Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Famed Gitmo Lawyer Facing Six Months in Prison For Writing Letter to Obama Detailing Torture of Client

Comment Is Free. Posted April 2, 2009.


Clive Stafford Smith is accused of 'unprofessional conduct' by Pentagon officials who monitor communication between Gitmo prisoners and their lawyers.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Lawyers for Binyam Mohamed face the incredible prospect of a six-month jail sentence in America after writing a letter to President Obama detailing their client's allegations of torture by U.S. agents.

The privilege review team -- officials from the U.S. Department of Defense who monitor and censor communication between Guantánamo prisoners and their lawyers -- have previously been accused of using their powers to suppress evidence of the abuse and mistreatment of detainees.

Clive Stafford Smith, director of legal charity Reprieve, and his colleague Ahmed Ghappour have been summoned to appear before a Washington court on May 11 after a complaint was made by the privilege review team.

Stafford Smith had written to the president after judges in the UK ruled against the release of U.S. evidence detailing Mohamed's alleged torture at Guantánamo. The letter [PDF] asked the president to reconsider the U.S. position and urged him to release the evidence into the public domain. He attached a memo summarizing the case because his US security clearance gives him access to the classified material. In order to comply with classification guidelines, the memo did not identify individual officers by name or specify locations of the abuse.

He and Gappour submitted the memo to the privilege team for clearance but the memo was redacted to just the title, leaving the president unable to read it. Stafford Smith included the redacted copy of the memo in his letter to illustrate the extent to which it had been censored. He described it as a "bizarre reality." "You, as commander in chief, are being denied access to material that would help prove that crimes have been committed by U.S. personnel. This decision is being made by the very people who you command."

The privilege team argue that by releasing the redacted memo Reprieve has breached the rules that govern Guantánamo lawyers and have made a complaint to the court of "unprofessional conduct".

Stafford Smith described their actions as intimidation, saying the complaint "doesn't even specify the rule supposedly breached."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: pentagon, barack obama, department of defense, binyam mohamed, reprieve, guantánamo, ahmed ghappour, cliver stafford smith, privilege review team

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is RIDICULOUS!
Posted by: Quannah on Apr 2, 2009 9:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess the First Amendment doesn't apply to attorneys for Gitmo detainees? WTF is that supposed to mean? I can't believe that any court will actually do anything about this, but what I want to know is who are these dictatorial holdovers from the Pentagon who have the balls to actually make the complaint?

Obama's people better let the Pentagon know this shit won't fly anymore! They better!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is RIDICULOUS! Posted by: Zimbly
» RE: This is RIDICULOUS! Posted by: Quannah
» RE: This is RIDICULOUS! Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: This is RIDICULOUS! Posted by: peacefullaim1
A Case That Will Go Nowhere
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 3, 2009 4:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Eric Holder is stupid enough to prosecute this case, I have severely misjudged him. There's no doubt that he's party to Obama's connivance and protection of war criminals, but it's unlikely that he'd outrage most Americans by taking the case to trial, knowing that it would be almost impossible to seat a jury that would convict. Sadly, it's the political repercussions and not the ethics and law that most likely would sway the Attorney General, but anyway this case is going nowhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» a general attorney, maybe Posted by: godsbreath64
» Will not be a Jury Trial... Posted by: MausMasher54
» DOJ Has to Prosecute Posted by: DrBrian
Any minute now the faux-patriot clowns brunowe and EncinoM
Posted by: MeyravLevine on Apr 3, 2009 5:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are going to post telling us that this story is overblown and in any case GITMO prisoners don't need legal representation and blah, blah blah...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ya, well the world accuses the Pentagon of unconscionable operandi
Posted by: godsbreath64 on Apr 4, 2009 2:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop terror. Arrest The cheneydick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Pentagon has become a devil's fortress and Gates and the officials seriously need to be changed.
Posted by: maxpayne on Apr 4, 2009 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arresting a lawyer for revealing the truth based on what the corrupt Pentagon officials say is just disgusting. Obama had better fire Gates and replace the Pentagon officials immediately. Keeping the same Bush appointees to run the Department of Defense is not change at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Cavalry is Riding Dead Horses
Posted by: americansheep on Apr 4, 2009 7:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I say "let's wait"... and while we wait we can "pray"... and as cobwebs cocoon us as we sit at our keyboards as we type, as we pray and as we wait for Obama and his posse to bring truth and justice to this cesspool of a swampland. And just before we take our last breath we will wonder why no one invaded our swampland to liberate us. That's when we see we have to do it ourselves, but now we are too tired and resigned to our life in our cocoon, so we pray and wait, nibbling on itsy bitsy spiders that come our way. But I digress. Let us rise up and confront the gloom and doom and liberate ourselves by pushing past the obstructive politicians who have cocooned us. Let's nibble them one by one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wikileaks is the answer
Posted by: mcgoo on Apr 4, 2009 8:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The letter needs to be posted in its entirety on Wikileaks, then we could all be arrested. BRB, going to Wikileaks right now to check.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Loonies
Posted by: frank69 on Apr 4, 2009 8:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pentagon: A nuthouse where the nuts are in charge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dick cheney gets a hard on
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Apr 4, 2009 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is one of the worst instances of police state tactics I can imagine.

Dick Cheney has left behind a lot of goons. They all need to be fired. He is still trying to control things from his new undisclosed location. Cheney seriously needs to learn to play shuffleboard and accept the fact that he is no longer in power. Feed him french fries with mayo for breakfast and hopefully his ticker will give out. Oh wait....he already had a metal one installed?

Granny's crazy videos Go get a chuckle!

Luv,
Granny

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Serioiusly? Redacting a letter to the President?
Posted by: rickiey on Apr 4, 2009 10:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since when does the President have a lower security clearance than the Pentagon?

The only way I can see that being legal is if Obama said "I want plausible deniability, don't tell me anything I will want to be able to deny knowledge of, later".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AND THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 4, 2009 3:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right!

ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mister Barry, TEAR DOWN THIS GITMO WALL IMMEDIATELY !!
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Apr 4, 2009 4:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And shut down the crummy Pentagon already !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember the suicides that were called attacks
Posted by: BenL8 on Apr 4, 2009 4:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When some prisoners at Gitmo committed suicide the Pentagon charged them with attacks against the U.S. --- lunatics at the Pentagon should be committed to a mental hospital, something that resembles beloved Guantanamo. By the way, read Chalmers Johnson at Z Communications to learn that the military budget is not $487 billion but $1.1 trillion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It beggars belief
Posted by: Fish on Apr 4, 2009 5:08 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That strange things happen in America is a given.
But surely this story is false, I cannot imagine anyone even American officials being as stupid as this. Perhaps it is a plot for Boston Legal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It beggars belief Posted by: DaBear
Jail? Give him a medal!
Posted by: kerastes on Apr 4, 2009 6:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stafford Smith deserves a medal for defending his country in the face of domestic enemies of our freedoms. Those idiots in the Pentagon and sadists at Guantánamo are the ones who belong in jail, and throw away the key.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jail? Give him a medal! Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Actually... Posted by: peacefullaim1
Maybe this issue should be brought forth at....
Posted by: MausMasher54 on Apr 5, 2009 12:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Change.gov in time for President Obama to see that there is an interest for the truth, regardless of who is/was involved in the torture and we do not want, but demand an answer in all the matters of torture allegations. Time to add this to the "weed" question list....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Build a group gallows on The Mall...
Posted by: truthteller on Apr 5, 2009 12:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want nothing more than to see every senior member of the Bush Administration, from Dubya on down, frog-marched in chains up the steps of that gallows to hang for their crimes against the American people and the World.

I don't want to limit this catharsis to just those officially in-charge. I want their corporate masters, media mouthpieces, and pseudo-"think tank" leaches taking the "big swing" with them.

Obviously, not much changed with the Obama administration. I said as much was going to happen when I pushed for y'all to vote conscience instead of expediency, and support Cynthia McKinney and the Green Party, but no, Obama is not bought-and-paid-for like the others. Well, the Hell he's not!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hoooooly Craaaaaap.
Posted by: Longdream on Apr 5, 2009 2:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't get this at all.

My thoughts were that granting the Guantanamo prisoners the right of habeas in civilian court abrogated all of the quasi-UCMJ regulations and the new, Rumsfeldian guidelines for military tribunals, because they were found unconstitutional. If I remember, the justification for these carrion birds monitoring the communications of the prisoners with their lawyers was that we didn't want these "terrorists" sending messages to their accomplices through their world-traveling, code-talking, millionaire pro-bono attorneys.

While attorney-client privilege isn't a protected right, it's a construct that existed in Roman law and developed more completely in English common law. The privilege can be nullified by the action of the court, or by failure to exhibit the five or six necessary guidelines. One of those is that the privilege cannot be used to shield information in aid of committing a crime. It's hinky to blanket the communications of every prisoner that way, and to assume that all the lawyers were willing to aid and abet terrorism or stupid enough to be duped, but it was Rumsfeld, so what can I tell you?

My bet is that this is going to be thrown out as a piece of rotten fish left over from those Rumsfeld tribunals, where, if you remember, the prosecution didn't have to disclose any evidence to the in-name-only military defense lawyer who was under the command of the judge (usually, that's not the case for obvious reasons).

At least I hope that's the case. If not, I'm with Quannah--this can not stand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hoooooly Craaaaaap. Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Hoooooly Craaaaaap. Posted by: Longdream
Hope Change Hope Change Hope
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 5, 2009 3:19 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too much hope. Not enough change.

Oh wait... lemme guess, just give the man some time... uh huh. How's that workin' out for the lower classes? How's that workin' out for justice?

Sounds to me like the Bama-bots are gettin' slammered and the rest of ya are in denial. Meanwhile rich boyz are fucking you over, plundering what little you got left, sticking you with a bill for it, AND now, they're gonna send y'all to jail to be tortured for daring to think for yesseffs...

Brilliant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama
Posted by: Mel H. on Apr 6, 2009 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm liking Obama less and less.

So much for the "Yes We Can" slogan. It really means "Yes Obama will ignore us unless we force him to listen"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

satanic law
Posted by: om7buss on Apr 6, 2009 7:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that's what we are living under...www.henrybook.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement