Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Good Move Obama: Why Sonia Sotomayor Is a Great Choice for the Supreme Court

By John Nichols, TheNation.com. Posted May 26, 2009.


Sotomayor's wide legal experience, especially on corporate and financial issues, along with her background make her a solid pick for the high court.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When Supreme Court Justice David Souter announced his planned retirement, the pressure was on President Obama to add a second woman to a bench.

At the same time, Obama was encouraged to pick a Hispanic justice.

He did both, and a good deal more.

Obama's nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit as his first appointment to the high court, was made at the White House this morning, with the president hailing her as "an inspiring woman who I think will make a great justice."

Describing Sotomayor as a lawyer who "has worked at almost every level of our judicial system," Obama noted that she has "more experience on the bench and more varied experience of the bench than anyone currently serving on the Supreme Court when they were appointed."

While much will be made of the fact that Obama has chosen a woman of Puerto Rican background to serve on a court that until the 1960s was made up entirely of white men, the president has, as well, chosen a jurist whose specific experience will make her a key player on a court that, in coming years, will be taking on more and more cases involving financial and economic issues.

Judge Sotomayor's 11 years of service on the federal appeals bench (as an appointee of Bill Clinton) have been served just a few blocks from Wall Street in Manhattan, as were her six years as a federal judge (as an appointee of George H.W. Bush as the recommendation of former New York Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan).

"As the top federal appeals court in the nation's commercial center," the New York Times notes, "the court is known in particular for its expertise in corporate and securities law."

Obama specifically cited Sotomayor's legal skills with regard to financial and corporate issues as something that made her particularly appealing as a nominee.

The daughter of a factory worker who died when she was a child, Sotomayor -- who diagnosed with diabetes as an eight year old -- was raised by her mother, a nurse at a methadone clinic. Inspired by "Perry Mason" television programs, Sotomayor graduated from Princeton University summa cum laude in 1976 and then from Yale Law School, where she was an editor of the Yale Law Journal.

Before her appointment to the federal bench, Sotomayor served as an assistant district attorney for Manhattan, , working with D.A. Robert Morgenthau, who developed a reputation for policing -- or at least trying to police -- Wall Street.

Obama picked Sotomayor from a slate of women finalists that reportedly included Judge Diane P. Wood of Chicago, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Solicitor General Elena Kagan.

Sotomayor was not the most liberal of the prospective jurists, but that did not matter to conservatives who have been preparing for a fight. Wendy Long, counsel to the right's Judicial Confirmation Network, came out swinging: "Judge Sotomayor is a liberal judicial activist of the first order who thinks her own personal political agenda is more important than the law as written. She thinks that judges should dictate policy, and that one's sex, race, and ethnicity ought to affect the decisions one renders from the bench."

That's a reference to a case involving applications for promotions within the New Haven, Connecticut fire department, in which Sotomayor was a member of a judicial panel that objected to tests used to evaluate candidates for promotion when no minority candidates ranked at the top of the list of those who took the test.

That white male jurists agreed with Sotomayor will be lost on her critics. But her record is generally seen as being very much in the mainstream of legal debates about diversity and affirmative action.

The swift strike at this nominee provides a reminder of how important this confirmation battle will be to conservatives, who see the fight to block Obama's first high-court pick as essential to the renewal of their sagging political fortunes.

But Sotomayor will have plenty of allies.

Even before the nomination was announced, National Organization for Women president Kim Gandy announced that NOW would launch a "Confirm Her" campaign to ensure swift confirmation of the nominee.

"Nominated to serve as the third woman and first Hispanic on the Supreme Court in the history of the United States, Judge Sotomayor will serve the nation with distinction. She brings a lifelong commitment to equality, justice and opportunity, as well as the respect of her peers, unassailable integrity, and a keen intellect informed by experience. President Obama said he wanted a justice with 'towering intellect' and a 'common touch' and he found both in Judge Sotomayor," said Gandy. "What more do women want? We want a swift confirmation in the U.S. Senate, and Associate Justice Sotomayor to join Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Court before the Senate's August recess."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: supreme court, barack obama, sonia sotomayor

John Nichols is The Nation's Washington correspondent.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I don't know enough about her, but I know about the Nation
Posted by: leafsong1 on May 26, 2009 10:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and I don't think that they would provide an unbiased assessment of an Obama pick. So, this article isn't much help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Compelling...and yet...
Posted by: VoxMagi on May 26, 2009 11:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Politically, Sotomayor is an near ideal choice. Her nomination addresses both the inequity of perspective that has plagued the court, but in no way sacrifices experience or competence.

I have every expectation that she will pass muster and join the court, and let the pundits of the right say what they will, because frankly, anyone even slightly to the left of Robert Bork would be greeted by cries of outrage from the right, so pleasing them is of no concern.

But, I admit with a little hesitation that it would have been nice to see an intellectual powerhouse, preferably one clearly and sharply left of center, placed onto the court, with no question of whether they pass some social litmus test or have avoided any controversial opinions. The court cries out for change to deal with new times, and moderacy will not provide much of that.

But hey, on the bright side, it isn't as if she'll have to work overtime to intellectually outshine any of the Bush appointees.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Compelling...and yet... Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
A Great American.
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist VI on May 27, 2009 12:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Her story is why America is great. She grow up poor in a non English speaking household. Instead of sitting on an ever expanding welfare ass in section 8 housing, she decided to work hard and make something of her life.

I appreciate the fact that she has put her career ahead of children. Feminist like to tell the half truth of "Only making 78% of a man's salary". What they fail to mention is the fact that they don't put in the same hours at work. Sotomayor made the choice to not be the best. She didn't expect anyone to subsidize a hobby of child rearing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Great American. Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Diversity
Posted by: PensiveGadfly on May 27, 2009 3:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, I'd like to see fewer Catholics, but she adds diversity in gender and ethnicity, and comes with a Princeton/Yale pedigree (and top of her class at that) and forces the Republicans to think about opposing an Hispanic. Pretty good overall.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement