Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Bill Moyers Talks Drugs, Crime, Journalism and Democracy with Creator of 'The Wire'

By Bill Moyers, Bill Moyers Journal. Posted April 21, 2009.


HBO's critically-acclaimed "The Wire" creator David Simon talks about inner-city crime and politics, storytelling and the future of journalism.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Editor's Note: The following is the transcript from Bill Moyers' recent interview with newspaper beat reporter turned television writer and producer David Simon. You can watch the interview here.

BILL MOYERS: Welcome to the Journal.

"When television history is written," one critic says, "Little else will rival 'The Wire.'"And when historians come to tell the story of America in our time, I'll wager they will not be able to ignore this remarkable and compelling portrayal of life in our cities.

Take a look at this scene:

[...]

DETECTIVE JIMMY MCNULTY: Let me understand you, every Friday night you and your boys will shoot crap right? And every Friday night your pal Snot Boogie he'd wait 'till there was cash on the ground and then he'd grab the money and run away? You let him do that?

WITNESS: If we'd catch him we'd beat his ass but ain't nobody let it go past that.

DETECTIVE JIMMY MCNULTY: I gotta ask you, if every time Snot Boogie would grab the money and run away why'd you even let him in the game?

WITNESS: What?

DETECTIVE JIMMY MCNULTY: Snot Boogie always stole the money, why'd you let him play?

WITNESS: Got to. This America, man.

[...]

BILL MOYERS: For five seasons on HBO, this critically acclaimed series held up a mirror to the other America — the America we couldn't see anywhere else on television. It reveals a lot about what's happened to us in recent years, and it comes from a surprising source — a newspaper beat reporter turned television writer and producer.

David Simon and his creative team, including Ed Burns, a cop turned teacher, used the City of Baltimore and the drug wars there as a metaphor for America's urban underbelly.

Through storytelling brutally honest and dramatic, Simon and crew created a tale of corruption, despair and betrayal as devastating as any Greek tragedy.

David Simon comes by his knowledge of gritty urban reality from twelve years as a crime reporter with THE BALTIMORE SUN.

From his reporting on the streets came the book and NBC television series HOMICIDE, and on HBO, THE CORNER. At the moment he's producing the pilot for a series about musicians in post-Katrina New Orleans, called TREME.

Remember, you heard it here — what Edward Gibbon was to the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, or Charles Dickens to the smoky mean streets of Victorian London, David Simon is to America today.

He's with me now. Welcome to the Journal.

BILL MOYERS: Welcome to the Journal.

DAVID SIMON: Thank you very much for having me.

BILL MOYERS: There is a fellow in city government, here in New York, who's a policy wonk and a die-hard WIRE fan. And he's hoping I will ask you the one question on his mind, and the mind of many other fans. Here it is. "David Simon has painted the most vivid and compelling portrait of the modern American city. Has he walked away from that story? And if he has, will he come back to it?"

DAVID SIMON: I've walked away from the WIRE universe. It's had its five years. Stories that have a beginning, middle, and end-- sort of stand-as stories-- if you keep stuff open ended, and if you keep trying to stretch character and plot, they eventually break or they bend.

BILL MOYERS: What is it about the crime scene that gives you a keyhole, the best keyhole perhaps, into how American society really works?

DAVID SIMON: Right. You see the equivocations. You see the stuff that doesn't make it into the civics books. And also you see how interconnected things are. How connected the performance of the school system is to the culture of a corner. Or where parenting comes in. And where the lack of meaningful work in all these things, you know, the decline of industry suddenly interacts with the paucity and sort of fraud of public education in the inner city. Because THE WIRE is not a story about the America, it's about the America that got left behind.

BILL MOYERS: I was struck by something, I forget where I read it, that you said. You were wrestling with this one big existential question. And you talked about drug addicts who would come out of detox and then try to steel jaw themselves through their neighborhood. And then they'd come face to face with the question, which is?

DAVID SIMON: "What am I doing here? What am I doing here?" You know, all the same problems that a guy coming out of addiction at 30, 35, because it often takes to that age, he often got into addiction with a string of problems, some of which were interpersonal and personal, and some of which were systemic. The fact that these really are the excess people in America, we-- our economy doesn't need them. We don't need ten or 15 percent of our population. And certainly the ones that are undereducated, that have been ill served by the inner city school system, that have been unprepared for the technocracy of the modern economy. We pretend to need them. We pretend to educate the kids. We pretend that we're actually including them in the American ideal, but we're not. And they're not foolish. They get it.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drugs, journalism, crime, police, war on drugs, bill moyers, reporting, the wire, baltimore, arrests, david simon, dope

Bill Moyers is president of the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Moyers Interview with Simon is a Must See ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Apr 21, 2009 12:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Simon lays it all out A-Z ... If you didn't catch The Wire on cable this is the next best thing.

Simon's knowledge of today's political, economic and social situation is unrivaled and he lays it all out so that anybody can understand. His overview of America, especially the cities and our drug policies is second to none.

There's really too much to comment on to do it justice ...

Don't miss it !

Moyers Interviews David Simon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Article of the year contender
Posted by: cordas on Apr 21, 2009 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A fantastic interview, its pure gold to hear such an adult grown up conversation on the issues raised in The Wire (and thanks to alternet/Obama for putting me onto what has to be the best TV I think I have ever seen).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Probably better to see it than to read it...
Posted by: Bizatch! on Apr 21, 2009 6:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I also agree that the Simon interview is packed with insight and real disdain for a system that doesn't work anymore. But it's a long interview, so reading it would be kind of tedious in this format, though.

I have a friend who loves The Wire. I know I would love it too, if I had cable (I followed 'Homicide' diligently all those years ago)... somehow, though, I can't watch things like that with enthusiasm in these times. It's too close to the bone. I know this stuff exists out in the streets (even if I don't live it), and the entertainment factor is kind of uncomfortable for me.

My friend on the other hand is a great lad but also somewhat conservative, and so for him this series provides a needed flashlight into the dark alleys he'd otherwise avoid. I've noticed his outlook soften substantially in recent times, and maybe this has had some effect on him.

David Simon is right about using fictional characters to put the message across. We have tons of paper (studies, research, statistics) that tell us 'everything' we need to know, but nobody will act on them. We have to experience these things emotionally and personally before anything is going to change meaningfully.

I also agree with Simon that things will likely only change after the situation has gone too far wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

X pat from Chicago
Posted by: davy on Apr 21, 2009 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just got the first series on BBC. My English wife said, "The BBC played it late at night consecutively and at slightly different times, could this be that the "higher ups" see that the same thing is happening in Britain, and they don't want us to wake from our/their dream." Best show ever and I hope we see the other series, but truth is scary for those in "power". Humm, isn't that what The Wire is saying. Best ever story on Alternet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Best TV Ever
Posted by: Parcival01 on Apr 21, 2009 6:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A little background: Until I was 17 (a long time ago), I might have been labeled a TV addict. That's what I did was watch the idiot box. Then I was in an automobile accident and spent some time in the hospital where I had nothing to do but watch the tube.

When you're forced to watch it, you realize how bad television is.

Then when I was in my 30s, single, and living in the DC area, some colleagues were amazed at the commercials I had never seen. I didn't watch TV. I read, worked out... (They thought that made me a little...wierd!)

Now I'm older and HBO came out a number of years ago with "The Wire." I tuned in out of curiosity--and that I'd just been in that portion of Baltimore (Ballmer) where the series was shot. Excuse the parallel but--I was hooked.

Each season had a different focus. The first was sort of intro, the second on the stevedoers union ("It's not about me, Ziggy!"), the third about the mayoral election and "Hamsterdam" (watch it), the fourth about the public schools and the last about the press. Real issues. Real violence. Real futility.

Thanks, David Simon. Thanks, cast and crew. You've rejuventated my faith in SOME television being worth watching.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

33yrtv-veteran
Posted by: babka on Apr 21, 2009 7:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
undoubtedly the best tv/novel ever. the only false moment for me was the Goodnight Moon, but hey. netflix, end to end...deep as it gets. now: what to do in "reality", one by one?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We'd be impressed David
Posted by: weathered on Apr 21, 2009 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you'd confront Larry Silverstein and ask how feels about the blood all over his hands from the trade center killings - you know the event on 9/11 that MSM/NPR/PBS avoid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We'd be impressed David Posted by: miles_ahead
» RE: We'd be impressed David Posted by: mikeblack
» RE: We'd be impressed David Posted by: barefeet
» RE: We'd be impressed David Posted by: mikeblack
» RE: We'd be impressed David Posted by: kogwonton
» RE: We'd be impressed David Posted by: mikeblack
» RE: We'd be impressed David Posted by: kogwonton
Any society that criminalizes organic agriculture...
Posted by: P.E.A.C.E. on Apr 21, 2009 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is doomed to extinction.

In 1937 industrial hemp agriculture was banned using marijuana as an excuse to cripple the free market. Mankind was forced to choose fossil fuels over plant-based energy. In 72 years nothing has changed, except that our addiction to chemicals has gained political legitimacy and the prohibition against Cannabis has been reinforced.

Bill! Please consider that "hemp" has been recognized in (Executive Order 12919) as a strategic resource. How can a strategic resource -- the most nutritious agricultural crop on Earth and the most useful plant known to man-- be concurrently classiefied as a Schedule 1 drug? It's called 'corruption' -- of natural values. That's why Nature is breaking down. Natural values have been disrespected for too long.

Want to end the drug war? End prohibtion of industrial hemp. That was the original motivation for Cannabis prohibition, and it still is.

Want to end economic disparity? Then let people grow what they need without being preyed upon by the thugs who have been duped into enforcing laws to inductiy essential resource scarcity.

Without hemp agriculture to produce fuel and food (from the same harvest), our species will never see the end of this Century. Without Cannabis monoterpenes in the atmosphere, to reflect solar radiation and seed cloud formation, the planet will be broiled to extinction by UV-B radiation before global warming finishes melting the polar ice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sanity
Posted by: Quasar on Apr 21, 2009 8:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am very intrigued and excited by the confluence of art and journalism that he represents - the synthesis of fact and fiction. The heart of the journalist with the eye and the touch of the artist.

Thanks to Simon for defining for us what sanity is through his words and showing to us what it isn't through his work.

We need it more than ever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America is doomed
Posted by: macdon1 on Apr 21, 2009 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the present attitude this country has, it is doomed to failure,no matter how much the commentators talk. The sky is falling but the American chicken littles worry about petty and stupid issues and ignore the huge disaster that is taking place. The definition of stupid is doing the same old thing over and over and expecting the same result. The greedy and rapacious corporate system has brought us to our knees, but it is allowed to continue, bailed out with billions of our tax dollars. Meanwhile, citizens go hungry and homeless because our social safety net has been devastated and our housing programs gutted. Our public property has been sold for a song to entrepreneurs and developers for private profit. Our industrial base has fled almost completely for cheap labor abroad and we are now a net exporter of raw materials and an importer of manufactured goods. (Economics 101...the definition of a lesser developed country) All we need now is for the World Bank to call in our loans and our transformation to a banana republic will be complete.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Moyers
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 21, 2009 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you missed this broadcast (and you don't have the patience to read the whole thing on AlterNet) try to get a copy of the program on DVD from PBS Video. It was an eye-opening broadcast that made me think of things I had never even considered before.

Thank Heavens I taped it. It is a keeper, that's for sure!

The Republican Implosion of '09

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I am instantly a David Simon fan
Posted by: mikeblack on Apr 21, 2009 11:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I saw this on PBS, it was the first time I have been sorry I don't have cable because the clips they showed and the way David Simon explained the show sounded and looked absolutely amazing.

I do not watch television beyond PBS occasionally because I hate the stupidity of television and I am shocked that this slipped through onto the idiot box. I have ordered DVDs of the show and look forward to watching them. But I guess since it's HBO and was ignored by the general public, like anything of quality people like me who would have supported it didn't even know about it.

Simon has a great idea about weaving facts into drama (and comedy like The Daily Show) to seep in. Quite frankly journalism is dead, unless you know where to find it (which in case you already know what's going on so it doesn't matter.)To turn it into a subversive joke or weave it into a dramatic plot and suddenly people pay attention. It's sad that you have to go to that today, but it's all you can do.

But as the media gets stupider and stupider, I hope David Simon can continue slipping in, because the media hates people like him who write television scripts that aren't just window dressing between advertisements. They want people like him regulated into making low budget indie flicks screened at film festivals, tossed on IFC or Sundance channel once early in the morning and forgotten about. That has been the state of American "entertainment" for the past 20 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And not one mention that with Alcohol Prohibition we have seen it all once before?
Posted by: Sojourner on Apr 21, 2009 12:01 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
C'mon. It's not as if nobody has noticed before what The Wire dramatizes. The plea that no one pays attention is BS.

It's denial. We surround ourselves with denial in order to be *happy.* If you do not give the appearance of being *happy,* you are undesirable and therefore lonely. Not all the tv journalism in eternity can combat denial, so long as denial is the coin of the realm.

The resort to entertaining us with other people's suffering is as old as Greek tragedy. It changes nothing. If you want change, blow up your tv, throw away your newspaper.

"The Other America" got attention in the '60s. But the voters preferred Nixon, since he was more entertaining than Humphrey. The oligarchy owns the mass media. They also pay-off public media (once known as "educational" tv). (Ask Moyers how he got fired.)

America is a phony society and more phonyness (even award winning) won't change anything.

Can a democracy reign in its oligarchy? Not so long as citizens want to "Get Rich or Die."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thank you
Posted by: ratsass841 on Apr 21, 2009 12:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for the wire. It is incredible on every level. It is truth meets art, and has opened my eye's to reality.
This is the best article ever on Alter.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

everyone is at least a bit corrupt
Posted by: Gregsdiary on Apr 21, 2009 4:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice interview. I can tell I'd have loved The Wire--if I had a tv.

In talking about how crime in general can provide a particular insight as to how American society works, Simon mentions "And also you see how interconnected things are" later on saying "this comes down to Wall Street."

I love that.

Since a market society runs on the profit-motive, everyone is attached to each other by self-ingerest and disconnected by self-interest. You see how this plays out in the The Wire in how "school test scores, crime stats, arrest reports, arrest stats" are basically lies "that a politician can run on" or "that somebody can get a promotion on."

It's everyman for himself.

In that respect Wire is about everyone.

I thought Johann Hari summed it up pretty good in an piece last week:

"we have built our societies on exaggerating this status panic - and we have been ratcheting it up over the past thirty years. The more unequal a society is, the more intense it becomes. Even if you slip to the bottom in Sweden, it's not so very different from the top. But when there is a long social ladder and the bottom rung means humiliation and poverty, everyone at every rung feels a sweatier need to cling to their place - and the society starts to go wrong."

That is, everyone these days is driven to be at least a little bit corrupt if not outright criminal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

David Simon is a true revolutionary
Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin on Apr 21, 2009 10:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a time when bullsh** surrounds us everywhere and people are crawling back into their cacoons away from reality, and people are afraid to speak the truth to power because it isn't profitable, David Simon spoke truth to power and told it like it is. Thank you Simon, for 6 years you delivered a beautiful,ugly,hard,eye-opening,sad,funny,charismatic,and wise tv series like the Wire. If there was a way too get more people to watch this show over the crap like 24 and The Shield and Heroes,I would gladly do it. Instead, all I can do is watch the American Empire burn down,while people are oblivious, rushing to the mall and buying bluetoothes and iphones. I miss the Wire,(even though its been a year since it went off the air),you and Battlestar Galactica,and Homicide:Life on the Street, and the comedian George Carlin, helped me make sense about life in this Crazy Insane Nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I saw it and was very hopeful. But If the torch of truth is not carried....
Posted by: common intelligence on Apr 22, 2009 5:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... then this interview too will be buried in the archieves as another passing moment in entertaining curiosity.

Just like all the emotion and intelligent responses people voice here on Alternet, it'll be just a little blip of digital wisdom to be filed away.

For if people do nothing to drive the country to realize responsibility, accountability and face the truth, ADD ACT ON IT, than all this soul searching America does in bits and bites will amount to no more than the plethora of the same that sits in the libraries of the world gathering dust over the ages, generation to. generation.

CARPA DIEM

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pt. 2
Posted by: kogwonton on Apr 23, 2009 11:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Concerning the 'NWO' I have to make a couple of things clear. People equate 'New World Order' with 'Illuminati. I hate the terms, even though they have been used by sitting presidents. What is clear is that financial and corporate interests are now global institutions with no clear loyalty to the nations who granted them their charters. It is clear that we now are well on the way toward a globalized financial and industrial system. Considering the preferential treatment of nations, Israel in particular, over the interests and needs of Americans, many are justified in seeing our government as having been taken over by these financial/corporate interests. Whether it's the 'NWO' and the 'Illuminati' makes no difference, and I do hate the terms. What is clear is that our Constitution and Government are not working for us, but in the interests of global financiers and industrialists. These military contractors, financiers, and energy companies have consistently use fear to coerce at least three continents to allow themselves to be taxed nearly to death in the name of fear for the last sixty years, to build a war machine that we no longer own, and they are becoming the dominant global institutions of our time. Who needs the Illuminati when we have the IMF or EXON or BP? Who needs them when we have Goldman Sachs or Deutschebanke? They do the same job just fine, and they can be taken to court without hysterical laughter.

The Israeli government has a huge amount of sway over our domestic and foreign policy. They have conducted the most intense espionage against our country than any other for the last twenty years. The Israeli government is guilty of war crimes, yet in the name of the holocaust are allowed to use similar tactics against their own indigenous populations, use our domestic political processes and tax money to their advantage through our politicians' fear of being called Anti-Semitic. It still is not clear what it means to be a Jew in current dialog. The world thought it a good thing that Jews should have a homeland, but at the cost of displacing the people who possessed the land for two thousand years. Is it a racial or religious factor that makes a person Jewish? If it is racial, then certainly Israel is a state which has a legal system in which status as a citizen, and recourse to law, is based upon race - apartheid. If it is religious, then we are basing our political affiliations and alliances based on a deed allegedly written by 'God'. I have a problem with that, and so should you. Native Americans have a more clear case for their right to the whole of the Continental U.S. than Israel does over the land of Palestine.

I have said many times that I don't need the WTC collapse to find plenty of reason to suspect that 9/11 was something other than 19 hijackers with box cutters attacking us for religious reasons. I could leave that part out altogether and still have enough to go on for days, all factual and all from impeccable sources. The event defined our time, redefined our nation, and justified the complete restructuring of our nation under the banner of Homeland Security. I personally asked the I.G. of the DoJ a couple of questions that had nothing to do with the collapses, and he fled like I had bitten him. He outright lied to me, and there was never a single transparent accounting for the most pertinent questions about those events. The government was obstructionist from day one, and still is. I find it highly suspect, and feel justified in thinking we have been the victim of a military coup. I am not alone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

May 2, 2009 PhillyNORML - 2009 Global Cannabis March
Posted by: aahpat on Apr 23, 2009 2:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 2009 Global Cannabis March, or Philadelphia Cannabis Festival, will be taking place on Saturday May 2, 2009. The event is still being planned, so more information will be posted as it becomes available. The GCM is an annual event that brings out hundreds of supporters, patients, and onlookers. It's an excellent opportunity to show just how popular legalization is, and to have a lot of fun. In 2008 we had our biggest one yet with over 400 people. This year we hope to top 1,000. Check back often for updates!

Saturday, May 2, 2009
Meet at Broad St. and South St. at 3:30 - 4:00pm
March towards Headhouse Square at 4:20pm
Arrive at Headhouse Square by 5:20pm
Speeches - done by 6:30pm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FactCheck.org on taxes paid by top 1%
Posted by: obgood on Apr 23, 2009 3:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
May 2, 2008
Q: What percent of taxes does the top 1 percent pay and what percent of the income do they make?
A: The top 1 percent of all households got 18 percent of all personal income and paid nearly 28 percent of all federal taxes in 2005, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The top 1 percent now pay a significantly larger share of taxes than before President Bush's tax cuts, and also have a larger share of income.
The nonpartisan CBO keeps track of such things and published its most recent tables in December 2007. The information to answer this question is in "Summary Table 2: Shares of Federal Tax Liabilities, 2004 and 2005."

The top 1 percent in 2005 were those households with income of at least $307,500, and they got 18.1 percent of all "comprehensive" income, which includes all cash income plus the cash value of such benefits as Medicare and food stamps.

As for taxes, CBO calculates that the top 1 percent paid 27.6 percent of all federal taxes, including:
38.8 percent of federal individual income taxes


4.0 percent of federal social insurance taxes (Social Security and Medicare)


58.6 percent of corporate income taxes (indirectly, through stock ownership)


5.5 percent of federal excise taxes (on such things as gasoline, tobacco, alcoholic beverages and telephones.)
The share of taxes paid by different income levels have changed over time.





The share now borne by the top 1 percent is the highest it has been since 1979, the earliest year for which CBO has figures. And surprisingly, it is larger than in 2000, the last year of President Bill Clinton's administration, before President Bush signed a series of tax cuts that benefited upper-income taxpayers by cutting the top rate on federal income taxes, cutting the rate on capital gains taxes and reducing the estate tax. One reason is that the top 1 percent now receive a greater share of income than at any time covered by CBO's statistics, though those households receive only slightly more than the 17.8 percent share they got in 2000.



The change in income distribution is only one reason the top 1 percent pay more now than before their income tax rates were cut. The major reason is what the CBO and other tax experts call "real bracket creep." Even though income tax brackets are adjusted upward each year for inflation, there is still a tendency for incomes to grow faster than inflation, causing more income to be taxed in higher brackets.


-Brooks Jackson

Sources
U.S. Congressional Budget Office. "Historical Effective Federal Tax Rates: 1979 to 2005" Summary Table 2, December 2007.

U.S. Congressional Budget Office. "Historical Effective Federal Tax Rates: 1979 to 2005" Appendix: Detailed Tables for 1979 to 2005 Tables 1A and 1B, December 2007.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement