is so low that clinics no longer choose to go through the complicated and rarely successful process of seeking coverage.

The truth is that there is no real Medicaid exception for poor women and girls who have been raped or victimized by incest. They join other groups of vulnerable women whose rights are not protected, but instead, are severely abridged by bans on abortion funding. By definition, the Hyde Amendment burdens some of the most disadvantaged women in our society - those who depend on the government for health care. Given racial inequalities in the United States and the resulting racial distribution of poverty, women of color disproportionately depend on such coverage. This makes the issue of abortion funding a matter of racial justice, as well as economic justice and women's rights. Young women, who often have few resources of their own, are also hard hit by funding bans.

A policy report released this month from the National Network of Abortion Funds, entitled Abortion Funding: A Matter of Justice, illustrates the devastating costs to women of bans on Medicaid funding by looking at case studies of abortion funds and the hardships faced by the women they assist. Women who come to abortion funds are usually already mothers and may be unable to care for another child. They have suffered from rape and battery at rates that are even higher than those of the general population, and they are also more likely to be living with a serious illness.

Because it can take so long for poor women to find the money for an abortion, they tend to have later and thus more costly abortions. Often, women pay for abortions with money that was supposed to pay for rent, food, or utilities. And many times, women are unable to get the abortion at all. As many as one in three poor women who would have an abortion if the procedure were covered by Medicaid are forced to continue the pregnancy.

While the Network helps thousands of women and girls every year, the organization can never fill the gap created by the denial of Medicaid funding. As a country, we need to replace harmful policies that target the most vulnerable women with just, compassionate ones that give poor women the resources they need to obtain abortions and also provide support for poor mothers to have and raise their children with dignity.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

For details on the policy recommendations and the work of the Network, please see Abortion Funding: A Matter of Justice at http://www.nnaf.org/policy_report.html.

Stephanie Poggi is the executive director of the National Network of Abortion Funds.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Vera Drake
Posted by: 42Years on Apr 29, 2005 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When society won't help those who need it and looks the other way when those who can afford it do it, we are once again acting in a backasswards way. The politicians scoff at us when they pass legislation. To them it's like passing gas. They know the laws only apply to those less fortunate while their families and friends can do it their way -- with money. Vera Drake? A nice little understated movie about one woman's attempt in 1950s London to help other women take charge of their bodies and lives. The "other" women couldn't afford a lawful procedure so they turned to Vera who used a very simple procedure that didn't include coat hangers or knitting needles. You might notice that with few exceptions, it was (and is) men who made the rules and passed the laws about women and their bodies. When will it ever end?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Vera Drake Posted by: jakealeah
» RE: Vera Drake Posted by: 42Years
» RE: Vera Drake Posted by: jakealeah
What can be Done?
Posted by: karyse on Apr 29, 2005 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been complaining about the lack of access to abortion since the late seventies when I was in the Air Force. It might surprise be to know that what applies to poor women, applies to women in the military.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cami0
Posted by: cami0 on Apr 29, 2005 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It boggles my mind to know Men, who could never experience the state of pregnancy, can dictate to Women what we do with our bodies. You know, if men where able to have kids, we would have 'drive-thru' abortion clinics.
It also makes me sick to know that the lack of CORRECT info about our bodies and birth control
floods media and educational institutions.
I am very interested in finding more info on results of rape/incest
pregnancies and the severe trauma that they may experience.
I am also aware of a certain case whereas a mother with a child born from rape, was denied 'good cause' by CFC, and now is facing FELONY FLAGRANT NON-SUPPORT charges, because she could not name the father.
If anyone may have info that could help, please reply..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: cami0 Posted by: faultroy
» RE: cami0 Posted by: cami0
» RE: cami0 Posted by: grace
» RE: cami0 Posted by: cami0
Condoning Rape
Posted by: ALANHESTER on Apr 30, 2005 4:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One message that this article brings clearly to mind is that it is apparent that conservatives are condoning rape. Ruining a woman's life doesn't seem to matter to them. Of course, for an undereducated woman to have a child will probably place the woman in poverty, which is the grand design of all conservatives

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Murder or Abortion: Scott Peterson Story
Posted by: liberal commies on May 5, 2005 2:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even though it is hard to decipher when abortion should be allowed and not there should be one law to take care of all of it: no abortion. Its God’s will if someone gets pregnant no matter what the circumstance and to murder a life is wrong no matter how you look at it. Should Scott Peterson be charged with a double murder if we allow abortion anyway. Maybe he wanted an abortion so should we let him go free. I think not and we should not be hypocritical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]