Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

CIA Was Authorized to Keep Prisoners Awake for 11 Days

Agence France Presse. Posted May 11, 2009.


The method involved forcing chained prisoners to stand, sometimes for days on end.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

By Agence France-Presse

WASHINGTON – More than 25 of the CIA's war-on-terror prisoners were subjected to sleep deprivation during the administration of former president George W. Bush, The Los Angeles Times reported.

Citing memoranda made public by the Justice Department, the newspaper said that at one point, the Central Intelligence Agency was allowed to keep prisoners awake for as long as 11 days.

However, the limit was later reduced to just over a week, the report said.

Sleep deprivation had been one of the most important elements in the CIA's interrogation program, used to help break dozens of suspected terrorists, the paper said.

The technique is now prohibited by President Barack Obama's ban on harsh interrogation methods issued in January, although a task force is reviewing its use along with other interrogation methods, The Times said.

But the Justice Department memos released last month indicate the method involved forcing chained prisoners to stand, sometimes for days on end, the report said.

The prisoners had their feet shackled to the floor and their hands cuffed close to their chins, The Times said.

Detainees were clad only in diapers and not allowed to feed themselves. A prisoner who started to drift off to sleep would tilt over and be caught by his chains, according to the report.

Medical personnel were to make sure prisoners weren't injured. But a 2007 Red Cross report on the CIA program said detainees' wrists and ankles bore scars from their shackles, The Times said.

When detainees could no longer stand, they could be laid on the prison floor with their limbs "anchored to a far point on the floor in such a manner that the arms cannot be bent or used for balance or comfort," the paper said, citing a May 10, 2005, memo.

"The position is sufficiently uncomfortable to detainees to deprive them of unbroken sleep, while allowing their lower limbs to recover from the effects of standing," the report quotes the document as saying.

Within the CIA, sleep deprivation was seen as a method with the unique advantage of eroding prisoners' will to resist without causing lasting harm, The Times noted.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, torture, cheney, obama, yoo, sleep deprivation, memos, bybee

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And yet,
Posted by: chomsky on May 11, 2009 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Despite all these harsh interrogation methods the best the CIA and the Pentagon could "produce" were 3 or 4 convictions? This sounds like the "success" ratio the US has had in Afghanistan where after bombing to smithereens 750 innocent civilians, the US could only manage killing 14 "suspected" Al-Qaeda members.

The US has finally joined the ranks of North Korea, China and Russia on torture and mayhem. Congrats!

Reports are now coming in indicating the US is using White Phosphorus in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bombastic Posted by: Schnookums
» RE: And yet, Posted by: left_witch
Perspective
Posted by: Axiom69 on May 11, 2009 11:37 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ask journalist Daniel Pearle if he would prefer to be kept awake for days on end instead of the fate his captors gave him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Idiotic non sequitor Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Perspective Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Perspective Posted by: Axiom69
» RE: The choice is not one or the other Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: Perspective Posted by: login@bugmenot.com
» parrotuya Posted by: parrotuya
» RE: parrotuya Posted by: Axiom69
THERE'S LOTS MORE WHERE THAT CAME FROM
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 11, 2009 12:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alot of files were handed over during the past 2 weeks or so. Everything is signed and approved by Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Yoo. According to the program I watched on PBS the administration was updated daily on what was going on the the world of "We don't torture". Except that we do and it's damned ugly. Anna

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And Americans felt A-OK with this because they had been so terrified by the 9/11 attacks.
Posted by: pfgetty on May 11, 2009 12:52 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even now so many Americans, as they recall that fateful day when we were attacked, feel that almost anything was acceptable if it would bring us more information about those who attacked us on 9/11 and ensure no more attacks would coming. And that is why any prosecutions against Bush/Cheyney will lead no where.

We are all going in the wrong direction. Exposing the sins of torture does make Bush and Cheyney look more like monsters, but only to those who already see them as such.
But exposing the greater crime, the crime of covering up 9/11 and actually being complicit in 9/11, would actually bring in virtually all Americans and ensure that this popular opinion would finally bring justice to these hideous leaders.

But it takes the media to bring the information that PROVES that 9/11 was an inside job. PROOF!
And we have it. How could any journalist ever ignore this, the biggest story of all time.
We have known that the WTC collapse was brought on with controlled demolition. There are so many bits of evidence that make any other explanation highly implausible.
But for every bit of evidence, the defenders of the official story would present some improbable explanation.
This time, though, we have a scientific paper in a peer reviewed physics journal by Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan and other distinguished scientists that proves that thermite was present in large quantities in the dust samples taken from the WTC area right after the collapse. And this thermite, and explosive substance used in controlled demolition, is a special type called nanothermite, which was not commercially available and only experimental, with each research facility making different types, each with its own signature composition. It would not be hard to find out where it was made and who made it and how it ended up at the WTC.

And we could find out all of that if only our media, like Alternet, would expose what we do know and expose the scientific work proving the WTC collapsed due to controlled demolition. And neither will Amy Goodman or antiwar.com or Counterpunch or the Nation or any other progressive sites.
The continuing wars and occupations and human rights crimes can be blamed on our press, and particularly our alternative media, because exposing the lies of 9/11 would put a quick end to all of these horrors.

Why won't they expose any of it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stress
Posted by: QQOblivion on May 11, 2009 3:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even minor emotional stress can harm the human body, possibly seriously, to say nothing of being forced to endure stress positions for *11 days* without any sleep.

I am surprised that fewer than 100 detainees died in US custody. It seems likely that the death-toll will rise greatly over the next few years as former prisoners die from heart-disease, suicides, cancers, etc as a direct result of their captivity and treatment.

And what kind of "intelligence" is given by a man who hasn't slept in over a week!? It can't exactly be reliable. And the fact that wars were waged based on this unreliable information is really one of the greatest evils in all of human history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do this at MCRD: Parris Island or San Diego..
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on May 11, 2009 5:11 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.. and a bunch of other stuff you'll be a enlisted US Marine! Mix in sometime at NAS Brunswick Maine and you'll get some air wings!

Semper Fi

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Half Dozen of the Other
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on May 11, 2009 5:36 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as renditions continue the use of torture in our name has not stopped.


FREE AMERICA

VOCA, NOW !!

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is torture? Don't make me laugh.
Posted by: AJR Journal on May 11, 2009 7:10 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sleep deprivation? How did they stand it?
Don't forget they also endured a "bland, yet nutritious diet".
Unlike the rich, varied diet they were used to.
Don't forget about the caterpillar in the box.
Yuck! That had to be terrible.
Don't forget about the loud noise that came from behind them.

Sheesh!! This was torture? Sober up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is torture? Don't make me laugh. Posted by: login@bugmenot.com
» You don't make any sense! Posted by: AJR Journal
Poor babies
Posted by: 2thepoint on May 12, 2009 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No sleep...wow.. torture for sure..*L*

The problem here is it gives them more time to plan terrorists attacks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement