Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Right-Wing Hate Machine Launches Vicious Campaign of Racist and Sexist Attacks on Sotomayor

By Faiz Shakir, The Progress Report. Posted May 30, 2009.


The right wing media has gone to town with their vile rhetoric even as Republican senators have attempted to distance themselves from the hatred.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

This piece was written by by Faiz Shakir, Amanda Terkel, Satyam Khanna, Matt Corley, Benjamin Armbruster, Ali Frick, Ryan Powers, and Brad Johnson.

The radical right wing has launched a vicious campaign of racist and sexist attacks against Judge Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama's selection to replace the retiring Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court. Sotomayor's "compelling life story" involves a brilliant legal career after being raised in a South Bronx public housing project by parents who moved from Puerto Rico. Sotomayor graduated from Princeton University summa cum laude, edited the Yale Law Journal, then served as a "fearless and effective" New York City prosecutor and corporate lawyer before being appointed to the bench by President George H. W. Bush in 1992. "Since joining the Second Circuit in 1998, Sotomayor has authored over 150 opinions," only three of which have been overturned by the Supreme Court's conservative majority. During her time as an appeals judge, "her influence has grown significantly." Public reaction to the nomination of the first Latina and third woman to the nation's highest court is "decidedly more positive than negative." Former Bush adviser Mark McKinnon remarked, "If Republicans make a big deal of opposing Sotomayor, we will be hurling ourselves off a cliff." However, "the same right-wing extremists who drove the country into the ground," Salon's Glenn Greenwald writes, "continue to attack Sonia Sotomayor with blatant and ugly stereotypes." Right-wing pundit Pat Buchanan called Sotomayor an "affirmative action candidate," and Weekly Standard editor Fred Barnes claimed she "has benefited from affirmative action over the years tremendously." As hate-radio extremist Glenn Beck described the nomination: "Hey, Hispanic chick lady! You're empathetic ... you're in!"

'Wise Latina Woman'

"[L]ess than 24 hours after President Obama's nomination of Sotomayor," right-wing hate merchants seized on a 2001 speech about her Latina heritage and the courts, calling her "a racist" and a "bigot." In a 2001 speech before the Berkeley La Raza Law Journal's annual symposium, Sotomayor argued that judges' gender and race can influence their decisions on gender and race discrimination cases, saying she "would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

However, she cautioned she owes the parties who appear before her "constant and complete vigilance in checking [her] assumptions, presumptions and perspectives." Pulling out the "wise Latina woman" phrase, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich attacked Sotomayor on his Twitter feed as a "Latina woman racist." "Obama is the greatest living example of a reverse racist," hate-radio host Rush Limbaugh complained, "and now he's appointed one...to the U.S. Supreme Court." Former Republican House member and anti-immigration extremist Tom Tancredo agreed that Sotomayor "appears to be a racist" and called La Raza the "Latino KKK without the hoods or the nooses."

Curt Levey, executive director of Committee for Justice, "a conservative legal group active in judicial nominations," said that "I wonder whether she knows the difference" between being a Puerto Rican advocate -- Sotomayor served on the board of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund in the 1980s -- and being a judge. Some of the racist attacks on Sotomayor are simply absurd. Mark Krikorian of the right-wing Center for Immigration Studies blogged on the National Review's Corner about his outrage over people "[d]eferring" to Sotomayor over the "unnatural pronunciation" of her own name.

'Sort of a Schoolmarm'

Right-wing extremists have also launched vicious attacks on her intelligence, temperament, and demeanor.  Karl Rove, President Bush's "political brain," has led the sexist slurs, claiming that Sotomayor is "not necessarily" smart and has acted "like sort of a schoolmarm" on the Second Circuit. "I'm not really certain how intellectually strong she would be," he opined on Fox News. In the Wall Street Journal, Rove argued she is one of those judges selected "for their readiness to discard the rule of law whenever emotion moves them."

Citing anonymous attacks promoted by the New Republic, Weekly Standard executive editor Fred Barnes said that Sotomayor was "not the smartest." The New York Times writes that "to detractors, Judge Sotomayor's sharp-tongued and occasionally combative manner -- some lawyers have described her as 'difficult' and 'nasty' -- raises questions about her judicial temperament and willingness to listen." But a fellow Second Circuit judge, Guido Calabresi, "kept track of the questions posed by Judge Sotomayor and other members of the 12-member court" and found that her "behavior was identical." "Some lawyers just don't like to be questioned by a woman," Judge Calabresi added. "It was sexist, plain and simple."

Republican Senators Step Back

Although Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) said that Sotomayor may be subject to the "undue influence" of her race and gender, Republican senators have attempted to distance themselves from the hatred. Even Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS), who announced he would vote against Sotomayor's nomination, said, "I think that we should be judging people not on race and gender, or background or ethnicity or a very compelling story."

Some members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will conduct hearings on Sotomayor's nomination this summer, have directly denounced the worst invective. Responding to the attacks on Sotomayor calling her "racist," Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) told NPR's "All Things Considered," "I think it's terrible. This is not the kind of tone that any of us want to set when it comes to performing our constitutional responsibilities of advice and consent." 

"I don't agree with" the "racist" smear, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) said recently. "If there are no otherwise disqualifying matters here it appears to me she will probably be confirmed," Hatch told CNN Radio yesterday.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: supreme court, rush limbaugh, newt gingrich, sotomayor

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What's in a name?
Posted by: baci&abbracci on May 30, 2009 2:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to Mark Krikorian, Sotomayor's pronunciation of her own name is "unnatural." I don't remember such comments being made for Antonin Scalia; is he having his surname pronounced correctly, i.e., , given its Sicilian origin, or is he "deferring" to the Americanization of the same, i.e., , or, as other Italian-American have done, ? Is it important, does it matter? If it is important to the person who bears that family name, then we should learn the correct pronunciation. Does it have an impact on the person's job performance? I don't think so.
Other critics are pointing to Sotomayor's gender and ethnicity as liabilities. Did the same critics attack the gender and ethnicity of Kennedy, Scalia, etc.? I don't remember so. Therefore a pattern is evident here: her critics do not like Sotomayor because she is a Latina woman who is not afraid to admit, as reality necessitates, that our gender and history shape our identity. That is an obvious statement for any scholar, or any person who decides to think on their own on this issue. Is Sotomayor going to be an "inferior" justice b/c of her identity? Not any more or less than any of her colleagues, if gender/ethnic identity is the standard. Let's focus on her legal record, instead, to decide whether or not she is a person suitable for the job, and if she is not, let's choose another candidate who is (names, pets, wardrobe choices, etc. excluded as criteria, if at all possible:)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What's in a name? Posted by: Jinx
» RE: What's in a name? Posted by: Libsrule
How to pronounce Scalia
Posted by: baci&abbracci on May 30, 2009 2:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i don't understand why in my previous comment the different ways to pronounce 'scalia' were omitted; anyway, for those who would like to know, here are the parts missing in the previous post;
'scalia' sicilian/italian pron: 'scahlEEah'
'scalia' americanized (1) pron: 'scAHlea'
'scalia' americanized (2) pron: 'scaLAIah' (like Maraiah)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How to pronounce Scalia Posted by: whealeydj
Any Criticism?
Posted by: Sparks56 on May 30, 2009 3:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is any criticism of Sotomayor "vicious", "racist", and "sexist"? That said, the right-wing pundit/bloviator class is doing the only thing they can do; sniping from the sidelines to an ever-shrinking audience. (If Obama found the cure for cancer they would say it was a trojan horse to advance socialized medicine.) I read the Buchanan piece and am waiting to hear from Ms. Milken and Coulter. I don't expect anything different of substance from those two either. Let 'em go! It's as if they had a check-list of voter blocs that they wanted to alienate, leaving Republican politicians with the choice of jumping ship, or kissing huge numbers of voters good-bye.
Rush, Pat, Karl, I love you all! Keep it up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

from the record
Posted by: johnwinthrop on May 30, 2009 3:57 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
she wrote a paltry and inadequate explanation of why New Haven's firefighter promotion policy is justified, even though the city denied promotions to the highest scoring candidates. (Ricci case) No one demonstrated the test was racist.

If she is a result oriented judge, she should be kept off the court and never should have been on the 2nd circuit. not only is she a predictable vote for affirmative(socalled) action discrimination, but she is a ready and willing vote for big corporations.

Love the irony of Alternet falling all over the corporate stooge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Imagine saying this about a white man
Posted by: Word Mix on May 30, 2009 4:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Although Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) said that Sotomayor may be subject to the "undue influence" of her race and gender..."

Perhaps white males are subject to the undue influence of their race and gender. Guess we'd better not have any courts since all judges can be influenced by their race and gender.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is it really news when Limbaugh et al. act like Limbaugh et al.?
Posted by: hagwind on May 30, 2009 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And does hyperventilating about this stuff make for useful commentary? I don't think so.

I'm more concerned about the more lucid Republicans who think that occasional "brusqueness" is a reason to vote against confirmation -- I mean, hell, look what they managed to ignore with Clarence Thomas!

And I'm really, really worried that enough Democrats will express ambivalence (aka "cave") that the Republicans will sense blood and start barking louder.

The right is largely, and willfully, clueless about how race and sex play out in this society. They don't know, and don't want to know, what racism and sexism are. Are we surprised? We shouldn't be. We should be more concerned with how prevalent such ignorance is in the center and left-of-center, because this ignorance makes it very hard to mount effective opposition to both the salivating wingnuts and the more coherent "moderates."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama is countering them by advertising for Sotomayor on the television and radio.
Posted by: maxpayne on May 30, 2009 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure the rightwing will do to her what they did to Solis but in the end give it up. Even John Cornyn knows the racism allegations by Limbaugh and his ilk just don't add up. There are other issues to worry about such as economic justice since most cases that go to SCOTUS are about economic justice. With Wall $treet giving no complaints about her, I am concerned that she is another pro-corporate hack just like Roberts and most of the existing justices although I heard about her taking on a bad baseball owner for his corporate crimes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"some lawyers have described her as 'difficult' and 'nasty' "
Posted by: xvictor on May 30, 2009 6:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those same type comments were ascribed to Rudy Giuliani's abrasive character while he was New York City mayor. Yet, the Reichwingers had stridently and vehemently called his wanting governing style "leadership". Using the same Rethug standard, Ms. Sotomayor is qualified to be President!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Smell the Fear oozing from these Pussy Asses pores??
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 30, 2009 6:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Real Proof the 'Good Ol' Boys' have required assistance throughout their tenor as the 'Deciders' for all these millenia.
Come on this is far more another attack by the cowardly males, then even that of White Racists.
Why do you think they are hell bent on bringing down Pelosi instead of the numerous other male Dems who were also privvy to those 'briefing'. They haven't just not mentioned their own Repugs who sat in on those meetings, they haven't even mentioned the male Dems.
Men have been Terrified of Women since ...Adam and Eve? Ever wonder why God granted Women the blessing of bringing forth life and not men. Why God Choose to impregnant Mary instead of just Creating Jesus from Clay or dropping him from the Heavens- like supposedly He'll do upon his Return? Ever wonder why if Adam was such a 'perfect' creation or reflection, God felt inclined to create another? Plenty of Hermaphodic species and organisms that can merely divide.Perhaps God favors Females and thats why men have perpetuated this jealous, fear provoked, rivalry.
Just because they can't built a Pyre doesn't mean they aren't trying to burn these Females at the Stake of public opinion.
These Right Wingers are Cowards, feeble minded self absorbed pussies who can't handle real competiton. so you call Us 'Emotional', intellectual weak, biased...After millenia of being subjected to your Sexism (and Racism).. I say we deserve to dole out a lil' 'Pay backs a Bitch'.Cry Baby Cry, life sucks when Your minority status makes you eat shit ah?
Here boys let Us offer you one of those mind altering 'Mothers Lil Helpers' or at least a Midol- you've become Hysterical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "pussy ass"? Posted by: johnwinthrop
» WOW!!! Posted by: sirios
Why would being intellectually strong be a qualification?
Posted by: donnal on May 30, 2009 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sonia Sotomayer would be wrong if being intellectually strong is her only qualification. This President along with Ms. Sotomayer continue to use their personal story to tug at your hearts but do these wonderful stories make great leaders? When the truth is told and without the PR spin, you will find that both lived in better neighborhoods than you are lead to believe, both attended private schools and thru affirmative action and taxpayers funds attended Ivy Tower schools. It is because they both accomplished graduation from these schools that each of them believe that this makes them intellectually strong. Having doors opened for you and expounding on the richness of your life experiences have not made him a better President, nor will the richness of Ms. Sotomayer make her a better justice.

It is Mr. Obama's duty to appoint Ms. Sotomayer, and its the duty of the committee to confirm or not to confirm. The committee must ask, "does she apply the law as written or apply her richness of life in her rulings".

He has the right to appoint, as he won the election, which he continues to inform us on so many occasions. Vile comments about her gender or race are wrong as are the threats from the left that attacking her will not sit well with her race.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

EVERYONE Brings Life Experiences to the Table-
Posted by: dragonlady620 on May 30, 2009 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the inevitable part of being human.
"I would hope that a white male corporate executive with the richness of his stock portfolio would come to a better decision than(any)female who did not have his penis."
This was the conventional wisdom for years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

REMEMBER ALBERTO GONZALES ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 30, 2009 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The perfect example of a minority who excelled at everything, a brilliant legal mind that the country couldn't get along without. There were no cheap shots. No clues to the fact that he was a mean S.O.B. He just sat and grinned and got the job. If he had been turned down, his next stop was to be the Supreme Court. Now there's job security. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Justice Samuel Alito said what Judge Sonia Sotomayor said
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on May 30, 2009 12:36 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's interesting that during his confirmation hearings that Justice Samuel Alito basically said what Judge Sonia Sotomayor said when he noted that his family as Italians had known discrimination and as such it had given him more empathy for those who had also suffered because of their race, ethnic origin etc.

~Beth~

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The rethugs are pissing in the wind
Posted by: willymack on May 30, 2009 4:58 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And they know it. There's little chance ANYTHING they say will prevent the conformation of Sotomayor. They've got something else in mind. Don't forget their complete dominance of the popular media, and their back door politics. They wouldn't risk making even bigger fools of themselves without some payoff in mind. Better watch out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Other Views
Posted by: BurrDeming on May 30, 2009 4:59 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In fairness, we should consider the arguments against the judge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» FUCK FAIRNESS Posted by: sirios
Joan Of Arc
Posted by: melpol on May 30, 2009 6:21 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An advocate for left wing causes is desperately needed on the highest court. Sotomayer has the potential to fill that need. Her humble background gives her the empathy to champion the battles of all the underdogs in America. Hopefully she will be another Joan Of Arc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Joan Of Arc Posted by: baci&abbracci
» Those Tricky Metaphors Posted by: johnwinthrop
NARAL is wary of Sotomayor because of past rulings
Posted by: whealeydj on May 30, 2009 10:29 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in which she upheld free speech of anti abortion protestors but also upheld the Worst President Ever's right to withold money from international family planning groups. I am a little wary that (by some counts) she will be the 6th Catholic Supreme Court Justice if confirmed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Flashback to the primaries
Posted by: Perry Logan on May 31, 2009 2:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I heard the accusations of racism repeated over and over, I thought for a minute I was back in the Democratic primaries, listening to Obama supporters call everyone and his brother a racist. :(

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nyt has article on this 6th catholic fact
Posted by: whealeydj on May 31, 2009 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
let us hope she is a Walter Brennan -Dorothy Day Catholic rather than a Antonin Scalia-Opus Dei Catholic

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

William not Warren
Posted by: whealeydj on May 31, 2009 5:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
oops

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lol@ Glenn Beck
Posted by: bobdown on May 31, 2009 6:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
9/11 saved Glen Becks career, if it wasn't for that he would be riding around some city on the back of a garbage truck picking up the trash

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dose Him and then Dose Him Again Posted by: johnwinthrop
Qualifications being equal or better of course,
Posted by: reg373 on May 31, 2009 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is the slot for an Hispanic female. Just as with Thomas and Ginsburg, it's the only way to have the court reflect the makeup of the population it administers jurisprudence to --- found a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crossing The Rio Grande.
Posted by: melpol on May 31, 2009 3:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most judges are politicians who follow the wind. Very few would dare come out of the closet if they had politically radical views. Sotomayor is a team player who knows the rules of the game. Deep inside she might hate the system but she is wise enough to keep it hidden. She metaphorically has crossed the Rio Grande and she wants to stay here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More Underdog Favoratism On Courts Needed.
Posted by: melpol on May 31, 2009 5:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Underdogs Need More Representation. We need a thousand supreme court judges that represent every race and persuasion. Today`s judges are politicians who follow the wind. Very few would dare come out of the closet if they had politically radical views. Sotomayor is a team player who knows the rules of the game. Deep inside she might hate the system but she is wise enough to keep it hidden. She metaphorically has crossed the Rio Grande and she wants to stay here. More judges on the high court would make America more democratic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same old tactic--do The People see through it?
Posted by: NigelSimpson on May 31, 2009 6:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The coordinated simultaneous attack approach is being used, once again, to smear a person who doesn't toe the right wing Republican line.

Here they go again...the looney fringe of the GOP is sometimes an embarrassing liability, but they are also sometimes a useful bunch of shock troops to try to re-frame public discussion with hot-button words.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well she IS a racist...What do you expect?
Posted by: Daito on May 31, 2009 8:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This woman is reaping what she sowed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Affirmative Action" - what, AGAIN?
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Jun 2, 2009 3:48 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When every branch of government, every corporation, for every office or job has scoured until if has found a minority or a woman to fill it - passing over as many competent an qualified white men as is necessary for political correctness - who will trust the government, the corporation, the officeholder or worker and their product or work?

When the doctor is a member of a minority or a woman, how will I dare trust them - knowing that they were chosed because they weren't white and male or a woman? How do I trust law made by the third, fourth, and fifth choice - expecially when there were twenty of so persons better qualified by virtue of competence?

I don't, and I won't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Affirmative Action" - what, AGAIN? Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
CHECK OUT HER POSITION ON 'EMINENT DOMAIN' - THEY CAN GRAB YOUR HOUSE & NOT PAY YOU FOR IT
Posted by: joeocho88 on Jun 3, 2009 10:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eminent Domain is when the government or a governmental agency is allowed to take your property away from you and pay you fair market value in exchange for using it to build a road or some other public purpose.

Under Bush administration, the US Supreme Court made one of the stupidest biased UNCONSTITUTIONAL RULINGS EVER -- and that is a governmental agency can take YOUR property away form you AND NOT PAY YOU FOR IT AND GIVE IT TO A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY and THEY CAN THEN GIVE IT OR SELL IT TO ANYONE --INCLUDING SCUMBAG REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS--if the governmental agency can get MORE TAX MONEY FROM WHOEVER THEY GIVE IT TO THAN FROM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.

DOES ANYBODY ELSE BUT ME SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH THIS?

I DO.

IT IS WRONG,WRONG,WRONG AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE PAID FOR THEIR PROPERTY!

THIS IS ANOTHER VERY BAD POLICY FROM BUSH THAT OBAMA INTENDS TO PURSUE TO THE FULLEST EXTENT!
SO IF YOUR HOME IS NOT FORECLOSED THEN EMINENT DOMAIN CAN TAKE YOUR HOUSE AWAY FROM YOU oR YOUR BUSINESS BUILDING OR YOUR FARM OR RANCH OR RENTAL PROPERTY!

PASS THIS ON,

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I sure hope people are smart enough not to
Posted by: TruthBeTold on Jun 4, 2009 4:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
believe that republican senators have attempted to distance themselves from the hatred.

Republicans senators have give the green light to all of the bigots and racist polluting the air waves with their garbage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nokia Middle East
Posted by: menokia on Jun 25, 2009 8:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
منتديات نوكيا الشرق الاوسط
نوكيا الشرق الاوسط

دليل المواقع
العاب فلاشيه
دردشة
طب الاعشاب
Site Map

احدث اجهزة نوكيا
برامج نوكيا

برامج نوكيا الجيل الثالث
برامج الجوال العربية

برامج نوكيا الجيل الخامس
شاشات التوقف - خطوط الجوال
تعريب البرامج , كسر البرامج

العاب جوال
العاب نوكيا الجيل الثالث

العاب الانجيج الجيل الثالث
العاب نوكيا الجيل الخامس
ثيمات الجوال
ثيمات نوكيا الجيل الثالث
ثيمات نوكيا الجيل الخامس
مسجات
فديو
اناشيد
نغمات, تحميل نغمات
اي فون
سوني اريكسون
برامج كمبيوتر
برامج الحماية و الصيانة
برامج المالتيميديا, برامج الصوتيات, برامج الفيديو
شرح استخدام البرامج
العاب الكترونية, العاب الكمبيوتر, العاب بلاي ستيشن
افلام سينما
تحميل افلام عربية
تحميل افلام اجنبية
منتدى السيارات
صور
نكات, صرقعه
اعشاب طبية
عالم حواء
الديكور و الأثاث المنزلي - The Design and Decor Section
تحديث سوفت وير نوكيا
خيمة رمضان

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement