COMMENTS: 94
Rumsfeld Knew His Guys Were Torturing People to Death, Which Is a Serious Crime
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.
Now we have a new president – and we have a new boogeyman – the economic meltdown. .
Now don't get me wrong. Anyone who's read this column over the past few years knows I've been Chicken Littling about the financial house of cards for a long time. And, now that it's finally collapsed, it's even worse than I predicted, and getting worse by the day.
Which is why Obama and his team are on the tube night and day talking about nothing else -- as if Americans are concerned about nothing, which isn't true.
71% of Americans are in favor of an investigation into the possible misuse of the Department of Justice by the Bush administration according to a Gallup poll released yesterday. (Full Story)
That's a pretty startling number, even for those of us who've been arguing for investigations for some time now. After all, Obama didn't get 71% of the vote, which means that a lot of folks who voted for McCain also want equal justice applied equally.
One reason for this surprisingly robust groundswell for investigations may be that each day, formerly secret Bush-era documents surface that truly shock the conscience.
Just yesterday the ACLU got it's hands on a truly smoking gun memo written for then Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld. This document informed Rumsfeld that those he'd tasked with beating information out of suspected terrorists had not just tortured them, but tortured some of them, to death. In other words, they murdered them.
No, I'm not kidding. Here read the original document yourself.
If Rumsfeld had been, say, some local police captain in charge of these guys, this document would make him – at very least – accessory-after-the-fact to murder. He not only conspired to keep this evidence secret, but did not report this as the crime it is, nor order the perpetrators arrested, charged and put on trial.
There's a legal name for this crime: “Misprison of a Felony.” Defined here as:
Under the federal statute, the prosecution must prove the following elements to obtain a misprision of felony conviction:
(1)another person actually committed a felony;
(2)the defendant knew that the felony was committed;
(3)the defendant did not notify any law enforcement or judicial officer; and
(4)the defendant took affirmative steps to conceal the felony.”
As for Rumsfeld, this document, the crimes it describes, and the available evidence indicate that, were he charged for misprison of a felony, he would be found; guilty on each count.
I am completely sympathetic to the extraordinary economic burden Obama and his team shouldered on January 21. But during the campaign it was Obama himself who posited the notion that a president had to be capable of do “more than one important thing at a time.”
The economic meltdown – likely the worst since the Great Depression – demands immediate and intense attention. But the economy is not the only thing that melted down during the Bush years. Core American values melted down as well, and require equally urgent attention from this new administration.
Because America's strength and moral authority in the world don't flow solely from a robust US economy, but also by an unswerving adherence to a unique and lofty set of moral values. Both the economy and our moral authority need urgent and immediate repair. Obama needs to work night and day to return health and stability to our economy. He also needs to work night and day to restore our moral authority. And that can only be accomplished by holding those who so despoiled our national soul accountable for their (well-documented) crimes.
But so far I've not seen a glimmer that Obama or his Attorney General, Eric Holder, have the stomach for real investigations that could lead to real crimes and real prosecutions. For example, even though Obama has repeatedly promised to lift the many lids of secrecy the Bush administration slammed down on the public's right to know, he hasn't. It's currently just as hard to get information and documents about the Bush years out of the Obama administration as it was to get the same out of the Bush folks themselves.
They need to be told to keep their promise and loosen up, to release the kind of hard evidence we need to fully know what crimes were committed, by whom, where, when and how many.
To help get this message through to them please sign this petition.
The must. Who says so? Just 71% of the people they represent. That's who.
One more thing. Now that the Obama folks have those documents, they also have constructive knowledge of felonies committed. Which means if they don't investigate and prosecute, they may be the next ones found guilty of misprision of a felony. Ya know?
(For more Bush administration documents see the Document Drawer at -- http://www.bushproject.com)
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bobdown on Feb 14, 2009 12:54 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yeah right!
Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
» There is still the Hague..... and isn't redition legal now???
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: There is still the Hague..... and isn't redition legal now???
Posted by: MausMasher54
» Objectivity Lost
Posted by: iris89
» Israel's gifts to America
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Objectivity Lost
Posted by: peacefullaim1
» RE: Objectivity Lost
Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
» Objectivity Lost
Posted by: iris89
» RE: Objectivity Lost
Posted by: peacefullaim1
» RE: Objectivity Lost
Posted by: bobdown
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Truelass on Feb 14, 2009 1:38 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Of course they do, that is why we IMPORTED ALL THOSE NAZI'S...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Truelass -- Consider This. . .
Posted by: Zeugitai
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SENILEBIKER on Feb 14, 2009 1:42 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The new administration is setting up the process so that it can't be accuses of instigatig a witch hunt.
First steps is to pull the veil off of what happened FOI request is a perfect example. As more evidence comes to light, public opinion will force the AG to investigate - maybe appoint a Special Investigator. As that process rolls out, the usual small fry will start to co-operate in return for immunity - reduced sentencing a la Abramoff.
All things come to those who wait
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Patience, Patience
Posted by: StillStanding
» RE: Patience, Patience...StillStanding
Posted by: Captainmagic
» RE: Patience, Patience
Posted by: SENILEBIKER
» Excuse me, he was a senator for 4 years before that as well...
Posted by: Prophit
» Wow, really? Got Party?
Posted by: godsbreath64
» Witch Hunt, my Rosey, Pink Hiney!!!
Posted by: MausMasher54
» Patience, my ass
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jstuv on Feb 14, 2009 2:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A) To make aware that these crimes were actually committed,
B) To examine HOW these crimes were able to be committed,
C) Who committed these crimes and
D) To punish the criminals.
Should the guilty not be punished, then, their Criminal Acts would be absolved and could easily be repeated. There would not be any justice.
“The true administration of justice is the firmest pillar of good government.”
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Crimes
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Crimes - Not all brought to justice
Posted by: jleman
» So... what else hasn't changed?
Posted by: BigRon
» RE: Crimes
Posted by: jstuv
» Invasion of Iraq qualifies as a "war crime", while the use of ....
Posted by: Prophit
» yes, they should all be prosecuted...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: Crimes
Posted by: MausMasher54
» ----------THE above post is worth reposting
Posted by: Anthhh
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jstuv on Feb 14, 2009 2:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With ALL the evidence available: Eyewitnesses, Documents, Dead Bodies, Remnants of Death Camps, Newsreel clips, piles of clothes, piles of shoes, piles of hair, piles of eyeglasses, piles of gold teeth –COLD HARD EVIDENCE-, there are Holocaust Deniers being celebrated, glorified and believed.
So, too, these (alleged) criminals will be praised and glorified for future generations.
We will have not have learned from history –and the American society will repeat this debacle.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» While I agree with your concern.... there is a slight mistake ...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: COLD HARD EVIDENCE
Posted by: MausMasher54
Comments are closed-
Posted by: phindrup on Feb 14, 2009 2:52 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, down the years, as the financial collapse actually gets under way, when nobody will trade with you unless you front bullion first, when Mexico is having problems with US citizen wetbacks attempting to infiltrate the south in search of work that will enable them to send some money to their families, then we will see these people handed over, or taken.
Political reality will override US pride, and given the choice of starving, or handing the motley crew over, there will simply be no contest.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» AIPAC will be Obama's undoing
Posted by: weathered
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BST on Feb 14, 2009 3:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Feb 14, 2009 3:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It began when Reagan's people negotiated with terrorists to defeat Jimmy Carter (unless you think the terrorists releasing the hostages on the day of Reagan's nomination was a coincidence).
The Reagan Administration went on to transfer nuclear secrets to the communist Chinese--an act which the Republicans tried to blame on Bill Clinton. They used this false accusation to call President Clinton a traitor, when the real traitor was Ronald Reagan--their best guy.
And so on, up to stealing two Presidential elections--an act of civil war which should never be forgotten--the Plame case, the war crimes, the torture.
I pray every day we will nail the bastards. But even if they slither free, the Republicans have stained their name forever.
8 Years without a Leader
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And still without one
Posted by: DJC11
» In both your cases it was Bush Sr, who committed the treason....
Posted by: Prophit
» Love the truth. Thank you.
Posted by: godsbreath64
» RE: In both your cases it was Bush Sr, who committed the treason....
Posted by: willymack
» RE: In both your cases it was Bush Sr, who committed the treason....
Posted by: BigRon
» Sad Note....
Posted by: MausMasher54
» Absolutely Right Maus
Posted by: marid
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Anthhh on Feb 14, 2009 4:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.......This is me reposting someone's excellent post
__________________________________
________________________________________
"Should the crimes of treason, by the Bush/Cheney Administration be overlooked,
then these crimes of high treason will be repeated in future administrations.
The Allies conducted the Nürenberg Trials (in 1945 to 1949) for several reasons:
A) To make aware that these crimes were actually committed,
B) To examine HOW these crimes were able to be committed,
C) Who committed these crimes and
D) To punish the criminals.
Should the guilty not be punished, then, their Criminal Acts would be absolved and could easily be repeated. There would not be any justice.
“The true administration of justice is the firmest pillar of good government.”
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
* and this WAS onother Person's comment that's worth repeating:
And Lets not forget there is a group running affairs from
behind the stage the stage may change... but the group
and the affairs are still exactly the same.
.. President Obama is NOT the magic "Fat Lady Singing" on War Crime!
... War Criminals NEVER STOP On Their Own, but must
ALWAYS BE stopped by a world who can not and will not remain silent!!
Lets raise our voices beyond the rafters, the mountaintops
.. to the valleys from sea to sea, coast to coast, and around the world.
Finding comments worth repeating, saving them in cliff notebook,
and reposting them where ever and when ever it might be proper.
and if you find a comment short enough for a bumper sticker,
make it into a Giant BANNER and hold it near a rush hour traffic.
Protesting treason is not treason.
War Crimes and allowing war Criminals to grow and continue is!
TREASON AGAINST HUMANITY.
_____________________________________________
_________________________________________
____________________________________________
.
.........See How Easy it is?
It is very easy to counter-propaganda the War Criminals.
You do NOT need a $100,000 Mainstream Media outlet(whose reputation for being trustworthy is now over).
.
-It's Easy To Counter-Propaganda
__________________________________
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: godsbreath64 on Feb 14, 2009 5:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prosecute Rumsfailed.... Who's the funnyguy who pondered that one?
WE ARE TALKING CHUMP "change" !!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: undead on Feb 14, 2009 5:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If that date passes without indictments, you can kiss the prosecutions good bye.
As hopeless as it is, I signed the petition; did you?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Statute of Limitation Expires on March 11th.
Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
» Only if Cheney says so.
Posted by: godsbreath64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Feb 14, 2009 6:15 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if a death occurred as a result of his actions but Rumsfield was not aware of that death and somehow this means that he is not legally responsible for the death, if only torture occurred because of his action he still must be prosecuted for only causing torture.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yeah, but if you read that report in this article above, it shows....
Posted by: Prophit
» Absolutely, or change the textbooks.
Posted by: godsbreath64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Feb 14, 2009 6:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if a death occurred as a result of his actions but Rumsfield was not aware of that death and somehow this means that he is not legally responsible for the death, if only torture occurred because of his action he still must be prosecuted for only causing torture.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dogman12 on Feb 14, 2009 6:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Veteran
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GuitarBill on Feb 14, 2009 9:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you click on his "Privacy Center" hyperlink, the server the link points to will install a keylogger on your computer, which is used to steal your credit card number, SSN, etc.
Please, report the comment to Alternet's staff.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» dogman12
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: linecrosser on Feb 14, 2009 8:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pfm on Feb 14, 2009 9:58 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: maybe YOU have no one else to blame...
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: UMSFELD
Posted by: peacefullaim1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kimberly on Feb 14, 2009 11:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.
Under Title 42, U.S.C., Section 1997, the Department of Justice has the ability to initiate civil actions against mental HOSPITALs, Retardation Facilities, Jails, Prisons, NURSING FACILITIES T42CFR409.33, and juvenile detention facilities when there are Allegations of Systemic Derivations [ 1999 HHS T42CFR417.1 denial of Covered T42CFR409.33 Claims and OPM T5CFR890.105 denial of Covered T42CFR409.33 Claims, to force ~ fraud by fright white collar crime ~ illegal HCFA State Medicaid T42CFR409.33 Kickback Conversions ~ eligibility Poor T18CFR286CRIME ] of the constitutional rights of institutionalized persons.
.
U.S. Constitution: Fourteenth Amendment
Fourteenth Amendment - Rights Guaranteed Privileges and Immunities of Citizenship,
Due Process and Equal Protection
Amendment Text | Annotations
Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
.
TITLE 42--PUBLIC HEALTH CHAPTER IV-[ HCFA ]-HEALTH CARE FINANCING ADMINISTRATION, [ DHHS ] DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PART 409-- HOSPITAL INSURANCE BENEFITS --Table of Contents Subpart D-[ Federal ]-Requirements for Coverage of Post-hospital SNF [ NURSING FACILITY ] Care Sec. 409.33 Examples of skilled nursing [ Medically Necessary ] and rehabilitation services. ~~ To DENY this SERVICE [ systematic deprivation HHS T42CFR417.1 adverse determination ], is called an ANTI-Dumping Violation
.
CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR ACTS INVOLVING FEDERAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS SEC. 1128B. [42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b] DETERMINING RIGHTS
.
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 242 Prev | Next § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
.
Region 5 HCFA : Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio and Wisconsin
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: OIG Violates Patroit Act 02
Posted by: Kimberly
» RE: Judiciary Allows Criminal Misconduct
Posted by: Kimberly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kimberly on Feb 14, 2009 12:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.
JANUARY 2008
A Vehicle to Avoid A Government Investigation HHS T42CFR417.1 Alternative Dispute Resolution T18CFR371CRIME.
.
National Governors Association ~ Alternate Dispute Resolution
T42CFR417.1 grievance procedure, Adverse Determination ~ used to force illegal HCFA State Medicaid Kickback Conversions color of law T18CFR371CRIME
January 28, 2008 letter (from NGA executive director Ray Scheppach) to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt requesting that HHS rescind the proposed rule amending Departmental REGULATIONS GOVERNING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW ~ by the Departmental Appeals Board (DAB). RE: Proposed Rulemaking: Revisions to Procedures for the Departmental Appeals Board and Other Departmental Hearings ~ 'Dispute Resolution' ( T42CFR417.1 grievance procedure, denial of covered claims misprison of a felony anti-dumping violation ) ~ For example, litigation briefs, memos, Emails, and other types of " informational documents interpreting STATUTES and published REGULATIONS " [ SSA 1128b Consumer Protection due process of law T18CFR24CRIMES Civil and Criminal Rights ] WOULD be deemed to HAVE equivalent AUTHORITY to the statute and regulations themselves. Governors OPPOSE the proposed rule [ T18CFR242CRIME ] and request that the department retain existing ( T42CFR417.1 adverse determinations misprison of T18CFR24CRIMES white collar crime ) DAB policies that provide states with the assurance of an impartial and independent dispute resolution process ~ RICO willfully failed to keep individuals from harm.
.
Sincerely,
All ENTITLED Federal Employee Health Beneficiaries & the General Public in Region 5 HCFA, who are being criminally denied HHS T42CFR417.1 Existing ( Federal State Private ) HMO Health Insurance Coverage, illegally billed for HMO denied covered claims and forced into HCFA State Medicaid Programs for the POOR. Title18CFR1001Crime. 1998 still pending 2009 denial of civil and criminal rights - reporting waste fraud and abuse - Color of Law T18CFR242CRIME
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cbishopp on Feb 14, 2009 12:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Feb 20, 2009 1:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jennifer Bedingfield on Feb 14, 2009 4:40 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Polls, schmolls ! THEY DON'T MATTER !!
Posted by: robert.noll
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AJR Journal on Feb 15, 2009 8:25 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How did they die?
Where did this happen?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: vidence? Does it even exist?
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peskyfly1 on Feb 15, 2009 9:16 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: usmarks on Feb 15, 2009 9:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Newsguy on Feb 15, 2009 10:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Should read: "Just yesterday the ACLU got its hands on a truly smoking gun..."
The contraction "it's" refers to the two words "it is" The word "its" is an entirely different word.
This is a common mistake but it shouldn't be committed by a professional writer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» No Proof-Read, No Peace.
Posted by: godsbreath64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ranchero42 on Feb 15, 2009 10:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DJ BALL on Feb 15, 2009 11:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AmBushed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ypsEmg9yOs&fmt=22
or
http://vimeo.com/2845340 (Better quality)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Must see music video... anti torture... anti war criminal...this is worthy !
Posted by: rinthy
» RE: Must see music video... anti torture... anti war criminal...this is worthy !
Posted by: MausMasher54
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 15, 2009 1:54 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jbpazz on Feb 15, 2009 4:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My bet is that we can bag and tag the lot of them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 15, 2009 10:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For better (for the most part, historically), and often, worse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gopblowsgoats on Feb 15, 2009 11:09 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You can AIPAC for
Posted by: weathered
» RE: You can AIPAC for
Posted by: marni
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WeimMom on Feb 16, 2009 4:53 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In four or eight years when Obama is no longer the President, then we can go after the Obama Administration for things they did.
Everyone wanted the Bush Administration to protect us post 9-11, however people do not have the stomach for what it takes. Had the Bush Administration not done what it took, he they would have be judged for that as well.
Wake up America, we can't have it both ways. If only we lived in a perfect world.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bush Administration War Crimes
Posted by: MausMasher54
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwindsong on Feb 17, 2009 11:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John
Privacy Center
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Feb 17, 2009 2:00 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
catch the podcast, generally available before midnight.
wanna chat about it? call 800.385.1566
===
Tues.17.Feb.09: Guests & Topics
We spoke with Wolfgang Kaleck, General Secretary of the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights e.V. (ECCHR, long-time president (2000-2008) of the progressive Republican Lawyer’s Association (RAV) and former vice-president and general secretary of European Democratic Lawyers (see http://www.aed-eda.com), has been working in the field of national and international human rights for the past ten years. He has worked closely with Amnesty International, CCR and Human Rights Watch on cases regarding Germans disappeared in Argentina, the detainees in Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, and the former Uzbek Minister of the Interior.
Together with CCR he filed two lawsuits in Germany against former US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and other high-ranking members of the US administration and military for gross violations of international law in regard to human rights abuses in Abu Ghraib. Although the suits were dismissed by courts of first instance, they stimulated positive discussions in Germany and elsewhere about command responsibility and the modern-day significance of the Nuremberg precedents.
At 5 PMest Dennis Hof - Moonlite Bunny Ranch, on the topic of privacy, vice & representative social governance.
At 6 PMest Safwan Javed, Wide Mouth Mason drummer responds to the introduction of the controversial Canadian DMCA."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOBLExSiaDY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOCyJDDTWxA
Did you think this issue isn't about Americans? Think again!: RIAA Takes Over DOJ
We spoke with Percy Schmeiser, who stood up to Monsanto abuses in Canada.
We also spoke with Dr. Vandana Shiva, a world-renowned environmental leader and thinker. Director of the Research Foundation on Science, Technology, and Ecology, she is the author of many books, including:
-'Water Wars: Pollution, Profits, and Privatization' (South End Press, 2001),
-"Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge" (South End Press, 1997),
-"'Monocultures of the Mind" (Zed, 1993),
-"The Violence of the Green Revolution" (Zed, 1992), and
-"'Staying Alive" (St. Martin's Press, 1989).
Dr. Shiva is a leader in The International Forum on Globalization, along with Ralph Nader and Jeremy Rifkin. She addressed the World Trade Organization summit in Seattle, 1999, as well as the recent World Economic Forum in Melbourne, 2000. In 1993, Shiva won the Alternative Nobel Peace Prize (the Right Livelihood Award). The founder of Navdanya ("nine seeds"), a movement promoting diversity and use of native seeds, she also set up the Research Foundation for Science, Technology, and Ecology in her mother's cowshed in 1997.
Its studies have validated the ecological value of traditional farming and been instrumental in fighting destructive development projects in India.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yolanda on Feb 19, 2009 8:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: john77075 on Feb 20, 2009 1:59 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lets Be Positive
Posted by: BigRon
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BigRon on Feb 21, 2009 12:17 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This argument about Bush is tainted beyond redemption. Kind of like deciding ONLY to put Nazis on trial for any crimes they committed after 1943. If an activity is illegal, then it's illegal PERIOD. Not just when the previous administration carried it out. You can't JUST prosecute GW Bush, and at the same time allow crimes carried out under Reagan, Nixon, or even Clinton be ignored. If an activity is illegal - and carried out in a nation that's REALLY governed by law - then it has to be investigated and prosecuted. Regardless of the political leanings of the leadership at the time it happened.
Reading all the posts on this page, I see absolutely NO inclination to investigate "crime" BECAUSE IT'S A CRIME. I just see endless howls that a very specific category of very recent crimes should be investigated. And friends.. that just ain't good enough! Far from restoring America's credibility... it just damages it even more. Gaining a reputation as a nation that carefully exploits prosecution to attack political enemies does little more than confirm what the rest of the world already knew.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bobdown on Feb 14, 2009 12:54 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yeah right!
Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
» There is still the Hague..... and isn't redition legal now???
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: There is still the Hague..... and isn't redition legal now???
Posted by: MausMasher54
» Objectivity Lost
Posted by: iris89
» Israel's gifts to America
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Objectivity Lost
Posted by: peacefullaim1
» RE: Objectivity Lost
Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
» Objectivity Lost
Posted by: iris89
» RE: Objectivity Lost
Posted by: peacefullaim1
» RE: Objectivity Lost
Posted by: bobdown
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Truelass on Feb 14, 2009 1:38 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Of course they do, that is why we IMPORTED ALL THOSE NAZI'S...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Truelass -- Consider This. . .
Posted by: Zeugitai
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SENILEBIKER on Feb 14, 2009 1:42 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The new administration is setting up the process so that it can't be accuses of instigatig a witch hunt.
First steps is to pull the veil off of what happened FOI request is a perfect example. As more evidence comes to light, public opinion will force the AG to investigate - maybe appoint a Special Investigator. As that process rolls out, the usual small fry will start to co-operate in return for immunity - reduced sentencing a la Abramoff.
All things come to those who wait
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Patience, Patience
Posted by: StillStanding
» RE: Patience, Patience...StillStanding
Posted by: Captainmagic
» RE: Patience, Patience
Posted by: SENILEBIKER
» Excuse me, he was a senator for 4 years before that as well...
Posted by: Prophit
» Wow, really? Got Party?
Posted by: godsbreath64
» Witch Hunt, my Rosey, Pink Hiney!!!
Posted by: MausMasher54
» Patience, my ass
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jstuv on Feb 14, 2009 2:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A) To make aware that these crimes were actually committed,
B) To examine HOW these crimes were able to be committed,
C) Who committed these crimes and
D) To punish the criminals.
Should the guilty not be punished, then, their Criminal Acts would be absolved and could easily be repeated. There would not be any justice.
“The true administration of justice is the firmest pillar of good government.”
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Crimes
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Crimes - Not all brought to justice
Posted by: jleman
» So... what else hasn't changed?
Posted by: BigRon
» RE: Crimes
Posted by: jstuv
» Invasion of Iraq qualifies as a "war crime", while the use of ....
Posted by: Prophit
» yes, they should all be prosecuted...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: Crimes
Posted by: MausMasher54
» ----------THE above post is worth reposting
Posted by: Anthhh
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jstuv on Feb 14, 2009 2:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With ALL the evidence available: Eyewitnesses, Documents, Dead Bodies, Remnants of Death Camps, Newsreel clips, piles of clothes, piles of shoes, piles of hair, piles of eyeglasses, piles of gold teeth –COLD HARD EVIDENCE-, there are Holocaust Deniers being celebrated, glorified and believed.
So, too, these (alleged) criminals will be praised and glorified for future generations.
We will have not have learned from history –and the American society will repeat this debacle.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» While I agree with your concern.... there is a slight mistake ...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: COLD HARD EVIDENCE
Posted by: MausMasher54
Comments are closed-
Posted by: phindrup on Feb 14, 2009 2:52 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, down the years, as the financial collapse actually gets under way, when nobody will trade with you unless you front bullion first, when Mexico is having problems with US citizen wetbacks attempting to infiltrate the south in search of work that will enable them to send some money to their families, then we will see these people handed over, or taken.
Political reality will override US pride, and given the choice of starving, or handing the motley crew over, there will simply be no contest.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» AIPAC will be Obama's undoing
Posted by: weathered
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BST on Feb 14, 2009 3:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Feb 14, 2009 3:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It began when Reagan's people negotiated with terrorists to defeat Jimmy Carter (unless you think the terrorists releasing the hostages on the day of Reagan's nomination was a coincidence).
The Reagan Administration went on to transfer nuclear secrets to the communist Chinese--an act which the Republicans tried to blame on Bill Clinton. They used this false accusation to call President Clinton a traitor, when the real traitor was Ronald Reagan--their best guy.
And so on, up to stealing two Presidential elections--an act of civil war which should never be forgotten--the Plame case, the war crimes, the torture.
I pray every day we will nail the bastards. But even if they slither free, the Republicans have stained their name forever.
8 Years without a Leader
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And still without one
Posted by: DJC11
» In both your cases it was Bush Sr, who committed the treason....
Posted by: Prophit
» Love the truth. Thank you.
Posted by: godsbreath64
» RE: In both your cases it was Bush Sr, who committed the treason....
Posted by: willymack
» RE: In both your cases it was Bush Sr, who committed the treason....
Posted by: BigRon
» Sad Note....
Posted by: MausMasher54
» Absolutely Right Maus
Posted by: marid
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Anthhh on Feb 14, 2009 4:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.......This is me reposting someone's excellent post
__________________________________
________________________________________
"Should the crimes of treason, by the Bush/Cheney Administration be overlooked,
then these crimes of high treason will be repeated in future administrations.
The Allies conducted the Nürenberg Trials (in 1945 to 1949) for several reasons:
A) To make aware that these crimes were actually committed,
B) To examine HOW these crimes were able to be committed,
C) Who committed these crimes and
D) To punish the criminals.
Should the guilty not be punished, then, their Criminal Acts would be absolved and could easily be repeated. There would not be any justice.
“The true administration of justice is the firmest pillar of good government.”
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
* and this WAS onother Person's comment that's worth repeating:
And Lets not forget there is a group running affairs from
behind the stage the stage may change... but the group
and the affairs are still exactly the same.
.. President Obama is NOT the magic "Fat Lady Singing" on War Crime!
... War Criminals NEVER STOP On Their Own, but must
ALWAYS BE stopped by a world who can not and will not remain silent!!
Lets raise our voices beyond the rafters, the mountaintops
.. to the valleys from sea to sea, coast to coast, and around the world.
Finding comments worth repeating, saving them in cliff notebook,
and reposting them where ever and when ever it might be proper.
and if you find a comment short enough for a bumper sticker,
make it into a Giant BANNER and hold it near a rush hour traffic.
Protesting treason is not treason.
War Crimes and allowing war Criminals to grow and continue is!
TREASON AGAINST HUMANITY.
_____________________________________________
_________________________________________
____________________________________________
.
.........See How Easy it is?
It is very easy to counter-propaganda the War Criminals.
You do NOT need a $100,000 Mainstream Media outlet(whose reputation for being trustworthy is now over).
.
-It's Easy To Counter-Propaganda
__________________________________
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: godsbreath64 on Feb 14, 2009 5:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prosecute Rumsfailed.... Who's the funnyguy who pondered that one?
WE ARE TALKING CHUMP "change" !!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: undead on Feb 14, 2009 5:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If that date passes without indictments, you can kiss the prosecutions good bye.
As hopeless as it is, I signed the petition; did you?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Statute of Limitation Expires on March 11th.
Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
» Only if Cheney says so.
Posted by: godsbreath64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Feb 14, 2009 6:15 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if a death occurred as a result of his actions but Rumsfield was not aware of that death and somehow this means that he is not legally responsible for the death, if only torture occurred because of his action he still must be prosecuted for only causing torture.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yeah, but if you read that report in this article above, it shows....
Posted by: Prophit
» Absolutely, or change the textbooks.
Posted by: godsbreath64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Feb 14, 2009 6:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if a death occurred as a result of his actions but Rumsfield was not aware of that death and somehow this means that he is not legally responsible for the death, if only torture occurred because of his action he still must be prosecuted for only causing torture.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dogman12 on Feb 14, 2009 6:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Veteran
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GuitarBill on Feb 14, 2009 9:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you click on his "Privacy Center" hyperlink, the server the link points to will install a keylogger on your computer, which is used to steal your credit card number, SSN, etc.
Please, report the comment to Alternet's staff.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» dogman12
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: linecrosser on Feb 14, 2009 8:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pfm on Feb 14, 2009 9:58 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: maybe YOU have no one else to blame...
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: UMSFELD
Posted by: peacefullaim1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kimberly on Feb 14, 2009 11:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.
Under Title 42, U.S.C., Section 1997, the Department of Justice has the ability to initiate civil actions against mental HOSPITALs, Retardation Facilities, Jails, Prisons, NURSING FACILITIES T42CFR409.33, and juvenile detention facilities when there are Allegations of Systemic Derivations [ 1999 HHS T42CFR417.1 denial of Covered T42CFR409.33 Claims and OPM T5CFR890.105 denial of Covered T42CFR409.33 Claims, to force ~ fraud by fright white collar crime ~ illegal HCFA State Medicaid T42CFR409.33 Kickback Conversions ~ eligibility Poor T18CFR286CRIME ] of the constitutional rights of institutionalized persons.
.
U.S. Constitution: Fourteenth Amendment
Fourteenth Amendment - Rights Guaranteed Privileges and Immunities of Citizenship,
Due Process and Equal Protection
Amendment Text | Annotations
Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
.
TITLE 42--PUBLIC HEALTH CHAPTER IV-[ HCFA ]-HEALTH CARE FINANCING ADMINISTRATION, [ DHHS ] DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PART 409-- HOSPITAL INSURANCE BENEFITS --Table of Contents Subpart D-[ Federal ]-Requirements for Coverage of Post-hospital SNF [ NURSING FACILITY ] Care Sec. 409.33 Examples of skilled nursing [ Medically Necessary ] and rehabilitation services. ~~ To DENY this SERVICE [ systematic deprivation HHS T42CFR417.1 adverse determination ], is called an ANTI-Dumping Violation
.
CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR ACTS INVOLVING FEDERAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS SEC. 1128B. [42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b] DETERMINING RIGHTS
.
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 242 Prev | Next § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
.
Region 5 HCFA : Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio and Wisconsin
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: OIG Violates Patroit Act 02
Posted by: Kimberly
» RE: Judiciary Allows Criminal Misconduct
Posted by: Kimberly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kimberly on Feb 14, 2009 12:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.
JANUARY 2008
A Vehicle to Avoid A Government Investigation HHS T42CFR417.1 Alternative Dispute Resolution T18CFR371CRIME.
.
National Governors Association ~ Alternate Dispute Resolution
T42CFR417.1 grievance procedure, Adverse Determination ~ used to force illegal HCFA State Medicaid Kickback Conversions color of law T18CFR371CRIME
January 28, 2008 letter (from NGA executive director Ray Scheppach) to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt requesting that HHS rescind the proposed rule amending Departmental REGULATIONS GOVERNING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW ~ by the Departmental Appeals Board (DAB). RE: Proposed Rulemaking: Revisions to Procedures for the Departmental Appeals Board and Other Departmental Hearings ~ 'Dispute Resolution' ( T42CFR417.1 grievance procedure, denial of covered claims misprison of a felony anti-dumping violation ) ~ For example, litigation briefs, memos, Emails, and other types of " informational documents interpreting STATUTES and published REGULATIONS " [ SSA 1128b Consumer Protection due process of law T18CFR24CRIMES Civil and Criminal Rights ] WOULD be deemed to HAVE equivalent AUTHORITY to the statute and regulations themselves. Governors OPPOSE the proposed rule [ T18CFR242CRIME ] and request that the department retain existing ( T42CFR417.1 adverse determinations misprison of T18CFR24CRIMES white collar crime ) DAB policies that provide states with the assurance of an impartial and independent dispute resolution process ~ RICO willfully failed to keep individuals from harm.
.
Sincerely,
All ENTITLED Federal Employee Health Beneficiaries & the General Public in Region 5 HCFA, who are being criminally denied HHS T42CFR417.1 Existing ( Federal State Private ) HMO Health Insurance Coverage, illegally billed for HMO denied covered claims and forced into HCFA State Medicaid Programs for the POOR. Title18CFR1001Crime. 1998 still pending 2009 denial of civil and criminal rights - reporting waste fraud and abuse - Color of Law T18CFR242CRIME
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cbishopp on Feb 14, 2009 12:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Feb 20, 2009 1:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jennifer Bedingfield on Feb 14, 2009 4:40 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Polls, schmolls ! THEY DON'T MATTER !!
Posted by: robert.noll
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AJR Journal on Feb 15, 2009 8:25 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How did they die?
Where did this happen?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: vidence? Does it even exist?
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peskyfly1 on Feb 15, 2009 9:16 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: usmarks on Feb 15, 2009 9:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Newsguy on Feb 15, 2009 10:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Should read: "Just yesterday the ACLU got its hands on a truly smoking gun..."
The contraction "it's" refers to the two words "it is" The word "its" is an entirely different word.
This is a common mistake but it shouldn't be committed by a professional writer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» No Proof-Read, No Peace.
Posted by: godsbreath64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ranchero42 on Feb 15, 2009 10:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DJ BALL on Feb 15, 2009 11:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AmBushed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ypsEmg9yOs&fmt=22
or
http://vimeo.com/2845340 (Better quality)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Must see music video... anti torture... anti war criminal...this is worthy !
Posted by: rinthy
» RE: Must see music video... anti torture... anti war criminal...this is worthy !
Posted by: MausMasher54
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 15, 2009 1:54 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jbpazz on Feb 15, 2009 4:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My bet is that we can bag and tag the lot of them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 15, 2009 10:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For better (for the most part, historically), and often, worse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gopblowsgoats on Feb 15, 2009 11:09 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You can AIPAC for
Posted by: weathered
» RE: You can AIPAC for
Posted by: marni
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WeimMom on Feb 16, 2009 4:53 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In four or eight years when Obama is no longer the President, then we can go after the Obama Administration for things they did.
Everyone wanted the Bush Administration to protect us post 9-11, however people do not have the stomach for what it takes. Had the Bush Administration not done what it took, he they would have be judged for that as well.
Wake up America, we can't have it both ways. If only we lived in a perfect world.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bush Administration War Crimes
Posted by: MausMasher54
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwindsong on Feb 17, 2009 11:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John
Privacy Center
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Feb 17, 2009 2:00 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
catch the podcast, generally available before midnight.
wanna chat about it? call 800.385.1566
===
Tues.17.Feb.09: Guests & Topics
We spoke with Wolfgang Kaleck, General Secretary of the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights e.V. (ECCHR, long-time president (2000-2008) of the progressive Republican Lawyer’s Association (RAV) and former vice-president and general secretary of European Democratic Lawyers (see http://www.aed-eda.com), has been working in the field of national and international human rights for the past ten years. He has worked closely with Amnesty International, CCR and Human Rights Watch on cases regarding Germans disappeared in Argentina, the detainees in Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, and the former Uzbek Minister of the Interior.
Together with CCR he filed two lawsuits in Germany against former US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and other high-ranking members of the US administration and military for gross violations of international law in regard to human rights abuses in Abu Ghraib. Although the suits were dismissed by courts of first instance, they stimulated positive discussions in Germany and elsewhere about command responsibility and the modern-day significance of the Nuremberg precedents.
At 5 PMest Dennis Hof - Moonlite Bunny Ranch, on the topic of privacy, vice & representative social governance.
At 6 PMest Safwan Javed, Wide Mouth Mason drummer responds to the introduction of the controversial Canadian DMCA."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOBLExSiaDY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOCyJDDTWxA
Did you think this issue isn't about Americans? Think again!: RIAA Takes Over DOJ
We spoke with Percy Schmeiser, who stood up to Monsanto abuses in Canada.
We also spoke with Dr. Vandana Shiva, a world-renowned environmental leader and thinker. Director of the Research Foundation on Science, Technology, and Ecology, she is the author of many books, including:
-'Water Wars: Pollution, Profits, and Privatization' (South End Press, 2001),
-"Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge" (South End Press, 1997),
-"'Monocultures of the Mind" (Zed, 1993),
-"The Violence of the Green Revolution" (Zed, 1992), and
-"'Staying Alive" (St. Martin's Press, 1989).
Dr. Shiva is a leader in The International Forum on Globalization, along with Ralph Nader and Jeremy Rifkin. She addressed the World Trade Organization summit in Seattle, 1999, as well as the recent World Economic Forum in Melbourne, 2000. In 1993, Shiva won the Alternative Nobel Peace Prize (the Right Livelihood Award). The founder of Navdanya ("nine seeds"), a movement promoting diversity and use of native seeds, she also set up the Research Foundation for Science, Technology, and Ecology in her mother's cowshed in 1997.
Its studies have validated the ecological value of traditional farming and been instrumental in fighting destructive development projects in India.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yolanda on Feb 19, 2009 8:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: john77075 on Feb 20, 2009 1:59 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lets Be Positive
Posted by: BigRon
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BigRon on Feb 21, 2009 12:17 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This argument about Bush is tainted beyond redemption. Kind of like deciding ONLY to put Nazis on trial for any crimes they committed after 1943. If an activity is illegal, then it's illegal PERIOD. Not just when the previous administration carried it out. You can't JUST prosecute GW Bush, and at the same time allow crimes carried out under Reagan, Nixon, or even Clinton be ignored. If an activity is illegal - and carried out in a nation that's REALLY governed by law - then it has to be investigated and prosecuted. Regardless of the political leanings of the leadership at the time it happened.
Reading all the posts on this page, I see absolutely NO inclination to investigate "crime" BECAUSE IT'S A CRIME. I just see endless howls that a very specific category of very recent crimes should be investigated. And friends.. that just ain't good enough! Far from restoring America's credibility... it just damages it even more. Gaining a reputation as a nation that carefully exploits prosecution to attack political enemies does little more than confirm what the rest of the world already knew.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Why Are We Afraid to Tax the Super-Rich?
Was "Jihad Jane" a Real Terrorist Threat? Or a Mentally Unstable Loner?
Ban the Box: People with Convictions Deserve a Second Chance




