Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Why I Plan to Emulate Dr. George Tiller

By Rozalyn Farmer Love, Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Posted June 15, 2009.


As a future OB/GYN, I dream of delivering healthy babies. But as part of my practice, I also plan to provide abortions to women who need them.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If I'd passed her on the street, I probably wouldn't have known her. Her gait is a bit stiff and her left eye somehow different from her right. She's not famous, exactly, but some people might know her name: Emily Lyons. She's the nurse who survived the 1998 bombing of an abortion clinic in Birmingham at the hands of Eric Rudolph.

I was 14 years old when that clinic was bombed, killing a police officer and spraying Emily's body full of hot nails and shrapnel. Back then, I lived in a small Alabama town, went to church every Sunday and was adamantly opposed to abortion. But by the time I met Emily last year, I was president of the Birmingham chapter of Medical Students for Choice, a group supporting abortion rights. Watching her walk slowly into our fund-raiser on her husband's arm -- a woman who'd endured more than 18 operations -- I thought of all she'd been through and knew that I'd come to the right decision in my support of reproductive rights.

That conviction only became stronger after I read that Kansas physician George Tiller had been murdered at his Wichita church.

I'm a third-year medical student at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. I plan to become an obstetrician-gynecologist. I dream of delivering healthy babies, working with families and supporting midwifery. But as part of my practice, I also envision providing abortions to women who need them.

The road I took to get here isn't your stereotypical one. My parents are conservative Christians who believe abortion is wrong. Growing up, I naturally shared their view. But I've also wanted to be a doctor since I was 4 years old, and in high school, I began to feel drawn to issues of women's health. In college, I designed my own major to broaden my understanding of women's health by including psychology, sociology and women's studies.

I also served as a counselor for a volunteer organization that helps victims of rape. I sat in hospital rooms with young women who would look at me and say, "I just couldn't carry his baby." I could feel their desperation.

At the same time, I found myself shocked at how little many of my friends -- women who were studying biology and planning to become doctors -- knew about their own sexual health. They didn't know about or couldn't get the reproductive health care they needed because of barriers put up by their culture, their religion and their parents.

I began to feel as if I were leading a double life. At school, the choices I saw women struggling with were forcing me to question my old convictions. When I went home, I'd go to church with my parents but would find that my views contrasted starkly with those I heard in the sermons. It was a difficult time, because I felt that neither my family nor my church would welcome my questions or understand my struggle.

For the most part, I don't talk to my parents about those beliefs. They already feel as though I've turned my back on much of what they taught me because my husband and I bought a house and lived together for a few months before we were married. Two and a half years later, that rift isn't fully healed. I know that my views on reproductive rights would be another blow.

But ultimately, we have more in common than they might think. I agree that ending an unwanted pregnancy is a tragedy. When I advocate for reproductive rights, for choice, I don't claim that abortion is morally acceptable. I think that it's a very private, intensely personal decision. But I was stunned when one of my professors, a pathologist and a Planned Parenthood supporter, told me that decades ago, entire wings of the university's hospital were filled with women dying from infections caused by botched abortions. It's clear that women who don't want to be pregnant won't be deterred by limited access to providers or to clinics. And I believe that it's immoral to let them die rather than provide them with safe, competent care.

I still have a long way to go in my medical training. I've never witnessed an actual abortion procedure, though I have been trained, through my work in Medical Students for Choice, in manual vacuum aspiration, a simple procedure used for both incomplete miscarriages and elective terminations in the first trimester. I plan to choose a residency program that provides further training -- a place where I won't worry that asking to be taught to perform an abortion could somehow limit my future options. At the start of medical school, I was very careful about how I presented my views to the faculty for fear that I could jeopardize my grades or hurt my chances for recommendations or of being accepted into a program run by any of the professors.

As I continue my education, my views on abortion are still evolving. Take late-term abortions. When I first heard about them, I was horrified.

It wasn't until I spent time in ultrasound rooms in graduate school that I began to see late-trimester abortions in a very different light. In one case, the patient's baby had just been diagnosed with a lethal congenital anomaly. The high likelihood was that it wouldn't survive after birth for more than a few minutes. As long as the baby remained in her mother's womb, however, she would live. I asked the physician what this woman's options were. The answer was, not many. She could choose to continue the pregnancy, but then she might be waiting for almost 20 more weeks to give birth to a baby that would never take more than a few breaths on its own. She was past the point where she could legally terminate the pregnancy in Alabama. If she could get an appointment in Atlanta within the next week, she might be able to have the procedure there. Beyond that, there were only a few physicians in the nation who would perform an abortion in such a case.

I could hardly wrap my mind around the agony that this woman and her husband must have been facing. They needed a caring physician to help them through this dark moment, and if they chose not to continue the pregnancy, they also needed a physician who was both skilled enough and brave enough to provide them with the care they needed. They needed Dr. Tiller.

I can't yet imagine doing the kind of work that he did. When I think about my future practice, I think about a doctor I met at a conference who spoke candidly about the harassment his children endured at school because of what their father did. I wonder what seventh grade might be like for my children if I choose to provide abortions.

I'm not the only one with questions. Once, after Medical Students for Choice co-hosted a panel discussion on reducing the number of abortions by providing better education on reproductive health, some of my classmates approached close friends of mine. They were puzzled that an abortion-rights group was talking about wanting to reduce abortions -- and that it viewed ending unwanted pregnancies as a tragedy. Mostly, though, they were confused about what I was doing there. "I know Roz goes to church every Sunday and that she's a good person," one classmate asked. "Why would she be involved in a group like this?"

I know my answer to that question. Someday I hope my classmates will understand, too.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: abortion, dr. george tiller, abortion clinics, emily lyons, eric rudolph

Rozalyn Farmer Love is a third-year medical student at the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Congratulations
Posted by: BobS on Jun 15, 2009 12:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It takes a lot of courage to do what you are doing. Keep on keepin' on!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Agree totally Posted by: BlueTigress
Yes, providing abortions to women who need them is a noble cause...
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jun 15, 2009 1:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm concerned about issues like abortion instead of contraception, and also the keen interest eugenicists have shown towards abortion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Further note on eugenicists Posted by: BlueTigress
Create a model or visual aid to educate public on abortion
Posted by: Moonray on Jun 15, 2009 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ultrasound is a great medical technology, but it has been devastating to the women's movement because it's used to portray fetuses as fully formed mini-humans who "wave" at the outside world and perform generally like children rather than zygotes. The choice movement needs more visual aids to teach people that the vast majority of abortions involve unformed fetuses that are no more full-fledged humans than women's appendixes or gall bladders.

Also, it's important to tie the anti-abortion fanatics to religion, which fuels and funds them. Christians in particular oppose abortion because it challenges the myth of a soul being magically injected into the fertilized egg at the moment of conception. Without belief in that myth the Christian religion falls apart and Bible-thumpers lose their ability to instill fear and guilt into the population. In short, they lose their power. That's why they fight so hard against abortion.

All Americans should demand an end to tax exemptions to religious groups as well as the huge payments of tax dollars to "faith-based organizations." Those changes alone could pay for a complete overhaul in our health care system -- not just the token changes Congress is working on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Interesting, isn't it.... Posted by: morticia
Question
Posted by: progressive-life on Jun 15, 2009 5:24 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
would you perform abortions to healthy women where the baby is healthy?????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Question Posted by: xvictor
» RE: Question Posted by: progressive-life
» Is it your fetus? Posted by: xvictor
» RE: Is it your fetus? Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: Is it your fetus? Posted by: mjglow
» you're right.. Posted by: mjglow
» RE: you're right.. Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: you're right.. Posted by: mjglow
» RE: fetus != child/baby/person Posted by: MeyravLevine
» RE: fetus != child/baby/person Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: Question Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: Question Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: Question Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: Question Posted by: Caleb Darkstar
» Mr. Pointy Head! Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Question Yes Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Question Yes Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: Question Yes Posted by: Quannah
» Abortion is Legal Posted by: eres
» RE: Abortion is Legal Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: Question Posted by: MotherLodeBeth
» What!?!?!?!?!? Posted by: gerty954
» RE: Question Posted by: Vik
» *** TROLL ALERT!!! *** Posted by: Quannah
good article to make you think...
Posted by: ellie on Jun 15, 2009 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you developed a medical condition during late pregnancy that would kill you before birth and you were past the cut off date for early trimester abortions, would you rather die then abort???

if you were carrying a pregnancy that you knew there would be a horrible and painful death right after birth, what would you do???

what about finding out late that the fetus you are carrying would have a painful existence or never be aware or conscious, only kept alive by being hooked up to life support and other measures... are you tough enough to do this???

don't want to go back to the days when it was a clear choice for the dad-to-be to choose between his wife or soon-to-be newborn... during these times, it was encouraged to go for the child because you could always find a new wife...

don't want to go back to the days of botched abortions and death... helped a friend years ago before Roe get an abortion due to date rape... it involved 4 different shady characters and a woman to do the procedure... my friend died 3 days later from infection...

all abortions should be legal due to their personal and private implications... it's a medical decision, not up to the courts...

remember Roe is not about abortion only, it's basis is about privacy rights...

hope this author can stay on track with her career plans... we need docs like her...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: good article to make you think... Posted by: Caleb Darkstar
70% of Ordained Clergy are Pro-Choice
Posted by: hncarp00 on Jun 15, 2009 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for your essay and for your commitment to women's health and human rights (abortion is a human rights issue).

I just wanted to let you know that you might be surprised where you find your allies. At least a figure from the 90's showed that 70% of Ordained Clergy are/were pro-choice. This number may have slipped a bit, but you can find allies for reproductive rights in churches/synagogues if you would like to try to figure out how to explain your views through a religiously oriented lens. (UCC or UU churches might be best able to help you articulate your beliefs)

When abortion was illegal, there was a network of ministers, particularly in the mid-West and South, that helped women get safe(r) abortions.

Taking on late-trimester abortions is as admirable as it is necessary. Less than 1% of abortions are late abortions such as those performed by Dr. Tiller, and they all require medical necessity (and to be signed off by two other doctors) to be performed. These are the most sympathetic of abortions because they are usually wanted pregnancies that end horribly due to nature's cruel red claw. Yet, the anti-choicers fawn over late-term abortion fetus porn, like everyone of these abortions is performed for fun and giggles and that a happy, healthy baby would be the result of EVERY PREGNANCY in their sick fantasies. Women have no minds, abortion providers are evil men, and a fetus can perform a two-step in utero and wave for the camera fully formed on the day of conception. Anti-choicers simply do not accept medical reality, let alone the full human rights of women to make decisions about their bodies. Anti-choicers are NOT pro-life, their positions (anti-contraception, anti-universal healthcare, and anti-daycare) create the exact kinds of conditions that make more abortions necessary. Anti-choicers simply want to control the lives of others because they are authoritarians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

diolagirl
Posted by: diola girl on Jun 15, 2009 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I salute you in your bravery and willingness to go against your culture and your religion in order to provide women with safe abortions. Both my aunt, who is 93, and my mother, who is 91, had illegal backstreet abortions, long before the procedures were legal. They both went on to produce healthy children and both became ardent supporters of Roe vs. Wade and a women's right to choose.

I also witnessed illegal abortions when I lived in Africa as girls took abortifacient mixtures of boiled peanuts. Some died, and then did so in agony. It would be shameful if we went back to those backstreet days. We need you and we need those Dr. Tillers who are willing to stand up to the fascist and vocal, pro-life segment of our population willing to kill in order to save unwanted fetuses. Isn't that oxymoronic?

No woman has an abortion without intense emotions and reflection. There are already too many unwanted children in this world. We need stronger laws protecting all women and all doctors and all clinics in this fight for the right to choose. Rozalyn, keep up the good work! I would be proud to have you as my daughter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A brave choice, all things considered
Posted by: willymack on Jun 15, 2009 9:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But, if I were you, I wouldn't advertise myself too much. There are a lot of homicidal nuts out there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE-Why I Plan to Emulate Dr. George Tiller
Posted by: munchkinpup on Jun 15, 2009 4:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"When I advocate for reproductive rights, for choice, I don't claim that abortion is morally acceptable. I think that it's a very private, intensely personal decision."

I admire this young woman's commitment to provide reproductive care for women. But, I think she needs to address her own squeamishness with what is considered "morally acceptable." For many women it is a MORAL choice whether or not to have children. Choosing to have an abortion is not an immoral choice, and the women that have them are not immoral human beings. As others have stated on this thread, it is a very personal choice, which only the woman and her physician should make.
The author has mentioned taking women's studies in college-- then perhaps she is aware that the anti-choice movement is about coercing women to have children, regardless of their circumstances, and they are anti-birth control as well. As many other authors on AlterNet have stated, it is all about controlling the lives of women.

I have discussed the alarming attacks against choice with my OB, and he has told me that there are fewer med schools which will even train prospective OBGYN physicians to provide late term abortions, and even 1st. trimester as well. He said that women's reproductive rights were under siege all over this country, especially in the south and midwestern areas. Particularly because of a lack of funding for teaching hospitals, along with the constant pressure from anti-choice extremists.
I'd like to know that the writer, whose intentions are indeed admirable, is truly aware that this is an issue about women's autonomy and civil rights. Without full reproductive choice, women are not equal in any society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anthony D'Auria
Posted by: Tony D on Jun 15, 2009 7:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your a brave young medical student who happens to be studying medicine during a time in our country when there is ample demonstration that in certain areas of the US there is a complete lack of critical thinking citizens. We must be aware that the reason for this lack is a deficiency in our educational system. To bring a child into a world where he/she is promised an almost insane intellectual brain-washing, to become but another one of the millions of citizens who cannot see reality because of their illusions, is itself immoral.

You appear to be a critical thinking person and your essay leaves me with the hope that you will succeed in perhaps being a real part in the re-education of those who live and are controlled by their myths. Good luck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The author says....
Posted by: morticia on Jun 15, 2009 8:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"But I was stunned when one of my professors, a pathologist and a Planned Parenthood supporter, told me that decades ago, entire wings of the university's hospital were filled with women dying from infections caused by botched abortions. It's clear that women who don't want to be pregnant won't be deterred by limited access to providers or to clinics. And I believe that it's immoral to let them die rather than provide them with safe, competent care."

That paragraph says it all. This is why abortion is legal today in the U.S. Anyone who wishes to make abortion illegal again either:

a. Has bought into revisionist doctrine which denies the bloody deadly squalid reality of how it is for women when abortion is illegal, or

b. Knows how bad it was (is, in other parts of the world) and thinks it's what a woman who aborts deserves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"I can't yet imagine doing the kind of work that he did"
Posted by: Red State Gal on Jun 15, 2009 9:07 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I met a doctor like you once. She had decided to help women with late abortions out of well-intentioned principle. One day she looked in the garbage can, where a pile of little arms and legs was visible, to be taken out with the trash. She thought of her son, and his beautiful arms and legs.

She gave up late term abortions right there and then.

I am glad you can't yet imagine doing the kind of work that Tiller did . . . and I hope you never shall. If you do, one day the same moment will come to you, also . . . and you will have regrets to the end of your life.

There are other paths, other ways, to deal with the tragedies you discuss . . . ones that will not bring regrets on one's deathbed. May the convictions of your parents abide in your heart and mind--they are no fools.

Red State Gal
RedStateFeminists

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you want to deliver healthy babies, become a midwife...
Posted by: VegaNOLA on Jun 16, 2009 12:02 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
stay away from disease ridden hospitals and learn about nutrition not surgical procedures. If you want to get rich at the expense of your future patients otherwise good health, your on the right track.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anti-women zealots can't have a rational discussion over reproductive rights
Posted by: MeyravLevine on Jun 16, 2009 6:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The legal history of abortion does not start with Roe v. Wade. Our right to privacy and decision to make fundamental choice about our health, including reproductive health.

The legal history of abortion shows that these fundos are against right to use contraceptions.

They will not stop after banning a woman's right to make a choice about her health; they will go after right to use contraception.

These anti-women zealots can't have a rational argument because they operate under the god delusion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement