Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

Is the "Turban Effect" the New Bradley Effect?

By Tom Jacobs, Miller-McCune.com. Posted November 17, 2008.


Two recent studies conducted in two very different settings reveal a disturbing anti-Muslim bias among students.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

<i>Miller-McCune magazine and Miller-McCune.com draw on academic research and other definitive sources to provide reasoned policy options and solutions for today's pressing issues.</i>

The election of the United States' first African American president has been welcomed as evidence the nation is belatedly moving beyond bigotry. But two new studies suggest that at least one unconscious prejudice -- a fear or dislike of Muslims -- remains very much alive.

"Islamophobia," U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon said Wednesday at a two-day United Nations interfaith dialogue, "has emerged as a new term for an old and terrible form of prejudice."

When rumors began circulating during the recent presidential election that Barack Obama was a Muslim, observers from former Secretary of State Colin Powell to comedian Jon Stewart responded by asking, "Why would it matter if he was?" But whoever was circulating that misinformation was playing into a widely held prejudice -- one that has infected even the minds of sophisticated, educated Westerners. At least, that's the conclusion of two recently published studies, which detected anti-Muslim bias in two very different settings.

The first is "The Turban Effect," published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology by a team from the University of New South Wales in Sydney. It suggests that simply noticing someone is a Muslim increases aggressive tendencies on the part of non-Muslim Westerners.

Psychologists Christian Unkelbach, Joseph Forgas and Tom Denson modified a pre-existing computer game in which participants are instructed to shoot at subjects carrying weapons, but hold their fire when they spot someone who is unarmed. The target subjects were of both genders and a variety of races, but, most importantly for this study, some were given a Muslim appearance -- that is, they wore a turban or the hijab.

The 66 university students who played the game -- 35 of them female -- were significantly more likely to shoot at Muslim targets. The targets who received the highest number of hits were Muslim-looking, non-Caucasian males; the fewest hits were for non-Muslim, Caucasian females.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: psychology, muslims, hijab, prejudice, turban effect

Tom Jacobs is a veteran journalist with more than 20 years experience at daily newspapers. He has served as a staff writer for the Los Angeles Daily News and the Santa Barbara News-Press. His work has also appeared in the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune and Ventura County Star.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
cause and effect
Posted by: 2thepoint on Nov 17, 2008 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have they tried to draw a corrolation between "The Turban Effect," and terrorists attacks?

The problem with the actions of a few is that it stains the many. Most muslims are peace loving people, many are brainwashed by their governments or religion into hating anything western. The same goes on in western nations.

This has actually been something going on for centuries, not just the past 8 years although 9/11 and terror attacks have brought it to the forefron

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: cause and effect Posted by: davewuxi
Video Games
Posted by: Xynyx on Nov 17, 2008 9:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So... how many people have played video games?

And how many people have played video games involving shooting people (or "bad guys")?

And how many people have played video games where the people that you generally shoot look like they are or might be Muslims?

And how many people have played video games where the people that you generally shoot look like they are or might be Christians? (And I mean, specifically, Christians. How do Christians dress? Wow... lots of questions down this road... is everyone who dresses in some Middle Eastern fashion Muslim?)

Many video games depict violence. Often, that violence is presented in some sort of fictional world involving characters based on current real-world caricatures. Al Qaeda is on the rise. They proclaim themselves to be Muslim, they use the word "jihad". It should be no surprise that people would be more inclined to "shoot" "Muslims" in video games... they are the current popular targets in most violence-oriented (non-fantasy, i.e., not involving aliens or other nonexistent creatures, as in Halo or Gears of War, for example) video games.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Happy Bigots
Posted by: QQOblivion on Nov 17, 2008 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Article said:
"This seemingly odd result confirms recent theories that positive affect tends to trigger a more spontaneous style of processing information, which in turn increases the influence of stereotypes. In other words, if you're happy and you know it, it's more likely your latent bigoted beliefs will rise to the surface."

Hmmm. Another recent study showed that political conservatives were happier in general than political liberals.
Do I see a pattern here?...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The polarizing effect
Posted by: Andrew_S on Nov 20, 2008 10:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as Le neo grande global imperative calls for the fulfillment of the revelations. Nihilists and rapturites of a common theme enjoin together. Same book different world regions, different understanding. Ignorance as evidenced by the CFR educational report states US collective ignorance and indoctrination regarding the rest of the world constitutes a threat to national security. The legal and media systems of capitalizing on some pretty nifty marketing for the ardent consumer is nothing as compared to what is historically inevitable. We have the western idea that effeminately coercing the great collective will shield the obvious. We must not ever forget that the political will to deal with the management of human resources worldwide is about as intelligent as the method.
After all arresting population growth along with a smattering of covert decimation now and then is nothing as compared to the suffering dealt to those of other indigenous flavors. We need an open educated plan, not an elitist dictum of false flag skullduggery against the helpless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about "religiophobia" as religions have been the bane of
Posted by: thekidde on Nov 21, 2008 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
humanity since the beginning of time. My god's better than your god has been killing, enslaving, abusing humans since even before the brutal "Old Testament". It's time we all grew up and lost our delusions and valued our humanity without regard to power hungry, superstitious horse pucky.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]