Dems Introduce Vital Protections for Workers; Corporate America Responds With a Big Lie

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted March 11, 2009.

On Tuesday, House Democrats introduced the Employee Free Choice Act, a vitally important package of protections that would help restore working people's much-denuded right to join a union if they so desire.  

There's nothing more terrifying to corporate America than the prospect of dealing with its workforce on an even playing field, and, along with its allies in Congress, it's pulling out all the stops to keep that from happening.

The Chamber of Commerce, D.C. lobbyists, firms that rely on cheap labor and a host of  "Astroturf" front groups have built a massive war chest they're using to try to defeat the EFCA and other efforts to put a check on corporate power and rebuild a declining middle class.  

The central message of their campaign is remarkably dishonest. America's professional union-busters have seized on a compelling talking point tailored to suit our political culture, namely that the "card-check" provision of the EFCA -- which allows workers to form a union if a  majority indicate they want one -- which does away with "secret ballots" that Americans have come to expect when casting a vote.

It is, in short, a Big Lie. There has never been a "right" to a secret ballot for union elections; in fact, most union organizing in recent decades has  been done via card check. The issue is this: It is currently up to the employer to decide whether their workers choose to organize via majority sign-up -- "card check" -- or through a National Labor Relations Board election. Under EFCA, workers themselves would get to make that call, not their bosses. 

It's an important distinction. Union busting has reached a high art form in the United States. Companies no longer need thugs and gun-toting Pinkertons to keep workers from exercising their legal rights to organize; now they have high-priced, Armani-wearing lawyers, who simply brainwash workers into silence. 

The tactics are as subtle as they are insidious. A study by Cornell University labor scholar Kate Bronfenbrenner found: 9 in 10 employers facing a union campaign force employees to attend closed-door meetings to hear anti-union propaganda; 80 percent train supervisors on how to attack unions and require them to deliver anti-union messages to workers they oversee; half of employers threaten to shut down the plant if workers unionize (only 2 percent actually do); and 3 out of 4 hire outside consultants to run anti-union campaigns, "often based on mass psychology and distorting the law." 

Increasingly, cunning forms of intimidation are often enough to produce a "no" vote. But if workers do vote to unionize, management is then able to dispute the outcome, and the case can drag on, often for years.

While it's pending, pro-union workers lose their jobs. A study published last year (PDF) by economists John Schmitt and Ben Zipperer found that "almost 1 in 5 union organizers or activists can expect to be fired as a result of their activities in a union election campaign." 

That's illegal -- workers are guaranteed the right to organize -- but since the Reagan administration gutted U.S. labor protections, companies that cross the line pay modest penalties that can be written off as part of the cost of remaining union-free. 

See more stories tagged with: efca

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »