Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Time for a Truth Commission

By Marie Cocco, Washington Post Writers Group. Posted May 19, 2009.


The United States government must at last hold accountable the architects of the torture calamity
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

WASHINGTON -- The partisan firefight over House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's incendiary allegation that the CIA lied to Congress about its use of "enhanced interrogation techniques" -- torture -- is a blessing. It turns the compelling case for a public inquiry into the Bush administration's policies toward terrorism detainees into an urgent necessity.

Americans must finally own up to what was done, at whose order, with whose acquiescence, and why. The United States government must at last hold accountable the architects of this calamity -- not only the underlings like Lynndie England and Charles Graner and Janet Karpinski, those frontline military personnel who paid the price for bit roles in the scandal after the first stomach-turning photos of abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison came to light.

This trio again comes to mind because even as the Pelosi furor escalated beyond all reason -- not to mention the known facts -- President Obama rescinded not one but two promises. He reneged on a commitment to release more photographs of the horror at Abu Ghraib and at detention sites in Afghanistan. The first pictorial chronicle of depravity at Abu Ghraib led to the congressional inquiries that eventually led us to understand that the United States had implemented torture as official policy. And that policy was not some half-baked idea cooked up by kids in the desert but developed by lawyers and top administration officials in Washington.

The presidential candidate who harnessed the power of the Internet to gain the White House seems oddly oblivious to the fact that, however much he may want to keep the photos private to spare U.S. troops the possibility of deadly backlash, more images already circulate. The unauthorized distribution of the graphic photos is just as likely to provoke the same reaction. Yet a controlled release by the Obama government, abiding by a court decision and what this president has pledged would be the "rule of law" on his watch, holds the possibility that the president -- and the country -- would gain respect abroad for breaking cleanly with the culture of cover-up.

Obama meanwhile has decided to reinstitute the discredited military commissions for trying suspects at the Guantanamo Bay prison -- a system he once decried as anathema to civilized society. Even in doing so, he noted that as a senator, he'd voted in favor of military commissions in 2006. Which loops us back to the Pelosi controversy and to the larger question of Democratic complicity in the moral outrages of the Bush era.

We do not know who is lying about CIA briefings on torture, and who is telling what best approximates the truth. These briefings were at best cryptic, members of Congress weren't allowed to take notes, and the whole enterprise was classified. If Pelosi had emerged from such a session and blown the whistle on torture, the very same Republicans who now attack her for keeping silent would have howled mercilessly and quite possibly pronounced her guilty of treason.

Yet Democratic acquiescence in abhorrent Bush policies is a worthy subject for a chapter in any final report of a truth commission. Too often in the aftermath of 9/11, Democrats decided where to stand depending on where George W. Bush sat. When he sat atop the public opinion polls, they cowered at the possibility he would call them soft on terror and threaten their re-elections.

This syndrome was at the root of the 2002 vote to authorize the war in Iraq. A majority of Senate Democrats, led by Tom Daschle -- known last year as anti-war candidate Obama's inside-Washington promoter -- voted to let Bush charge recklessly into Iraq. Pelosi and most House Democrats voted no. Still there were many later opportunities for forceful action, if not against torture and abuse, then in determined opposition to warrantless wiretapping, the Guantanamo penal colony, the detainee deaths while in U.S. custody -- the list goes on and on.

That the list is so lengthy, and that we still lack basic facts about so much of what transpired, is reason enough to establish a nonpartisan panel, along the lines of the 9/11 commission, to at last expose the truth. Those who designed and implemented the policies that have brought such discredit to the nation must be called to account.

Those who looked the other way must now face their own responsibility. For the worst of human history inevitably unfolds when good people avert their eyes.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: torture, marie cocco

Marie Cocco is a prize-winning syndicated columnist on political and cultural topics for The Washington Post Writers Group. She is a frequent commentator on national TV and radio shows.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Or Else What?
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on May 19, 2009 12:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Vote of Confidence Amendment will give American voters the power to dismiss any elected official at any time.

VOCA, Now !!

FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Or Else What? Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Or Else What? Posted by: willymack
Barack Obama: Progressive Nightmare ...
Posted by: mmckinl on May 19, 2009 1:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here we are, imploring the President to uphold the rule of law. This is NOT "Change We Can Believe In". We've just had 8 years without the rule of law, but it seems we have many more ahead ...

Torture Investigations, War, The Banks, Health Care, Coal Mining ... all betrayals of policy by Obama. There seems no end to his duplicity and the long term damage he is causing. You can't be a Progressive and Pro- Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Al
Posted by: alkamm on May 19, 2009 2:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to see war criminals treated as such, but there's always those that slip into the cracks. Impatience isn't a virtue, the last time I looked. I think that Holder will initiate some legal action against the administration, but it's his call, not Obama's. In the mean time, the Congress is on the case.
The one thing that Obama could do is to release those incarcerated for torture. They were ordered to debase and threaten prisoners at Abu Ghraib, and the Bush chickenhawks allowed them to go to prison to cover up the more widespread systemic outrages ordered from the top. To allow someone else to go to jail for you is the lowest form of treachery, and the Bush administration got us to swallow it whole.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Impatience isn't a virtue? Posted by: leafsong1
Smearing the blame
Posted by: Perry Logan on May 19, 2009 3:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Note how the author takes time to smear some of the blame onto the Democrats. This absurd behavior is ubiquitous in our right-biased political discourse.

It's an unwritten rule of American poitics: No matter how bad the Republicans screw up, everyone always takes time to smear some of the blame onto the Democrats.

Of course, the opposite never happens. If the Democrats screw up, the Democrats screw up and that's all we hear.

This bizarre thinking stems from the corporate media, which exists to weaken the left. Since they can't always make the Republicans look good, they can at least drag the Democrats down with them.

Progressives have internalized this crippling mode of thought, to the point where we can't criticize Republicans without taking time to beat up our own party.

During a brief, nightmarish stint at Democratic Underground, all I did was defend Democrats.

If you want to hear your leaders given a royal reaming, just read the comments at HuffPo. Not suitable for children.

We of the left have come to believe it's cool to attack our own leaders. It's like some kind of Stockholm Syndrome, in which we spend half our energy beating ourselves up, while the right lashes out with all its might. The corporate powers that be must be very pleased with us.

Needless to say, this self-destructive behavior cripples us immeasurably. That's why we have another neocon in the White House.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sharing the blame Posted by: Boctaoe1
Truth commissions are for third world countries and emerging democracies
Posted by: No.mad on May 19, 2009 4:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We don't need a truth commission. We need investigations and trials. President Obama should request a special prosecutor from the justice department and let him or her go to work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are splitting hairs. Posted by: Centavo
Take back MSM/PBS/NPR
Posted by: weathered on May 19, 2009 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or stay stuck in the myths, suspicions, denial and distractions of the well reported Lies.

'by deceit we wage war' is the toxic embodiment of a diabolic agenda and its chief architect Netanyahu is a vector of infection.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Until American Jews confront Posted by: weathered
Why more commissions? It's nothing but more big government.
Posted by: John More on May 19, 2009 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We could instead throw our elected officials out in the next election and put in better qualified pols. Building another commission is totally useless and a further waste of taxpayer money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wonderful Point
Posted by: JSquercia on May 19, 2009 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Marie made a wonderful point concerning the Pelosi briefing . As she indicated it was classified and those briefed could NOT take notes . Had Pelosi been told of Waterboarding , what would the Republicans have done had she revealed it . They would have gone after her as a TRAITOR who was endangering the country .
So the point is even if she HAD been briefed ,a position I do not believe , what would have been her options . She could not have revealed classified information and so nO MATTER what her objections might be she could NOT voice them .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wonderful Point Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Wonderful Point Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Wonderful Point Posted by: JSquercia
Another commision?
Posted by: bizeeb on May 19, 2009 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
from Boomsday by Christopher Buckley:


"...commissions are for the most part things to be ignored, a vermiform appendix to the body politic. It was always the same:
Important personages are appointed to the commission, with instructions to - by all means - study the problem in all its complexity, get to the root of it, and report back to the very highest levels of government. Six, nine months go by, with occasional fifteen second sound bites on the evening news of commissioners sternly telling witnesses that they were not coming clean with the commission; the witnesses replying that, really, they're doing their best (give us a break). In due course, the commission delivers its report. There is a day or two of news coverage. The media reports the findings, that the United States is about to run out of molybdenum, or to be overcome by bacteria emanating from geese; or that filthy, disgusting Arabs have no right to own American seaports, no matter how moderate they are; or that the government has no disaster plan ready in the event an asteroid the size of Rhode Island lands in the Pacific Ocean; or that the CIA failed to detect the cold war, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Tehran embassy takeover, Grenada, Iran-contra, Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, Bosnia, the attack on the USS Cole, 9/11, Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Oh Shit, Now What?; or that really there was no excuse at all for launching cruise missiles against Papua New Guinea.
These revelations are duly followed by grave tsk-tsking and chin rubbing and hand-wringing about how these vitally important issues are still being mishandled and even ignored by the government. The commissioners are officially thanked for their diligent efforts and given commemorative paperweights with the wrong middle initial. The president and the relevant cabinet secretaries and government officials pledge to give the commission's report recommendations "the most serious consideration" (which is to say, none whatsoever), and everyone goes back to ignoring and mismanaging the vital issues.
Six months later, one of the ex-commissioners writes a pained and well-argued op-ed piece in The New York Times, complaining that nothing - not one single recommendation - has been acted upon. Whereupon a junior White House press secretary issues a pained, not-very-well-argued statement saying this is simply "not the case." Moreover, that as a result of the commissions "fine work," a number of things have been done, though he is not at liberty to go into details. Moreover, further study is needed, as this is - "indeed" - an issue of vital importance not only to the nation, but to all nations. And that's the end of it."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A truth commission is not "holding them accountable"
Posted by: leafsong1 on May 19, 2009 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is merely tallying up the account.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Pelosi consented to the conditions of the briefing...
Posted by: leafsong1 on May 19, 2009 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...she deserves what she gets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why a truth commission ?
Posted by: HipBone on May 19, 2009 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when I hear the need for a 'truth' commission I am reminded of the 9/11 'truth' commission, where the false confessions of tortured people were used unquestionedly by the panel, and used to paint a fictional account of what happened. This is why prosecutions and jail are the only recourse. All the way to the Top.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: why a truth commission ? Posted by: VZEQICVA
WHY GIVE THE PROCEEDINGS A NAME?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 19, 2009 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not necessary to fight about what to call it. Let's just do it. No one should be allowed to say, "there's enough blame to go around". There shouldn't be. That alone indicates that the CIA was disorganized. Pelosi isn't the only one who got half baked information. The CIA has always been highly regarded. But many agencies and individuals have tarnished their reputations during the last 8 years. We all know that a handful of people are responsible for the damage we have to clean up. Nancy Pelosi isn't one of them. We'll also find out why impeachment was off the table. As long as what remains of the Republican Party is allowed to run the show, the country will be paralyzed. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Truth commission
Posted by: willymack on May 19, 2009 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pardon me if I appear skeptical about a "truth" commission. Its very name implies whitewash, or sweep it under the rug. We have a real problem with the TRUTH in this country. It's as if our "leaders" think we can't handle the truth. More likely is the fact that their sorry asses may be on the line if the whole awful truth about 911, Iraq, and Afghanistan, were brought to light. In my opinion, a truth commission would be only marginally better than nothing at all, and only if it was kept clean and truthful, something that seems nearly impossible, given our dismal past. What we need to do is to overcome the desolate and willful ignorance and apathy of so many of our people. I think actual trials and unbiased news coverage of them would serve much better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Truth commission Posted by: Sister_Lauren
averting one's eyes
Posted by: Jaffe on May 19, 2009 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The optimum response is to persist in dissenting while the genocide is going on, but obviously that comes with official recriminations and penalties.

After the fact, then, we get after the genociders and lots of people pile on, as it was after the Nazi occupation of France, when nearly all of France seemed complicit with the Occupation, and then after the war when much of France claimed to have resisted.

Well, yes, getting after the criminals now is better than nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It is not after the fact Posted by: Sister_Lauren
This isn't Obamas fight
Posted by: tsmith144000 on May 19, 2009 12:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is NOT our Attorney General. This issue really isn't in his hands. Sure, he can attempt to play it down, but it's ultimately up to Eric Holder to put any teeth into the matter. This issue is a JUDICIAL one. An entirely different branch of gov't. If we want anything actually done about this, we need to pressure our AG.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This isn't Obamas fight Posted by: Sister_Lauren
You Can't Get To Any of This Unless You Get to 9/11
Posted by: edgar_michel on May 19, 2009 2:24 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's the Elephant in the room.

see:

http://www.ae911Truth.org

9/11 was the same wholesale disregard for humanity as was Abu-Ghraib, Gitmo and Black site interrogations centers. Get to the bottom of 9/11 and you get to the bottom torture, plain and simple; otherwise you are only blowing smoke.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gather all the evidence
Posted by: hurricane hugo on May 19, 2009 2:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and send it to The Hague.

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: gather all the evidence Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Truth? What a bold idea...
Posted by: kogwonton on May 20, 2009 12:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've just been so incredulous at the way the waters have been muddied for the last decade, much less over the course of my life. I always knew that there wasn't very much truth in the mainstream media or political discourse. But the last decade has utterly blown my mind. After seeing how much of a divisive bullshit storm the power brokers (most of them multinational in scope) in this country are capable of stirring up I haven't got a clue who on this earth would be credible enough to host such a commission. And even then there are powerful interests in turning whatever findings result from it into a perpetual 'controversy' that may never end with prosecutions, or any justice whatsoever.

I think that religious thinking operates no differently than ideological/nationalist thinking, as concerns public/national mythology. Certain foundational myths underlying policy must be protected, if not with facts, than with dissonance.

If anyone has a clear idea of how to form a Truth commission with any credibility I would dearly love to hear about it. I don't see a lot of hope for peaceful redress in this lawless age. Something has to give or our children are in for some very dark ages indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Work together to expose and prosecute those that Tortured In Our Name
Posted by: JohnHKennedy Denver CO on May 20, 2009 4:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must not stop until those that ordered or conspired to order Torture have been prosecuted.

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITIONS
for a Commission and a Special Prosecutor at

http://ANGRYVOTERS.ORG

Over 250,000 have Signed,
Join Us and Pass This Url
to all your friends & Groups.

.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Truth Commissions Suck Ass
Posted by: thepuffin on May 20, 2009 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry for the profanity, but sometimes profane ideas warrant them.

If you want accountability, then this long-established tool of gov't and corporations to sweep things under the rug isn't it.

How 'bout this (and it angers me to have to point it out, but then, your article is designed to convince that a TC is worth a flying fuck, innit?):

Investigate, indict convict imprison and/or execute.

Truth Commission. Right. Jesus fucking Christ.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

interview with TJFS on importance of Truth Commissions & WarCrimes Trials
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on May 20, 2009 7:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
on trials, media & social crimes:

-Wolfgang Kaleck

-Bill Ayers

-Mike Malloy

-Dan Kovalik - “The Coca-Cola Case

-Dahr Jamail

-Michelle Rainey


"... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice..." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
"Violence can only be concealed by a Lie, & the Lie can only be maintained by Violence." ... "Any man, who has once proclaimed Violence as his Method, is inevitably forced to take the Lie as his Principle" – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
Perspective.

The Jeff Farias Show: streams FREE & LIVE Mon-Fri, 6-9pmEDT

FREE podcast

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Investigate 9/11
Posted by: J4761 on May 23, 2009 4:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
alternet should break the silence ... investigate 9/11

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TRUTH = #1 LIBERAL ENEMY
Posted by: reelman on May 25, 2009 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since when are dems into truth? They denied they trashed the economy via Fannie-Freddie, 5 million home loans to illegals for a start...
They deny they just put us 9 trillion in debt on borrowed money...a good bit to buy votes...they deny they trashed the car industry to protect union donations while they earn $70 and hour...$43 when NOT working.
Pelosi lies about an issue, then refuses to take any more questions...try that under oath.
The dems just can't get over Bush prevented a terror attack from the cult of allah nutcases for 7 years...wow, we waterboarded 3 top terror kook people plus hundreds of our own troops in training.
Liberals live in a world where they NEVER correctly see evil...its always bad America or bad Republicans...Teddy Kennedy can leave a woman in 4 feet of water for 9 hours while he makes phone calls and he is a liberal hero...
Klinton, a known serial adulterer and gifted liar convicted of perjury...another liberal hero. The pattern here is the dems have NO morals, no character...and never will...but they expect to be the judges of the rest of us...all to gain power and satisfy their daily angry unhappy selves...pathetic excuses for humans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement