Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Seymour Hersh: "After 9/11 We Became a Different Country"

By Faisal Abbas, Asharq Al-Awsat. Posted December 25, 2008.


The New Yorker's star reporter discusses Abu Ghraib, the "war on terror," and why U.S. reporters don't pay enough attention to the Arab press.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Asharq Al-Awsat, London -- In this interview, Asharq Al-Awsat speaks to veteran American reporter Seymour Hersh, who, four years ago, exposed the now infamous prison abuse scandal of Abu Ghraib in Iraq at the hands of U.S. soldiers.

In 1969, Hersh brought to light the My Lai massacre carried out by U.S. forces in Vietnam, for which he received a Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting in 1970.

However, as most journalists know, it is impossible to please everybody. Hersh has been praised and is often regarded as "the last American reporter," while on the other hand he is also criticized and described as "the closest thing American journalism has to a terrorist," particularly for his outspokenness against the American administration and U.S. forces.

The interview proceeded as follows:

Asharq Al-Awsat: Many Arab journalists say that it is shameful that the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal was uncovered by a Western journalist rather than an Arab journalist. What is your view of the Arab media and its failure to expose this incident?

Seymour Hersh: I can't answer on behalf of somebody as to why he did not do something but what I can say is thank God it was reported by a Westerner, whether it was me or anybody else. Just imagine how mush worse it would have been for America if [the] Abu Ghraib [prison abuse scandal] had been reported by the Arab press. I can also say that as an American, it shows that there is at least a little bit of integrity left in the system.

I would not defend the American press with regards to reporting on [U.S. President George W.] Bush; I think we did a terrible job, particularly on the Weapons of Mass Destruction issue. However, in this [Abu Ghraib] case, you should not be too tough on the Arab press simply because the photographs and the report that I obtained came from within America, not from the Middle East.

One of the things about Abu Ghraib is that the story was there to be had; if you had read the reports by the various groups that monitor abuses and torture, you would have known that they had already been talking about Abu Ghraib, so it was not really newly discovered that it was a hell-hole. What was new was that there were photographs, and those were not available to anyone outside the American system.

I can also say that in general, one of the things that drives me crazy about my country and our reporters is that they do not pay enough attention the Arab press, which has more reporters to move around locally and has better language skills.

Asharq Al-Awsat: But it seems that a story only gains momentum when it is reported by a major "Western" media institution such as the New York Times, or The Washington Post, or in your case, The New Yorker.

SH: I agree. That is only because of the incredible bias of the American press. Al Jazeera, for example, could break a story for a week and the American press would simply ignore it. In general, the American press is much less interested in reporting other news.

The New York Times, for example, cheerleads its own stories, and does not care about other people's exclusive reports.

Furthermore, the American media does not just ignore the Arab press; for example during the Vietnam War, there were many amazing stories in the North Vietnamese, North Korean and Japanese press services. Though they were communists, there were terrific stories about prisoners of war and other accurate issues that were simply ignored by us. The point is you can be an honest reporter in spite of who you work for.

Asharq Al-Awsat: Let us talk about the reaction to your work, [former Chairman of The Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee] Richard Perle described you as "the closest thing American journalism has to a terrorist…"

SH: (Laughing) That was a compliment from Richard Perle!


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, vietnam, journalism, new york times, seymour hersh, abu ghraib, syria, new yorker, barry mccaffrey, my lai

Faisal Abbas is Asharq Al-Awsat's Media Editor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Not Our Finest Hour
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Dec 25, 2008 12:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the whole sorry, crime-ridden spectacle of the Bush regime, a few heroes stand out. Hersh and Taguba come immediately to mind. There are some real villians like Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld, and there are a lot of spineless people who knew better but didn't have the guts to protest, like Pelosi, Reid and most of the media.

To paraphrase Churchill, people will say, 'this wasn't their finest hour."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not Our Finest Hour Posted by: motamanx6
» That was the intention Posted by: texasrodeoqueen
» RE: Not Our Finest Hour Posted by: weathered
» RE: Not Our Finest Hour Posted by: willymack
» Payola at that end, Posted by: pelican beak
Hersh Is A Real Journalist
Posted by: NoPCZone on Dec 25, 2008 12:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What most in the MSM have forgotten or refuse to admit is that a journalists job is, among other things, to NOT be a cheerleader for their home country or whomever or whatever they happen to be covering. They are to detach from any personal connections and follow the truth, evidence and details of the story and follow where it leads. They are certainly not to be water carriers for anybody in times of peace or war.

One of the reasons that the press has (is supposed to have) special protection under our system is that they will occasionally have to bite the hand that feeds them or pee in the punchbowl. The bulk of the MSM press, most notably those in D.C. & N.Y.C., have long ago joined the social circle of those they are supposed to be watching and reporting upon- the very thing they should avoid at all costs.

You cannot ask the impolite question, speak truth to power, or broach the inconvenient truth while you are a lackey for your subjects. Millionaire TV reporters who socialize with their subjects are very far away from the public they are supposed to be serving and are helping not the cause of democracy, but themselves. One of the best ways to avoid the Beltway mentality is to not join the Beltway crowd.

Seymour Hersh understands this and has practiced the art of journalism for a very long time now. He understands that the work he does is far more important than an editorial title, an award, an invitation to some navel gazing seminar of insiders or a pat on the back by some politician. Too bad that this is the exception rather than the rule.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The MSM Dies Before Our Eyes
Posted by: jbpazz on Dec 25, 2008 3:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aljazeera English covers the US much more objectively than the Americans do. Muslim reporters are also better in touch with 'grassroots' Americans than the US mass media.
The print media is helpful to wrap fish bones. Television should stick to old time movies and to stand-up comics.
By any standard the Huffington Post is more meaningful than the four major networks combined.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To Seymore Fisal, and Alsharq, in the words of Compte de St. Germain" ; continuez à garder l'on" ;
Posted by: Nightstallion on Dec 25, 2008 4:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are causing stress to these Media hacks and Content Regurgitating puke fountains you must be doing something right! The foul stench of the tripe that they have cut out and left on their edit bay floors is filtering into the air and ground water!

I have heard of Oil spills by Exxon Valdeze and coal oil dam breaks in tennesee here. It can't hold a candle to what these warmongering garbage scows are feeding the folks in the USA.

We should have expected it though because: "You can lead a Whore to Culture, but you can't make him think!"

And Seymore though I agree with most of your writings I beg to differ about the USA not being the same after 9/11. That came far earlier when Sam Clemens report on the sinking of the Battle Ship Maine in 1898 first hit the presses. For over one hundred years the State of this Country has fallen drib by drab to the point that a man of Twain's caliber would be looking for the key group responsible instead of shouting Heil and Viva from the roof tops like the rest of the masses raised on beer pretzles and football.

Like Steven Segal quips in Above the Law, "What, are we the damn Romans now?" I don't like bread and circuses. I don't like lying shit stirs, and it is time to repudiate those vile Cabinet and Congress members who kowtowed to those madmen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Much Different after 9/11.
Posted by: gar1948 on Dec 25, 2008 6:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For all those who think the United States SUDDENLY changed with George Bush and 9/11, I urge you to read Howard Zinn's book "The People's History of the United States."

The only real change was Toto pulled back the curtain and allowed us to see the Wicked Wizard for what he really is. Absolute power corrupts absolutely; the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. This country is now, and always has been, run for the fat cats and their lackeys, the politicians in Washington D.C.

Now that we see the truth, we have a choice. We can keep pushing for "Truth, Liberty, Justice, and the American Way." We can insist that those responsible for the atrocities we have witnessed over the last eight years pay for their crimes. Or, we can put our heads back in the sand and let the curtain close again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Media Echo Chamber
Posted by: gradioc on Dec 25, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would expand on what Hersh said about the major media outlets ignoring foreign press. The fact is there is a very small club of outlets, including WAPO, NYT, and the TV networks that all listen to each other and not much else. The McClatchy papers Washington bureau did great reporting on the bad intel used in selling the Iraq invasion, but because it was published in places like Charlotte and Miami, not DC or NYC, it went largely ignored by the national outlets. Truth is they probably pay more attention to Al Jazeera than reporters right here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

9/11 truth
Posted by: edgeofnowhere on Dec 25, 2008 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"it is my job to hold public officials to the highest possible standards.

In my case, I hold public officials to the same standards that I hold my family to. I wouldn't want my children to lie to me and I wouldn't want to lie to them."

One hopes that Mr. Hersch's new book will attempt to tell the truth about the 9/11 incident. If that truth were revealed to the American people in its entirety, you would really see some change in this country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 9/11 truth/Amen Posted by: ron heringhauser
» RE: 9/11 truth/Amen Posted by: willymack
» RE: 9/11 truth/Amen Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: 9/11 truth/Amen Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: 9/11 truth Posted by: pfgetty
» RE: 9/11 truth Posted by: brunowe
» RE: 9/11 truth Posted by: arraya
» RE: 9/11 truth Posted by: pfgetty
» RE: 9/11 truth Posted by: brunowe
» RE: 9/11 truth Posted by: pfgetty
» RE: 9/11 truth Posted by: brunowe
» Exercise your "intellect on this: Posted by: LeftWright
» RE: 9/11 truth Posted by: dustdevil
Thank you Seymour Hersh
Posted by: we_need_Abe on Dec 25, 2008 9:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comments such as Richard Perle's just further confirms how not only unamerican he is as he obviously does not believe in our constitution but he is on the verge of being inhuman. His disregard for the lives of other human beings is appalling and one can only hope that he and the rest of "them" get what they deserve.

One last comment - I am fearful as to the future of our getting stories such as Mr. Hersh gets as he retires and funding for his sort of work becomes harder to find.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thank you Seymour Hersh Posted by: Garvagh
US newspapers should pay more attention to Iranian press
Posted by: Garvagh on Dec 25, 2008 11:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American newspapers pay far too little attention to the Arab press, as Hersh points out, and also far too little attention to the Iranian press. For example, today the Iranian press covered the comments made by the foreign minister of Bahrain yesterday, that the Arab countries support Iran's domestic nuclear power program. This is in stark contrast to Condoleezza Rice's statements that the Gulf Arabs fear a nuclear Iran and believe Iran is building a bomb.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BoldDIGG is open
Posted by: rosinante on Dec 25, 2008 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I opened the DIGG. Please click DIGG this. This tells the internet that this is a fine article of interest to all thinking people.

If you add a comment in the box provided, it doubles your DIGG count.
pup34

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

C'mon now; let's see a show of hands
Posted by: willymack on Dec 25, 2008 12:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of those who actually believe the insulting lies, misdirections, and obfuscations in the 911 Commission Report. Ok, your homework assignment for tonight is to READ it. It makes me angry just to think about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

9/11 = Ground Zero for Denial of FASCISM U.S.A.
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Dec 25, 2008 9:18 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In my case, I hold public officials to the same standards that I hold my family to. I wouldn't want my children to lie to me and I wouldn't want to lie to them"

Nice words.

What about the master lie at 9/11 coverup for the thousand lies it led to for bogus war on a noun a.k.a. "war on terror"?

I won't hold my breath waiting for that answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I would argue that it was not 9/11.
Posted by: Phred42 on Dec 26, 2008 10:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
9/11 was a symptom.

It was the Judicial coup d'etat of 2000.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yup... a completely diffrent country...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Dec 28, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... and one planned from the sewers of republican brain trusts no doubt!

Everything this administration did and has done for 8 years is a complete waste of time effort and money... his whole approach to government was child like and incompetent from day 1...

the only way to regain world trust in US leadership... would be to ship this entire cabal of neo-cons to the Hague to face charges for crimes against humanity!

even then... i doubt you will save face

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

games
Posted by: hankjmatt on Jan 5, 2009 11:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
online games, online game, flash games, free online game, free online games, flash game

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yes
Posted by: messiah4 on Jan 20, 2009 6:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement