Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

As Chinese Troops Seal off Tibet, Dalai Lama Warns Tibetan Identity 'Near Extinction'

By Antoaneta Bezlova, IPS News. Posted March 13, 2009.


On the 50th anniversary of his flight from Tibet, the Dalai Lama accused China of having brought "hell on earth" to his homeland.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

BEIJING, Mar 11 (IPS) - China has sealed off Tibet with troops and demanded that the international community recognize the legitimacy of Beijing's historical claims over the Himalayan plateau, escalating a row over its policies there.

"It is impossible for any western country to not interact with China. However, it is [also] impossible for the West to cooperate with China unless it develops an objective and unbiased stance on Tibet," said an editorial in the Communist party's flagship publication, the People’s Daily, this week.

The ultimatum comes as Chinese foreign minister Yang Jiechi urged foreign governments "not to allow [Tibet's exiled leader] the Dalai Lama to visit their countries" and "not to allow their territories to be used by him to separate Tibet from China."

Refusing the Dalai Lama a visit should be written into "the basic norms of international relations" of any country "interested in preserving its ties with China," Beijing’s top diplomat said during a press conference on the weekend.

Yet China is far from winning the historical debate over who has the right to decide the fate of Tibetans, according to Barry Sautman, political scientist at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

"They [the Chinese] have won the debate inside the country with the possible exception of some Tibetans," he says. "But their focus on beefing up security in Tibet in the face of strong international criticism shows they are feeling under siege. Their position on Tibet is continuously criticized in the West and automatically dismissed."

The 50th anniversary of the failed Tibetan uprising against Chinese rule, this week, saw Tibetan areas locked in a massive security ring, and sporadic manifest of anger quickly suppressed as Beijing put up the strongest show of force since Chinese communist troops first arrived on the Tibetan plateau in 1950.

"We must build up a Great Wall in our fight against separatism and safeguard the unity of the motherland," China’s President Hu Jintao said Monday. He was speaking to Tibetan delegates of the National People’s Congress, China’s legislative body, which is currently holding its annual session in Beijing.

In the run-up to the anniversary, Beijing launched a blitz propaganda campaign designed to drum up support for its policies of heavy investment and tight political control in Tibet.

An exhibit showcasing the "democratic reforms" brought by China into Tibet opened at the Cultural Palace of Nationalities in Beijing on Feb. 24, while the China Central Television (CCTV) aired a three-part documentary featuring Tibet’s evolution from "autocracy to democracy," according to the People’s Daily.

"I hope they [people] can come on site to learn about the real situation in Tibet -- the region’s gruesome past, and the vast changes since then," Qiangba Puncog, Tibet governor, was quoted as saying from the site of the exhibition.

Reflecting Beijing’s position that Chinese communist troops liberated Tibet from a brutal feudal regime, earlier this year pro-Chinese Tibetan lawmakers declared a holiday on Mar. 28 -- the anniversary of the dissolution of the old Tibetan government, and called it "Serf Emancipation Day."

Beijing insists Tibet has been an integral part of Chinese civilization since the 13th century and its rulers exercised hands-on administration, appointing imperial envoys to supervise the remote, mountainous territory.

But the Tibetan government-in-exile rejects such claims, saying Tibet was only annexed by Chinese troops in 1951 when the Dalai Lama and Mao Zedong signed a 17-point agreement which officially acknowledged Chinese rule.

The Chinese communist government created an autonomous region in central Tibet and divided the rest of the Tibetans among different provinces. Under the terms of the agreement, inner Tibet was temporarily exempted from introducing the same policies of collectivisation and cultural uniformity enforced over the rest of the country.

But the rest of Tibetans who now lived in the provinces of Sichuan, Qinghai, Gansu and Yunnan rose in revolt against the destruction of their monasteries and the appropriation of their lands. In 1959, violence boiled over to inner Tibet, escalating into large-scale bloodshed and forcing the Dalai Lama to flee to India amid fierce fighting.

Tibet's government-in-exile says that more than 87,000 people died between March and October of 1959 alone. Last year, the 49th anniversary of the uprising saw more violent protests, which spread from the capital Lhasa across Tibetan regions of western China.

In a speech to mark the sensitive anniversary of the failed uprising on Mar. 10, the Dalai Lama accused China of having brought ‘’hell on earth’’ to his homeland after unleashing a series of repressive campaigns since his flight to India.

"These thrust Tibetans into such depths of suffering and hardship that they literally experienced hell on earth," he said in a speech televised from Dharamsala, the north Indian capital from where he runs his ‘government-in-exile’.

Thousands of Tibetan Buddhist monks, nuns, and young descendants of those who had originally followed him into exile, flocked to Dharamsala on Tuesday to pledge support with events that culminated in a candlelight vigil.

"Even today, Tibetans in Tibet live in constant fear, and Chinese authorities remain constantly suspicious of them. Their religion, culture, language, identity are near extinction,’’ the Dalai Lama told his followers in India.

China says the Dalai Lama is seeking to carve out a "Greater Tibet" despite his repeated claims that he is only pursuing "meaningful autonomy" for his homeland.

"Would Germany, France or other countries accept that a quarter of their territory be separated?" Yang Jiechi asked on the sidelines of the National People’s Congress.

His remarks follow a bitter spat with the European Union over a December meeting between French President Nicolas Sarkozy and the Dalai Lama. Last year, relations between China and Germany suffered a setback after German Chancellor Angela Merkel met with the Dalai Lama in the autumn of 2007.

But despite Yang’s warning to foreign countries that friendly relations with China hinge on rejecting the Dalai Lama’s quest, Beijing’s handling of Tibet continues to draw scrutiny and criticism.

On Tuesday, the U.S. urged China to reconsider its policies in Tibet, saying they have created tensions and had a "harmful impact" on religion and culture in the region.

In a statement marking the anniversary of the uprising, the U.S. state department said it is "deeply concerned by the human rights situation in Tibetan areas" and called for talks between Beijing and the Dalai Lama.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: china, angela merkel, tibet, sichuan, hu jintao, china central television, qiangba puncog, qinghai, gansu, yunnan, dharamsala, yang jiechi, nicolas sarkozy

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Genocide? And Autonomy vs. Independence
Posted by: vision on Mar 13, 2009 6:05 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we westerners often fail to realize is that the idea of the unity of China is the most important value to the Chinese. That must be remembered when we try to make progress for Tibetan cultural survival.

I have been to the Tibetan areas in Sichuan and Yunnan provinces mentioned in this article and found them to be filled with the loveliest people I have met anywhere on the planet. Definitions of genocide generally include destroying a people's language and culture, so I think it may be time to consider applying that label to what is happening in Tibet.

Perhaps lessons from Hong Kong and Taiwan will be useful as western leaders work with Chinese leaders to try to provide some autonomy for the Tibetans. We must remember is that autonomy -- cultural and political -- is the goal. Independence will simply never happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» right -- 1962 war w/India Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey
Reactionary character of "free Tibet movement"
Posted by: Motion on Mar 14, 2009 4:25 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is an article that rips the mask off of the so-called "free Tibet movement" to reveal its true reactionary nature:

http://www.pslweb.org/site/
News2?page=NewsArticle&id=8845&news_iv_ctrl=1040

"Many U.S. progressives and liberals are supporting the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan opposition to the People’s Republic of China. So are George W. Bush, Rush Limbaugh, the CIA, and every pro-imperialist government and media outlet. The vast majority of the peoples of China, including many in Tibet, oppose the U.S.-supported separatist movement.

How could progressive people be on the same side as Bush, the CIA and the ultra-right? How do we explain the paradox of progressive people supporting a movement that is financed and supported by the proponents of the U.S. empire, as well as by all the other old European colonial powers that divided, humiliated and looted China for a full century prior to the 1949 revolution?

This riddle is solved by appreciating the impact of the effective CIA propaganda supporting the Dalai Lama and the old Tibetan ruling class, which lost its power, privileges, serfs and slaves because of the Chinese Revolution. This propaganda is echoed in the Western media constantly and has affected liberal public opinion.

The National Endowment for Democracy funds the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan opposition. It also funds or funded the pro-U.S. opposition to Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez, the fascist opposition to former Haitian president Jean-Bertrand Aristide and the opposition to the Cuban Revolution. The NED also funded Ronald Reagan’s contra war against the Sandinistas in Nicaragua.

From 1995 to 2005, the NED gave $2,047,479 to opposition Tibetan publications, radio stations, organizations and other institutes.

The Dalai Lama has a long history of working closely with the U.S. government. In fact, he and his supporters have been on the CIA payroll since the 1950s.

The International Campaign for Tibet, the Tibet Fund, the Tibet Voice Project, the Tibet Information Network, the Tibetan Literary Society, the Tibetan Review Trust Society and the Voice of Tibet all advance the progressive-sounding call for a "Free Tibet." They are all funded by the NED, which is itself funded by the U.S. State Department and the CIA.

According to historian Allen Weinstein, "A lot of what [the NED does] today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA." Weinstein helped draft the legislation that created the NED. (1)

Many progressives in the United States believe that Tibet is severely oppressed by the government of the People’s Republic of China. They have been convinced that the Dalai Lama is a man of peace who has been ruthlessly suppressed by China, and that he has the allegiance of nearly all Tibetans. Most of these individuals sincerely believe in the right of self-determination and believe that the People’s Republic of China has violated this right.

Among this sector of liberal and progressive opinion, the reflex to any struggle between China and what they perceive to be the Tibetan people as a whole is to express profound solidarity with those they consider to be the oppressed. But this view obscures the essential social and class dynamic in Tibet. Influenced by a false conception, people who should know better lose their critical faculties.

Knowing that George W. Bush is an imperialist criminal, one must pause and ponder the question: Why did Bush award the Congressional Gold Medal to the Dalai Lama in a highly publicized White House ceremony in 2007? Bush would never conduct such a ceremony for a genuinely progressive person. Bush views the Dalai Lama in much the same way he viewed Ahmed Chalabi before the invasion of Iraq—as a useful tool for the U.S. empire."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I'm also amazed... Posted by: buffeliscious
» Right... Posted by: buffeliscious
Tibet hardly Shangri-La under Dalai Lama
Posted by: Bill_Dixon on Mar 14, 2009 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Hell on earth" says the Dalai Lama. Is he recalling what it was like before China asserted its sovereignty over Tibet?

For the first eight years of Chinese rule, Tibet continued as a feudal society where most of the people were serfs, a theocracy in which even the monks had their own slaves. After the 1959 rebellion, China at last carried out the emancipation of millions by abolishing slavery.

This is what should be celebrated 50 years on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nice Straw Man Posted by: 5by5
No one is talking about the geopolitical angle
Posted by: Fog on Mar 14, 2009 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one is asking WHY China is all up in Tibet's grill.

Read this intelligence article

Tibet represents a physical buffer between India and China. Without Tibet in Chinese control, China is threatened from the West, and therefore will never voluntarily give it up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't forget the water Posted by: kettleblack
Maybe if we'd cancel this shitty China PNTR scam would China not be so damn strong !
Posted by: superfeduphoosier on Mar 14, 2009 12:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, and quit borrowing from China to pay for those stupid wars, foreign oil, Wall Street bailouts, and tax cuts for the wealthy and big corporations !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Any westerner should take a long hard look at what
Posted by: drfun on Mar 14, 2009 4:05 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
their country has done in the past/continues to do with its territorial possessions, before dissing China about Tibet.

Who have had a 1,500 complex history of marriage exchanges, magistrates and Chinese troops garrisoned upon its soil since the Tang Dynasty.

You never about hear about the centuries old wars between the Yellow and Red Hat Buddhist sects vying for the spiritual leadership control of Tibet, or the serf obligations the Tibetan people endured under its reign.

As for the "Peaceful" Dali Lama who has received CIA $'s in the past and supported Bu$h's "War Of Terror", I begin to wonder about the minds who seek his advice.

I would think the central government of Beijing would find greater loyalty from its provinces if greater autonomy was granted for local jurisdictions to decide the fate of administration, than have it making decisions for them.

I know of one China-basher who bloviates about being a "Software Solutions consultant" for fortune 500 companies, without his realizing a portion of his pay comes indirectly from the very "Communist's" he loathes.

As the western world is out casting stones while living in glass houses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

chinese western education
Posted by: zorro on Mar 14, 2009 8:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You would be wrong on that one. The Chinese know a lot more about us than we know about them. They are taught western history--quite a bit of it. Therir libraries and bookstores all have substantial English sections (relative too the west). My students all know basic historical events and people. they immediately know ABE Lincoln and the American civil war and why and what happened. They probably understand world war 2 better than most americans as they suffered directly from it--the war was on their head, not on distant shores. they know george Washington and our revolution and the boston tea party. they know john locke and thomas hobbes. (especially university students) but they learn it in middle school. They may not learn to think critically about it--but they learn the supposed facts and dates and names. they are aware --far more than we are of them. Now consider most of all students must learn some level of english and that most university students are english majors or minors, and many to most chinese middle classes desire to learn some bit of english on their own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How to Handle This
Posted by: 5by5 on Mar 15, 2009 1:07 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tell China to give back Tibet to the Tibetans, or we won't repay the debt.

Suck it, Commies!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

tibet, the mother of all psyops.....
Posted by: denk on Mar 19, 2009 9:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Hypocrisy and Danger of Anti-China Demonstrations
http://tinyurl.com/4bpehp


VIDEO: The Tibet Riots: What Really Happened
tinyurl.com/cz9te8

Tibet, the 'great game' and the CIA
tinyurl.com/4exmzm

Is an 'Asian NATO' Really On The US Agenda?
tinyurl.com/acxes4

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement