CIVIL LIBERTIES  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 4

Executive Orders to Close Secret Prisons Mark Beginning of the End of Lawlessness

Under Bush, executive orders meant shredding the Constitution. It's uplifting to see them used to set things right.
January 22, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

We welcome the beginning of the end of lawlessness. Under the previous administration, executive orders became synonymous with secrecy, torture and attempts to override the Constitution. It is genuinely uplifting to see them now used to set things right. President Obama's orders today are an important first step in restoring the rule of law; let us take the next steps with great care not to open the way for a return to the darkness of these last years.

The order to close Guantánamo, though it provides little detail and allows perhaps too much time to get it done given the pressing issues at stake, is a good start. We believe the president will be able to close Guantánamo in less than a year: the priority must be to repatriate the many men who can go home and find safe havens for the approximately 60 who would face torture or persecution.

The government has to charge the rest of the detainees in federal criminal court. There can be no third way, no new schemes for indefinite or preventive detention or alternative national security courts. Any move in that direction would discredit all of the new administration's efforts in the eyes of the world.

The order to close the CIA black sites where people were held in secret for the purpose of torture is to be applauded. There is no place for such black holes in a democracy. Their intended purpose is to circumvent the Geneva conventions and our own laws. If the order leaves the option of reviving those sites, it is more symbolic than a true reversal.

The order to make all agencies abide by the Army Field Manual's acceptable interrogation tactics is perhaps the most important gesture toward restoring our moral authority as a nation. The Center for Constitutional Rights represents so many men who were brutally tortured by our government that this hits home for us in a way that it may not for those with no faces and lives to attach to the story.

Again, we caution that the order may leave an escape hatch if the CIA should want more tactics, i.e. torture, available in its arsenal. The Geneva conventions should be the only arbiter of what is possible for governments to do to human beings.

Today's orders are filled with promise. In addition, to ensure no future administration will take us back to these dark times, there needs to be individual accountably for the torture program, and other crimes committed. Prosecution is the only way to deter future lawbreakers. These orders are the right start, let us make sure this does not happen again.

***

CCR has led the legal battle over Guantanamo for the last six years -- sending the first ever habeas attorney to the base and sending the first attorney to meet with a former CIA “ghost detainee.” CCR has been responsible for organizing and coordinating more than 500 pro bono lawyers across the country in order to represent the men at Guantanamo, ensuring that nearly all have the option of legal representation. CCR represented the detainees with co-counsel in the most recent argument before the Supreme Court on December 5, 2007.

 


The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is a non-profit legal and educational organization committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change. Visit www.ccrjustice.org.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email


Comments are closed-

Yeah but Bush cronies are trying to obstruct Eric Holder appointment
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Jan 22, 2009 3:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.truthout.org/012209K

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Prosecution Must Happen To Set Things Right
Posted by: bryangalt on Jan 22, 2009 9:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have posted several times on the matter of prosecuting the Bush Administration and I will say it again: there must be a reckoning for the way that he treated the Constitution, international laws and human rights for the past eight years.

Recently, I was challenged by readers of the Fresno Bee to prove that Bush and Co. had in fact lied about the ties between Al Queda and the 9-11 attacks. What these folks didn't believe was that every time Bush opened his mouth and lied about the connection, he was committing a felony.

Under US statutes, anyone that lies to the Congress has committed a crime. And, if that lie leads to the use or commitment of US forces, or results in the death of US forces (civilian or military), then this lie becomes a death sentence offense.

When you tie all the lies to the "no-bid" contracts given out to all the pals of Bush & Co., you have a great case for Racketeering, War Profiteering, etc. These are also felonies that have enhancements attached.

The violation of a single person's civil rights can carry a 10-year prison sentence. If that person was killed as a result of that violation, then the sentence can be death. It could be argued that the civil rights of American citizen's being violated by their arrest without charges being filed for years on end could also be considered torture, a violation of the Constitutional rights (plus the many others that occurred under Bush).

Frankly, a country that is always crying out that "justice for all" is one of our bedrock principles cannot be seen as unsure of how to proceed with the Bush criminals. The Constitution does not capitulate justice from being served for criminal actions just because it's the office of the President that broke the law(s).

The black years under Bush cannot be swept under the rug. The only way to truly put them behind us is to prosecute with extreme prejudice those members of the government that would have taken away our way of life with no concern for what their actions were going to have in the short or long term. We must set an example that this kind of behavior from the Executive is unacceptable.

Read the Fresno Bee letter wars at my blog Bryan Galt's Blog

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

lemme get this straight...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jan 28, 2009 1:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...with HOW MANY government 'intelligence services'?
....with HOW MANY privatized 'intelligence services' to which the US contracts?
...with HOW MANY US CONGRESS FUNDED WHINSEC/'School of the Americas' graduates...?

we're supposed to BELIEVE THE US WHEN THEY SAY THEY'RE CLOSING THE TORTURE SITES WE KNOW ABOUT? gee, those union organizers & their families who are tortured on behalf of US corporations (I'm looking at YOU, Chiquita Banana!) in say, COLUMBIA... they're gonna close up shop?

yeah...

I'm all over that level of TRUST for which the US government is highly well-known...

I've got a thought: any chance the US is SIMPLY GOING TO MOVE TO MORE SECRET SITES?

nah... that could NEVER HAPPEN, right?

puhleeeze.

THE SUPER-SECRET SPOOKS ARE GOING TO CLOSE THEIR SITES WHEN THEY STOP MILITARIZING & CRIMINALIZING THE DRUG WAR THAT FUNDS THEIR BULLSHIT...

until then, "believe whatever they tell you"? come on...


┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
Spread Love, not corporate dependence...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @cup
ThisCanadian
"True Pacifism is not unrealistic submission to an Evil power...it is rather a courageous confrontation with Evil by the Power of Love, in the faith that it is better to be the recipient of violence than the inflicter of it, since the latter only multiplies the existence of violence & bitterness in the Universe, while the former may develop a sense of shame in the opponent, & thereby bring about a transformation & change of Heart." - MLK
"... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice..." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.

┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Yeah but Bush cronies are trying to obstruct Eric Holder appointment
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Jan 22, 2009 3:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.truthout.org/012209K

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Prosecution Must Happen To Set Things Right
Posted by: bryangalt on Jan 22, 2009 9:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have posted several times on the matter of prosecuting the Bush Administration and I will say it again: there must be a reckoning for the way that he treated the Constitution, international laws and human rights for the past eight years.

Recently, I was challenged by readers of the Fresno Bee to prove that Bush and Co. had in fact lied about the ties between Al Queda and the 9-11 attacks. What these folks didn't believe was that every time Bush opened his mouth and lied about the connection, he was committing a felony.

Under US statutes, anyone that lies to the Congress has committed a crime. And, if that lie leads to the use or commitment of US forces, or results in the death of US forces (civilian or military), then this lie becomes a death sentence offense.

When you tie all the lies to the "no-bid" contracts given out to all the pals of Bush & Co., you have a great case for Racketeering, War Profiteering, etc. These are also felonies that have enhancements attached.

The violation of a single person's civil rights can carry a 10-year prison sentence. If that person was killed as a result of that violation, then the sentence can be death. It could be argued that the civil rights of American citizen's being violated by their arrest without charges being filed for years on end could also be considered torture, a violation of the Constitutional rights (plus the many others that occurred under Bush).

Frankly, a country that is always crying out that "justice for all" is one of our bedrock principles cannot be seen as unsure of how to proceed with the Bush criminals. The Constitution does not capitulate justice from being served for criminal actions just because it's the office of the President that broke the law(s).

The black years under Bush cannot be swept under the rug. The only way to truly put them behind us is to prosecute with extreme prejudice those members of the government that would have taken away our way of life with no concern for what their actions were going to have in the short or long term. We must set an example that this kind of behavior from the Executive is unacceptable.

Read the Fresno Bee letter wars at my blog Bryan Galt's Blog

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

lemme get this straight...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jan 28, 2009 1:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...with HOW MANY government 'intelligence services'?
....with HOW MANY privatized 'intelligence services' to which the US contracts?
...with HOW MANY US CONGRESS FUNDED WHINSEC/'School of the Americas' graduates...?

we're supposed to BELIEVE THE US WHEN THEY SAY THEY'RE CLOSING THE TORTURE SITES WE KNOW ABOUT? gee, those union organizers & their families who are tortured on behalf of US corporations (I'm looking at YOU, Chiquita Banana!) in say, COLUMBIA... they're gonna close up shop?

yeah...

I'm all over that level of TRUST for which the US government is highly well-known...

I've got a thought: any chance the US is SIMPLY GOING TO MOVE TO MORE SECRET SITES?

nah... that could NEVER HAPPEN, right?

puhleeeze.

THE SUPER-SECRET SPOOKS ARE GOING TO CLOSE THEIR SITES WHEN THEY STOP MILITARIZING & CRIMINALIZING THE DRUG WAR THAT FUNDS THEIR BULLSHIT...

until then, "believe whatever they tell you"? come on...


┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
Spread Love, not corporate dependence...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @cup
ThisCanadian
"True Pacifism is not unrealistic submission to an Evil power...it is rather a courageous confrontation with Evil by the Power of Love, in the faith that it is better to be the recipient of violence than the inflicter of it, since the latter only multiplies the existence of violence & bitterness in the Universe, while the former may develop a sense of shame in the opponent, & thereby bring about a transformation & change of Heart." - MLK
"... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice..." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.

┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS