Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

The Trouble with Tasers

By Anne-Marie Cusac, The Progressive. Posted April 11, 2005.


The use of tasers -- even on the elderly and children as young as one year old -- is increasing.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

High-powered tasers are the new fad in law enforcement. They are becoming ever more prevalent even as their safety is increasingly in question. The proliferation of tasers in police departments across the country has led to unconventional uses. Among those hit by tasers are elderly people, children as young as one year old, people apparently suffering diabetic shock and epileptic seizures, people already bound in restraints, and hospital mental patients. Police used tasers against protesters at the 2003 Miami Free Trade Area of the Americas demonstration and against rowdy fans at the 2005 Fiesta Bowl. School systems are employing the weapons, with some officers carrying tasers even in elementary schools.

But doctors, reporters, and human rights groups have raised questions about the safety of the devices, which shoot two barbs designed to pierce the skin. The barbs are at the end of electrical wires carrying 50,000 volts. Last summer, The New York Times reported that at least fifty people had died within a short time after being hit with a taser. By November, when Amnesty International released its own report, that number had risen to more than seventy.

In February, Chicago police used the device against a fourteen-year-old boy, who went into cardiac arrest but survived, and a fifty-four-year-old man, who died. The Chicago Police Department, which had recently purchased 100 of the devices, decided not to distribute them until it had investigated the incidents.

The Department of Justice is conducting its own investigation into the safety of the devices. It has selected researchers at Wake Forest University and the University of Wisconsin to run independent taser studies.

Taser International, the biggest manufacturer of the weapon, denies that its product caused any deaths. The company insists that its products are safe. "The ADVANCED TASER has a lower injury rate than other nonlethal weapons and has had no reported long-term, adverse aftereffects," says the company website.

Early tasers, those used from the 1970s until the early 1990s, were lower wattage devices. "The original taser operated on only five watts and was followed by Air Taser on seven watts," says the November Amnesty International report.

William Bozeman, a medical doctor at the Wake Forest University department of emergency medicine, is investigating the safety of tasers for the Justice Department. "They've increased the amount of wattage that's delivered," he says. Above fourteen watts, he says, you get "electro-muscular disruption."

According to Taser International, that's the point. The "uncontrollable contraction of the muscle tissue" allows the taser "to physically debilitate a target regardless of pain tolerance or mental focus," says the company website. The tasers "directly tell the muscles what to do: contract until the target is in the fetal position on the ground."

Taser International introduced its "Air Taser" in 1994. Then, in 1998, "the company began Project Stealth: the development of the higher-power weapons to stop extremely combative, violent individuals who were impervious to nonlethal weapons." Project Stealth led to the M26, a taser with twenty-six watts of power.

In 2003, Taser International started selling an additional version of the twenty-six-watt taser, called the X26, which is light enough for police officers to carry at all times.

Police like tasers, sometimes for good reason. Greg Pashley, officer and spokesperson for the Portland Police Department, says the taser "is a tool that is effective in ending what could otherwise be a violent conflict without injuries. We're finding that time and again."

Many other officers add praise of their own. "It's increasingly a less lethal weapon of choice," says Scott Folsom, police chief at the University of Utah. "It doesn't have residual effects. It's proven to be a relatively safe and effective tool."

The Department of Justice is not the only governmental authority inquiring into tasers. On January 7, Taser International issued a press release that said the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission was investigating what Taser International described as "company statements regarding the safety" of the company's products. Arizona's Attorney General Terry Goddard is also investigating their safety.

Taser International did not respond to repeated requests for an interview. It eventually allowed The Progressive to submit a list of questions, but it never answered them. The company did, however, send several press releases by e-mail. One of those press releases concerned stories by AP and CBS about a study they said linked the taser to heart damage in pigs. The company disputed the news reports, saying, "TASER International is deeply concerned that CBS News and the Associated Press would publicize erroneous links between the TASER and heart damage conflicting with the study author's own assertions and relying solely on statistically insignificant readings."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Anne-Marie Cusac is Investigative Reporter of The Progressive.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Our American Police "heroes"
Posted by: paschn@comcast.net on Apr 11, 2005 10:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One thing you sheeple MUST understand, Police departments are nothing more than Lackeys of the government. Remember the brushed over scandal concerning the FBI? How they framed innocent men for murder to protect their CI's from arrest? Some of those victims of our government spent decades in prisons. They were the "lucky" ones. Others are dead. Kind of reminds one of Ruby Ridge and Waco doesn't it? These "heroes" will turn on the public like junk yard dogs if those in power ordered it. You can bet your Tasers on it. The American Sheeple are so damned hungry for heroes anyone can be labeled as such..for instance our Sports heroes...40% of the NBA have felony arrests... the ones caught that is..heroes one and all...our "brave boys" in Iraq murdering for Bush and Haliburton are heroes. I expect soon to read about our brave heroes in the post office fighting a never ending battle to get our junk mail to us. Heroes by golly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

taser article
Posted by: vianne99 on Apr 11, 2005 1:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for writing a article with many different sources of comments. Trying to give all points of view is refreshing. I would only add there are now three lengthy studies by the Potomic Instute for public policy, U.S. Dept of Defense and The United Kingdom Home Office. It would be helpful if more writers would reference URL's so the reader could have in depth data in order to better understand a subject. The pdf's for theses studies can be found at taser.com/hot topics. After reading more than the 200+ pages, I now see alot more media and political hype in the public comments and the real lack of concern for the police officer and citizen. Thanks again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: taser article Posted by: trudenza
Update, correction, and the San Jose experience
Posted by: junya on Apr 13, 2005 9:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[Note: formatting of links in comments is broken on this website, but I included links anyway for reference]

1 - The latest count of deaths following Tasers I've seen, dated Mar. 4 2005, is 101.

2 - Neither Crowder nor Kimbrell hold the record for the oldest person hit by a taser. Sorry, California's not to be outdone in the race to the bottom: in Dec. 2004 a Los Angeles International Airport police sergeant used a Taser to shock a 78-year-old man.

3 - Yes -
Phoenix police are now state-of-the art: when a shoplifter stole four cans of soup from a supermarket and fled on a bike, he was tracked by helicopter and shocked by Tasers when officers dragged him to the ground.

Presumably, this is one of Phoenix's cases that would have ended in a police shooting if Tasers weren't available to save lives. Is this really the most humane and cost-effective way Phoenix can come up with to deal with a shoplifter?

Seattle, from Jan 2003 through June 2004, had 269 Taser incidents, according to a Seattle Post-Intelligencer report. That's about one every other day -
same rate the Mercury News reported for the first 3 months of Taser usage in San Jose. And 78% of the Seattle Taser incidents were on unarmed people.

San Jose also purchased Tasers for all patrol officers. But you won't find San Jose mentioned anywhere on Taser Intl's website. Perhaps the San Jose story is one they'd rather not tell. San Jose is doubly cursed: police shootings up AND high Taser use.

If you accept a single year's data as evidence of correlation, then the
San Jose experience, where
shootings spiked to a near record high when Tasers were
introduced, forces you to draw the obvious conclusion: use of Tasers
increase injuries and fatalities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remote Control Terrorism
Posted by: junya on Apr 13, 2005 10:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1 - It's not just rookies that Taser people held to a hospital bed. In Orlando FL an 18-year-old was handcuffed to a hospital bed and tied with leather straps after he refused to urinate in a cup. The cop jumped on the bed with his knees on the teen's chest. When the teen continued to refuse, the cop used a Taser to shock him twice until the teen agreed to pee for police. Tasers: saving lives every day.

The police department said the policeman has more than 18 years on the
force
and no history of disciplinary problems,

Taser's power to neatly control at the push of a button can seduce any police officer, short-circuiting discretion, and instantly turn him/her into a rogue.

2 - Birmingham's mayor was not OK with Tasers in schools. He said:

...if you tazed in the school situation, notwithstanding what the facts are, I just don't think you'll be able to be forgiven for that.

He halted plans to bring Tasers to Birmingham schools.

But then, after a talk with the police chief, the mayor caved in. The local newspaper backed the ban and lamented his switch, saying in an editorial that the mayor "got it right the first time".

"You have got to have something that the children fear," says Shiver,

Has the word "terrorism" been used so much that we've forgotten its meaning: "the systematic use of intense fear as a means of coercion"?

"We have to be in a position to control these schools by whatever means possible."

Whatever - electroshock, dogs, water cannons...Control by fear: Bull
Connor would have loved this guy. Just substitute 'colored people' for
'children' and 'schools' in the quotes above. Even George Wallace showed more discretion in speaking.

And that's the problem: it's not just law enforcement that's gripped by the Iron Fist mentality. Many so-called "civilians" in this nation are all too ready to sacrifice their rights, their liberties - even their children - to bring our violent society under "control", not seeing the obvious: increasing violent control teaches that "might makes right" - so those you seek to control realize they must become more violent to win. It's a mentality that's doomed to disaster - for both school and nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Article on Taser Safety or Rant Against Law Enforcement?
Posted by: Tech-Whiz on Apr 14, 2005 11:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article contains some important information, but I don't think the problems described are due to Tasers per se, as much as they are an indication of the abuse of power that plagues law enforcement agencies.

While the touting of Tasers as "harmless" may be overstating the case, it's patently obvious that a Taser is less violent and destructive than the use of lethal force such as guns. As such, we should encourage the complete transition from guns to Tasers or similar devices while still championing an overhaul of the abusive practices that are so common in most law enforcement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ilyana
Posted by: ilyana on Apr 15, 2005 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is against the law for Parents or caregivers to abuse children. Why allow police to terrorize children to gain compliance by children?

Information in the following section is excerpted from: Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Children’s Administration, Protecting the abused and neglected child: An explanation of the Washington State mandatory reporting law on child abuse, 1997. :

"What are the types of abuse and neglect?
Physical injury: A physically abused child is one who has sustained non-accidental physical injury or injuries such as: bruises, burns, fractures, bites, internal injuries, auditory, dental, ocular or brain damage, etc. Injuries sustained may be permanent or temporary.

Mental injury: A child who has been injured mentally is one who sustains damage to intellectual, psychological, emotional or psychological functioning which is clearly attributable to the non-accidental acts or omissions of the parent or guardian. Examples of a parental or caretaker behaviors include a pattern of rejecting, isolating, ignoring, corrupting or terrorizing a child.

Sexual abuse: There is a wide range of sexual offenses defined in the Washington state criminal code involving children that constitute sexual abuse such as: indecent liberties, communication with a minor for immoral purposes, sexual exploitation of a minor, child molestation, sexual misconduct with a minor, rape of a child and rape.

Neglect: Negligent treatment or maltreatment (a dangerous act)is that which constitutes a clear and present danger to the child’s health, welfare, and safety such as:

Failure to provide adequate food, clothing, shelter, emotional nurturing or health care.

Failure to provide adequate supervision in relation to a child’s level of development.

An act of abandonment, exploitation, or reckless endangerment.

Other dangerous acts such as hitting, kicking, throwing, choking a child or shaking an infant"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]