Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Obama Risks 'Future Guantanamos': Sen. Russ Feingold

Agence France Presse. Posted June 10, 2009.


At a Senate hearing Tuesday, Feingold said that holding suspects indefinitely must not be 'enshrined as acceptable in our system of justice.'
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

WASHINGTON (AFP) -- U.S. President Barack Obama risks creating "future Guantanamos" by continuing his predecessor's policy of indefinitely holding Al-Qaeda suspects, a prominent Democrat warned on Tuesday.

Senator Russ Feingold said he was "troubled" by Obama's policies, warning the practice of holding some suspected terrorists indefinitely risked being "effectively enshrined as acceptable in our system of justice."

Feingold warned the current administration risked mimicking the policies of the Bush administration, which "claimed the right" to detain anyone, anywhere, he said.

During a major security speech at the National Archives in May, Obama acknowledged for the first time that a legal framework could be established to hold the most dangerous U.S. detainees indefinitely without trial.

Speaking during a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on the consequences of "prolonged detention," Feingold said that could set "the stage for future Guantanamos, whether on our shores or elsewhere, with potentially disastrous consequences for our national security."

If Obama follows through on the proposal for establishing "a new legal regime for prolonged detention to deal with a few individuals at Guantanamo," Feingold said "he runs the very real risk of establishing policies and legal precedents."

Feingold said it would be worse if these policies were "effectively enshrined as acceptable in our system of justice, having been established not by a largely discredited administration, but by a successive administration with a greatly contrasting position on legal and constitutional issues."

Also at the hearing, former White House lawyer Richard Klingler warned prolonged detention was "already widespread" and set to continue "on a wide scale."

Klingler, who served as a lawyer in the Office of White House Counsel under former president George W. Bush, told senators the "debate on indefinite detention often wrongly focuses on Guantanamo Bay," arguing the practice is "considerably more widespread."

It is a practice Obama "will continue to pursue," in Afghanistan, Iraq, and at Guantanamo, and he noted the White House has already followed in the Bush administration's footsteps by defending it repeatedly in court.

The "wartime framework underlying [these tactics] have settled well within the mainstream of the American tradition," added Klingler, who also served as the former general counsel for the National Security Council staff.

Obama, he added, has embraced practically all the controversial components and related executive powers asserted by Bush to carry out a global offensive against extremists. The continuation of the practices, therefore, has lead to a "broader recognition of the established legal basis" for indefinite detention, Klingler said.

The president has pledged to close the controversial U.S. Navy-run prison in southeastern Cuba by early next year.

Signaling a major move toward reaching that goal, on Tuesday a Tanzanian Guantanamo detainee became the first to be transferred to a civilian court on U.S. soil.

He pleaded not guilty to taking part in the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in East Africa.

Arbitrary and unlimited detention has boosted U.S. enemies by serving as a "powerfully effective recruiting advertisement" for Al-Qaeda and other groups, Human Rights First CEO Elisa Massimino testified before the hearing.

"It has strengthened the hand of terrorists -- rather than isolating and delegitimizing them -- in the political struggle for hearts and minds," she told subcommittee.

Obama declared in his security speech last month that the "terrorists can only succeed if they swell their ranks and alienate America from our allies -- and they will never be able to do that if we stay true to who we are."

His administration, Obama said, has been tasked with cleaning up what is "quite simply a mess … a misguided experiment that has left in its wake a flood of legal challenges."

Transferring the remaining 240 so-called "war on terror" inmates at Guantanamo Bay to top security jails in the United States remains deeply unpopular with both Democrats and Republicans in Congress.

"We are not going to release anyone if it would endanger our national security, nor will we release detainees within the United States who endanger the American people," Obama has promised.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, afghanistan, guantanamo, barack obama, george w. bush, russ feingold, human rights first, indefinite detention, richard klingler, elisa massimino

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Looks dusky outside...
Posted by: talkville on Jun 10, 2009 12:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although the Obama admin is quite early in its efforts addressing this still-barely-analyzed muck we find ourselves in, it doesn't look to good on a lot of fronts, this being one of them.

Insisting on that "one-way-corrigan" approach and directing the eyes, ears and sense forwards only, there is slim if any evidence that anyone in this administration is even considering re-visiting the barely congealing Bush/Cheney apparatus of oppression and repression, still currently in force.

I've seen little if any news as regards re-visiting such currently effective legislative policies and laws such as Patriot Acts I and II, and a host of other police, military and essentially fascist institutions of control -- in regards to our domestic as well as our foreign approaches to things.

All things considered, it seems our current administration is perfectly accommodated to maintaining all these Bush II era "reforms" in place -- perhaps even "enhancing" them?

With justice denied, why bother with worrying about whether its delayed or not?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wonderful story.
Posted by: Christopher Hobe Morrison on Jun 10, 2009 4:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a wonderful story, and isn't it interesting it came from Agence France Presse, which was the source of most of the really good stories that came out during Vietnam. The New York Times, CBS, the BBC and the lot got interested in it later on, when the writing was all over the wall and AFP had done the hard work.

By the way, is Radio France International still on strike? I guess their issues are more important than informing the English-speaking world what is going on in the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement