CIVIL LIBERTIES  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 26

Was It the National Security Bureaucrats Who Forced Obama to Hold on to the Torture Photos?

Politicians come and go, but the folks who actually run the government have an agenda of their own, including covering their mistakes.
May 16, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

Allow me to share some analysis about the way things work in Washington. President Obama's flip-flop on his agreement to turn over photographs of detainees being tortured by American soldiers is a message with broad and clear implications. Those who believe that the Obama Administration should expose and prosecute persons who committed war crimes should understand that it is not going to happen the way they would like, or as quickly, because Obama is having internal battles as well. His pullback is not occurring because he fears that Republicans will attack him (he knows they will); rather it is occurring because he needs the national security community behind him, and they fear they will be further embarrassed and humiliated if more information is revealed.

According to The Washington Post, President Obama told White House lawyers he does not "feel comfortable" releasing the photos because of the reaction they could cause against U.S. troops, and because "he believes that the national security implications of such a release have not been fully presented to the court," in responding to the ACLU's Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. [Emphasis added.]

Even before looking closely at Obama's change of mind, I understood immediately what had taken place, as soon as I heard the report on the radio. President Obama was, in fact, speaking for the national security bureaucracy in announcing his change of mind. I knew it would happen at some point. Although his first instinct had been to release the pictures, as he had released the new Justice Department torture memos, it was clear he had been turned around, and I was certain it was the work of the national security bureaucracy.

My hunch was confirmed by the AP report, which explained, "American commanders in the war zones expressed deep concern about fresh damage the photos might do, especially as the U.S. tries to wind down the Iraq war and step up operations against the Taliban and al-Qaida in Afghanistan." How do the commanders know this to be the case? How do they know that it is the not the case that, to the contrary, more people around the world might admire us for openly correcting past mistakes? In fact, you can be certain "the commanders" do not truly know that the photos will harm America's image, but they do know how to protect the national security bureaucracy, after having risen to its top ranks. This is exactly what is going on here, and the explanation was pure bureaucratic excuse-making.

The National Security Bureaucracy

On average, it takes about 100 days for the great Executive Branch bureaucracy to begin to work its way and will on the new officials, and that threshold has now been crossed. If anyone believes a rookie president and his new team can take over the executive branch, and actually run it without the cooperation of the permanent people, those who remain in place as presidents and their appointees come and go, he or she does not understand how Washington really works. Political appointees come and go, but the folks who actually run the government have an ongoing agenda of trying not to let these part-time political people screw it up too badly. Nowhere are there more of these permanent career professionals than in the departments and agencies that constitute the national security community.

Few presidents have true national security experience before arriving at the White House. For example, of the last twelve presidents - Truman, Eisenhower, JFK, LBJ, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II and Obama - only Eisenhower, Nixon, and Poppy Bush truly understood national security operations when they arrived in the Oval Office. President Obama, like all the others, is getting on-the-job training. Who is doing that training? While his appointees with national security experience are playing a role, they themselves were all trained by the national security bureaucracy, and since the Democrats have been out of power for eight years, Obama's national security team is still relying heavily on the career people. It takes about 18 to 24 months for a new presidential team to get control of the national security behemoth.

I have never tried to catalogue the parts of this dominant segment of our national government, but any off-the-top-of-one's-head list would have to include the Cabinet departments with the largest budgets, like the Department of Defense (with the Army, Navy, and Air Force), Department of State (with its Foreign Service and Embassies throughout the world), Department of Homeland Security (which united some 22 agencies including the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the U.S. Coast Guard, the U.S. Customs Service, the U.S. Secret Service, and the Transportation Security Administration.) In addition, virtually every Cabinet department has national security responsibilities -- from the Department of Commerce to the Department of the Treasury to the Department of Justice, with its Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). And, of course, there are the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National Security Agency (NSA), and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) - all are involved in national security.


John W. Dean, a FindLaw columnist, is a former counsel to the president.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: torture, obama, bureaucracy, photos


Comments are closed-

ah I knew the Obama CYA was coming
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on May 16, 2009 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last I recall President Obama is...


... President.

We are trying to win wars and I think Obama want to stick around for more than one term. Let the poor guy be president however this kissie face stuff should be on the cover of the New York Times, Washington Post not the AlterNet. What if someone at the Pentagon go to the President, last I recall he is the... President! He made a decision not to do this, yes I'm sorry folks but the poor guy is also human (yes you can stop bowing to him). I'm sure the White House appreciates the efforts for the minions to do the "Cover Your Ass" piece however people are starting to see through all the smoke screens. I guess the Bush years gave a lot of people bullshit detectors that many still chose to use. President Obama is at the top of the food chain so why are you trying to tag this of the rabbits of the DOD? Really, try harder or just don't try to insult my intelligence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Spot On
Posted by: westomoon on May 16, 2009 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article, but optimistic. Digby wrote a piece back in November that predicted the same situation, but from a more realistic, modern perspective. I never thought I'd look back on the Nixon era as a more innocent time, but Mr. Dean's assumption that bureaucrats are still the good and kindly gnomes of his day is unfortunately archaic.

Immediately after the Nixon-Ford presidencies, Jimmy Carter took steps to politicize the bureaucracy, primarily through the creation of the Senior Executive Service for the highest ranks of the career civil service. That structure was put in place just in time for Ronald Reagan's anti-government administration to exploit it. The bureaucracy began a slow downhill slide -- the statutory hedging of the civil service from partisan politics still held in the lower ranks, but they answered to senior civil servants who were dancing frantically to the tune of their current political bosses.

Then George Bush began the wholesale corruption of the ranks of the Civil Service, appointing a previous executive of Regents University to head the Office of Personnel Management, which runs the civil service and is responsible for adherence to the laws which protect it from politics. Monica Goodling in the Department of Justice was not the only person making civil service hires on the basis of ideology and partisan political affiliation -- it happened all over the Executive Branch. The career ranks are now filled with incompetents whose main strengths are their rigid conservative ideologies.

Bush and Cheney also created environments in the National Security sector where organizations were turned loose to do the things prohibited to them by law -- and kept those environments in place so long that promotions and management selections were based on the aptitude for doing those prohibited things, and for giving a corrupt Administration what it wanted.

There was a sudden spike in CIA employees taking out personal liability insurance policies around 2003, and the Agency also reimbursed employees for the cost of those policies -- both basically unheard-of in the Executive Branch, whose employees are protected by law from litigation. These people knew they were operating outside the law.

What Obama has inherited is far worse than the bureaucracy Dean experienced in the seventies. In Dean's day, the bureaucracy closed ranks to protect its professional mission. These days, the bureaucracy is more like a multifaceted Mafia, closing ranks out of omerta, to protect itself from its own crazed and thuggish behavior, or, like the Republicans in Congress, out of blind resistance to following the orders of a President who does not share their fanatic neocon worldview.

The new President does not yet appear to understand what a thoroughly broken instrument he has been handed -- until he does, he will continue to try to defend bizarre actions, and the employees who take them, out of a genuine impulse toward loyalty. I hope that, once he learns what a zoo he has inherited, he will turn his attention to a reform of the Civil Service laws and regulations -- he's gonna need to do it out of simple self-defense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Who said anybody forced Obama to do anything?
Posted by: rafaeltoral on May 16, 2009 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is as much a part of the criminal enterprise we call the federal government than anyone else. Quit pretending like Obama is being forced to do anything. He is doing it willingly. He is a schill. If you cannot see that then I have no pity for you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

someguy56
Posted by: gorkman on May 16, 2009 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe Obama is making a critical mistake.
His previous promise not to prosecute those in the intelligence community for their Bush/Cheney ordered crimes should alleviate their CYA concerns.

But to fight court orders on Freedom of Information Act requests, and to reinstate the bogus military courts in gitmo is going to hurt the president.

He is reneging on promises, and that is never good.
He is also tainting himself with the crimes of the previous president which a diplomatic catastrophe that he may never recover from. We need international support to help bear the burden.

I think the best course of action to protect our soldiers and resolve the issues can be summed up in one word; REPENT.

He must release the photos, and accompany them with eloquent words of remorse. Then back up those words with prosecutions of the top decision makers who masterminded and ordered the program.

The faster and more abruptly Obama can do a 180 degree turn on the road to evil Bushco put us on, the better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: someguy56 Posted by: Sister_Lauren

Comments are closed-

Obama is defending torture and the torturers
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on May 16, 2009 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That might make him the second worst president ever, Bush will always top that list - I hope.

BREAKING: Scahill reports US tortures detainees with germ warfare and gasoline enemas. Semper Fi?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

National Security allowing Health Care Fraud Region 5 CMS
Posted by: Kimberly on May 16, 2009 7:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Report any suspected criminal or terrorist activity to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
CONNECTING GOVERNMENT OFFICES - Homeland Security - U.S. PATROIT ACT
.
Under current United States law, set forth in the USA PATRIOT Act, acts of domestic terrorism are those which: "(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States."[3]
.
If it’s shown that an official willfully failed to keep an INDIVIDUAL from harm, that official could be in violation of the color of law statute
.
1998 ~ U.S. Attorney General and HHS OIG Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol (SDP), see 63 Fed. Reg. 58,399 Program ~ 1996 HIPAA Violation | T18CFR286CRIME | T18CFR371CRIME ~ Color of Law T42CFR417.1 Willfully failed to keep individuals from harm T18CFR242CRIME
DATED: November 24, 1998 June Gibbs Brown [ HHS ] Inspector General
DATED: November 24, 1998 Nancy-Ann Min DeParle [ HCFA ] Administrator
DATED: January 16, 2008 Daniel R. Levinson [ HHS ] Inspector General
.
Region 5 HCFA : Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio and Wisconsin The Region 5 HCFA 1998 Partnership Arrangements [ T18CFR371CRIME Alternate Dispute Resolution T18CFR1518CRIME ] with Contractors [ HAPCORP.ORG T42CFR417.1 Anti-dumping violation T18CFR286CRIME ] and U.S. Attorneys in MICHIGAN and Ohio - T18CFR242CRIME
.
MISPRISON of FELONY --- Administrative fraud by fright Alternate Dispute Resolution
(3) FELONY CONVICTION RELATING TO HEALTH CARE FRAUD.--Any individual or entity that has been convicted for an offense which occurred after the date of the enactment of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 [36], under Federal or State law, in Connection With the Delivery of a Health Care Item or SERVICE [ HHS T42CFR417.1 Adverse Determination | grievance procedure | Alternate Dispute Resolution - Anti-dumping Violation to force, fraud by fright, illegal HCFA State Medicaid Kickback conversion ] or With Respect to any Act or Omission in a Health Care Program ... (1) operated by or financed in whole or in part by any Federal, State, or local government agency, of a criminal offense consisting of a felony relating to fraud, theft, embezzlement, breach of fiduciary responsibility, or other financial misconduct.
.
According to the Detroit News, Between 1999 & 2001 Michigan's Medicaid clientele ballooned [ HHS T42CFR417.1 systematic denial of Existing Federal T42CFR409.33 Post-hospital extended care, to induce forfiture, to force - fraud by fright, white collar crime, illegal Medicaid kickback T42CFR409.33 conversion ] to 1.25 million from 1 million, at a cost of approximately $6,000 on each Medicaid Reciepent. The Detroit News stated according to Paul Rienhart " a Medicaid Expert " in The State Budget Office of Michigan, says HCFA - OFIS Medicaid consumed 8% of Michigan's General Funds in 1998. HCFA - OFIS Medicaid will consume 32 % of the General Fund budget by 2004.
.
2003 Federal Budget Committee ~ knowingly ~ Financed $130 Billion Dollars for 1998 U.S. Attorney General and HHS OIG 'Volentary Discloused' Health Care Fraud and Abuse T42CFR417.1 AGAINST Entitled Federal Beneficiaries and Federal Health Care Programs ~ Claiming IT ~>HCFA State Medicaid Kickback Conversions T18CFR242CRIME was from increased costs of care for Retiring Babyboomers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Out, damned spot!
Posted by: Basenjis on May 16, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's a little late if he fancies, for whatever reason, that he can keep the knowledge and the suspicions of the last administration's crimes a secret from the world. The world knows. And what the world has not seen in video form or witnessed with its own eyes, it suspects.

Even if many Americans are naive, prone to denial, or just plain ignorant, the rest of the world is not unaware of even the finer, more esoteric techniques of torture. Certainly our "enemies" in the Middle East know what torture is all about. They know it has nothing to do with winning anyone's heart and mind. There no protection now from that.

Who needs those pictures, anyway. Only the disbelieving Americans need "proof." Those videos can harm no one now. The damage is done. We can't erase the past, but the public needs a look in case some are tempted some day to allow another Bush/Cheney-type atrocity again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Out, damned spot! Posted by: particle

Comments are closed-

THE NEW AMERICA
Posted by: Dennis St. John on May 16, 2009 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A nation of the bureaucrats, by the bureaucrats, and for the bureaucrats.

As far back as JFK, the bureacrats ignored the dictates of the president. He pushed and they pushed back, and someone shot him dead.

The America of my youth is already gone, and I don't envy the young the America they inherit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

CNN hosts four bloggers on the subject of torture
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on May 16, 2009 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought this was pretty good, Pelosi, Torture, Tribunals: Scott Ott on CNN.com LIVE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I say again and again; I have been saying for decades . . .
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 16, 2009 10:55 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been saying the words Operation MOCKINGBIRD, explaining it and urging everyone who read my books, my essays, and my website to look up for themselves and understand the co-opting and takeover of our news and information media by the military industrial complex and the government it owns.

Why, but for a media totally controlled by the government and those who own it body and soul, would be have come to this state? Who else would desire to cover up and obscure, to distort and mollify, the deliberate, repeated drowning (you really believe that's the limit of what is being done - how much more proof of the media's power do you need?) of a human being.

Imagine, parenthetically, if the victims here were animals. Or members of some favored minority.

Beginning in 1977, I wrote to congressman, senators, judges, policemen, and to all the major news media networks, sending incontrovertible proof of rape, extortion to commit rape, misappropriation of property, embezzlement, theft, and more felony crimes by members of IRS and other agencies of the federal government. I wrote and forwarded tape recordings, movies, and video recordings to Geraldo, to Sixty Minutes, to Twenty-Twenty - even Soldier of Fortune Magazine.

I wrote literally hundred of letters.

In 1987, I went to the U.S. District Court of Colorado, a lawsuit demanding release under the Freedom of Information Act records that would prove my charges and contentions - records that would have made my citizens arrest of certain officials high in government - like these torturers (forcing a woman to have sex by threatening her with loss of her children is also torture in my system of ethics) - incontrovertibley legal.

How much did you hear about it all?

No one needs to offer me an explanation of all this - certainly not one like they're offering you.

P.S. You might also profit by looking up and reading Marshal MacLuhan - the medium is indeed the message.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Damn my paralyzed fingers!
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 16, 2009 11:00 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That should have read: "Why, but for a media totally controlled by the government and those who own it body and soul, would WE have come to this state?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Was It the National Security Bureaucrats Who Forced Obama to Hold on to the Torture Photos?
Posted by: Quannah on May 16, 2009 11:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DICK CHENEY forced Obama to hold onto the Torture Photos.

It's called "suppression of evidence."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Why so surprised?
Posted by: Daito on May 16, 2009 12:17 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You mean just because Obama SAID the things you wanted to hear, you actually expected him to DO that? He is a sleazy politico just like the rest of the Washington democrats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

who force obama's capitulation?
Posted by: IRIQUOIS227 on May 16, 2009 6:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
no one. He may not have the cajones for the job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

In My Mind's Eye...
Posted by: p.ray on May 16, 2009 7:08 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That which is felt inspires my most vivid recollections...

In Oliver Stone's 1983 film Scarface, Al Pacino's character (Tony Montana) is forced to watch as his friend and cohort Angel (played by Pepe Serna) is slowly dismembered in a shower stall with a chainsaw. Bound and with his mouth taped, Angel's screams are muffled and only his eyes reveal his horrified and helpless agony.

In the tradition of Janet Leigh's shower scene murder in Alfred Hitchcock's 1960 film Psycho (and, unlike the senselessly explicit and graphic portrayal of most of today's horror genre films), Stone doesn't showcase the heinous details of this act of mutilation and murder. Nevertheless, twenty-seven years later, the image of Angel's tortured expression and Pacino's blood-sprayed but stoically-calm face still haunts me.

For those who already possess empathic intelligence, a description of the soul-retching brutality endured by torture victims proves more than sufficient. Our imagination alone creates an image more vivid than even 10,000 pictures ever would. However, for those who are either out-of-touch with or even bereft of their feelings of empathy and compassion, even a million photographs won't ever be enough.

Regardless of his motivation, I appreciate Obama's sensitivity. I personally can conceive of no useful purpose in further pandering to the salacious voyeurism of the already emotionally anesthetized and disengaged.

Although I will not rest any easier knowing that depraved and sadistic monsters engineered and committed atrocities allegedly in my name and for my benefit, nevertheless (and unlike detainees so deprived), I, for one, will at least be able to sleep.

Phala

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What part of the word "torture" don't you understand?
Posted by: chance garden on May 17, 2009 7:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...What part of the statement "The US does not torture" don't you understand?

Who cares if Obama gets a 2nd term? Obama should do what is right. Torture is wrong, political torture is a state crime and all the more heinous and criminal because it was done under the COLOR OF AUTHORITY! It is just that simple.

Anybody involved in these crimes should be tried to determine their guilt. That includes those who DID THE TORTURING and THOSE WHO ORDERED IT. It IS THAT SIMPLE.

If the US cannot bring criminals who commit crimes within the government under the COLOR OF AUTHORITY to Justice than you might as well open up all the cell doors in the prisions and let all the inmates go free because your system of justice is complete hypocrisy and our "leaders" do not deserve to be guiding the Nation.

To believe otherwise would be to engage in DOUBLETHINK.

For those of you who STILL do not understand the nature of the TOTALITARIAN government that we are oppressed by, THIS should prove beyond all doubt that Orwell's 1984 is HERE, and that YOU, COMRADE, are just one of it's PARTY MEMBERS...

...See you all at the Chestnut Tree CAFE,

SMITH 16497 SMITH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

ah I knew the Obama CYA was coming
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on May 16, 2009 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last I recall President Obama is...


... President.

We are trying to win wars and I think Obama want to stick around for more than one term. Let the poor guy be president however this kissie face stuff should be on the cover of the New York Times, Washington Post not the AlterNet. What if someone at the Pentagon go to the President, last I recall he is the... President! He made a decision not to do this, yes I'm sorry folks but the poor guy is also human (yes you can stop bowing to him). I'm sure the White House appreciates the efforts for the minions to do the "Cover Your Ass" piece however people are starting to see through all the smoke screens. I guess the Bush years gave a lot of people bullshit detectors that many still chose to use. President Obama is at the top of the food chain so why are you trying to tag this of the rabbits of the DOD? Really, try harder or just don't try to insult my intelligence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Spot On
Posted by: westomoon on May 16, 2009 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article, but optimistic. Digby wrote a piece back in November that predicted the same situation, but from a more realistic, modern perspective. I never thought I'd look back on the Nixon era as a more innocent time, but Mr. Dean's assumption that bureaucrats are still the good and kindly gnomes of his day is unfortunately archaic.

Immediately after the Nixon-Ford presidencies, Jimmy Carter took steps to politicize the bureaucracy, primarily through the creation of the Senior Executive Service for the highest ranks of the career civil service. That structure was put in place just in time for Ronald Reagan's anti-government administration to exploit it. The bureaucracy began a slow downhill slide -- the statutory hedging of the civil service from partisan politics still held in the lower ranks, but they answered to senior civil servants who were dancing frantically to the tune of their current political bosses.

Then George Bush began the wholesale corruption of the ranks of the Civil Service, appointing a previous executive of Regents University to head the Office of Personnel Management, which runs the civil service and is responsible for adherence to the laws which protect it from politics. Monica Goodling in the Department of Justice was not the only person making civil service hires on the basis of ideology and partisan political affiliation -- it happened all over the Executive Branch. The career ranks are now filled with incompetents whose main strengths are their rigid conservative ideologies.

Bush and Cheney also created environments in the National Security sector where organizations were turned loose to do the things prohibited to them by law -- and kept those environments in place so long that promotions and management selections were based on the aptitude for doing those prohibited things, and for giving a corrupt Administration what it wanted.

There was a sudden spike in CIA employees taking out personal liability insurance policies around 2003, and the Agency also reimbursed employees for the cost of those policies -- both basically unheard-of in the Executive Branch, whose employees are protected by law from litigation. These people knew they were operating outside the law.

What Obama has inherited is far worse than the bureaucracy Dean experienced in the seventies. In Dean's day, the bureaucracy closed ranks to protect its professional mission. These days, the bureaucracy is more like a multifaceted Mafia, closing ranks out of omerta, to protect itself from its own crazed and thuggish behavior, or, like the Republicans in Congress, out of blind resistance to following the orders of a President who does not share their fanatic neocon worldview.

The new President does not yet appear to understand what a thoroughly broken instrument he has been handed -- until he does, he will continue to try to defend bizarre actions, and the employees who take them, out of a genuine impulse toward loyalty. I hope that, once he learns what a zoo he has inherited, he will turn his attention to a reform of the Civil Service laws and regulations -- he's gonna need to do it out of simple self-defense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Who said anybody forced Obama to do anything?
Posted by: rafaeltoral on May 16, 2009 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is as much a part of the criminal enterprise we call the federal government than anyone else. Quit pretending like Obama is being forced to do anything. He is doing it willingly. He is a schill. If you cannot see that then I have no pity for you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

someguy56
Posted by: gorkman on May 16, 2009 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe Obama is making a critical mistake.
His previous promise not to prosecute those in the intelligence community for their Bush/Cheney ordered crimes should alleviate their CYA concerns.

But to fight court orders on Freedom of Information Act requests, and to reinstate the bogus military courts in gitmo is going to hurt the president.

He is reneging on promises, and that is never good.
He is also tainting himself with the crimes of the previous president which a diplomatic catastrophe that he may never recover from. We need international support to help bear the burden.

I think the best course of action to protect our soldiers and resolve the issues can be summed up in one word; REPENT.

He must release the photos, and accompany them with eloquent words of remorse. Then back up those words with prosecutions of the top decision makers who masterminded and ordered the program.

The faster and more abruptly Obama can do a 180 degree turn on the road to evil Bushco put us on, the better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: someguy56 Posted by: Sister_Lauren

Comments are closed-

Obama is defending torture and the torturers
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on May 16, 2009 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That might make him the second worst president ever, Bush will always top that list - I hope.

BREAKING: Scahill reports US tortures detainees with germ warfare and gasoline enemas. Semper Fi?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

National Security allowing Health Care Fraud Region 5 CMS
Posted by: Kimberly on May 16, 2009 7:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Report any suspected criminal or terrorist activity to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
CONNECTING GOVERNMENT OFFICES - Homeland Security - U.S. PATROIT ACT
.
Under current United States law, set forth in the USA PATRIOT Act, acts of domestic terrorism are those which: "(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States."[3]
.
If it’s shown that an official willfully failed to keep an INDIVIDUAL from harm, that official could be in violation of the color of law statute
.
1998 ~ U.S. Attorney General and HHS OIG Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol (SDP), see 63 Fed. Reg. 58,399 Program ~ 1996 HIPAA Violation | T18CFR286CRIME | T18CFR371CRIME ~ Color of Law T42CFR417.1 Willfully failed to keep individuals from harm T18CFR242CRIME
DATED: November 24, 1998 June Gibbs Brown [ HHS ] Inspector General
DATED: November 24, 1998 Nancy-Ann Min DeParle [ HCFA ] Administrator
DATED: January 16, 2008 Daniel R. Levinson [ HHS ] Inspector General
.
Region 5 HCFA : Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio and Wisconsin The Region 5 HCFA 1998 Partnership Arrangements [ T18CFR371CRIME Alternate Dispute Resolution T18CFR1518CRIME ] with Contractors [ HAPCORP.ORG T42CFR417.1 Anti-dumping violation T18CFR286CRIME ] and U.S. Attorneys in MICHIGAN and Ohio - T18CFR242CRIME
.
MISPRISON of FELONY --- Administrative fraud by fright Alternate Dispute Resolution
(3) FELONY CONVICTION RELATING TO HEALTH CARE FRAUD.--Any individual or entity that has been convicted for an offense which occurred after the date of the enactment of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 [36], under Federal or State law, in Connection With the Delivery of a Health Care Item or SERVICE [ HHS T42CFR417.1 Adverse Determination | grievance procedure | Alternate Dispute Resolution - Anti-dumping Violation to force, fraud by fright, illegal HCFA State Medicaid Kickback conversion ] or With Respect to any Act or Omission in a Health Care Program ... (1) operated by or financed in whole or in part by any Federal, State, or local government agency, of a criminal offense consisting of a felony relating to fraud, theft, embezzlement, breach of fiduciary responsibility, or other financial misconduct.
.
According to the Detroit News, Between 1999 & 2001 Michigan's Medicaid clientele ballooned [ HHS T42CFR417.1 systematic denial of Existing Federal T42CFR409.33 Post-hospital extended care, to induce forfiture, to force - fraud by fright, white collar crime, illegal Medicaid kickback T42CFR409.33 conversion ] to 1.25 million from 1 million, at a cost of approximately $6,000 on each Medicaid Reciepent. The Detroit News stated according to Paul Rienhart " a Medicaid Expert " in The State Budget Office of Michigan, says HCFA - OFIS Medicaid consumed 8% of Michigan's General Funds in 1998. HCFA - OFIS Medicaid will consume 32 % of the General Fund budget by 2004.
.
2003 Federal Budget Committee ~ knowingly ~ Financed $130 Billion Dollars for 1998 U.S. Attorney General and HHS OIG 'Volentary Discloused' Health Care Fraud and Abuse T42CFR417.1 AGAINST Entitled Federal Beneficiaries and Federal Health Care Programs ~ Claiming IT ~>HCFA State Medicaid Kickback Conversions T18CFR242CRIME was from increased costs of care for Retiring Babyboomers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Out, damned spot!
Posted by: Basenjis on May 16, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's a little late if he fancies, for whatever reason, that he can keep the knowledge and the suspicions of the last administration's crimes a secret from the world. The world knows. And what the world has not seen in video form or witnessed with its own eyes, it suspects.

Even if many Americans are naive, prone to denial, or just plain ignorant, the rest of the world is not unaware of even the finer, more esoteric techniques of torture. Certainly our "enemies" in the Middle East know what torture is all about. They know it has nothing to do with winning anyone's heart and mind. There no protection now from that.

Who needs those pictures, anyway. Only the disbelieving Americans need "proof." Those videos can harm no one now. The damage is done. We can't erase the past, but the public needs a look in case some are tempted some day to allow another Bush/Cheney-type atrocity again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Out, damned spot! Posted by: particle

Comments are closed-

THE NEW AMERICA
Posted by: Dennis St. John on May 16, 2009 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A nation of the bureaucrats, by the bureaucrats, and for the bureaucrats.

As far back as JFK, the bureacrats ignored the dictates of the president. He pushed and they pushed back, and someone shot him dead.

The America of my youth is already gone, and I don't envy the young the America they inherit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

CNN hosts four bloggers on the subject of torture
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on May 16, 2009 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought this was pretty good, Pelosi, Torture, Tribunals: Scott Ott on CNN.com LIVE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I say again and again; I have been saying for decades . . .
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 16, 2009 10:55 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been saying the words Operation MOCKINGBIRD, explaining it and urging everyone who read my books, my essays, and my website to look up for themselves and understand the co-opting and takeover of our news and information media by the military industrial complex and the government it owns.

Why, but for a media totally controlled by the government and those who own it body and soul, would be have come to this state? Who else would desire to cover up and obscure, to distort and mollify, the deliberate, repeated drowning (you really believe that's the limit of what is being done - how much more proof of the media's power do you need?) of a human being.

Imagine, parenthetically, if the victims here were animals. Or members of some favored minority.

Beginning in 1977, I wrote to congressman, senators, judges, policemen, and to all the major news media networks, sending incontrovertible proof of rape, extortion to commit rape, misappropriation of property, embezzlement, theft, and more felony crimes by members of IRS and other agencies of the federal government. I wrote and forwarded tape recordings, movies, and video recordings to Geraldo, to Sixty Minutes, to Twenty-Twenty - even Soldier of Fortune Magazine.

I wrote literally hundred of letters.

In 1987, I went to the U.S. District Court of Colorado, a lawsuit demanding release under the Freedom of Information Act records that would prove my charges and contentions - records that would have made my citizens arrest of certain officials high in government - like these torturers (forcing a woman to have sex by threatening her with loss of her children is also torture in my system of ethics) - incontrovertibley legal.

How much did you hear about it all?

No one needs to offer me an explanation of all this - certainly not one like they're offering you.

P.S. You might also profit by looking up and reading Marshal MacLuhan - the medium is indeed the message.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Damn my paralyzed fingers!
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 16, 2009 11:00 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That should have read: "Why, but for a media totally controlled by the government and those who own it body and soul, would WE have come to this state?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Was It the National Security Bureaucrats Who Forced Obama to Hold on to the Torture Photos?
Posted by: Quannah on May 16, 2009 11:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DICK CHENEY forced Obama to hold onto the Torture Photos.

It's called "suppression of evidence."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Why so surprised?
Posted by: Daito on May 16, 2009 12:17 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You mean just because Obama SAID the things you wanted to hear, you actually expected him to DO that? He is a sleazy politico just like the rest of the Washington democrats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

who force obama's capitulation?
Posted by: IRIQUOIS227 on May 16, 2009 6:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
no one. He may not have the cajones for the job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

In My Mind's Eye...
Posted by: p.ray on May 16, 2009 7:08 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That which is felt inspires my most vivid recollections...

In Oliver Stone's 1983 film Scarface, Al Pacino's character (Tony Montana) is forced to watch as his friend and cohort Angel (played by Pepe Serna) is slowly dismembered in a shower stall with a chainsaw. Bound and with his mouth taped, Angel's screams are muffled and only his eyes reveal his horrified and helpless agony.

In the tradition of Janet Leigh's shower scene murder in Alfred Hitchcock's 1960 film Psycho (and, unlike the senselessly explicit and graphic portrayal of most of today's horror genre films), Stone doesn't showcase the heinous details of this act of mutilation and murder. Nevertheless, twenty-seven years later, the image of Angel's tortured expression and Pacino's blood-sprayed but stoically-calm face still haunts me.

For those who already possess empathic intelligence, a description of the soul-retching brutality endured by torture victims proves more than sufficient. Our imagination alone creates an image more vivid than even 10,000 pictures ever would. However, for those who are either out-of-touch with or even bereft of their feelings of empathy and compassion, even a million photographs won't ever be enough.

Regardless of his motivation, I appreciate Obama's sensitivity. I personally can conceive of no useful purpose in further pandering to the salacious voyeurism of the already emotionally anesthetized and disengaged.

Although I will not rest any easier knowing that depraved and sadistic monsters engineered and committed atrocities allegedly in my name and for my benefit, nevertheless (and unlike detainees so deprived), I, for one, will at least be able to sleep.

Phala

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What part of the word "torture" don't you understand?
Posted by: chance garden on May 17, 2009 7:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...What part of the statement "The US does not torture" don't you understand?

Who cares if Obama gets a 2nd term? Obama should do what is right. Torture is wrong, political torture is a state crime and all the more heinous and criminal because it was done under the COLOR OF AUTHORITY! It is just that simple.

Anybody involved in these crimes should be tried to determine their guilt. That includes those who DID THE TORTURING and THOSE WHO ORDERED IT. It IS THAT SIMPLE.

If the US cannot bring criminals who commit crimes within the government under the COLOR OF AUTHORITY to Justice than you might as well open up all the cell doors in the prisions and let all the inmates go free because your system of justice is complete hypocrisy and our "leaders" do not deserve to be guiding the Nation.

To believe otherwise would be to engage in DOUBLETHINK.

For those of you who STILL do not understand the nature of the TOTALITARIAN government that we are oppressed by, THIS should prove beyond all doubt that Orwell's 1984 is HERE, and that YOU, COMRADE, are just one of it's PARTY MEMBERS...

...See you all at the Chestnut Tree CAFE,

SMITH 16497 SMITH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS