Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Psychologists to Obama: Don't Name Torture Apologist John Brenner CIA Director

By Stephen Soldz, Psyche, Science, and Society. Posted November 25, 2008.


An open letter from 200 psychologists and allies who are urging Obama not to select John Brennan to be Director of the CIA.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

November 22, 2008

Dear President-Elect Obama,

We are writing to urge you not to select John Brennan as Director of the CIA. We are psychologists and allies who have long opposed the abuses of detainees under the Bush administration. We are just concluding a successful several-year struggle to remove psychologists from their roles in aiding or abetting these abuses. It has been a distressing fact that, while the Bush administration resorted to abuse and torture of those in our custody, often psychologists have been put in positions to use their psychological expertise to guide these unconscionable practices.

We look forward to your administration as an opportunity for genuine change -- in this case for our country to take a new direction in its treatment of prisoners. We applaud your commitment to closing Guantanamo and are encouraged by your clear statement from your “60 Minutes” interview last Sunday, “America doesn’t torture, and I’m gonna make sure that we don’t torture.” This fuels our hope for a decisive repudiation of the “dark side” -- the willingness to use or abet illegal and unethical coercive interrogation tactics that sometimes amount to torture and often constitute cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

We are concerned, however, by reports that you may appoint John Brennan as Director of the CIA. Mr. Brennan served as a high official in George Tenet’s CIA and supported Tenet’s policies, including “enhanced interrogations” as well as “renditions” to torturing countries. According to his own statements, Mr. Brennan was a supporter of the “dark side” policies, wishing only to have some legal justification supplied in order to protect CIA operatives. In describing Director Tenet’s views he stated during a March 8, 2006 Frontline interview:

I think George [Tenet] had two concerns. One is to make sure that there was that legal justification, as well as protection for CIA officers who are going to be engaged in some of these things, so that they would not be then prosecuted or held liable for actions that were being directed by the administration. So we want to make sure the findings and other things were done probably with the appropriate Department of Justice review.

We know, of course, that “the appropriate Department of Justice review” means that torture was authorized and conducted by our government.

The use of these tactics goes against the moral fiber of our country and is never justified. This is true whether these “enhanced interrogation” techniques are used directly by U.S. forces, as in the CIA’s “black sites,” or by other countries acting as our surrogates, as in the “renditions” program where individuals are taken to countries practicing torture, resulting in suffering inflicted by that country’s forces.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: cia, torture, war on terror, barack obama, george tenet, john brennan

Stephen Soldz is a psychoanalyst, psychologist, public health researcher, and faculty member at the Boston Graduate School of Psychoanalysis. He maintains the Psychoanalysts for Peace and Justice web page and the Psyche, Science, and Society blog. He is a founder of the Coalition for an Ethical

Psychology, one of the organizations leading the struggle to change American Psychological Association policy on participation in abusive interrogations.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Don Quixot
Posted by: Don Quixote on Nov 25, 2008 1:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The CIA director, by definition, has to be a man completely without any consciense problems, like every chief of secret services in every other country, so the worst, the better. If we know all the classified data still existing and the classified data that has been destroyed forever so we will never know the secret history of every country, we would hardly believe it. It took decades for people to know that the CIA killed a forever unkown number of military and civilian US citizens, including pregnang women, just to make experiments with over the effects of nuclear radiation, mind control, etc., as human laboratory animals. If they did this to US citizens imagine what they have done with enemies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don Quixot Posted by: Lauren
And how about ABOLISHING the CIA?
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 25, 2008 4:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has been nothing but a backdoor for terrorists and has done NOTHING to stop terrorism. Besides, if the Democrats really hate Bush, they'd destroy the source of the Bush dynasty's rise to power, the CIA. Besides, the CIA is a complete waste of taxpayer money. They've been a drag on America and other countries in the worst ways so I say give 'em the DEATH PENALTY !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who Would Protect Obama?
Posted by: folkie on Nov 25, 2008 4:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know Obama got the friendly visit from the economic hitman after he became a political figure, many years ago. He is still alive, so we also know what choice he made.

As John Perkins explains, all politicians are given the same choice, plata o plomo, silver or lead, a bribe or a bullet, riches beyond your wildest dreams or death. Some politicians are rich, others like JFK and Wellstone are dead.

Rockefeller tells the CIA what he wants and they tell the President. The President either complies or is killed. For the background to Perkins' Confessions of an Economic Hitman, I recommend Chapter 23 of Thy Will Be Done The Conquest of the Amazon: Nelson Rockefeller and Evangelism in the Age of Oil by Colby and Dennett, and JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters by James W. Douglass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who Would Protect Obama? Posted by: sunnywater
» RE: Who Would Protect Obama? Posted by: georgiaorwell
Torture Apologist for Director of the CIA? Good idea!
Posted by: rickiey on Nov 25, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm totally in favor of it. Which is kinda odd, because I'm also in favor of human rights and I'm against torture.

But I'm totally in favor of other countries assuming that we are willing torture. It's good for the CIA's ability to do their job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: you are sick Posted by: Lauren
PLEASE SELECT - John Brenner CIA Director
Posted by: ds1st on Nov 25, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Brenner is a true American. He is a patriot and values the safety of American children.

He will not let the African-American children be labeled as infidel and put into bondage by Al-Qaeda. He will not let the homosexual be put back in the closet or executed by the sword.

Please protect our citizens by making John Brenner CIA director.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brennan thinks FISA is a good program.
Posted by: Quannah on Nov 25, 2008 9:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He believes the telecom companies should have immunity.

Here's a National Journal interview during which he is very clear about where he stands. It isn't a good picture that he paints.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

*** THIS JUST IN... ***
Posted by: Quannah on Nov 25, 2008 11:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apparently, Brennan has just announced that he does not want to be considered, nor would he serve, in ANY CAPACITY in the intelligence agencies!

He said this is due to the pressure from the NETROOTS!!!

This is amazing.

FINALLY! A VICTORY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» YES BUT ... Posted by: ds1st
» RE: *** THIS JUST IN... *** Posted by: Lauren
take the victories where we can get them.
Posted by: whealeydj on Nov 26, 2008 8:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So he withdrew saying that he actually tried to fight the torture advocates among Bush Adminsitration like Addington Gonzales,Cheney and Rumsfeld. It may be difficult to get an intelligence person not tainted by the Bush willingness to torture. Frank Church is long gone but maybe someone from the National Security archive who is skeptical of intelligence would be great. However, Obama has proven very disapppointing with appointments, it would be nice to see more stand up progressives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT APPEARS THAT BRENNER HAS PULLED DOWN HIS OWN NAME. BUT
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Nov 27, 2008 12:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there are respondents above who hit a really good point. They asked whether the CIA should be just shut down. That seems blunt. Lets try another door.

In a democracy the voting individual must rule. If secrets are kept from the voting individual can he make a proper decision. The question I have asked is whether you can have a secret service in a democracy. In other words, if you have a secret service is a democracy possible.

Our representatives say just trust us. Surely we know better. They are supposed to do what we tell them. They get to thinking that they are elected as dictators. If you believe that they are supposed to be elected dictators then we have nothing further to discuss.

In due time we are going to need more direct democracy. Twenty two states have initiative petition laws. We need the same right at the federal level. The old men haven't gotten it. The young men are going to have to demand it. It may mean taking to the streets. Its hard to get them to give up their power voluntarily.

Let me leave you with a question. IS IT POSSIBLE TO BE RADICAL WHEN WE ARE DISCUSSING DEMOCRACY?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We've created a Monster now what do we do?
Posted by: Patriot46 on Nov 30, 2008 11:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why was the CIA formed? If it has outlived it's usefulness, then we as citizens must demand it be dismantled.
"The trouble is that once you see it, you can’t unsee it. And once you’ve seen it, keeping quiet, saying nothing, becomes as political an act as speaking out. There’s no innocence. Either way, you’re accountable." ~Arundhati Roy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]