Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Massive 'Homeland Defense' Joint Exercise Is Under Way

By Matthew Rothschild, The Progressive. Posted November 15, 2008.


Joint military exercise 'Vigilant Shield,' involving maritime, aerospace, ballistic missile defense is under way.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg


 

This week and into next, NorthCom and NORAD are conducting a joint exercise called “Vigilant Shield ’09.”

The focus will be on “homeland defense and civil support,” a NorthCom press release states.

From November 12-18, it will be testing a “synchronized response of federal, state, local and international partners in preparation for homeland defense, homeland security, and civil support missions in the United States and abroad.”

NorthCom is short for the Pentagon’s Northern Command. President Bush created it in October 2002. (The Southern Command, or SouthCom, covers Latin America. Central Command, or CentCom, covers Iraq and Afghanistan. And the new AfriCom covers, well, you get the picture.)

Vigilant Shield ’09 “will include scenarios to achieve exercise objectives within the maritime, aerospace, ballistic missile defense, cyber, consequence management, strategic communications, and counter terrorism domains,” the press release states.

NorthCom’s press release also says that other participants in the exercise include the U.S. Strategic Command’s “Global Lightning 09,” which is a plan to use nuclear weapons in a surprise attack.

The Pentagon’s “Bulwark Defender 09” is also involved in the exercise, and it is a cyberspace protection outfit of the Pentagon.

Something called the “Canada Command DETERMINED DRAGON” also is participating, as is the California National Guard and California’s “Golden Guardian.”

California’s involvement appears to center around planning for a catastrophic earthquake.

“Under the leadership of Governor Schwarzenegger and direction of his Office of Homeland Security, the nation’s largest state sponsored emergency exercise will take place November 13-18,” a press release from the governor’s office states.

“Golden Guardian 2008 tests California’s capability to respond and recover during a major catastrophic earthquake. The Golden Guardian 2008 full-scale exercise scenario focuses on a simulated, catastrophic 7.8 magnitude earthquake along the southern portion of the San Andreas Fault.”

NorthCom is being shy about giving out additional information about Vigilant Shield ’09. When I called for a fact sheet on it, I was told there was none.

But the Pentagon did issue such a fact sheet for Vigilant Shield ’08.

Last year’s exercise included “the simulated detonation of three nuclear dispersal devices.” The fact sheet stressed the need to support a “civilian-led response” and to “exercise defense support of civil authorities,” including involvement in “critical infrastructure protection events” and coordinating “Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection activities.”

That fact sheet ended by saying: “There will be minimal deployment of active duty forces and no crossborder deployments. We anticipate little to no direct impact on local communities.”

NorthCom has been in the news lately, after the Pentagon designated to it a battle-tested fighting unit from the war on Iraq. This appears to be against the law, according to the ACLU, since the army isn’t supposed to be patrolling our own country.

On top of that, NorthCom was up to its eyeballs in getting peace groups spied upon.

“The security people at USNORTHCOM . . . had begun noticing some trouble at a few military recruiting events in 2005,” Eric Lichtblau recounts in Bush’s Law: The Remaking of American Justice. “Military officials at NORTHCOM asked their counterparts at CIFA [the Pentagon’s Counterintelligence Field Activity] to ping their powerful new database -- do a broader study and find out how many episodes of violence and disruption were actually imperiling their recruiters."

And NorthCom even was in the loop at the Republican Convention in St. Paul.

Is it too much to ask Congress to look into NorthCom?

 

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: northcom, homeland defense

Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
......dont let the name fool you
Posted by: Anthhh on Nov 15, 2008 3:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's funny how they always play with the word "vigilance". I see it used a lot with these plays on words.

The "VIGILANCE" OF CIVILIANS is what they seek to SHIELD THEMSELVES from.

They HATE the vigilance of civilians. Our vigilance means they can't get away with doing whatever they want, when ever they want to.

They NEED to keep us as ignorant as possible. Without us knowing. At all costs (and they do have all costs) Especially in these times of their raging rampage of wanton rape and pillage of the planet. The ones with their hands pulling the strings are so completely bad, but look how the lowly troopers and underlings try to appear to be clueless of the wrongdoing against civilians.

(another example)
If you google "PPD PATCH" and you will find that the "providence police" department that uses a masthead with the depiction of a sword which is ACTUALLY STABBING through the word "SEMPER VIGILANS" (Ever vigilant).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

X pat observer
Posted by: davy on Nov 15, 2008 3:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keep em scared and spend spend spend that money. Wonder how much more damage will be reeked until January. The bailout ??? Ya, now there's another good one. Hoooeeee you yanks have bought the Brooklyn Bridge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I thought President Obama and more Democrats in Congress were elected to cut down funding on these
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 15, 2008 4:01 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
scumbags ! Oops, it's like we have another FUCKING Clinton/Blair clone ! I guess I should have been a racist and voted Nader instead of switching to Obama on the last fucking minute !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whats the point?
Posted by: 2thepoint on Nov 15, 2008 4:02 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is the ACLU drawn to issues that involve national security? How do these issues impact civil rights?

This is just the kind of coordinated response exercise that the nation needs. If a disaster had occurred and we, like on 9/11, had no coordinated response plan, the ACLU would be among the first to criticize the governments lack of preparation.

I also do not see the problem with trying to provide for the safety of military recruiters?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Whats the point? Posted by: Inlander
» RE: Whats the point? Posted by: 2thepoint
» It's called Posse Comitatus Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» usterroristnation Posted by: usterroristnation
..........DDWIs
Posted by: Anthhh on Nov 15, 2008 4:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..............

Are they shielding With vigilance or AGAINST vigilance..(namely OURS)? My guess is that it's against vigilance.

Those doofy Devil-worshipping Illumiinatis and thier play-on-word games.

.............................

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some more theorizing in case anyone was interested.
Posted by: Beagle17 on Nov 15, 2008 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is little in the news about this operation. Here is one thing that comes up in a Google News search, an opinion piece at OpEdNews by two guys who seem to know quite a lot of sh;t.

Bush's False Flag Finale

I'm sure most readers here are by now familiar with Naomi Wolf's theories on a standard 10-step process for converting democracies into police states. And Naomi Klein's shock doctrine theory. And Obama's promise of change, and the GOP's bizarre selection of Sarah Palin as a new star, who Naomi Wolf suggests will be the Evita figurine of the new police state.

And now, as if on cue, comes this preparedness training. Yes, it does make the skin crawl a bit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time for another false flag attack
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Nov 15, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
on 9/11 there were numerous wargames going on. Some of them involved flying planes into the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon.

On July 7 in London there were simulated attacks being run by the British government involving explosives at the very Sites that the real events occurred.

my simple point is beware when the government is running any wargames since they could be cover for another false flag attack.

I have many articles regarding this fake war on terror on my website which is www.911insidejob.net. I have a Google search function which will allow you to find whatever topic you wish on my website.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not Bush, but Obama Posted by: schiffer
"homeland" security
Posted by: luzmejor on Nov 15, 2008 8:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Homeland" was what the Nazis called their caging of the public's opinions too.

Of course the politicians who have been running America since Nixon's heyday are afraid they will be brought to justice for crimes against the people.

They are sissies who believe they can be slain by the way that Americans freely tell the truth about their so-called leaders.
We have been amply warned by their treatment of the legitimate press during the political conventions in both Denver and Minneapolis.

It is way past time to wake up and start ringing the fire bells! Our democracy is definitely in danger unless we hold our representatives accountable for what they are doing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Viogilant
Posted by: Archie1954 on Nov 15, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I especially liked the game dealing with a surprise nuclear attack but it wasn't clear if the US was launching the attack on some poor suckers or if it was an attack on the US. with Bush in the oval office I suspect the former. Also please at least let the president elect be sworn in before you start criticizing him for things done or not done. He doesn't even have his hands on the levers of power yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here we go again?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 15, 2008 9:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Homeland security, eh? Civil support, eh? Gee, I wonder if testing their "crowd cooker" microwave ray guns is part of their "civil support exercises?

Vigilant shield '09, eh? What part of '09 – the part that comes before January 20th, perhaps?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here we go again? Posted by: glorybe
stormy7
Posted by: STORMY78 on Nov 15, 2008 11:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what was going on when 911 happened. Is our government going to pull off another terrorist attack against this country so they can stay in power? They got away with it before.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Right....... Posted by: gellero1
I would pay attention to Stormy7 and all of the other spooky types about now.
Posted by: Nightstallion on Nov 16, 2008 1:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would no more give any portion of the officials of Homeland Security access to direct intelligence of the Radar Defense Net than I would hand Dr. Joseph Goebbles access to the Radio Communications Network of Europe in WWII. Shut down this Gestapo organization now before it has a chance to perpetrate another war scenario!

Write letters to President Elect Obama and tell him your fears and suspicions. You are a single person only one voice? True, but an avalanch is built of hundreds of billions of little snow flakes that by themselves are meaningless.

Enough voices heard and even Washington D.C. will shake.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Army of the people??? O/o
Posted by: stev90 on Nov 16, 2008 4:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The essence of our democracy is best expressed in these words: "Government of the people, by the people, for the people..."

If the Army is so afraid of the people, then this Army is not the Army of the people, in the same way that a government afraid of it's citizens is truly representative of it's own people.

It reinforces the idea that the Army merely exists to protect the interests of the rich, the elite and the powerful, who in turn make the rules.

The people are therefore reduced to obedient sheeple, obedient taxpayers and yes, only fit as slaves and cannon fodder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When will we
Posted by: willymack on Nov 16, 2008 11:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever trust our military, intelligence, judicial, legislatitive,and executive functions of government again? They certainly haven't done a whole lot to inspire confidence, let alone respect in the last eight years, now, have they? In my opinion, only a complete overhaul of all the above will accomplish any change for the better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: When will we . . . . . . Hmm. Posted by: Nightstallion
So, what else is new???
Posted by: marizara on Nov 17, 2008 5:24 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did anyone REALLY believe that Bush was going to leave quietly?? -- I have always thought he would be up to some more mischief before he gave up the position of "First Monkey". -- It would be out of character for him not to try, anyway. -- Think of how much damage he can do on his way out!!! -- Could be impressive!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sale By Owner
Posted by: britney1940 on Nov 20, 2008 8:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my opinion this is an interesting article through which i gathered a lot of information.
================
Britney
Sale By Owner

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement