Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

It's Our Responsibility as a Country to Pursue Justice for Bush Crimes

By Rep. John Conyers, Jr., Huffington Post. Posted February 2, 2009.


Naysayers warn against reckoning with the sins of the past, calling it partisan payback. I could not disagree more.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The Obama era began in earnest last week, with bold action such as closing the Guantanamo Bay prison camp and promising to end torture. In its very first days, the new administration has begun to lift the veil of secrecy surrounding executive branch operations, and has made great strides forward on fundamental challenges such as energy and the environment, and above all the national economic crisis left in the wake of the Bush Presidency. While great challenges and much hard work remain, the way forward is bright and clear.

As we proceed, however, the question remains how best to respond to the severe challenge posed to our constitutional structure, and to our national honor, by the Bush administration's actions, and in particular its national security programs. Faced with a record of widespread warrantless surveillance inside the United States, brutal interrogation policies condemned by the administration's own head of the Guantanamo Bay military commissions as torture, and flawed rendition practices that resulted in innocent men being abducted and handed to other countries to face barbaric abuse, what actions will we take to meet our commitment to the rule of law and reclaim our standing as a moral leader among nations?

I have previously explained my view that a full review of the record must be conducted by an experienced and independent prosecutor, and should focus on the senior policymakers and lawyers who ordered and approved these actions. Others, such as my fellow Michigander Senator Carl Levin, have suggested similar measures. This approach is compelled in my opinion by the basic notion that, if crimes were committed, those responsible should be held accountable - after all, is there any principle of American freedom more fundamental than the rule that no person is above the law? If this independent review concludes that the Bush Administration's legal constructs make prosecution impossible for some, so be it, but the matter should be given a proper look before such judgments are made one way or the other.

Some commentators -- including even those firmly opposed to criminal investigation -- support the creation of an independent Commission with appropriate clearances and subpoena power to review the existing record, make policy recommendations, and publish an authoritative account of these events. I have introduced a bill in the House that would create such a commission, and I believe this sort of public accounting is critical as well.

There remain those, however, who would have us simply move on. Some fear the consequences of a true accounting, or worry that taking time to reckon with the sins of the past will hinder us in meeting the challenges of the future. Others argue that the facts are already known, and further review will accomplish little. Often, the call for further review of the Bush administration's actions is dismissed as partisan payback, kicking an unpopular President when he's down.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: torture, dick cheney, bush administration, guantanamo, extraordinary rendition, barack obama, warrantless wiretapping, john yoo, enhanced interrogation, independent prosecutor, truth commission

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Save your breath - ain't gonna happen.
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Feb 2, 2009 3:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not because crimes weren't committed, but because too many powerful people made lots of money in the process.

We won't see a full reckoning that sheds light on a regime that benefitted the people that steer the world from behind the scenes. Just ain't gonna happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sparlow
Posted by: sparlow on Feb 5, 2009 1:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The one certain way to return to high standards is to hold people accountable. This must be firmly and unalterably established with penalties set with reasonable but firm penalties.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sparlow Posted by: tap17x
BushCo and Mark McGwire
Posted by: Koondog on Feb 5, 2009 2:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wouldn't it be great if we all could commit crimes and then just get everyone to "move on"? Not talk about the past? Move forward? Of course it is, if you're the one with the crimes. There's a story about some nobleman in France or Germany or someplace in Europe who brutally murdered a peasant and thought he could get away with it because of his standing. He was taken to trial and the judge said, "I'm going to let you go free, but I'll do the same to anyone who does to you what you did to that peasant." (More elegantly stated, though.) McGwire could redeem himself by a confession and maybe even make it into the Hall of Fame one day. Bush, not so much.
But, like millions of Americans and many millions around the world, I'm looking forward to a day when these crooks get their day in a court other than that of public opinion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One step back, two steps forward. . .
Posted by: peacefullaim1 on Feb 5, 2009 5:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . .so to speak. I couldn't agree more with this article. If the issues and concerns regarding the Bush administration are not fully investigated - if Bushco are not held accountable - their "crimes" rest fully on "we the people" and our nation cannot move "forward".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush is a mass murderer...........
Posted by: tap17x on Feb 5, 2009 8:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.......worse than all the civilian mass murderers in U.S. history put together. He should be treated as such.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LONG overdue
Posted by: dianectaylor on Feb 5, 2009 9:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congressman Conyers is right on...and about six years late. Many things should never have been allowed to happen, but our elected officials were either too corrupt or too cowardly to stop them. Now it's absolutely time to prosecute war crimes perpetrated by the US president, vice president and other officials who knew better. They shouldn't get away with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks, Congressman, But Why Did You and Others in Congress Wait So Long?
Posted by: Jayzer on Feb 6, 2009 12:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, Congressman Conyers, but why did you and other members in Congress wait so long to take any action against members of the Bush regime? Key members of the administration could have been impeached as early as 2003, when the war of aggression against Iraq was launched. I do believe that former attorney general Ramsey Clark called for impeachment that early and many of us wanted to see it done as soon as Bush ordered troops into Iraq.

Even at that, we were a bit late because many of us assumed that sending troops into Afghanistan was a good-faith effort to arrest or kill the al-Qaeda leadership, so on that score, many of us (myself, included) were misled and were complicit in the crimes committed against the Afghani population.

What sticks in my craw about the statement that you have written is where you point out that the crimes of torture (and presumably also the acts of aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan) were committed in the name of the people of the United States, thus leaving us the onus of collective responsibility. In a certain sense, that's true, but the weight of an effective counter-action to those crimes was to be found in Congress, whose members could have impeached Bush, Cheney, Condoleeza Rice and possibly others, but chose not to do so, out of expedience or political cowardice.

This was a major evasion of responsibility among those who could have done something to reverse the trend, but didn't. I suppose better late than never is to be ruefully accepted, but really, sir: What took you so long?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Words...empty words
Posted by: superjls on Feb 6, 2009 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Mr. Conyers,

With all due loss of respect, your lack of action belies the eloquence of your words.

Hollow rhetoric.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rep Conyers should have all progressives support
Posted by: solitarysherlockian on Feb 6, 2009 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With so much of Congress frightened of their own shadow, it is refreshing to find John Conyers willing to do his job for the rest of them. Why isn't there overwhelming support from all progressive reps? Where is the accountability? Where is the investigation of past misdeed?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Trial of Bush Administration
Posted by: jlowelld on Feb 6, 2009 2:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether or not the principals who would be tried in the Bush administration prosecution go to jail, is not important. However, the process of trying them would be an opportunity to reeducate the citizenry about the meaning of democracy, and the dangers of corporatism (Fascism). Ultimately, the Bush administration is just representative of a class struggle between those who control the coercive apparatus and those that supply the labor. If we are to survive the coming global ecological/economic collapse, the citizens have to become more knowledgeable--the Bush prosecution is a necessary step in that process.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

now or never
Posted by: lorado on Feb 8, 2009 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if not now, when?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your words are really soft
Posted by: jleman on Feb 9, 2009 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
considering the actions we have been forced into accepting because Congress feared for their lives after Wellstone's death along with the inside job of the Anthrax mail-a-grams. Maybe all of Congress should go on "Are you smarter than a fifth grader?" as contestants because the majority of the polled Americans believe 9/11 was an inside job along with the "reign of Terror" pushed forward by the Conservatives and acted upon by a politicized military and security services. Imperial subjugation of the global peoples started with the State Sponsored Terrorism taught at the School of the Americas and put into action by the neocons in the military, Congress and the Presidency.
That we should so eloquently call for an "investigation" into "possible?" acts is so outrageous that it defies good conscious people everywhere. Elected leaders were silent because they feared for their personal lives and the lives of their loved ones. The Wellstone family murder was a "message" everyone got as well as the media spectacle and condemnation of the electorate's political feelings which followed in ceremonies.
We should be purging our security services, military and government personnel in the middle of the night and send them to Guantanamo to be "interrogated" along with Cheney and Bush. Then, maybe, we'll have "transparency" at their "war trials".
Congresspeople can then come out of their hideaways and deliver their eloquences when they feel it is safe along with their condemnations.
Just how much "media coverage" would a citizen march on government get if they vented their anger on those who deserve it? Probably, nada.
So, maybe it is up to us individually to have spontaneous acts of mayhem against government and ex-government officials complicit in the affairs of the last eight years?
No organizing. No target for the security services. Just random acts of violence?
Light the match!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement