COMMENTS: 106
16-Year Old Got Life Without Parole for Killing Her Abusive Pimp -- Should Teens Be Condemned to Die in Jail?
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.
This article is the first in a two-part series about juveniles and harsh sentencing.
Sara Kruzan was 11 years old, a middle school student from Riverside, Calif., when she met a man -- he called himself GG -- who was almost three times her age. GG took her under his wing; he would buy her gifts, take her and her friends rollerskating. "He was like a father figure," she recalls.
Despite suffering severe bouts of depression as a child, until then, Kruzan was a good student, an "overachiever" in her words. But her mother was abusive and addicted to drugs; as for her father, she had only met him a couple of times. So, more and more, GG filled in.
"GG was there -- sometimes," she said. "He would talk to me and take me out and give me all these lavish gifts and do all these things for me …" Before long, he started talking to her about sex, giving her his expert advice on what men were really like and telling her that she didn't "need to give it up for free."
Unbeknownst to her, GG was grooming Kruzan to be a prostitute. When she was 13, he raped her. "He uses his manhood to hurt," Kruzan recalls, "Like, break you in. I guess."
Kruzan worked for GG as a prostitute for three years. The hours were 6 p.m. until 5:30 or 6 in the morning. She and "the other girls" would come back and hand over their earnings to him. "He was, like, married to all of us I guess," she says. " … Everything was his."
After years of prostitution and sexual abuse, when she was 16, Kruzan snapped: She killed GG, was arrested and convicted of first-degree murder. Despite attempts by her lawyer to have her sentenced as a juvenile, the judge described her crime as "well thought-out" and sentenced her to life without parole.
"My judge told me that I lacked moral scruples," she recalls, a term she did not know the meaning of.
But the meaning of her sentence was all too clear. Life without parole, she says, "means I'm gonna die here."
'These Children Were Literally Lost In Adult Prison'
A few years ago, Sara Kruzan's story grabbed the attention of California State Sen. Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, who introduced legislation to abolish the sentence of life without the possibility of parole for youth offenders. The bill was no get-out-of-jail pass; under his legislation, a juvenile who committed a felony before the age of 18 would serve a minimum of 25 years before being eligible to go before a parole board (also not a get-out-of-jail pass).
Yee is also a child psychologist. When it comes to judging the actions of teenagers versus those of adults, he argues, "the neuroscience is clear; brain maturation continues well through adolescence, and thus impulse control, planning and critical-thinking skills are still not yet fully developed."
Condemning teenagers to die in jail, then, means curtailing the lives of potentially productive members of society. "Children have a greater capacity for rehabilitation than adults," Yee said. Anyway, didn't California's prison system rename itself the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation?
In politics, however, punitive almost always wins out -- particularly in California, where "three strikes" laws have led to a prison crisis unparalleled anywhere else in the country. Yee's bill met intense political resistance and eventually died.
This past February, he introduced a new, watered-down bill that, instead of eliminating life without parole for juveniles would provide a review of a youth offender's sentence after 10 years.
In 2005, Human Rights Watch published an unprecedented study, "The Rest of Their Lives: Life without Parole for Child Offenders in the United States," which found "at least 2,225 people incarcerated in the United States who have been sentenced to spend the rest of their lives in prison for crimes they committed as children." Today, the number is even higher: 2,574.
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ghoulman on Oct 31, 2009 5:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An article about how the US (unlike every other first nation on the planet) puts children into jail for life, even death and YOU find this is an opportunity to advertise sneakers???!!?!!!
I hope you choke on those things you heartless bastard.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SPAM!!! Bastard!
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: SPAM!!! Bastard!
Posted by: Ghoulman
» I went through all the new articles this morning and reported all the spam to the moderator.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: SPAM!!! Bastard!
Posted by: rinthy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Oct 31, 2009 2:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They should let judges make experienced decisions.
Their approach is that of a 3rd world nation and I am sure it does not reduce crime. It's state budget for prisons is that of a
small nation. We are the only developed country in the world that puts minors in prison for life. I have written Boxer and
Obama about this. It is profoundly wrong,
unjust and immoral. There should be a
public out cry about this! It is just
another step backward for all of us as a humane society. If you are from CA your should
call your rep and protest this abusive system.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» We have become one of the most backward developed nations
Posted by: cori
» The Criminal Injustice System in California
Posted by: macdon1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Oct 31, 2009 3:42 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But we should note the context of all this. America is experiencing a massive epidemic of youth violence. It's been going on since 1983.
We know young Americans can't write songs or pick Presidential candidates. We know they mar their flesh with grotesque tattoos and body piercings.
But more seriously, young people in the U.S. would seem to be incredibly prone to violence. The Surgeon General has even written a report on the problem--Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General :
"The [surge in youth violence from 1983-1993] has not been resolved. Another key indicator of violence--youths' confidential reports about their violent behavior--reveals no change since 1993 in the proportion of young people who have committed physically injurious and potentially lethal acts. Moreover, arrests for aggravated assault have declined only slightly and in 1999 remained nearly 70 percent higher than pre-epidemic levels. In 1999, there were 104,000 arrests of people under age 18 for a serious violent crime--robbery, forcible rape, aggravated assault, or homicide (Snyder, 2000). Of these, 1,400 were for homicides committed by adolescents (Snyder, 2000) and, on occasion, even younger children (Snyder & Sickmund, 1999).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The context of youth violence
Posted by: LightningJoe
» Funny how you left this out
Posted by: brunowe
» can't write SONGS???
Posted by: deborama
» MTV 'destroyed' music
Posted by: felipe
» Let me conect some dots for you.
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruehigeAngie on Oct 31, 2009 4:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» America - The Great Experiment
Posted by: PJAW
» Examples of family support in Germany
Posted by: ruehigeAngie
» RE: xamples of family support in Germany
Posted by: ruehigeAngie
» RE: xamples of family support in Germany
Posted by: fc7711
» RE: If the US only....
Posted by: Phe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeonBNJ on Oct 31, 2009 5:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, some youthful offenders need extended sentences when involved with the most severe crimes but even then, it shouldn't be for life. We must recognize that in the past, we recognized that ability of those 18, or at one time under 21 to be able to have suficcient reason to consider their actions as crimes.
The increased media attention of such horrible crimes by minors encourages the politicans in both parties looking for votes to keep showing they are tougher than the opposition so they go back and forth and keep esclating the penalties to these now obscene levels. This is connected to the whole 'War on Crime' attitudes particulary of the Republican Party that started in the late 1960's.
Then include that many trial judges and local proscutitors are elected (or seeking major elected offices later)and need to show they are tough on crime too. Earlier this week, in Pennsylvana, a trial judge was nailed and most of his sentences of minors offenders over 5 years have to be dismissed due to payoffs from a private juvenial detention facility. As a result, sentences for those who were minors at the time of their crimes have to be dismissed, but still the kids suffered needlessly due to his horribly unethical behaviors, including not permitting sufficient and compentant legal counsel.
We must start to look at criminal sentencing terms, not just that of minors, to assure that all defendants have sufficent and compentant legal counsel of all being charged with crimes.
Then there is the horrible treatment many of these juvinials face in jails from rape, general assult and horrible psychlogical damage. That is unacceptable and inhumane.
Politicans are now realizing we cannot afford the costs of extensive sentences with the budget deficits we now face. Criminals are now being released to reduce costs to taxpayers. We should put these long term incarcarated 'kids' into other programs to help them and shorten their jail terms. It would also be much better to instead sufficently fund social programs and schools to prevent these kids from falling between the cracks that lead to criminal behaviors or situations where they end up in situations as in the case in this story.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: harryf200 on Oct 31, 2009 5:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
7.3 billion people banged up, the biggest prison population in the World, even more than China and Russian combined at their height of their (so-called) Communist tyranny!
So much for the land of the free'!
This is an abomination, an affront to what is supposed to be a civilised country and an example to the World. The best you can say about it is at least she wasn't stoned to death!
But the 3 strikes rule is worse. Have you seen what petty crimes are putting people in prison for life? Example: Leandro Andrade was given not one but two sentences of 25 years-to-life for stealing nine children's videotapes, including "Snow White," "Cinderella" and "Free Willie 2." He didn't kill anyone, didn't even threaten anyone! He just stole a few silly things. Cutting off the man's hand Koranic style would have been more civilised!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» 7.3 billion? I think you mean 7.3 million.
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Oct 31, 2009 6:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A prostitute killing an abusive pimp should be self-defense...
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: A prostitute killing an abusive pimp should be self-defense...
Posted by: wbblack
» RE: A prostitute killing an abusive pimp should be self-defense...
Posted by: truthteller
» RE: A prostitute killing an abusive pimp should be self-defense...
Posted by: yellow
» yes but appointed conservative judges hate women
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» RE: A prostitute killing an abusive pimp should be self-defense...
Posted by: redmond
» RE: A prostitute killing an abusive pimp should be self-defense...
Posted by: tremonisha
» You miss the point. Pimps are low life abusive scum...
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chrysalis124812 on Oct 31, 2009 6:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MIAresults on Oct 31, 2009 7:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: betsy
Posted by: politicky
» RE: betsy
Posted by: unrobin
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leftytomato on Oct 31, 2009 7:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I feel like I'm going insane.
Posted by: Dysphoric1
» RE: I feel like I'm going insane.
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: I feel like I'm going insane.
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nobyjingo on Oct 31, 2009 7:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» This is true, but our brains
Posted by: tatamchwh
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Oct 31, 2009 8:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Uggs are evil
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: Uggs are evil
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Uggs are evil
Posted by: Joni50
» RE: Uggs are evil
Posted by: unrobin
Comments are closed-
Posted by: victimssister on Oct 31, 2009 8:52 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While there are some extreme cases where these killers may deserve consideration, there are quite a bit of them that are exactly where they need to be. The Human Rights Watch and other organizations have padded the numbers of people serving these sentences that are truly juveniles. In addition, the majority of these murderers are put through a judicial review before this sentence is on the table.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» After 8 years of the Bush/Cheney regime, do you really expect the gov't to do anything right???
Posted by: JohnTruth2001
» RE: Juvenile Killers, not all poor suffering children...
Posted by: TheExpatriate
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Oct 31, 2009 9:11 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our big-brother gov't needs to be restrained & kept under strong checks & balances, or it will run amok over our rights!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bettyn on Oct 31, 2009 10:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't believe that an abused child like this girl has been treated this way in our name by our government.
Barbaric!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yankee2 on Oct 31, 2009 10:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This all depends of course on the abuse and intimidation having been real, and escape virtually impossible, and that would be the job of the courts to decide. The sooner we begin to think this way, in terms of the rights for abuse victims, the sooner these last remnants of what amounts to institutionalized discrimination against women will fade into history.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: no crime
Posted by: tremonisha
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Annapurna1 on Oct 31, 2009 11:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
life without parole for a 16 y/o is a windfall for the prison company..whether or not she deserves that sentance.. and the criminal justice system will be inclined towards the latter if..for example..they get an up-front percentage of that windfall upon conviction...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» correction...
Posted by: Annapurna1
» RE: kickbacks..anyone??...
Posted by: yankee2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yellow on Oct 31, 2009 11:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But many of the 2,500 cases are not comparable to this one. Many are 16 or 17 year old gang bangers who just murdered other minors outright in cold blood, killed innocent bystanders in drive by shootings or just killed people in general. I have no sympathy for them. To me their age is nothing but a number. One of the reasons that the legal system has been going after teens is that so many are involved in gangs. The exact reasoning is that these are hardened criminals whose "adult behavior and lifestyle" made it acceptable to try them as adults and punish them that way. Being a sociopath who doesn't value human life should not be acceptable. A high price should be paid for taking human life.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why this Girl's Case is different from so many other ones.
Posted by: yankee2
» "Age is nothing but a number" - no informed person can possibly agree with this.
Posted by: fcvoigt
» RE: "Age is nothing but a number" - no informed person can possibly agree with this.
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yankee2 on Oct 31, 2009 11:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They do not always know right from wrong partly because they are bombarded with conflicting messages almost every waking hour, and partly because their minds are not fully developed. Many have been very poorly cared for, not only physically, but also mentally and emotionally.
It really is obscene what we are doing to they who are our only true reason to exist, who we should be protecting and nurturing, our children. They NEED our love, and these most of all, and this is how we treat them?
I also agree that our recent trend toward a prison industry also smells really, really bad. Now incarceration is profit-driven. This is not the only case I've heard of. In another, school children were being sent to what amounts to a private reform school, for months at a time, at a cost to taxpayers of some $3000-$4000/DAY. Their crimes included throwing a piece of meat at a parent, talking back in school and tardiness. In that case, the company that owned the prison had bribed a judge to the tune of about $2 million, and the school profited by about $20 million of tax money.
The good 'ole US of A now incarcerates 8X as many of our population as the Europeans do of theirs. The Soviets were never so punitive, and neither are the Chinese (officially), both of whom we used to criticize on this point. Isn't there something terribly wrong here? Is American really the most brutally punitive country in the world? And now it's a growing industry?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A totally bizarre, insane legal attitude toward children
Posted by: tremonisha
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Oct 31, 2009 12:16 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Same thing happenned in Germany after WWI.
How exactly Did Germany Change From The Total Financial Destruction After WWI To Become So Economically and Militarily Powerful To Control All of Mainland Europe?
It Was Slave Labour Of The German People in Prison Camps...
America is Now a NAZI Prison Camp
Americans Need To Fight For Their Liberation, Or Submit To Slavery
Who Could Believe It Possible?
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Slavery - Coming Soon to Your Own American Town - Unless You Defeat The EVIL in Control Of You
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Oct 31, 2009 12:35 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me.
Now we are Going To Put Our Differences Aside
And WE ARE COMING FOR THE EVIL NAZI BASTARDS In CONTROL of Us
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: First they came for the Blacks, and I did not speak out—because I was not Black
Posted by: richholland
» RE: First they came for the Blacks, and I did not speak out—because I was not Black
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: carolleo on Oct 31, 2009 1:35 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
on Wordpress as PrisonMovement
She really is in need of competent legal help...so if there is anyone out there that can help the Rileys, pro bono- please contact me.
carolleo864@yahoo.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: carolleo on Oct 31, 2009 1:47 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 31, 2009 2:52 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lauraj400 on Oct 31, 2009 3:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This has to be case by case
Posted by: lulu
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fcvoigt on Oct 31, 2009 5:22 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(If you have to pay her, you can assume she is not enjoying the encounter – even if she does get to keep the money, which Sara didn't. Call-girls are great actresses and you are paying for that act too.)
Prostitution is regularly accompanied by abuse and beatings if the rapists don't pay enough.
The rapists often refuse to use condoms, resulting in STDs, HIV and pregnancy.
The pregnancy problem is solved by enforced back-street abortions, even if the mother wants to keep her baby.
("Pro-lifers" please note.
But maybe you rape child prostitutes too and are anti THOSE children's lives?)
How many readers here have been 13 years old?
Remember what it was like?
How much good control did you have over your life then?
Sara Kruzan was 13.
She was brutally raped by her "father figure" and forced into prostitution when she was 13.
All the "clients" who subsequently raped her and paid her pimp must have known that she was under 18.
I am assuming that many if not all of those men would have been over 18, because they were able to pay for their pleasure.
Don't you have a law in America forbidding rape?
And one forbidding sex with minors?
Why weren't any of the rapists charged?
Is it legal to rape a minor if you pay her pimp?
This is the USA.
The judge must surely have been over 18.
He must have been to college.
He must have studied law.
This judge took ONE DAY to think about Sara's sixteen years of life.
He failed to listen to her lawyer's arguments
He just told Sara that her crime was well thought-out, and that SHE lacked moral scruples.
Maybe that trained and qualified mature adult judge did no thinking that day at all.
Or he thought it would be good to discourage children from trying to escape from a peculiarly despicable kind of permanent abuse.
Do you suppose he has kids of his own?
Whichever way he failed to reveal the slightest tiny whiff of a moral scruple or anything resembling humane justice
He has really earned a life sentence without parole for the living death to which he condemned Sara.
Genuine leaders of the FREE world would never tolerate such a man in such a powerful position.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Where are the judge's moral scruples?
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eosrk on Oct 31, 2009 7:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I find this comment very immature and stupid.
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HighRoad on Oct 31, 2009 8:22 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The presentation available through the link below tells the story of one such case...as well as the
story of another youthful offender's life wasted here in the States b/c he was sentenced as an adult.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: klondike on Oct 31, 2009 9:24 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: http://www.alternet.org/rights/143635/
Posted by: richholland
» RE: http://www.alternet.org/rights/143635/
Posted by: leerhok
» RE: http://www.alternet.org/rights/143635/
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: http://www.alternet.org/rights/143635/
Posted by: Ratskii
» 2 1/2 hours is terrible. But 12 hours a day for three years? And lifelong jail for ending it?
Posted by: fcvoigt
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tatamchwh on Oct 31, 2009 10:55 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is not about children, but about abusers.
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: phindrup on Oct 31, 2009 11:45 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then she and the other kids that this creep had attempted to destroy ought to have been provided with accommodation and an education, in recognition that the state had so completely failed to protect them.
Not only would this have been just, it would have sent a clear signal to other low lives living in this manner that their slaughter by any of the girls that they had enslaved would be seen as deserved and that the girls would be properly cared for.
But then, this is the US, and the US has never made any effort to take responsibility or care of its citizens — no more than it does for others around the world who are unfortunate enough to fall into its clutches.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: She ought to have been commended -- not convicted!
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: unrobin on Nov 1, 2009 7:05 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Nov 1, 2009 7:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Makaainana on Nov 1, 2009 8:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Justice???
When dealing with juveniles the statue of Justice shold be allowed to take off the blind fold. Unfortunately it is too often this only happens with adults.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YogiBear on Nov 1, 2009 10:18 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are dozens of comments condemning the judge, the Californian court system, etc., but who among us knows the facts of the killing (which is over 10 years ago). Sure we all know her background, but what about what happened the day of the killing? What was her motive for killing this man? Why wasn't it included in the above piece? It's implied that 3 strikes laws are to blame, but her arrest record isn't detailed. Nothing is explained. I think we're all smart enough to hear the whole truth without being babyfed just the parts of the story the writer wants us to know.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How did she kill him?
Posted by: anarchris
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CaptainStormfield on Nov 1, 2009 12:42 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gopblowsgoats on Nov 1, 2009 9:22 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: She killed a PIMP. She deserves a MEDAL, not Life in Jail.
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SpiritMatter on Nov 1, 2009 10:11 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1) Both potential offender and victim must be treated equally by the justice system regardless of sex, race, religion, AGE, etc..
2) The punishment must be no greater than the offence no matter how many people hate the behavior or how evil they think it is.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: KAW on Nov 2, 2009 7:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abolish Juvenile LWOP Blog
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Phe on Nov 2, 2009 9:37 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What you do and why MATTERS people, age is not all that important. There was a kid who shot his 8 month pregnant stepmother in the head while she slept so he could be his daddy's only child. Would you give the same amount of time to a child the same age who shot their stepfather who physically and sexually abused him/her? NO you wouldn't so stop laying a blanket staement here. Call it out for what it is, a rape victim killing her rapist and state that such a crime NEVER warrants life without parole.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: osd on Nov 2, 2009 6:30 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maddydigrazia on Nov 4, 2009 8:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whealeydj on Nov 7, 2009 10:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: muadhib on Nov 11, 2009 12:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Life Without Parole for Killing
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dewre on Nov 19, 2009 4:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dewre on Nov 19, 2009 4:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ghoulman on Oct 31, 2009 5:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An article about how the US (unlike every other first nation on the planet) puts children into jail for life, even death and YOU find this is an opportunity to advertise sneakers???!!?!!!
I hope you choke on those things you heartless bastard.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SPAM!!! Bastard!
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: SPAM!!! Bastard!
Posted by: Ghoulman
» I went through all the new articles this morning and reported all the spam to the moderator.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: SPAM!!! Bastard!
Posted by: rinthy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Oct 31, 2009 2:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They should let judges make experienced decisions.
Their approach is that of a 3rd world nation and I am sure it does not reduce crime. It's state budget for prisons is that of a
small nation. We are the only developed country in the world that puts minors in prison for life. I have written Boxer and
Obama about this. It is profoundly wrong,
unjust and immoral. There should be a
public out cry about this! It is just
another step backward for all of us as a humane society. If you are from CA your should
call your rep and protest this abusive system.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» We have become one of the most backward developed nations
Posted by: cori
» The Criminal Injustice System in California
Posted by: macdon1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Oct 31, 2009 3:42 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But we should note the context of all this. America is experiencing a massive epidemic of youth violence. It's been going on since 1983.
We know young Americans can't write songs or pick Presidential candidates. We know they mar their flesh with grotesque tattoos and body piercings.
But more seriously, young people in the U.S. would seem to be incredibly prone to violence. The Surgeon General has even written a report on the problem--Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General :
"The [surge in youth violence from 1983-1993] has not been resolved. Another key indicator of violence--youths' confidential reports about their violent behavior--reveals no change since 1993 in the proportion of young people who have committed physically injurious and potentially lethal acts. Moreover, arrests for aggravated assault have declined only slightly and in 1999 remained nearly 70 percent higher than pre-epidemic levels. In 1999, there were 104,000 arrests of people under age 18 for a serious violent crime--robbery, forcible rape, aggravated assault, or homicide (Snyder, 2000). Of these, 1,400 were for homicides committed by adolescents (Snyder, 2000) and, on occasion, even younger children (Snyder & Sickmund, 1999).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The context of youth violence
Posted by: LightningJoe
» Funny how you left this out
Posted by: brunowe
» can't write SONGS???
Posted by: deborama
» MTV 'destroyed' music
Posted by: felipe
» Let me conect some dots for you.
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruehigeAngie on Oct 31, 2009 4:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» America - The Great Experiment
Posted by: PJAW
» Examples of family support in Germany
Posted by: ruehigeAngie
» RE: xamples of family support in Germany
Posted by: ruehigeAngie
» RE: xamples of family support in Germany
Posted by: fc7711
» RE: If the US only....
Posted by: Phe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeonBNJ on Oct 31, 2009 5:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, some youthful offenders need extended sentences when involved with the most severe crimes but even then, it shouldn't be for life. We must recognize that in the past, we recognized that ability of those 18, or at one time under 21 to be able to have suficcient reason to consider their actions as crimes.
The increased media attention of such horrible crimes by minors encourages the politicans in both parties looking for votes to keep showing they are tougher than the opposition so they go back and forth and keep esclating the penalties to these now obscene levels. This is connected to the whole 'War on Crime' attitudes particulary of the Republican Party that started in the late 1960's.
Then include that many trial judges and local proscutitors are elected (or seeking major elected offices later)and need to show they are tough on crime too. Earlier this week, in Pennsylvana, a trial judge was nailed and most of his sentences of minors offenders over 5 years have to be dismissed due to payoffs from a private juvenial detention facility. As a result, sentences for those who were minors at the time of their crimes have to be dismissed, but still the kids suffered needlessly due to his horribly unethical behaviors, including not permitting sufficient and compentant legal counsel.
We must start to look at criminal sentencing terms, not just that of minors, to assure that all defendants have sufficent and compentant legal counsel of all being charged with crimes.
Then there is the horrible treatment many of these juvinials face in jails from rape, general assult and horrible psychlogical damage. That is unacceptable and inhumane.
Politicans are now realizing we cannot afford the costs of extensive sentences with the budget deficits we now face. Criminals are now being released to reduce costs to taxpayers. We should put these long term incarcarated 'kids' into other programs to help them and shorten their jail terms. It would also be much better to instead sufficently fund social programs and schools to prevent these kids from falling between the cracks that lead to criminal behaviors or situations where they end up in situations as in the case in this story.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: harryf200 on Oct 31, 2009 5:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
7.3 billion people banged up, the biggest prison population in the World, even more than China and Russian combined at their height of their (so-called) Communist tyranny!
So much for the land of the free'!
This is an abomination, an affront to what is supposed to be a civilised country and an example to the World. The best you can say about it is at least she wasn't stoned to death!
But the 3 strikes rule is worse. Have you seen what petty crimes are putting people in prison for life? Example: Leandro Andrade was given not one but two sentences of 25 years-to-life for stealing nine children's videotapes, including "Snow White," "Cinderella" and "Free Willie 2." He didn't kill anyone, didn't even threaten anyone! He just stole a few silly things. Cutting off the man's hand Koranic style would have been more civilised!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» 7.3 billion? I think you mean 7.3 million.
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Oct 31, 2009 6:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A prostitute killing an abusive pimp should be self-defense...
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: A prostitute killing an abusive pimp should be self-defense...
Posted by: wbblack
» RE: A prostitute killing an abusive pimp should be self-defense...
Posted by: truthteller
» RE: A prostitute killing an abusive pimp should be self-defense...
Posted by: yellow
» yes but appointed conservative judges hate women
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» RE: A prostitute killing an abusive pimp should be self-defense...
Posted by: redmond
» RE: A prostitute killing an abusive pimp should be self-defense...
Posted by: tremonisha
» You miss the point. Pimps are low life abusive scum...
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chrysalis124812 on Oct 31, 2009 6:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MIAresults on Oct 31, 2009 7:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: betsy
Posted by: politicky
» RE: betsy
Posted by: unrobin
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leftytomato on Oct 31, 2009 7:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I feel like I'm going insane.
Posted by: Dysphoric1
» RE: I feel like I'm going insane.
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: I feel like I'm going insane.
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nobyjingo on Oct 31, 2009 7:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» This is true, but our brains
Posted by: tatamchwh
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Oct 31, 2009 8:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Uggs are evil
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: Uggs are evil
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Uggs are evil
Posted by: Joni50
» RE: Uggs are evil
Posted by: unrobin
Comments are closed-
Posted by: victimssister on Oct 31, 2009 8:52 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While there are some extreme cases where these killers may deserve consideration, there are quite a bit of them that are exactly where they need to be. The Human Rights Watch and other organizations have padded the numbers of people serving these sentences that are truly juveniles. In addition, the majority of these murderers are put through a judicial review before this sentence is on the table.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» After 8 years of the Bush/Cheney regime, do you really expect the gov't to do anything right???
Posted by: JohnTruth2001
» RE: Juvenile Killers, not all poor suffering children...
Posted by: TheExpatriate
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Oct 31, 2009 9:11 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our big-brother gov't needs to be restrained & kept under strong checks & balances, or it will run amok over our rights!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bettyn on Oct 31, 2009 10:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't believe that an abused child like this girl has been treated this way in our name by our government.
Barbaric!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yankee2 on Oct 31, 2009 10:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This all depends of course on the abuse and intimidation having been real, and escape virtually impossible, and that would be the job of the courts to decide. The sooner we begin to think this way, in terms of the rights for abuse victims, the sooner these last remnants of what amounts to institutionalized discrimination against women will fade into history.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: no crime
Posted by: tremonisha
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Annapurna1 on Oct 31, 2009 11:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
life without parole for a 16 y/o is a windfall for the prison company..whether or not she deserves that sentance.. and the criminal justice system will be inclined towards the latter if..for example..they get an up-front percentage of that windfall upon conviction...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» correction...
Posted by: Annapurna1
» RE: kickbacks..anyone??...
Posted by: yankee2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yellow on Oct 31, 2009 11:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But many of the 2,500 cases are not comparable to this one. Many are 16 or 17 year old gang bangers who just murdered other minors outright in cold blood, killed innocent bystanders in drive by shootings or just killed people in general. I have no sympathy for them. To me their age is nothing but a number. One of the reasons that the legal system has been going after teens is that so many are involved in gangs. The exact reasoning is that these are hardened criminals whose "adult behavior and lifestyle" made it acceptable to try them as adults and punish them that way. Being a sociopath who doesn't value human life should not be acceptable. A high price should be paid for taking human life.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why this Girl's Case is different from so many other ones.
Posted by: yankee2
» "Age is nothing but a number" - no informed person can possibly agree with this.
Posted by: fcvoigt
» RE: "Age is nothing but a number" - no informed person can possibly agree with this.
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yankee2 on Oct 31, 2009 11:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They do not always know right from wrong partly because they are bombarded with conflicting messages almost every waking hour, and partly because their minds are not fully developed. Many have been very poorly cared for, not only physically, but also mentally and emotionally.
It really is obscene what we are doing to they who are our only true reason to exist, who we should be protecting and nurturing, our children. They NEED our love, and these most of all, and this is how we treat them?
I also agree that our recent trend toward a prison industry also smells really, really bad. Now incarceration is profit-driven. This is not the only case I've heard of. In another, school children were being sent to what amounts to a private reform school, for months at a time, at a cost to taxpayers of some $3000-$4000/DAY. Their crimes included throwing a piece of meat at a parent, talking back in school and tardiness. In that case, the company that owned the prison had bribed a judge to the tune of about $2 million, and the school profited by about $20 million of tax money.
The good 'ole US of A now incarcerates 8X as many of our population as the Europeans do of theirs. The Soviets were never so punitive, and neither are the Chinese (officially), both of whom we used to criticize on this point. Isn't there something terribly wrong here? Is American really the most brutally punitive country in the world? And now it's a growing industry?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A totally bizarre, insane legal attitude toward children
Posted by: tremonisha
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Oct 31, 2009 12:16 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Same thing happenned in Germany after WWI.
How exactly Did Germany Change From The Total Financial Destruction After WWI To Become So Economically and Militarily Powerful To Control All of Mainland Europe?
It Was Slave Labour Of The German People in Prison Camps...
America is Now a NAZI Prison Camp
Americans Need To Fight For Their Liberation, Or Submit To Slavery
Who Could Believe It Possible?
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Slavery - Coming Soon to Your Own American Town - Unless You Defeat The EVIL in Control Of You
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Oct 31, 2009 12:35 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me.
Now we are Going To Put Our Differences Aside
And WE ARE COMING FOR THE EVIL NAZI BASTARDS In CONTROL of Us
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: First they came for the Blacks, and I did not speak out—because I was not Black
Posted by: richholland
» RE: First they came for the Blacks, and I did not speak out—because I was not Black
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: carolleo on Oct 31, 2009 1:35 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
on Wordpress as PrisonMovement
She really is in need of competent legal help...so if there is anyone out there that can help the Rileys, pro bono- please contact me.
carolleo864@yahoo.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: carolleo on Oct 31, 2009 1:47 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 31, 2009 2:52 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lauraj400 on Oct 31, 2009 3:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This has to be case by case
Posted by: lulu
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fcvoigt on Oct 31, 2009 5:22 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(If you have to pay her, you can assume she is not enjoying the encounter – even if she does get to keep the money, which Sara didn't. Call-girls are great actresses and you are paying for that act too.)
Prostitution is regularly accompanied by abuse and beatings if the rapists don't pay enough.
The rapists often refuse to use condoms, resulting in STDs, HIV and pregnancy.
The pregnancy problem is solved by enforced back-street abortions, even if the mother wants to keep her baby.
("Pro-lifers" please note.
But maybe you rape child prostitutes too and are anti THOSE children's lives?)
How many readers here have been 13 years old?
Remember what it was like?
How much good control did you have over your life then?
Sara Kruzan was 13.
She was brutally raped by her "father figure" and forced into prostitution when she was 13.
All the "clients" who subsequently raped her and paid her pimp must have known that she was under 18.
I am assuming that many if not all of those men would have been over 18, because they were able to pay for their pleasure.
Don't you have a law in America forbidding rape?
And one forbidding sex with minors?
Why weren't any of the rapists charged?
Is it legal to rape a minor if you pay her pimp?
This is the USA.
The judge must surely have been over 18.
He must have been to college.
He must have studied law.
This judge took ONE DAY to think about Sara's sixteen years of life.
He failed to listen to her lawyer's arguments
He just told Sara that her crime was well thought-out, and that SHE lacked moral scruples.
Maybe that trained and qualified mature adult judge did no thinking that day at all.
Or he thought it would be good to discourage children from trying to escape from a peculiarly despicable kind of permanent abuse.
Do you suppose he has kids of his own?
Whichever way he failed to reveal the slightest tiny whiff of a moral scruple or anything resembling humane justice
He has really earned a life sentence without parole for the living death to which he condemned Sara.
Genuine leaders of the FREE world would never tolerate such a man in such a powerful position.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Where are the judge's moral scruples?
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eosrk on Oct 31, 2009 7:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I find this comment very immature and stupid.
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HighRoad on Oct 31, 2009 8:22 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The presentation available through the link below tells the story of one such case...as well as the
story of another youthful offender's life wasted here in the States b/c he was sentenced as an adult.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: klondike on Oct 31, 2009 9:24 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: http://www.alternet.org/rights/143635/
Posted by: richholland
» RE: http://www.alternet.org/rights/143635/
Posted by: leerhok
» RE: http://www.alternet.org/rights/143635/
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: http://www.alternet.org/rights/143635/
Posted by: Ratskii
» 2 1/2 hours is terrible. But 12 hours a day for three years? And lifelong jail for ending it?
Posted by: fcvoigt
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tatamchwh on Oct 31, 2009 10:55 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is not about children, but about abusers.
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: phindrup on Oct 31, 2009 11:45 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then she and the other kids that this creep had attempted to destroy ought to have been provided with accommodation and an education, in recognition that the state had so completely failed to protect them.
Not only would this have been just, it would have sent a clear signal to other low lives living in this manner that their slaughter by any of the girls that they had enslaved would be seen as deserved and that the girls would be properly cared for.
But then, this is the US, and the US has never made any effort to take responsibility or care of its citizens — no more than it does for others around the world who are unfortunate enough to fall into its clutches.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: She ought to have been commended -- not convicted!
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: unrobin on Nov 1, 2009 7:05 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Nov 1, 2009 7:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Makaainana on Nov 1, 2009 8:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Justice???
When dealing with juveniles the statue of Justice shold be allowed to take off the blind fold. Unfortunately it is too often this only happens with adults.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YogiBear on Nov 1, 2009 10:18 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are dozens of comments condemning the judge, the Californian court system, etc., but who among us knows the facts of the killing (which is over 10 years ago). Sure we all know her background, but what about what happened the day of the killing? What was her motive for killing this man? Why wasn't it included in the above piece? It's implied that 3 strikes laws are to blame, but her arrest record isn't detailed. Nothing is explained. I think we're all smart enough to hear the whole truth without being babyfed just the parts of the story the writer wants us to know.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How did she kill him?
Posted by: anarchris
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CaptainStormfield on Nov 1, 2009 12:42 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gopblowsgoats on Nov 1, 2009 9:22 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: She killed a PIMP. She deserves a MEDAL, not Life in Jail.
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SpiritMatter on Nov 1, 2009 10:11 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1) Both potential offender and victim must be treated equally by the justice system regardless of sex, race, religion, AGE, etc..
2) The punishment must be no greater than the offence no matter how many people hate the behavior or how evil they think it is.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: KAW on Nov 2, 2009 7:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abolish Juvenile LWOP Blog
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Phe on Nov 2, 2009 9:37 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What you do and why MATTERS people, age is not all that important. There was a kid who shot his 8 month pregnant stepmother in the head while she slept so he could be his daddy's only child. Would you give the same amount of time to a child the same age who shot their stepfather who physically and sexually abused him/her? NO you wouldn't so stop laying a blanket staement here. Call it out for what it is, a rape victim killing her rapist and state that such a crime NEVER warrants life without parole.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: osd on Nov 2, 2009 6:30 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maddydigrazia on Nov 4, 2009 8:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whealeydj on Nov 7, 2009 10:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: muadhib on Nov 11, 2009 12:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Life Without Parole for Killing
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dewre on Nov 19, 2009 4:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dewre on Nov 19, 2009 4:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
ACORN Smear Collaborator Claims Persecution to Raise Money for Her Legal Troubles
Bad Policies Are Really What's Driving California's Huge Prison Costs




