COMMENTS: 11
Seven Days to Beat Anti-Immigrant Bigotry
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.
On August 28, Cindy Carcamo of the Orange County Register wrote an insightful article called Groups mobilize for the next immigration battle. The article quotes Barbara Coe a member of the white nationalist Council of Conservative Citizens. Coe has referred to Mexicans as “savages” and immigrants as “barbarians.”
As I sat down to write, I initially thought that I should use this blog to blast Barbara Coe for her relationship to organized racism. However, while I was pondering what to write I received a phone call from an old high school friend, Pam, who had read the same article.
Pam was spitting mad and wanted to know what she could do. She is a mother of two and works sixty hours a week as a florist. “I don’t want these bigots to have the last word,” she said to me as I heard her daughter in the background asking if she could have some juice. “I want to take their lemons and turn them into lemonade . . . so tell me what I can do Eric, but remember I don’t have a lot of time!”
I agree with Pam. Time is of the essence and we should use it wisely. Instead of writing what I think of anti-immigrant bigotry I’ve decided to use this week to take action. Below I’ve outlined an action for each day of the week. You can take a bite out of bigotry in less than five minutes a day! Let’s all join together and redeem the soul of America!
Write me and let me know how it went and what you thought. If you come up with your own list be sure to share it here at the Imagine 2050 blog as well. Print this post and pin it up on your wall, desk, or fridge.
MONDAY: Email this blog to six other people who you think might be interested. Write three short sentences telling all of them why you will be participating. Ask them to participate too, and reply to your email letting you know either way.
TUESDAY: Remember all of those times when Fox News host Glenn Beck made bigoted statements about immigrants? Beck may choose to forget but let’s shows him we haven’t. Beck is responsible for much of the anti-immigrant sentiment that has spread around the country. Over thirty companies agree with us and have stopped running their ads on the Glenn Beck show. Let’s help Color of Change get the message out even more. Go to http://www.colorofchange.org/beck/ and add your name!
WEDNESDAY: What can I tell you about Lou Dobbs that doesn’t already disgust you? Dobbs has falsely accused immigrants from Latin America of spreading Leprosy in the United States. When he got caught in his lies he simply lied again. CBS’s 60 Minutes didn’t buy his racist lies and neither do we. Now Media Matters is telling us that Dobbs will be participating in a national event organized by the Federation for American Immigration Reform, a known hate group according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. It’s time for CNN to take responsibility. You can read the short media release by clicking here. Now, go leave a comment for CNN President Jonathan Klein at http://edition.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form1.html?35. Tell him that you read the letter Media Matters sent to him, and you demand that he respond. Let Klein know that you are disgusted that CNN is willing to use bigotry to generate profits.
THURSDAY: Today we are going to show tangible support for those who have stood up against anti-immigrant bigotry. Twice in its recent history the Sierra Club has had to fight off anti-immigrant attempts to take over its well-respected environmental organization and corrupt its mission. In 1998 and in 2004 the Sierra Club drew a strong moral barrier against anti-immigrant racism. In recent days the Sierra Club has been targeted by anti-immigrant leaders still upset by the trouncing they took. One leader, Brenda Walker, went so far as to write an article on the white nationalist website VDARE attacking the Sierra Club for its commitment to diversity. Let’s give a little love to the Sierra Club by taking five minutes to join the organization. Click here to join and let them know why! If you are already a member like me, give a gift membership to a family member or friend.
FRIDAY: Anti-immigrant Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio has been terrorizing members of the Latino community and their allies in Arizona under an agreement with Homeland Security Director Janet Napolitano. America’s Voice points out the Napolitano, appointed by President Obama, could stop the insanity at any time with a single stroke of her pen. People have died under his custody, he has raided the offices of a newspaper that exposed his brutality, and he marched Latinos down the middle of the street in chains. Click here at the website of America’s Voice and send a message to Napolitano that “enough is enough!”
SATURDAY: Take five minutes to call a friend or family member. While catching up on the latest, be sure to spend five minutes telling them what you did this week to take a stand against anti-immigrant bigotry.
SUNDAY: Send me an email at imag2050@gmail.com. Let me know what happened and how it went!
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DAD77 on Aug 31, 2009 12:54 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The foreign born population has increased five fold since 1980 while the US native population is hovering at replacement rate. With the current levels of immigration and illegal immigration, the US population with exceed 425 million by 2050. The US could surpass a billion people by 2100.
In California, the increase in population causes traffic congestion, lack of affordable housing, and has led to the deterioration of our education systems.
Is it worth destroying a whole generation of our citizen children’s educational years simply to have lower cost produce or cheap gardeners?
Demanding enforcement of the US laws is not bigotry. Supporting a sustainable population and looking forward to a better nation for our children should be a priority. The US with a billion people doesn't sound like such a great place to me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Against Immigration
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Citlali on Aug 31, 2009 2:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the great taboo, I hear many environmentalists say. Population growth is the driving force behind our wrecking of the planet, but we are afraid to discuss it.
It sounds like a no-brainer. More people must inevitably be bad for the environment, taking more resources and causing more pollution, driving the planet ever farther beyond its carrying capacity. But hold on. This is a terribly convenient argument -- "over-consumers" in rich countries can blame "over-breeders" in distant lands for the state of the planet. But what are the facts?
The world's population quadrupled to six billion people during the 20th century. It is still rising and may reach 9 billion by 2050. Yet for at least the past century, rising per-capita incomes have outstripped the rising head count several times over. And while incomes don't translate precisely into increased resource use and pollution, the correlation is distressingly strong.
Moreover, most of the extra consumption has been in rich countries that have long since given up adding substantial numbers to their population.
By almost any measure, a small proportion of the world's people take the majority of the world's resources and produce the majority of its pollution.
Take carbon dioxide emissions -- a measure of our impact on climate but also a surrogate for fossil fuel consumption. Stephen Pacala, director of the Princeton Environment Institute, calculates that the world's richest half-billion people -- that's about 7 percent of the global population -- are responsible for 50 percent of the world's carbon dioxide emissions. Meanwhile the poorest 50 percent are responsible for just 7 percent of emissions.
Although overconsumption has a profound effect on greenhouse gas emissions, the impacts of our high standard of living extend beyond turning up the temperature of the planet. For a wider perspective of humanity's effects on the planet's life support systems, the best available measure is the "ecological footprint," which estimates the area of land required to provide each of us with food, clothing, and other resources, as well as to soak up our pollution. This analysis has its methodological problems, but its comparisons between nations are firm enough to be useful.
They show that sustaining the lifestyle of the average American takes 9.5 hectares, while Australians and Canadians require 7.8 and 7.1 hectares respectively; Britons, 5.3 hectares; Germans, 4.2; and the Japanese, 4.9. The world average is 2.7 hectares. China is still below that figure at 2.1, while India and most of Africa (where the majority of future world population growth will take place) are at or below 1.0.
The United States always gets singled out. But for good reason: It is the world's largest consumer. Americans take the greatest share of most of the world's major commodities: corn, coffee, copper, lead, zinc, aluminum, rubber, oil seeds, oil, and natural gas. For many others, Americans are the largest per-capita consumers. In "super-size-me" land, Americans gobble up more than 120 kilograms of meat a year per person, compared to just 6 kilos in India, for instance.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Consumption, Not Population Is Our Main Environmental Threat
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
» RE: Consumption, Not Population Is Our Main Environmental Threat
Posted by: Rick Shea
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bonnett on Sep 2, 2009 10:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too many people consuming too much. Deal with both variables or you deal with neither. You are in denial.
Tim M.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mjx729 on Sep 3, 2009 12:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Nike Dunks
Posted by: jamie1990
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jakeshaffer on Sep 4, 2009 8:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheap Auto Insurance Quotes
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: piaoliang on Sep 14, 2009 7:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sharing Youtube video with folks
On converting FLV to SWF, FLV to SWF Converter is relly the fantastic one. Using this tool,
you can convert Youtube(.flv) video to swf and edit flv files before converting.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jamie1990 on Sep 19, 2009 6:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
links of london charmsborrowed or returned the crown, she should register it. If Queen forgot or postpone returning it, the keepers would warn the maidservants of it. To Queen Alexandra, thisgold necklaces crown represented power. At the same time, it was an invaluable national treasure.
For many women, link of london jewellery is the symbol of status, wealth and identity.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DAD77 on Aug 31, 2009 12:54 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The foreign born population has increased five fold since 1980 while the US native population is hovering at replacement rate. With the current levels of immigration and illegal immigration, the US population with exceed 425 million by 2050. The US could surpass a billion people by 2100.
In California, the increase in population causes traffic congestion, lack of affordable housing, and has led to the deterioration of our education systems.
Is it worth destroying a whole generation of our citizen children’s educational years simply to have lower cost produce or cheap gardeners?
Demanding enforcement of the US laws is not bigotry. Supporting a sustainable population and looking forward to a better nation for our children should be a priority. The US with a billion people doesn't sound like such a great place to me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Against Immigration
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Citlali on Aug 31, 2009 2:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the great taboo, I hear many environmentalists say. Population growth is the driving force behind our wrecking of the planet, but we are afraid to discuss it.
It sounds like a no-brainer. More people must inevitably be bad for the environment, taking more resources and causing more pollution, driving the planet ever farther beyond its carrying capacity. But hold on. This is a terribly convenient argument -- "over-consumers" in rich countries can blame "over-breeders" in distant lands for the state of the planet. But what are the facts?
The world's population quadrupled to six billion people during the 20th century. It is still rising and may reach 9 billion by 2050. Yet for at least the past century, rising per-capita incomes have outstripped the rising head count several times over. And while incomes don't translate precisely into increased resource use and pollution, the correlation is distressingly strong.
Moreover, most of the extra consumption has been in rich countries that have long since given up adding substantial numbers to their population.
By almost any measure, a small proportion of the world's people take the majority of the world's resources and produce the majority of its pollution.
Take carbon dioxide emissions -- a measure of our impact on climate but also a surrogate for fossil fuel consumption. Stephen Pacala, director of the Princeton Environment Institute, calculates that the world's richest half-billion people -- that's about 7 percent of the global population -- are responsible for 50 percent of the world's carbon dioxide emissions. Meanwhile the poorest 50 percent are responsible for just 7 percent of emissions.
Although overconsumption has a profound effect on greenhouse gas emissions, the impacts of our high standard of living extend beyond turning up the temperature of the planet. For a wider perspective of humanity's effects on the planet's life support systems, the best available measure is the "ecological footprint," which estimates the area of land required to provide each of us with food, clothing, and other resources, as well as to soak up our pollution. This analysis has its methodological problems, but its comparisons between nations are firm enough to be useful.
They show that sustaining the lifestyle of the average American takes 9.5 hectares, while Australians and Canadians require 7.8 and 7.1 hectares respectively; Britons, 5.3 hectares; Germans, 4.2; and the Japanese, 4.9. The world average is 2.7 hectares. China is still below that figure at 2.1, while India and most of Africa (where the majority of future world population growth will take place) are at or below 1.0.
The United States always gets singled out. But for good reason: It is the world's largest consumer. Americans take the greatest share of most of the world's major commodities: corn, coffee, copper, lead, zinc, aluminum, rubber, oil seeds, oil, and natural gas. For many others, Americans are the largest per-capita consumers. In "super-size-me" land, Americans gobble up more than 120 kilograms of meat a year per person, compared to just 6 kilos in India, for instance.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Consumption, Not Population Is Our Main Environmental Threat
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
» RE: Consumption, Not Population Is Our Main Environmental Threat
Posted by: Rick Shea
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bonnett on Sep 2, 2009 10:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too many people consuming too much. Deal with both variables or you deal with neither. You are in denial.
Tim M.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mjx729 on Sep 3, 2009 12:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Nike Dunks
Posted by: jamie1990
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jakeshaffer on Sep 4, 2009 8:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheap Auto Insurance Quotes
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: piaoliang on Sep 14, 2009 7:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sharing Youtube video with folks
On converting FLV to SWF, FLV to SWF Converter is relly the fantastic one. Using this tool,
you can convert Youtube(.flv) video to swf and edit flv files before converting.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jamie1990 on Sep 19, 2009 6:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
links of london charmsborrowed or returned the crown, she should register it. If Queen forgot or postpone returning it, the keepers would warn the maidservants of it. To Queen Alexandra, thisgold necklaces crown represented power. At the same time, it was an invaluable national treasure.
For many women, link of london jewellery is the symbol of status, wealth and identity.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
ACORN Smear Collaborator Claims Persecution to Raise Money for Her Legal Troubles
Bad Policies Are Really What's Driving California's Huge Prison Costs




