Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Are the Protests in Iran Getting Hijacked?

By Jasmin Ramsey, PULSE. Posted June 18, 2009.


As the fight over Iran becomes more polarized, images of youth-filled streets in Tehran only tell part of the story.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

As images of the streets of Tehran flooded with Iranian protesters (many of them depicting defiant, injured youth) continue to be broadcast  on news channels, social networking sites and blogs operated from within and outside of the country, debates relating to the contested election results are also becoming increasingly heated and confused in nature. If one dares to go beyond (though not necessarily against) expressing support for the protesters in favor of taking a more analytical approach to this extremely complex situation, they are almost immediately defamed or written off as someone who supports Mahmoud Ahmadinejad ”the bad,” as Robert Fisk of The Independent has recently referred to him. Then there are those who are vehemently against statements made in support of Mir-Houssein Mousavi because they oppose to the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) as a whole. This group, comprised of an otherwise unlikely combination of Iranian and non-Iranian Communists, Socialists, Western Liberals, Feminists, Royalists and various other opposing as well as intersecting ideologies, only support the protesters to the extent that their resistance can help in advancing their own beliefs about how Iran should be governed and what role it should play within the region and on the international stage.  

Writes one Canadian-Iranian communist:

“[The] Iranian revolution has begun and it will go all the way to smash the whole Islamic regime and all its factions!”

So called Islamic Reformist (considered by many Muslims as a self-promoting opportunist) Irshad Manji also recently tweeted that she had received a note from a “well-connected” Iranian friend suggesting that the opposition’s demonstrations, widely reported as being held in support of Mousavi (who was very close to Ayatollah Khomeini), should be interpreted as an indication of the decreasing influence of religious leaders upon Iranian youth:

Heard from connected friend in #Tehran that many say this is beginning of end for clerics -- new generation now awake. Tipping point to come.

On June 13th I sat in disbelief as a speaker on an Iranian radio show (broadcasting from outside of Iran) urged youthful protesters inside the country to meet in a specific location, at a specific time, with their weapons. I couldn’t help but wonder if he would encourage his own children to the same.  Web activists are also inciting those with technical skills to hack IRI operated websites. Their digital protest is joined by satire and parody that is appearing everywhere, mostly to mock Ahmadinejad, who has only aggravated the situation further by downplaying the fervor of the protesters. Fisk does a good job of describing one such episode of this in his article entitled “Ahmadinejad whips crowd to frenzy as opposition muzzled.”

Although it has been reported that Iranian leader Ali Khamenei has agreed to further investigate the fraudulent vote claims, Ahmadinejad’s response continues to be regarded as patronizing belittlement by protesters and reports seem to suggest that they are becoming increasingly infuriated as they continue to light fires in the street, attack police men and destroy property. It shouldn’t be surprising that the forces enlisted to control the protesters are responding with matching (though still relatively restrained) amounts of violence. Reports allege that at least 7 people have been killed (by the Basij and/or riot polices) and many more have been imprisoned.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iran, youtube, twitter, glenn greenwald, mahmoud ahmadinejad, iran election, mir-houssein mousavi, irshad manji, justin raimondo, abbas barzegar, joshua kucera

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Good article :-)
Posted by: Scottx on Jun 19, 2009 3:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the best point by far was, were the elections fraudulent or weren't they? I don't believe G.W. Bush ever legitimately won a federal election, but there are many who still believe otherwise. And those elections are hardly the only ones that have been fraudulent in the last few years.

This being the cause, the possibility that Ahmadinejad -did- win can't be dismissed. Hopefully more information on whether the election was or wasn't fraudulent will come out soon.

I also think that Jasmin's point concerning certain figures in the U.S. administration that were perfectly willing to bomb iranians simply because they are possibly in the process of trying to get a nuclear weapon (when Americans have them coming out of their ears) must be taken very seriously, whether or not the elections were fraudulent.

I wouldn't be surprised if Ari Flescher had things backwards as well; that it was the world's liking of Obama and his less militaristic attitude in comparison to the Bush administration that finally got Iranians to realize that perhaps their biggest problems these days lie a little closer to home.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Moussavi behaving responsibly?
Posted by: Javan on Jun 19, 2009 5:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seeing Moussavi claim victory in the face of such an overwhelming loss, one would think he is complicit in provoking this external image. One would think a responsible leader who loved his country would not play into this, and step aside rather than give the west a reason to bunker bomb his people.

Please remember that up until the election, Ahmadinejad was bashing Rafsanjani and the like for their corruptive practices. Time to check Moussavi’s bank accounts for that CIA/Mossad seed cash.

If Iran were to descend into chaos, the Zionist would have an open window of opportunity in which to attack. Facing domestic turmoil, it would be difficult for Iranians to initiate a counter-attack against the Israelis. But Pakistan would probably give them a helping hand...with their nukes!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement