COMMENTS: 145
Sarah Palin's Outrageous Hypocrisy on Teen Sex
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.
So step right up and buy your “I’m SEXY enough… to make you wait!” t-shirts, courtesy of the Candie’s Foundation — the pro-abstinence group whose ambassador is now America’s most famous “Oh, fuck it, it feels better without the rubber” Supermom, Bristol Palin!
So on a flight to London over the weekend I caught the Bristol Palin magazine cover and was blown away. What does it take to get discredited as a moralizing right-wing ”family values” merchant these days?
It was one thing when we found out that super-religious governor Palin was letting Bristol’s hunkface beef accessory Levi nail her daughter more or less regularly under the family roof. It was another when we found out that the governor’s sister-in-law got popped for a B&E while her little daughter was waiting outside in the car. And it was still another thing when we found out that Levi’s Mom was going to eat a bust for dealing Oxycontin (and there’s apparently a lot behind the governor’s interest in that story).
For the most part, none of this stuff is any of our business — we all have family members with issues, although mine tend to leave their kids at home when they go out to commit burglaries to support their drug habits.
But this abstinence thing with Bristol, to me, is just too much. This sort of thing always grosses me out: this country has way too many people who do stuff like this, dragging their helpless minor kids with them on national media tours or publishing lengthy parenting memoirs in which their unwitting babies play starring roles as props in Mom’s narcissistic fantasies.
But this goes even beyond that. This poor little kid is going to grow up someday and find out she’s been brand-marketed to the human species by Madison Avenue as The Great Mistake.
Bristol’s quote about how girls need to close their eyes and imagine spending the rest of their lives with a screaming baby before they have sex — her daughter is someday going to cough that line up, through sobs, in her fourth or fifth year of very expensive therapy. If this little kid isn’t hooked on black baggy clothes and cutting by age 11 I’ll be shocked.
But beyond that, Bristol’s casual statement about deciding not to get married after all, about how it would have been a disaster, I just don’t get how this works, politically. How can a Republican presidential candidate (and let’s not fool ourselves, Sarah Palin is already that) publicly endorse unwed teen mothering? Am I missing something?
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jaffe on May 27, 2009 12:28 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America needs Palin even as Italy needs Berlu and France needs Sarko. Palin stands for who we are--writ large.
Here's the point. If we bash Palin we bash her with velvet gloves, keep her healthy and mouthy--Don't you love to hear her use words?
Tell the truth: Who would be a more evocative spectacle as Secretary of State--Hillary or Palin?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Tell the truth?
Posted by: LTBROWN
» RE: Bashing Palin
Posted by: masthead
» RE: Bashing Palin
Posted by: Jaffe
» Dump Palin in the hypocrisy trash bin as she deserves - ignorant savage puke that she is.
Posted by: thekidde
» RE: Isn't it neat
Posted by: Jaffe
» JOE THE PLUMBER FOR PRESIDENT
Posted by: strahlungsamt
» RE: JOE THE PLUMBER FOR PRESIDENT
Posted by: johnmont
» RE: Bashing Palin
Posted by: Jaffe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist VI on May 27, 2009 12:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Karen Decrow former NOW president:
"If women have the right to choose if they become parents, men [should] have that right too. There is a connection between legalizing abortion for women and ending of paternity suits for men. Giving men their own choices would not deny choices to women. It would only eliminate their expectation of having those choices financed by men."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: batmagoo
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: LTBROWN
» Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist VI
» RE: Your logic is compelling
Posted by: Jasonix
» Simple then, wear a condom
Posted by: Karlh
» RE: Simple then, wear a condom
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Simple then, wear a condom
Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: LaurelAnn
» RE: Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: LaurelAnn
» Hey LaurelAnn
Posted by: rickiey
» Hey rickiey
Posted by: LaurelAnn
» RE: Hey rickiey
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Hey rickiey
Posted by: LaurelAnn
» RE: Hey rickiey
Posted by: rickiey
» Give it up
Posted by: LaurelAnn
» RE: Give it up
Posted by: rickiey
» PS
Posted by: LaurelAnn
» RE: Hey rickiey
Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Hey rickiey
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: johnmont
» RE: Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: babs
» RE: Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: dave.macgeek
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: abbadon2007
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: dorym930
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: medusa
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: rickiey
» Look at all the little Jerry Falwells are the board.
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist VI
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VoxMagi on May 27, 2009 1:34 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...but I'm basically a gentle soul who feels genuinely sorry for people when their lives become cannon fodder in the march to sell an idea.
You're right, the entire spectacle is pathetic, and a frank conversation about bith control or a day after pill would have spared them all some grief, but I can't even muster much venom toward people who were stooped upon by GOP image hawks, swept up, transformed and marched into the spotlight...including the shotgun engagement of Levi and Bristol.
But...I'll save my full contempt for the organization and institutions that dragged these people kicking and screaming into the world spotlight with only a thin coat of whitewash to cover their basically human nature and personal foibles.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Give me a break. . .
Posted by: peacefullaim1
» RE: Give me a break. . .
Posted by: VoxMagi
» RE: Ahhh, Matt...now, now.
Posted by: Yankeeinexile
» Sarah Paline chose the spotlight - tough shit if it shows the pus.
Posted by: thekidde
» RE: Ahhh, Matt...now, now. Do You Really Believe that Palin...
Posted by: dragonlady620
» RE: Ahhh, Matt...now, now. Do You Really Believe that Palin...
Posted by: VoxMagi
» RE: Ahhh, Matt...now, now.
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Ahhh, Matt...now, now.
Posted by: VoxMagi
» RE: Ahhh, Matt...now, now.
Posted by: shd1230
Comments are closed-
Posted by: batmagoo on May 27, 2009 1:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live half my life in Europe, and when puzzled Europeans ask me for a shortcut into grasping the North American political dichotomy, I simply tell them that one of the two parties is designed to catch all the idiots, fools and lazy frightened cretins. They agree that subtleties are sacrificed, but thus, we get to move-on swiftly to another subject.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Are you missing something, Matt?
Posted by: BulldogRedeemer
» RE: Are you missing something, Matt?
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Are you missing something, Matt?
Posted by: babs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eeuropean2000 on May 27, 2009 2:07 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You made my day!
Posted by: PJAW
» Yupp, it's true
Posted by: tpurhrt
» RE: Yupp, it's true
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: No surprise, & thanks for the laughs
Posted by: Spiritgirl
» For the Catholic Church abortion equals no patrimony. Hypocrisy, anyone?
Posted by: fcvoigt
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on May 27, 2009 2:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me rephrase that....
SARAH PALIN FOR CANDIDATE
Before he was even inaugurated, I predicted two terms for Barack Obama. Although at the time that was somewhat of a daring prophecy, it is no longer bold as it once was. As a matter of a fact, it is a near certainty. Which brings us back to the dilemma facing the "party of Lincoln" (Doesn't that phrase just make ya wanna giggle?) Three years from now they won't be able to nominate another bland and boring white guy, that's for damned sure! What to do? It's simple! Nominate a minority or a woman. I can just picture the bumper stickers: SARAH PLAIN/BOBBY JINDAL in '12". Count on it: Barring a miracle, scandal or tragedy, either one of them - or both of them - will be on the ticket in 2012. Remember, you read it right here on "The Rant", folks.
Judge Sonia Has Her Day
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "party of Lincoln" -- yup!
Posted by: xvictor
» RE: "party of Lincoln" -- yup!
Posted by: LTBROWN
» Tom, keep up...
Posted by: zipper696
Comments are closed-
Posted by: warrior woman on May 27, 2009 4:34 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jrmart on May 27, 2009 4:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Did She Really say THAT?
Posted by: mkruege
» RE: Did She Really say THAT?
Posted by: hoohah
» RE: Did She Really say THAT?
Posted by: rickiey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maryyooch on May 27, 2009 5:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read it somewhere on a few different Alaskan blogs. While I'm not saying that it is true, don't you think it would be to Levi's advantage to have a paternity test done? That way, if it proves that he is not Bristol's baby daddy, he can make a clean escape from the clutches of the Palin Clan.
You have to feel sorry for Levi. He was just a regular horny, redneck teenager, who happened to get it on with Bristol. Then his entire life ( as well as his family's lives) were just blown away.
I don't think, (other than being a redneck and not too bright) that Levi or his family are such 'bad' people. I can't even imagine being trapped in the claws of the Palins.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Levi and his family seem to be idiots. No sympathy from this quarter - grow up.
Posted by: thekidde
» RE: There is a rumor in Alaska
Posted by: sandjthompson
» RE: There is a rumor in Alaska
Posted by: marletat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Daito on May 27, 2009 5:16 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: gilliani
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: marletat
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: dragonlady620
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: marletat
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: She doesn't drive me up the wall...
Posted by: cheryljohns
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: judette
» She does not rive me up a wall.
Posted by: TruthBeTold
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: Suzannah
» Well, Daito Haid, "Liberals" now compose 68% of the country
Posted by: hardwroc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LTBROWN on May 27, 2009 5:22 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The only time rethugs
Posted by: marletat
» RE: The only time rethugs
Posted by: dragonlady620
» RE: The only time rethugs
Posted by: iolanthe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on May 27, 2009 6:17 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're a collective train wreck, a WalMart of cheap, misaligned media distractions, symptomatic of a country that suffers from low self-esteem. >next.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SocioSam on May 27, 2009 6:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: To paraphrase Nixon
Posted by: marletat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: brunowe on May 27, 2009 6:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Incidentally, the film Idiocracy posited a dystopian American populated by idiots as a result of stupid people today having more children than smart people. I mention this because Sarah Palin has 5 children; the Obamas only have two (cue Twilight Zone theme here).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
» DON'T CLICK--IDENTITY THEFT
Posted by: brunowe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pelican beak on May 27, 2009 7:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Judy Kolbaba on May 27, 2009 7:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Judy
Posted by: BlueTigress
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WyrdSister on May 27, 2009 8:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The blantentness of the hypocrisy is ASTOUNDING and what's more astounding are the Believers of it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NamVeT on May 27, 2009 8:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sunnywater on May 27, 2009 9:05 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps Matthew should compose for People magazine.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: why post on it then?
Posted by: WyrdSister
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on May 27, 2009 9:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Will ya stop with palin, already?
Posted by: Vik
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on May 27, 2009 9:59 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joels@nccray on May 27, 2009 10:27 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More than any National Candidate since Harry Truman, she is ONE OF US! An American!
It is obviously the old adage, that he/she who has nothing good to say about themselves or their own political beliefs, has to pick on someone who is much, much much, better than they are. They ought to be ashamed of themselves.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: General Manager, Sales & Marketing
Posted by: Obijuan
» RE: General Manager, Sales & Marketing
Posted by: mollymorph
» RE: General Manager, Sales & Marketing
Posted by: Solar Wind
Comments are closed-
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on May 27, 2009 11:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BUT NOW? She's making money (and most likely will be a millionaire) off the fact she had unprotected sex.
...What do they call girls who have make money from having sex??
Oh That's right: Apparently, She's really just a whore.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GatoPreto on May 27, 2009 11:09 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dude, Taibbi is funny...I remember reading his stuff in the Moscow Times back in 1997 or so...good times. It made being an expat a lot easier.
Too bad he's shilling against getting to the bottom of 911 once and for all. A lot of the mess we're in hinges on that.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: hunkface beef accessory?
Posted by: mikeblack
» RE: hunkface beef accessory?
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: hunkface beef accessory?
Posted by: mikeblack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BulldogRedeemer on May 27, 2009 11:25 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Supporting Palin
Posted by: mikeblack
» RE: BULLDOG REDEEMER?????
Posted by: blurider
» RE: Supporting Palin
Posted by: judette
» Bullsh*t Redeemer, another STUPID white guy telling black people what's "wrong" with them
Posted by: Kym525
» Old-fashioned moral goodness?
Posted by: morticia
» the pot and the kettle
Posted by: MtnWolfGrl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: roli on May 27, 2009 11:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
gone, but not forgotten.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mikeblack on May 27, 2009 12:18 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I think he's giving Bristol Palin too much credit to think she's going to care she's being used one day. Growing up in that family, she has to know her role as a political pawn for mommy by now. Either that or they're paying her very well for her contributions to the movement and doesn't care. It's like when a fat person is used for the "ew" factor of a weight-loss related commercial. They know they're being held up for humiliation as the "what not to be" portion of things. But why not use your disadvantage for advantage, right?
But Matt Taibbi is 100% correct on how this is going to affect the child in question. Held up as the ultimate example on why two idiots should use birth control. I'm sure I was an "oops baby" by learning my parents history when I grew up. But if they came out and said it to me, it would definitely be a little bit of a mindfuck. But I can't imagine being able to go back to dig up archive footage from talk shows and People Magazine cover stories with bajillions of newspaper articles discussing it in depth. How could you not feel worthless seeing "Yeah, I fucked up with some loser boyfriend. But don't be like me, girls" propaganda with you at the center?
But then again, this family will probably have the baby (whatever idiotic name they gave this one) programmed into their worldview so by the time it reaches adulthood it will have no problems being a pawn like mommy and her aunts and uncles for granny.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fempatriot on May 27, 2009 1:56 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's one way parents could help their daughters to withstand the seductions of teen aged boys, and that's by telling the daughters the truth: Teen aged boys think of little else other than sex and food in that order. And they will say _anything_ , including "I love you," to a girl to get sex. It's that simple. Sex is what they're after, and teen aged girls are looking for "love." And often confuse the two. When I was young, just the thought of my father's wrath if I had gotten pregnant was enough to keep me pure. I remember telling more than one boy, "If you don't leave me alone, my daddy will kill you." And I really believed he would...and kill me too while he was at it. As for Sarah Palin, she is a big hypocrite, and it amazes me that people think she is presidential material. Just because she can talk a lot doesn't mean she's got a lot upstairs. Most women can talk. It's saying something meaningful that counts. That's where the less sexy gals like Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama leave Palin in the shadows.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: For starters, Bristol's "little mistake"
Posted by: jareilly
» RE: For starters, Bristol's "little mistake"
Posted by: Unapologetic Liberal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: judette on May 27, 2009 2:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fempatriot on May 27, 2009 2:39 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jareilly on May 27, 2009 2:54 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amen, pass the Oxy...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on May 27, 2009 4:01 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lorenbliss on May 27, 2009 4:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No less than a child deliberately sold into slavery by parents, Bristol has been handed over to the pitilessly profiteering national media for the psychological equivalent of gang rape. She is a victim who should be comforted, protected and helped to grow beyond her anguish rather than maintained as an object of public scorn for the nation's self-righteous voyeurism -- a voyeurism equally malicious whether from the bible-thump Right or the secular Left. For shame!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: muzunguhowru on May 27, 2009 4:23 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"family values" always was a crock .
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist VI on May 27, 2009 6:27 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrBrian on May 27, 2009 7:19 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin was pregnant at the altar and has had several documented affairs. But she says the right things, so she's respected.
It's well known that condom distribution saves lives and doesn't increase sexual activity, but conservatives oppose it. Comprehensive sex education--unlike their cherished ignorance-only programs--reduce pregnancy, STDs and sexual activity, but they oppose them. Needle exchange programs prevent HIV without increasing drug use, but they (and Obama) oppose them.
It's all posturing, cheap political theater.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: psychologist on May 27, 2009 8:05 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Extreamist ... Ha!
Posted by: bessie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ModelCitizen on May 27, 2009 8:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pirate1 on May 27, 2009 9:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» What bothers me is the double standard
Posted by: 2dogarage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: writer7 on May 28, 2009 4:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Zaratamara on May 28, 2009 6:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 2dogarage on May 28, 2009 6:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know about you but I can't get enough of trashing Sarah Palin and Co. I just can't think of anything more important to do with my time.
Thanks Matt for more cutting-edge reporting, it's what we've learned to expect from you.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hedgewytch on May 28, 2009 12:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bristol Palin's child, Tripp, is a boy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Factual error
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hurricane hugo on May 28, 2009 4:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Truck
Travesty
Trans
Trouble
Tree
Trot
Trick
#@!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jaffe on May 27, 2009 12:28 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America needs Palin even as Italy needs Berlu and France needs Sarko. Palin stands for who we are--writ large.
Here's the point. If we bash Palin we bash her with velvet gloves, keep her healthy and mouthy--Don't you love to hear her use words?
Tell the truth: Who would be a more evocative spectacle as Secretary of State--Hillary or Palin?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Tell the truth?
Posted by: LTBROWN
» RE: Bashing Palin
Posted by: masthead
» RE: Bashing Palin
Posted by: Jaffe
» Dump Palin in the hypocrisy trash bin as she deserves - ignorant savage puke that she is.
Posted by: thekidde
» RE: Isn't it neat
Posted by: Jaffe
» JOE THE PLUMBER FOR PRESIDENT
Posted by: strahlungsamt
» RE: JOE THE PLUMBER FOR PRESIDENT
Posted by: johnmont
» RE: Bashing Palin
Posted by: Jaffe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist VI on May 27, 2009 12:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Karen Decrow former NOW president:
"If women have the right to choose if they become parents, men [should] have that right too. There is a connection between legalizing abortion for women and ending of paternity suits for men. Giving men their own choices would not deny choices to women. It would only eliminate their expectation of having those choices financed by men."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: batmagoo
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: LTBROWN
» Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist VI
» RE: Your logic is compelling
Posted by: Jasonix
» Simple then, wear a condom
Posted by: Karlh
» RE: Simple then, wear a condom
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Simple then, wear a condom
Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: LaurelAnn
» RE: Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: LaurelAnn
» Hey LaurelAnn
Posted by: rickiey
» Hey rickiey
Posted by: LaurelAnn
» RE: Hey rickiey
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Hey rickiey
Posted by: LaurelAnn
» RE: Hey rickiey
Posted by: rickiey
» Give it up
Posted by: LaurelAnn
» RE: Give it up
Posted by: rickiey
» PS
Posted by: LaurelAnn
» RE: Hey rickiey
Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Hey rickiey
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: johnmont
» RE: Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: babs
» RE: Don’t expect me to finance your decision.
Posted by: dave.macgeek
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: abbadon2007
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: dorym930
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: medusa
» RE: I'm glad Levi is a dirt bag.
Posted by: rickiey
» Look at all the little Jerry Falwells are the board.
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist VI
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VoxMagi on May 27, 2009 1:34 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...but I'm basically a gentle soul who feels genuinely sorry for people when their lives become cannon fodder in the march to sell an idea.
You're right, the entire spectacle is pathetic, and a frank conversation about bith control or a day after pill would have spared them all some grief, but I can't even muster much venom toward people who were stooped upon by GOP image hawks, swept up, transformed and marched into the spotlight...including the shotgun engagement of Levi and Bristol.
But...I'll save my full contempt for the organization and institutions that dragged these people kicking and screaming into the world spotlight with only a thin coat of whitewash to cover their basically human nature and personal foibles.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Give me a break. . .
Posted by: peacefullaim1
» RE: Give me a break. . .
Posted by: VoxMagi
» RE: Ahhh, Matt...now, now.
Posted by: Yankeeinexile
» Sarah Paline chose the spotlight - tough shit if it shows the pus.
Posted by: thekidde
» RE: Ahhh, Matt...now, now. Do You Really Believe that Palin...
Posted by: dragonlady620
» RE: Ahhh, Matt...now, now. Do You Really Believe that Palin...
Posted by: VoxMagi
» RE: Ahhh, Matt...now, now.
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Ahhh, Matt...now, now.
Posted by: VoxMagi
» RE: Ahhh, Matt...now, now.
Posted by: shd1230
Comments are closed-
Posted by: batmagoo on May 27, 2009 1:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live half my life in Europe, and when puzzled Europeans ask me for a shortcut into grasping the North American political dichotomy, I simply tell them that one of the two parties is designed to catch all the idiots, fools and lazy frightened cretins. They agree that subtleties are sacrificed, but thus, we get to move-on swiftly to another subject.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Are you missing something, Matt?
Posted by: BulldogRedeemer
» RE: Are you missing something, Matt?
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Are you missing something, Matt?
Posted by: babs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eeuropean2000 on May 27, 2009 2:07 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You made my day!
Posted by: PJAW
» Yupp, it's true
Posted by: tpurhrt
» RE: Yupp, it's true
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: No surprise, & thanks for the laughs
Posted by: Spiritgirl
» For the Catholic Church abortion equals no patrimony. Hypocrisy, anyone?
Posted by: fcvoigt
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on May 27, 2009 2:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me rephrase that....
SARAH PALIN FOR CANDIDATE
Before he was even inaugurated, I predicted two terms for Barack Obama. Although at the time that was somewhat of a daring prophecy, it is no longer bold as it once was. As a matter of a fact, it is a near certainty. Which brings us back to the dilemma facing the "party of Lincoln" (Doesn't that phrase just make ya wanna giggle?) Three years from now they won't be able to nominate another bland and boring white guy, that's for damned sure! What to do? It's simple! Nominate a minority or a woman. I can just picture the bumper stickers: SARAH PLAIN/BOBBY JINDAL in '12". Count on it: Barring a miracle, scandal or tragedy, either one of them - or both of them - will be on the ticket in 2012. Remember, you read it right here on "The Rant", folks.
Judge Sonia Has Her Day
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "party of Lincoln" -- yup!
Posted by: xvictor
» RE: "party of Lincoln" -- yup!
Posted by: LTBROWN
» Tom, keep up...
Posted by: zipper696
Comments are closed-
Posted by: warrior woman on May 27, 2009 4:34 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jrmart on May 27, 2009 4:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Did She Really say THAT?
Posted by: mkruege
» RE: Did She Really say THAT?
Posted by: hoohah
» RE: Did She Really say THAT?
Posted by: rickiey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maryyooch on May 27, 2009 5:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read it somewhere on a few different Alaskan blogs. While I'm not saying that it is true, don't you think it would be to Levi's advantage to have a paternity test done? That way, if it proves that he is not Bristol's baby daddy, he can make a clean escape from the clutches of the Palin Clan.
You have to feel sorry for Levi. He was just a regular horny, redneck teenager, who happened to get it on with Bristol. Then his entire life ( as well as his family's lives) were just blown away.
I don't think, (other than being a redneck and not too bright) that Levi or his family are such 'bad' people. I can't even imagine being trapped in the claws of the Palins.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Levi and his family seem to be idiots. No sympathy from this quarter - grow up.
Posted by: thekidde
» RE: There is a rumor in Alaska
Posted by: sandjthompson
» RE: There is a rumor in Alaska
Posted by: marletat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Daito on May 27, 2009 5:16 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: gilliani
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: marletat
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: dragonlady620
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: marletat
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: She doesn't drive me up the wall...
Posted by: cheryljohns
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: judette
» She does not rive me up a wall.
Posted by: TruthBeTold
» RE: Palin for President
Posted by: Suzannah
» Well, Daito Haid, "Liberals" now compose 68% of the country
Posted by: hardwroc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LTBROWN on May 27, 2009 5:22 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The only time rethugs
Posted by: marletat
» RE: The only time rethugs
Posted by: dragonlady620
» RE: The only time rethugs
Posted by: iolanthe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on May 27, 2009 6:17 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're a collective train wreck, a WalMart of cheap, misaligned media distractions, symptomatic of a country that suffers from low self-esteem. >next.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SocioSam on May 27, 2009 6:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: To paraphrase Nixon
Posted by: marletat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: brunowe on May 27, 2009 6:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Incidentally, the film Idiocracy posited a dystopian American populated by idiots as a result of stupid people today having more children than smart people. I mention this because Sarah Palin has 5 children; the Obamas only have two (cue Twilight Zone theme here).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
» DON'T CLICK--IDENTITY THEFT
Posted by: brunowe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pelican beak on May 27, 2009 7:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Judy Kolbaba on May 27, 2009 7:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Judy
Posted by: BlueTigress
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WyrdSister on May 27, 2009 8:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The blantentness of the hypocrisy is ASTOUNDING and what's more astounding are the Believers of it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NamVeT on May 27, 2009 8:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sunnywater on May 27, 2009 9:05 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps Matthew should compose for People magazine.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: why post on it then?
Posted by: WyrdSister
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on May 27, 2009 9:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Will ya stop with palin, already?
Posted by: Vik
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on May 27, 2009 9:59 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joels@nccray on May 27, 2009 10:27 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More than any National Candidate since Harry Truman, she is ONE OF US! An American!
It is obviously the old adage, that he/she who has nothing good to say about themselves or their own political beliefs, has to pick on someone who is much, much much, better than they are. They ought to be ashamed of themselves.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: General Manager, Sales & Marketing
Posted by: Obijuan
» RE: General Manager, Sales & Marketing
Posted by: mollymorph
» RE: General Manager, Sales & Marketing
Posted by: Solar Wind
Comments are closed-
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on May 27, 2009 11:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BUT NOW? She's making money (and most likely will be a millionaire) off the fact she had unprotected sex.
...What do they call girls who have make money from having sex??
Oh That's right: Apparently, She's really just a whore.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GatoPreto on May 27, 2009 11:09 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dude, Taibbi is funny...I remember reading his stuff in the Moscow Times back in 1997 or so...good times. It made being an expat a lot easier.
Too bad he's shilling against getting to the bottom of 911 once and for all. A lot of the mess we're in hinges on that.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: hunkface beef accessory?
Posted by: mikeblack
» RE: hunkface beef accessory?
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: hunkface beef accessory?
Posted by: mikeblack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BulldogRedeemer on May 27, 2009 11:25 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Supporting Palin
Posted by: mikeblack
» RE: BULLDOG REDEEMER?????
Posted by: blurider
» RE: Supporting Palin
Posted by: judette
» Bullsh*t Redeemer, another STUPID white guy telling black people what's "wrong" with them
Posted by: Kym525
» Old-fashioned moral goodness?
Posted by: morticia
» the pot and the kettle
Posted by: MtnWolfGrl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: roli on May 27, 2009 11:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
gone, but not forgotten.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mikeblack on May 27, 2009 12:18 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I think he's giving Bristol Palin too much credit to think she's going to care she's being used one day. Growing up in that family, she has to know her role as a political pawn for mommy by now. Either that or they're paying her very well for her contributions to the movement and doesn't care. It's like when a fat person is used for the "ew" factor of a weight-loss related commercial. They know they're being held up for humiliation as the "what not to be" portion of things. But why not use your disadvantage for advantage, right?
But Matt Taibbi is 100% correct on how this is going to affect the child in question. Held up as the ultimate example on why two idiots should use birth control. I'm sure I was an "oops baby" by learning my parents history when I grew up. But if they came out and said it to me, it would definitely be a little bit of a mindfuck. But I can't imagine being able to go back to dig up archive footage from talk shows and People Magazine cover stories with bajillions of newspaper articles discussing it in depth. How could you not feel worthless seeing "Yeah, I fucked up with some loser boyfriend. But don't be like me, girls" propaganda with you at the center?
But then again, this family will probably have the baby (whatever idiotic name they gave this one) programmed into their worldview so by the time it reaches adulthood it will have no problems being a pawn like mommy and her aunts and uncles for granny.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fempatriot on May 27, 2009 1:56 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's one way parents could help their daughters to withstand the seductions of teen aged boys, and that's by telling the daughters the truth: Teen aged boys think of little else other than sex and food in that order. And they will say _anything_ , including "I love you," to a girl to get sex. It's that simple. Sex is what they're after, and teen aged girls are looking for "love." And often confuse the two. When I was young, just the thought of my father's wrath if I had gotten pregnant was enough to keep me pure. I remember telling more than one boy, "If you don't leave me alone, my daddy will kill you." And I really believed he would...and kill me too while he was at it. As for Sarah Palin, she is a big hypocrite, and it amazes me that people think she is presidential material. Just because she can talk a lot doesn't mean she's got a lot upstairs. Most women can talk. It's saying something meaningful that counts. That's where the less sexy gals like Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama leave Palin in the shadows.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: For starters, Bristol's "little mistake"
Posted by: jareilly
» RE: For starters, Bristol's "little mistake"
Posted by: Unapologetic Liberal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: judette on May 27, 2009 2:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fempatriot on May 27, 2009 2:39 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jareilly on May 27, 2009 2:54 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amen, pass the Oxy...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on May 27, 2009 4:01 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lorenbliss on May 27, 2009 4:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No less than a child deliberately sold into slavery by parents, Bristol has been handed over to the pitilessly profiteering national media for the psychological equivalent of gang rape. She is a victim who should be comforted, protected and helped to grow beyond her anguish rather than maintained as an object of public scorn for the nation's self-righteous voyeurism -- a voyeurism equally malicious whether from the bible-thump Right or the secular Left. For shame!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: muzunguhowru on May 27, 2009 4:23 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"family values" always was a crock .
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist VI on May 27, 2009 6:27 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrBrian on May 27, 2009 7:19 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin was pregnant at the altar and has had several documented affairs. But she says the right things, so she's respected.
It's well known that condom distribution saves lives and doesn't increase sexual activity, but conservatives oppose it. Comprehensive sex education--unlike their cherished ignorance-only programs--reduce pregnancy, STDs and sexual activity, but they oppose them. Needle exchange programs prevent HIV without increasing drug use, but they (and Obama) oppose them.
It's all posturing, cheap political theater.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: psychologist on May 27, 2009 8:05 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Extreamist ... Ha!
Posted by: bessie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ModelCitizen on May 27, 2009 8:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pirate1 on May 27, 2009 9:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» What bothers me is the double standard
Posted by: 2dogarage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: writer7 on May 28, 2009 4:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Zaratamara on May 28, 2009 6:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 2dogarage on May 28, 2009 6:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know about you but I can't get enough of trashing Sarah Palin and Co. I just can't think of anything more important to do with my time.
Thanks Matt for more cutting-edge reporting, it's what we've learned to expect from you.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hedgewytch on May 28, 2009 12:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bristol Palin's child, Tripp, is a boy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Factual error
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hurricane hugo on May 28, 2009 4:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Truck
Travesty
Trans
Trouble
Tree
Trot
Trick
#@!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
ACORN Smear Collaborator Claims Persecution to Raise Money for Her Legal Troubles
Bad Policies Are Really What's Driving California's Huge Prison Costs




