COMMENTS: 21
LT. Dan Choi Takes "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Directly to Obama
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.
Last week, in an act of daring befitting a West Point graduate and veteran of Iraq, recently discharged New York National Guard Lieutenant Daniel Choi defied the orders of dozens of crowd control police and stepped into the 'no protest zone' street to ceremoniously salute his Commander in Chief, Barack Obama, out of site at a star-studded fundraiser at the posh Beverly Hilton Hotel.
While the Lieutenant's respectful salute was extemporaneous, the effort that generated the Lieutenant's appearance at last night's pro-gay rights/pro-equality rally outside the Beverly Hilton Hotel, was anything but impromptu. It was a meticulous plan spearheaded by Rick Jacobs, one of the progressive movement's most effective organizers. Jacobs, Founder and Chair of the Courage Campaign, which boasts a membership of 700,000, is a co-founder of Brave New Films and a director of Liberty Hill Foundation. When I asked Jacobs what the tie-in was with Daniel Choi playing such a prominent role at last night's event, he offered the following:
The Courage campaign seeks to make California more progressive and more governable. The state cannot possibly be progressive if we can use the Constitution to take rights away from people. So nearly two weeks ago we saw Daniel Choi on Rachel Maddow, when he "came out." He's an Orange County California native… So we got in touch with him and said, 'Hey we'd like to run a campaign to help support you, to prevent the president from kicking you and others out of the military. So we put up a letter on line. It's very simple. It says:Dear Mr. President,
The time has come to end discrimination in our armed forces. We the undersigned ask you to stop the discharge of Dan Choi and any other soldier as a result of Don't Ask Don't Tell policy. We ask that you uphold your pledge and push Congress to quickly put a bill on your desk to repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell.Sincerely, the undersigned 140,860 people.
And you can see this at Courage Campaign if you scroll down to "Don't Fire Dan." A friend of ours is going to present this letter to the President inside tonight and we also are here. We're hoping the President will send a representative outside to see what we have to say. We have four big boxes - that's a lot of people - 140,000 people in a week. So the tie-in is very simple, this is all about equal rights. It's all about equality. We can win our equal rights in California but they mean nothing if we don't get them federally, so when we look at a young man like Daniel Choi who is willing to sacrifice his life for the country and gets thrown out of the military for saying I love a man, there's a problem. We elected President Obama based on a spirit of hope, bringing the country together and we expect him to do that.
Later at the rally, Jacobs proudly holds up the letter being delivered to Obama:
President Obama has been adamant about ending Don't Ask Don't Tell, but the longer he languishes, more seasoned, talented specialists like Arabic speaker Choi will be sacrificed by this discriminatory policy. It was this calculus that led Rick Jacobs and Equal Roots Coalition co-founder Matt Palazzolo, a co-organizer of last night's rally, to believe it would be helpful to have Lieutenant Choi close enough to the President to confront the issue directly, albeit not face to face. Thus, last night's rally, in addition to pursuing the right to gay marriage in California, was also to demand an end to Don't Ask Don't Tell.
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EinMD on Jun 1, 2009 11:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama can talk to Congress. Obama can tell Congress he's not going to sign another bill unless they do it (which will result in them overriding him and making policy themselves). Obama can make the case to the American people.
But he is not empowered to just ignore the law as he wishes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: dr_dredd
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: bridgerbot
» DADT started as a Clinton Administration executive order
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: DADT started as a Clinton Administration executive order
Posted by: brunowe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LouisFallert on Jun 2, 2009 8:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because he is afraid of offending those whose attitudes are offensive.
"July 26, 1948: President Truman signs Executive Order 9981, which states, "It is hereby declared to be the policy of the President that there shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the armed services without regard to race, color, religion, or national origin."
http://www.trumanlibrary.org/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Jun 2, 2009 10:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it doesn't concern me, the thinking goes, I could care less.
And just like American Jews did nothing to criticize the anti-Muslim and anti-Arab hatred that swept the US after 9/11, despite experiencing discrimination themselves just a few decades earlier, we, heterosexuals are now sitting idly by as unconcerned spectators.
As a heterosexual male, I believe we should all be standing up for equal rights whether its for blacks, gays, Hindus, Muslims or Asians.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Let's face it
Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: Let's face it
Posted by: HoboHomo
» Or it means we all agree
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DanoM on Jun 2, 2009 11:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While we are at it, let's get rid of the prohibitions on adultery and sexual positions that the military likes to hang over everyone's head just in case they need it to justify an otherwise unjustifiable discharge.
Time to take the distorted, evangelical view of the bible out of the military if you ask me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Time for the President to issue an executive order
Posted by: bridgerbot
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oregoncharles on Jun 2, 2009 11:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was afraid of that: yet another bit of fascism continued.
On the other hand, it makes civil disobedience SO easy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Makaainana on Jun 2, 2009 2:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Army strong. Hooyah
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cascadia on Jun 2, 2009 9:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea that military participation is a sign of progress in civil rights is another major propaganda coup for the US empire. Don't buy it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EinMD on Jun 1, 2009 11:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama can talk to Congress. Obama can tell Congress he's not going to sign another bill unless they do it (which will result in them overriding him and making policy themselves). Obama can make the case to the American people.
But he is not empowered to just ignore the law as he wishes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: dr_dredd
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Gay Rights
Posted by: bridgerbot
» DADT started as a Clinton Administration executive order
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: DADT started as a Clinton Administration executive order
Posted by: brunowe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LouisFallert on Jun 2, 2009 8:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because he is afraid of offending those whose attitudes are offensive.
"July 26, 1948: President Truman signs Executive Order 9981, which states, "It is hereby declared to be the policy of the President that there shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the armed services without regard to race, color, religion, or national origin."
http://www.trumanlibrary.org/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Jun 2, 2009 10:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it doesn't concern me, the thinking goes, I could care less.
And just like American Jews did nothing to criticize the anti-Muslim and anti-Arab hatred that swept the US after 9/11, despite experiencing discrimination themselves just a few decades earlier, we, heterosexuals are now sitting idly by as unconcerned spectators.
As a heterosexual male, I believe we should all be standing up for equal rights whether its for blacks, gays, Hindus, Muslims or Asians.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Let's face it
Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: Let's face it
Posted by: HoboHomo
» Or it means we all agree
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DanoM on Jun 2, 2009 11:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While we are at it, let's get rid of the prohibitions on adultery and sexual positions that the military likes to hang over everyone's head just in case they need it to justify an otherwise unjustifiable discharge.
Time to take the distorted, evangelical view of the bible out of the military if you ask me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Time for the President to issue an executive order
Posted by: bridgerbot
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oregoncharles on Jun 2, 2009 11:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was afraid of that: yet another bit of fascism continued.
On the other hand, it makes civil disobedience SO easy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Makaainana on Jun 2, 2009 2:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Army strong. Hooyah
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cascadia on Jun 2, 2009 9:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea that military participation is a sign of progress in civil rights is another major propaganda coup for the US empire. Don't buy it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
ACORN Smear Collaborator Claims Persecution to Raise Money for Her Legal Troubles
Bad Policies Are Really What's Driving California's Huge Prison Costs






