Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

"People Shouldn't Have to Live Like This": The Real Story Behind "Tent City" -- and How the Media Get It Wrong

By Rose Aguilar, AlterNet. Posted April 20, 2009.


The media have finally discovered homelessness. Not surprisingly, they get the story wrong.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Over the past few months, reporters from around the world have flocked to the now-famous tent city in Sacramento, Calif. When they find out that 55-year-old John Kraintz has been living in a tent for almost seven years, they turn around and walk away.

"They don't want to talk to me," he says. "They're searching for people who just lost their homes. It's kinda tough to lose a home when you've never owned one. Sorry, but most of the people here have been homeless for a long time."  

A tall and lanky man with a long beard tied in a ponytail, Kraintz is one of 100-200 people who have been told to leave the homeless camp between Sacramento's Blue Diamond Almond factory and the American River.

Kraintz and so many other homeless people like him have been living in scattered Sacramento encampments for years, but they've been largely ignored and hidden from public view. That is, until Lisa Ling, a reporter with the Oprah show, came to town in late February to focus on what Oprah Winfrey called the "new faces" of homelessness.  

The show reported -- inaccurately -- that an estimated 1,200 people in Sacramento are living in tent cities after losing their jobs and homes. According to Loaves & Fishes, a privately funded group that has been feeding the hungry and sheltering the homeless in Sacramento for 25 years, 1,226 people live on the streets of the city. Between 100 and 200 temporarily call tent city home.  

Like Oprah, several national and international articles and TV pieces have falsely portrayed everyone in tent city as once-middle-class people driven to homelessness because of the economic meltdown.

"The credit crunch tent city which has returned to haunt America" is the headline of a March 6 piece in the London-based Mail Online. On March 20, the Los Angeles Times ran a piece called "In Sacramento's tent city, a torn economic fabric."   

Joan Burke, Loaves & Fishes' advocacy director, says those headlines are misleading. The majority of Sacramento's homeless population suffer from physical disabilities, mental illness and drug and alcohol addictions.

"The media are trying to capture a very complex situation in a sound bite," she says. "We've had homelessness in this country for decades. Each person has his or her own circumstance, and you have to tease that out if you're going to address this problem. Why do we care so much for people who suffer for a short time versus those who suffer for a long time? What is that about?" 

Over the past few months, Burke has been bombarded with media requests from as far away as Colombia, Hungary, Australia and the Philippines.

On one of the days I was there, I saw a German radio team, reporters from a French magazine and several local TV trucks. The majority of the people I met at tent city say reporters aren't asking the right questions. 

"The other day, I heard a German reporter ask if this is happening because of the recent economic collapse," says Kraintz. "This has been happening for 30 years, but the powers that be have been able to pretend it doesn't exist. Why aren't reporters asking about flat wages, jobs being shipped overseas and the lack of affordable housing?" 

Burke agrees, saying one of the many issues ignored in most articles about tent city and homelessness is the fact that poor people cannot afford housing, especially in an expensive state like California.

"People who are poor end up homeless through no fault of their own, but because people higher up on the food chain have made affordable housing a very scarce commodity," she says. "If we had sound housing policies and programs that helped people when they have a run of bad luck, we would not have a tent city." 

Kraintz says he knew the system would finally blow up. It was just a matter of time. The question, according to him, is this: Do the powers that be have the political will to create a fairer, more just economic system?


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: tent city

Rose Aguilar is the host of Your Call, a daily call-in radio show on KALW 91.7 FM in San Francisco, and author of Red Highways: A Liberal's Journey into the Heartland.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This Makes More Sense
Posted by: pdxjoe on Apr 20, 2009 12:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"People who are poor end up homeless through no fault of their own, but because people higher up on the food chain have made [...] housing a [...] commodity..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This Makes More Sense Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: This Makes More Sense Posted by: HoboHomo
» And health... Posted by: Parcival01
Drug addiction is not “a run of bad luck”
Posted by: Honky The Antichrist on Apr 20, 2009 1:11 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Somewhere along the line those types choose to put a needle in their arm or a glass pipe in their mouth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Over 35% of homeless youth... Posted by: HoboHomo
» Tent city or Binghamton Posted by: Honky The Antichrist
The cause: Federal spending cuts
Posted by: Perry Logan on Apr 20, 2009 2:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NEW REPORT DOCUMENTS CORRELATION BETWEEN HISTORIC CUTS TO FEDERAL HOUSING PROGRAMS AND CONTEMPORARY MASS HOMELESSNESS

November 14, 2006, WRAP released a report that documents how more than 25 years of federal funding cuts to affordable housing have created the contemporary crisis of homelessness and near-homelessness. The report documents the correlation between radical cuts to programs administered by the US Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the US Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), and the emergence of the massive episode of homelessness in the 1980s which continues today. It also demonstrates why federal responses to this nationwide crisis have consistently failed....

"Without Housing: Decades of Federal Housing Cutbacks, Massive Homelessness and Policy Failures," documents the correlation between these trends and the emergence of a new and massive episode of homelessness in the 1980s which continues today. It particularly focuses on radical cuts to programs administered by the US Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the US Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), which administers funds for rural affordable housing.

HUD’s budget has dropped 65% since 1978, from over $83 billion to $29 billion in 2006.

The Emergency Shelter phenomenon was born the same year that HUD funding was at a drastic low point. In 1983, HUD’s budget was only $18 billion, the same year that general public emergency shelters began opening in cities nationwide.

HUD has spent $0 on new public housing, while more than 100,000 public housing units have been lost to demolition, sale, or other removal in the last ten years.

Federal housing subsidies are going to the wealthy. In 2004, 61 percent of these subsidies went to households earning more than $54,788, while only 27 percent went to households earning under $34,398.

More than 600,000 identified homeless students went to public schools in the 2003-2004 school year, according to the US Department of Education.

Federal support helps homeowners instead of poor people. In 2005, federal homeowner subsidies totaled more than $122 billion, while HUD outlays were only $31 billion – a difference of more than $91 billion.
http://www.sistersoftheroad.org/wa/sisters/info/991/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why do we care?
Posted by: Annarisse on Apr 20, 2009 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Why do we care so much for people who suffer for a short time versus those who suffer for a long time? What is that about?"

I can answer this question.

Those who have suffered for a long time have lost our sympathy because our perception is that they are responsible for staying down where they landed, even if they weren't responsible for getting there in the first place. It's the dark side of the American Dream. Anyone can make whatever they want of themselves through hard work. The dark side is that if you find you can't, it has to be because you haven't worked hard enough.

People who have fallen on sudden hard times still have all the habits of mind and speech that mark them as middle class, and they haven't had time to work their way up yet. They're in the middle of it. So they're in a perfect position for us to "help the poor help themselves."

It's discrimination based on social class.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ditto... Posted by: Parcival01
» RE: Why do we care? Posted by: kogwonton
U.S. Homelessness Is Policy Not Accident
Posted by: lorenbliss on Apr 20, 2009 4:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those of us who recognize that today’s United States has only one purpose -- the propagation of capitalism (which includes the absolute protection of the ruling class and the total subjugation of all the rest of us) -- will also understand that, from the capitalist perspective, people who are not exploitable for profit are not considered worthy of life.

Hence we have U.S. capitalism’s equivalent to the Final Solution: its unwritten policy of exterminating the definitively unprofitable -- in other words, any of us who are disabled, elderly or chronically impoverished -- by what amounts to euthanasia by neglect and abandonment.

Moreover, such euthanasia is the functional common denominator that unites and explains the persistence of an entire plague of socioeconomic outrages: the housing shortage and the resultant chronic homelessness; the methodical denial of medical and dental care every other civilized nation provides its peoples without charge; the worsening malnutrition that underlies the national crisis of obesity; the industrial world’s worst public schools; and the abysmal lack of affordable public transport.

All of these outrages are endemic to capitalism, an intrinsic part of which is a working class so powerless we can be treated exactly as if we were the soulless machines the ruling class imagines us to be: worked until we break or wear out and then thrown away at no further cost.

This has always been the quintessence of capitalism but in the aftermath of 22 November 1963 its reality became increasingly obvious until it was proven beyond a scintilla of doubt by the murderous abandonment of Afro-American New Orleans to Katrina. After such a revealing escalation, not only is the reality of euthanasia by neglect and abandonment no longer debatable; the threat of the more conventional modes of Final Solution loom ever more frighteningly.

The point of course is that if we are to understand why in the wealthiest nation on earth there is chronic homelessness we must first ask ourselves how it serves the ruling class. We must ask the same question about bad schools, lack of transport, denial of medical and dental care, malnutrition, joblessness, the malevolent absence of a safety net all civilized peoples take for granted. How do all these conditions serve the ruling class?

If we answer this question truthfully we realize that in each instance the answer is death: that is, the elimination of people deemed unprofitable -- euthanasia by abandonment and neglect. And in the present economic climate, the media focus on homelessness might just bring us closer to recognition of this deadly core reality of capitalism and therefore to acknowledgement of the reality of class-struggle itself.

Which could indeed become the first step in a genuine national awakening…

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» exactly Posted by: TrollTreason
» RE: exactly Posted by: Lara1967
» RE: Middleclass being destroyed by design Posted by: ron heringhauser
» Once again... Posted by: truthlover
MSM Afraid To Cover Bushville's?
Posted by: The_Curmudgeon on Apr 20, 2009 4:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether it's because it runs against conventional wisdom, or because the MSM is busy reporting on a purported "recovery" or because it is afraid to cover stories that are truly frightening, the fact is that the depth and breadth of the recession is not being told in human terms. As with so many other important pieces, it is "new media" that is providing coverage of how people's lives have been devastated by the GOP-induced recession.

Here's an example:

www.laprogressive.com/2009/04/08/it-is-as-bad-as-the-1930s/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MSM Afraid To Cover Bushville's!?! maybe its time to leave LA? Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» maybe its time to leave LA? Posted by: truthlover
MSM is getting it right for the wealthy
Posted by: timenotonmyside on Apr 20, 2009 5:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The good ole Wall Street Journal is posting an internet article today .......

''Wealth-Less Effect: Earning Well, Feeling Otherwise''
by Gary Fields
Monday, April 20, 2009


''Proposed Tax Increases on Six-Figure Earners Highlight Mounting Costs of Living -- and the Relativity of Prosperity

Ellen Parnell and her husband, Donald Parnell Jr., seem like the kind of well-off couple President Barack Obama has in mind when he suggests raising taxes on families earning more than $250,000 a year. A surgeon at Fort Sanders Sevier Medical Center in Sevierville, Tenn., he drives an Infiniti. They vacation at a beach resort every year.

Yet, right now he is working seven days a week. The car is more than a decade old, the vacation home in Sandestin, Fla., comes at a moderate weekly rate because members of Ms. Parnell's extended family own it. Her family of five would like more room than they have in their 2,500-square-foot home, yet they can't afford anything larger. The downturn has them skittish about paying for renovations.

"I'm not complaining, but the reality is Obama may call me wealthy, but I thought we were just good old middle class," says Ms. Parnell. "Our needs are being met, but we don't have a load of cash to cover wants."

And ''Already, many members of Congress are seeking to scale back some of the proposed tax increases, which call for raising the top federal tax rates to 36% from 33% on households earning $250,000 or above.

Wealth and comfort "depends on where you're coming from," said Lois Avitt, a sociologist and founding director of the Institute for Socio-Financial Studies in Charlottesville, Va. To a family earning $50,000, $250,000 is well off, but for the family earning $250,000, rising college and medical costs and dropping home values make the perception debatable.''



Yup, that's right WSJ says that Obama is hurting people making $250,000.00 per year.
And WSJ says he is hurting the ''MIDDLE CLASS''
Americans making $250,000.00 and up a year.

Can anyone define middle class ?

It looks like it's relative to your state of needs and wants these days.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» lol Posted by: inverse_agonist
» Common mind set? Posted by: hedgewytch
Our MIAFIA Government
Posted by: nismx on Apr 20, 2009 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many people in the USA could be helped with all the pallets of $100 bills we sent to Iraq ? MILLIONS...... We could give every homeless person in America a new start..Instead the Bastards running this country would rather buy guns and bombs and kill children and families in foreign countries to take their oil and drugs so they can get richer. The time has come to get rid of every politician and start over. We must start now before we are all homeless. NOW !!! They had us killed on 911... EYE for an EYE & tooth for tooth. We could blame it on temporary insanity !!!
Revolution from the Greedy Bastards and Bitches mascarading as OUR UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One local station did cover this...
Posted by: Robba29 on Apr 20, 2009 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's the link to the Sacramento station KCRA. They did a week long expose of Tent City. Here's the link: http://www.kcra.com/news/19120088/detail.html

I think they covered it fairly well...with all the obvious tear jerker stuff and (I'm hoping not) fake concern from the reporter. But, for those who aren't familiar with this, it should catch you up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America suffers from Dickensonian Bipolar Disorder.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Apr 20, 2009 7:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"As Tracy drives off, Williams says: 'We live in one of the most charitable countries in the world and one of the coldest.' "

When you talk about the PEOPLE of this country, we are one of the most charitable in the world; but when you talk about the captains of industry, finance and government, THAT'S where you find the freeze – and this is the one problem that underlies all the others.

We are two countries, but 90% of us live in that first one –– God bless us, one and all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dickensonian Posted by: leighsure
A new WPA.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Apr 20, 2009 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During the Works Progress Administration days of the Great Depression, when the construction of Hoover Dam was begun, the first thing those workers did was build their own housing with government-provided resources and materials. Whole cities sprang up where there was only sagebrush in the desert before.

The result? A giant hydroelectric dam, one of the 7 Wonders of the Modern World, that has provided and will continue to provide irrigation water and electricity for centuries, paying back its investment many, many times over.

Every time I read of homelessness, construction workers turn up in the stories time and again. We need a WPA-type works program once more to repair our degenerating infrastructure and put construction workers back to work – and where those construction workers could start right now is building housing for themselves and the other homeless; housing made affordable, or even free when necessary, by government support and land donation. This is the kind of "bubble-up" investment America needs desperately right now – and the kind that will pay America back many times over in the future. There is no better investment than this.

There is nothing worse than a person who has no purpose in life; and nothing better, or stronger, or kinder, than a person – or nation – who has one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It will take the people of this nation...
Posted by: djnoll on Apr 20, 2009 7:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to make the changes we need to help the homeless. In many respects, this article is correct - the questions asked and the reporting are far from the reality. But here are a few more touches of reality -

1. when you are homeless, depression is the most dangerous thing you have to fear because it robs you of your ability to think, to care for yourself or your family, robs you of your dignity, and finally, it drives you to behaviors you never thought you would ever succumb to in a million years - crime, drugs, booze.

2. when you are homeless, you realize that all the programs are merely designed to keep you down because they only treat the symptoms of homelessness, not really offer any solutions to the problem

3. when you are homeless, you quickly learn that those who are suppose to help you will treat you like a sub-human who is somehow responsible for the loss of a job or an illness that put you on the street.

4. If you are an addict or an alcoholic or mentally ill, you are told to get treatment, but they never tell you how you are going to pay for it or where you will go once you are done with treatment, so you are once again back on the streets and back in the same old groove.

There are now programs being tried, such as Pathways to Housing that are finding great success in helping those who have substance abuse or mental health issues, and it is a program that should be closely examined. It provides housing first, then addresses the issues of treatment. They are finding that by just providing housing, the levels of abuse decline to a level where out-patient care (which is less expensive) can be covered by state health care programs and therefore, it more feasible and long-term.

I have spoken to my Congresswoman here and given her a copy of a proposal for a national homesteading act that would open up HUD held properties as well as BLM land to be used for homesteading by the homeless. It lays out a program that would allow for new inner city cores to be rebuilt from the abandoned buildings and new rural agricultural communities to be built in rural areas. It is a program that could be adapted to cities and states where there are lands and property seized for taxes if the local citizens would advocate for such programs. It would actually cost less than putting the homeless on welfare programs and could give them the opportunity to have homes and businesses or jobs which they have worked for, thereby restoring their dignity and making them productive citizens.

There are answers to the problem of homelessness, but as long as all we do as a society is treat the homeless as untouchables and do not offer solutions, only band-aids for the symptoms, we will never solve the problems of the homeless, whether the newly homeless or the chronically homeless.

By the way, I am homeless. I do not drink, drug, nor am I mentally ill. My husband lost his job nine months ago and I am disabled. We survive on my disability income and student loans because I am having to continue my education in order to become more employable at age 56. I am putting myself into debt in order to survive well past the age of 70. So, as I write this, understand - it is not the first time in my life that I have experienced being homeless, but now I know what to do, where to go, and how to get out. It is time we helped show others that it is possible and with the ability to do so, we can work together to solve homelessness as a problem in this nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have wondered...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 20, 2009 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... when America will start getting its own favelas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I have wondered... Posted by: gimmie shelter
Another legacy of Ronald Reagan
Posted by: sausage on Apr 20, 2009 8:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The other day, I heard a German reporter ask if this is happening because of the recent economic collapse," says Kraintz. "This has been happening for 30 years..."

Yeah, remember how the right wingers god, Ronald Reagan, started throwing anybody who was disabled by alcoholism, drug addiction and mental illness off SSI?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Earlier legacy of Ronald Reagan Posted by: leighsure
oh--surprise! surprise! This has been going on since Reagan, FCS!
Posted by: raginghormones on Apr 20, 2009 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It never ceases to amaze me how our wonderful "fourth estate" discovers the "crisis of the week".

Next thing...a TV Movie of the Week!

Well...I got news for them. Homelessness has been ongoing for 30 years. And it REALLY got started big-time with the election of Reagan in 1980, and throughout the eighties it was well known--and dismissed--with alot of social and economic Darwinist excuses ("they're mostly drug addicts" or "they are mentally ill", etc. etc).

I can recall two movies even today from way back then: one was a tv movie starring Lucille Ball called "The Stone Pillow". And then there was John Carpenter's "They Live", a movie still very relevant today.

So..where is the big revelation, MSM? You've been friggin' ignoring the issues and going for the quick soundbites for the past 30 years!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A WELL CRAFTED PLAN TO CREATE A NEW SOCIAL ORDER
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 20, 2009 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over the ages, some people have always come by hard times. But when the ways in which this can be made to happen are well thought out and engineered, more and more folks become caught up in the storm. There are countless ways to become poverty stricken, many more than 20 or 30 years ago. All a person has to do is get sick and it's all over. None of this is accidental and not all homeless people are junkies and drunks. We have created a segment of the population that is expendible. They are unnecessary. Just my opinion, but I believe that as the ranks of the poor grew, they were expected to join the military to swell the ranks of the 'volunteer' military. That didn't happen. Other than that, the plan is working. As for the media, they retreated under their rocks and didn't see the need to report the news. There can't be anyone happier, than a politician living in a land with no newspapers because no one has the guts to report anything. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Notice how few comments an article like this gets.
Posted by: and_abottleofrum on Apr 20, 2009 10:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans simply don't give a fuck about the poor and/or homeless. And Americans will deserve the awful economic shitstorm that's just getting started. May we all suffer terribly for our callousness, but most especially those who are particularly judgmental.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It never ceases to amaze me Posted by: NthnBrazil
Pamela from Australia
Posted by: pvalemont@bigpond.com on Apr 20, 2009 10:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1987 I was able to get an Australian government loan repayable at a fixed rate of one quarter of my income, ( no matter what that income, whether I was working or on a government benefit. ) It was adjusted as my income fluctuated. Unfortunately, that scheme has now been disbanded. It would be nice to see Obama's government tackle the problem of the homeless in the USA by instituting such a scheme in your country. It would be nice to see our present government in Australia re- institute such a scheme as well. As a single mother of three sons, I would not have been able to provide a home for my children without this government assistance. Some people might be interested to hear how this scheme began. After the war, the American army posted armed guards outside of a deserted army hospital in Ekibin, Brisbane. After repeated representations by bodies of ex-servicemen and their families who were living in tent cities and shanty towns, the government refused to ask the Americans to sell the ex-army hospital to them. As a result, the homeless took the law into their own hands. They should have known better than to mess with men who had fought a war for their country, and been trained in weaponry. A group of homeless ex-servicemen led by armed ex-commandos crept up at night and disarmed the guards, then a group of the homeless occupied the buildings with their women and children. This placed the then Labour Government ( equivalent of your Democrats) led by Ned Hanlon in a very difficult position. He approached the American government, and thus the first Queensland Housing Commission was born. My parents were one of the first families to live within its walls. As people got on their feet, they moved on to better their lives. I was a baby ( born 1947) when my parents moved into the Housing Commission, and my father and mother moved out when I was about 4, and eventually had their own successful business and died debt free. When I found myself on my own with three children, I applied for a Housing Commission loan, got it and so was able to buy a small two bedroom home where I raised my children. Now, twenty two years later, I own that home. The small remainder of the mortgage I owed was paid for out of an inheritance I received from my parents' estate. I am telling you this story to show what a wonderful investment the American government will be making if they begin such a scheme. What is given out by them comes back to all eventually. The country and its citizens can only benefit in the long run. I and two of my children have tertiary educations, something that would never ever have been achieved if the Australian government had not helped me in this way. I am extremely grateful to them and the people of Australia for the chance we all were given. I now have a home to leave my children in my will. Perhaps if representation was made to the Obama government you could do the same thing in your country? It took a Labor Government in Australia led by Wayne Goss to undo what all those years of Labor Governments had upheld, subsidized housing loans for the disadvantaged. Had I known what he would do I would never have voted for him. Showing a lack of foresight he systematically all but demolished the scheme. In the case of the ex-servicemen and women, our government owed them. In the case of children, (like me when I was a child and mine when they were children), they owe them a future too, and the only way they can help them is by helping their parents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pamela from Australia Posted by: DaBear
Capitalism is a Crime
Posted by: Pop on Apr 20, 2009 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the newly printed "Capitalism is a Crime" Capitalist organizations are not unlike the MOFIA.
The ones running the organizations make very excessive profit from the sweat and blood of their labor forse who they pay only survival wages so they must come back to work to live yet another day. The Capitalists do no earning, they brutally manipulate for their own excess. Capitalism makes even more of their evil profits through war, and the fear of it. The United States needs to make major changes where profit can't be the driver for war as it was in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, and now even Pakistan. The Bush/Cheneys have long been in both oil and war materials where their hidden profits are hidden but very substantial. No war is good for any of the people actually fighting in them, but are brain washed by the profit takers. Just as we were conned by 9-11 that was a covert operation of our elite Capitalists.
Nothing that is done is "for the People" as they lie to the contrary. All of the on going wars are wars of Capitalist greed and for more power for their future, and not for the future of any "People".

The people of the streets, should be helped in what ever way that is necessary to where they can earn and enjoy the lives they now live in misery. Drunk or Drug habit? That can be fixed. Very many of the Capitalist Elites have those problems as well. They don't usually end up in a tent simply because they have money that they did not earn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Classes by Catigory
Posted by: Pop on Apr 20, 2009 11:30 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Super criminal Mofia Elite. Millions
Middle Mofia Elite. 250.000+

Upper middle: 120,000 - 250,000
MiddleClass-Nornmal: 60,000 - 120,000

Lower Middle: 15,000 to 59,000

Poor: 0-15.000

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Classes by Catigory Posted by: DaBear
Health Consultant
Posted by: careman on Apr 20, 2009 11:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
TENT CITY, Got my attention. Some yrs, ago in Arizona I spent 4 mos, whats call Tent city, Tents instead of a builing to house jail people. The worst, miserable time in my whole life. Like The Tent City, home less people atticle, THE media hasn't reported the conditions in this situition, some guys could not wait to be transfered to Prison. More money is spend to feed dogs,cats then human beings, we had to pay for soap, other personal items, every one had to pay $1.oo per wk. The sherif's brother own the vending machines. Talk abount BAD treattemt. I worked hard obeyed the the rules, still, got punished, I had a journal. recorded all BAD stuff the jail staff was doin, OF course they took it away, they don't want the people to know. When we break law, we pay. BUT not inhumanly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There will be more tent cities
Posted by: samd11 on Apr 20, 2009 1:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as more people lose their jobs and/or live in increasingly expensive cities that cater to the wealthy. Those wealthy people still need low paid support staffs for their restaurants and hotels and cleaning personel etc. Where are these minimum wage earners to live when they can't afford to live close to their jobs? Oh, I know...they are supposed to travel a few hours each way to that job in order to return to the tent city they inhabit far from the disapproving eyes of their employers who still believe that if they REALLY worked hard they would still be able to obtain the great American Dream. Civil unrest will come eventually unless we reaspire to a truly civil society. Good Luck with that!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ask Obama to review NAFTA Posted by: gellero1
Have a look at this article.
Posted by: GuitarBill on Apr 20, 2009 2:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America's Darkest Secret by Martha Rose Crow M.S.

Subtitled: The Nine Stages of American Autogenocide.

She presents an interesting argument, which begins, "...American Autogenocide is the deliberate, systematic and legal murder of American citizens by socially-engineering the die-off of populations that are 'problematic' for the interests of wealth and power. Most victims prematurely die from social forces targeted at them to cause them to wear out by stress. This process is called 'Weathering Away' or 'Attrition By Stress.'"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We, the People
Posted by: wormfarmer on Apr 20, 2009 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of this world, should be concentrating on providing an example of what we are capable of, not maintaining an empire, we should be promoting the advancement of a global existence that results in an address of the problems that are threating the planet that we call home, our very survival.
You think things are bad now? Let this pursuit of aggression continue. Pay attention to whats going on HERE!
TELL OBAMA TO LEAVE AF-PAK ALONE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have a dream, that one day exploiters of the poor will have their throats slit
Posted by: and_abottleofrum on Apr 20, 2009 4:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
enmasse by those they strive to repress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Panacea
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Apr 20, 2009 5:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tent cities need a system of representative democracy and to have their own currency but to have it controlled by Israel. Then they can be just as fucked up as the rest of the country.


FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

allen
Posted by: pursah on Apr 20, 2009 5:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps more than mental illness and drug addiction and shipping jobs to China, a major cause of the new poverty is SINGLE MOTHERHOOD.

Poverty is a feminine thing. Women and father less children are the face of poverty. I hate to admit it but that idiot, Dan Quayle, was right. Women with kids working two of three minimum wage jobs can't make it economincally. They can't raise their kids right, either, because they are too tired and busy, thus the exponential rise in juvenile crime. Single motherhood for most SM's is definately NOT Murphy Brown. Here again, if birth control and abortion were readily and cheaply available, poverty and crime would decrease rapidly.

But of course, the diminishing of human suffering is contrary to the beliefs of the religious nuts who make the policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

allen
Posted by: pursah on Apr 20, 2009 5:27 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps more than mental illness and drug addiction and shipping jobs to China, a major cause of the new poverty is SINGLE MOTHERHOOD.

Poverty is a feminine thing. Women and father less children are the face of poverty. I hate to admit it but that idiot, Dan Quayle, was right. Women with kids working two of three minimum wage jobs can't make it economincally. They can't raise their kids right, either, because they are too tired and busy, thus the exponential rise in juvenile crime. Single motherhood for most SM's is definately NOT Murphy Brown. Here again, if birth control and abortion were readily and cheaply available, poverty and crime would decrease rapidly.

But of course, the diminishing of human suffering is contrary to the beliefs of the religious nuts who make the policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The media ignores homelessness unless it's "trendy"
Posted by: Beadmaster on Apr 20, 2009 7:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My husband and I were homeless during a brief time when it was definitely not more common or "trendy." We were white collar crime victims and the perp who defrauded us of our money is still doing well and has never been punished.

There is no infrastructure at all to help the homeless, nor anything in place to keep it from happening. There are so many paths to it, and having been a victim myself, I can honestly say that if it does occur, it's like watching everything crumble before you. We did everything we could to avoid homelessness. Jobs (which didn't generate close to enough to pay the monthly bills, never mind the overdue bills that kept adding up from not having enough income to pay everything in the first place). Legal assistance to get our money back - forget it. Lawyers won't work for free, and if you have a tiny amount of income from jobs that don't come close to covering the monthly bills, then the "Legal Aid" types of organizations say you make "too much money."

We were lucky enough to have a halfway decent human services organization in our area, but they could do nothing to keep us from becoming homeless due to low income, nor could they provide us with temporary housing while we worked hard to pull ourselves out of it. Even welfare denied us. We were able to get the bare minimum of food stamps, but that was it.

We had been renting and our landlord did many illegal things to get us out. Nothing we could do about it. When eviction loomed over our heads, we managed to get limited legal advice over the phone from a legal services organization, but they would not represent us in court, because we made "too much money." Ultimately, the case went to court. The landlord lied, got us kicked out and got a hefty judgment for far more than we owed him, and when the illegal things he'd done were brought up, we were told the case wasn't about him, so it made no difference. Literally, he could have bodily walked into our home, trashed everything we owned and pushed us out onto the sidewalk, and nobody would have helped us. WTF.

So now the media is onto the Story of the Day - homelessness for people who haven't been homeless for long, and some who have made a poor choice to buy "too much house." Poor planning. I wonder how many of those people who have been homeless for years feel about being ignored in favor of the whiners of the day.

I'm not homeless, but it sure irks the hell out of me to have been ignored way back when, to watch it all crumble, and now to have to listen to the tide complaints of how "bad" it all is for those people. They made a choice. I don't care how insistent the mortgage brokers were that these deals were so great - we pulled ourselves out of homelessness by buying a mobile home. We would much rather have a "real" house, but we knew we couldn't afford it, no matter how glowingly the mortgage brokers would have talked. Period. It's called being realistic.

Funny how being realistic is just fine for those who are homeless when it's not "trendy," but now homelessness is such a "sad" problem, so the process of being unrealistic and thus causing such problems is forgivable, even pitiable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deport Illegals and give them Jobs !!
Posted by: gellero1 on Apr 20, 2009 7:24 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
something wrong with that??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This question just absolutely set my nut up inta mustard!
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 21, 2009 2:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After an hour of discussing everything from the prison industrial complex and poverty to U.S. foreign policy in Iraq and Haiti, I asked him why he doesn't spend more time fighting for the issues he's clearly so passionate about.

This really chapped my ass... what a dumb question! Because non-profits don't pay people to work on their activism, they use VOLUNTEERS! Volunteers don't get paid cash money, bonehead middling class jerk! Only the owning classers who start the damned non-profits get paid! Don't you know anything?!

As a long-term volunteer-against-my-will I have to say if I had a god damned dime for every time some well meaning owning-class idiot asked me that very same question, I'd be a fucking billionaire.

If you're a member of the owning class, you just GOT to STOP being an idiot class-hole and start being a damned functional class-ally!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

F*ck the middle class...
Posted by: HoboHomo on Apr 21, 2009 2:53 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they've done nothing for me, being low income and homosexual. They compose the majority of citizens who voted against gay rights (including marriage), against housing for the homeless, against universal health care, and against many other porgressive programs that most of the western nations now take for granted.

I spit on their ugly mugs, and will dance on their graves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: F*ck the middle class... Posted by: Ianni_Stragopulis
» RE: F*ck the middle class... Posted by: luzmejor
SO SORRY
Posted by: downup on Apr 21, 2009 8:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It breaks my heart that some people have to live like this in the United States. I'm only writing this so that the people who are homeless know that there are some people who care. I want to do something to end this or at least make their living conditions better. I don't care whose "fault" it is that they are there or how they got there. They are human beings and should have food, shelter, water and other basic human needs. I'm issuing a challenge to everyone out there to post ideas on how we can give these fellow human beings a helping hand. And, Oprah, if you or any of your employees read this, I ask if you'd be willing to set up a fund for people who care about this to donate to. And if Oprah isn't willing to do it, I would challenge any other viable organization to do so. I don't have the ability or the knowledge to know how to do it myself. If these people had a place to get their mail, a place to shower and toilet, a place to launder their clothes, a place to cook their food and maybe some prepaid phones for emergencies and/or employment callbacks, it shouldn't really take that much. I liked the suggestion about the KOA styled campground. It would at least give them a chance and wouldn't be very expensive. Come on, people, let's rally and help our fellow Americans! Put yourself in their place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SO SORRY Posted by: djnoll
Declaration of Human Rights
Posted by: haroldmh on Apr 23, 2009 2:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our country is a signatory of the Declaration of Human Rights; have been for six decades. Article 25 states:

"Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control."

Congress should move to withdraw its signature or, at minimum, declare its hypocracy. There is no evidence that it has any intention of living up to it's obligation.

Human Rights; bah humbug.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reply To "Lorenbliss"
Posted by: AlteredStates on Apr 27, 2009 1:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can I hear an, "Amen".

I remember the JFK years very well. And, I remember the reactions some of the people had the day he was shot. Some were hurt and shocked, but some were glad that it happened, even before word came that JFK had, indeed, died.

I was in the U.S. Navy at the time, so, I was exposed to a wide cross section of the working class. The people who were glad Kennedy died were the hard- nosed, ignorant, hicks from the "southern" (as in Mason/Dixon) states. When the first reports were broadcast, it wasn't clear, yet, weather or not he had died. I remember one such person saying after the initial report said, that, he was "shot in the face". That person said," Good, I hope he dies; that Yankee motherfucker". So, you see, that, even if Kennedy had lived through his 4 or 8 year terms, there would always be some that hated him, even though Kennedy was trying to help the very same people that were of his stature (poor working class rural farmers, et al).

Yes, we are that "Third World Tyranny/Moron Nation Sweatshop, and we still have people like the one I just described above, who will hate someone they know nothing about. And, they will hate "the Kennedy's" forever. If you have any doubts, try going to a gun show and listen to the "idle chatter" as you pass by the various "booths" of people showing their "goods and wears". You would think that you were back in the pre-civil rights days of the 1950's.

Ignorance is ignorance, but, when you add all of human nature's negative attributes, you get a virulent, toxic, mess, very much like what we have right now. And, their is no cure for that.

I wish I had something good to say about our present state, but I've lived long enough to realize, that, there is no cure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Downfall of America
Posted by: tom001 on Apr 27, 2009 9:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is very disturbing to think that so many protesters who end up in jail are raped. The culture within American jails is far worse then in any other first world country and even 3rd world countries with more men raped in America then Women due to the problem within jails.

With so many people who have been in and out of jail, the culture of American prisons is just waiting for the collapse of the economy and law and order to come out onto the streets. The culture within American prisons is a representation of the extent of chaos that will be seen in America during it's collapse.

America will soon be the next South Africa.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement