Obama Needs to Do More Than Swap Liberal Justices
Also in Rights and Liberties
Ugly Truth: Most U.S. Kids Sentenced to Die In Prison Are Black
Liliana Segura
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor
The Execution of a Potentially Innocent Man Less Scandalous Than an Affair?
Michelle Goldberg
Ten Things You Can Do to Reduce Incarceration
Walter Mosley, Rae Gomes
Six Uighurs Released From Gitmo; Seven Remain Locked Up
Andy Worthington
While everyone’s talking about how the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor may affect the Supreme Court, we need to keep our eye on the current court — and on Obama’s arguments in there.
For on the same day that Obama nominated Sotomayor, the Court came down with a horrendous decision on a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
By a 5 to 4 vote, the Court said that a defendant who has already been appointed counsel may be interrogated by police without that counsel present.
Amazingly, Obama’s Justice Department argued in favor of the decision that Justice Scalia handed down. It said the 23-year-old precedent, Michigan v. Jackson, "serves no purpose."
Distressed, Justice John Paul Stevens, who wrote the Michigan decision, took the unusual move of reading his heated dissent aloud from the bench.
"The police interrogation in this case clearly violated petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel," he said, adding that the court, by overturning a previous Supreme Court ruling, engaged in a "gross undervaluation" of precedent.
Stevens made the unassailable point that "if a defendant is entitled to protection from police-initiated interrogation under the Sixth Amendment when he merely requests a lawyer, he is even more obviously entitled to such protection when he has secured a lawyer."
Sotomayor won’t shift the balance on such issues, since David Souter, whom she’s replacing, was also in the minority here.
But Obama needs to do more than just swap one liberal justice for another. He needs to make sure that his Justice Department goes into the Supreme Court to uphold the Bill of Rights, not undermine it.
See more stories tagged with: rights, obama, supreme court, hispanic, sotomayor, judge
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.