Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rights and Liberties

"Dirty Bomb" Charges Dropped Against Gitmo Prisoner Binyam Mohamed

By Andy Worthington, AlterNet. Posted October 16, 2008.


Mohamed was brutally tortured after being rendered by the CIA to Morocco. "We're going to change your brain," one of his captors said.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The Washington Post recently reported that the U.S. Justice Department has dropped the key allegation against British resident and Guantánamo prisoner Binyam Mohamed -- that he was involved, with American citizen Jose Padilla, in a plot to detonate a "dirty bomb" in a U.S. city.

For over three years, Binyam's lawyers at Reprieve, the London-based legal action charity, have been arguing that the allegations against Binyam were extracted through the use of torture -- in Morocco, where Binyam was tortured for 18 months, after being rendered by the CIA, and at the CIA's own "Dark Prison," near Kabul, where he was held for four or five months from January 2004, before his transfer to the U.S. military prison at Bagram airbase, and his eventual arrival at Guantánamo in September 2004.

As Binyam explained to Reprieve's Director, Clive Stafford Smith, during the meetings at Guantánamo that first established what had happened to him after he was seized in Pakistan in April 2002, his torturers in Morocco insisted -- in spite of his protests that he had only recently converted to Islam and did not speak Arabic -- that he knew some of the big names in al-Qaeda:

Some of the time they said that some big people in al-Qaeda were talking about me. Some of the time they told me that the U.S. had a story they wanted from me and it was their job to get it. They talked about Jose Padilla and they said I was going to testify against him and big people. They named Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Abu Zubaydah and Ibn Sheikh al-Libi. I was meant to be working with these people, giving them ideas like the dirty bomb. It is hard to pin down the exact story, because what they wanted changed all the time. First in Morocco it changed, then when I was in the Dark Prison, then in Bagram and again in Guantánamo Bay.

Binyam explained that, between the savage beatings and the razor cuts to his penis, his torturers "would tell me what to say." He added that even towards the end of his time in Morocco, they were still "training me what to say," and one of them told him, "We're going to change your brain."

As it happens, one of the confessions that was tortured out of Binyam is so ludicrous that it was soon dropped, but not before Clive Stafford Smith had learnt of it and had been able to use it to demonstrate the extent to which it indicated that all of Binyam's "confessions" were untrustworthy. As he explained in his book The Eight O'Clock Ferry to the Windward Side, "[T]he U.S. authorities insisted that Padilla and Binyam had dinner with various high-up members of al-Qaeda the night before Padilla was to fly off to America. According to their theory the dinner party had to have been on the evening of April 3rd in Karachi … Binyam was meant to have dined with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Abu Zubaydah, Sheikh al-Libi, Ramzi bin al-Shibh and Jose Padilla." What made the scenario "absurd," as Stafford Smith pointed out, was that "two of the conspirators were already in U.S. custody at the time -- Abu Zubaydah was seized six days before, on 28 March 2002, and al-Libi had been held since November 2001."

Binyam's lawyers have long maintained that the charges against him would not stand up to independent scrutiny in a courtroom, and this is indeed what has happened. After June's ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court -- that the prisoners have constitutional habeas corpus rights (the right to ask a judge why they are being held) -- the District Court in Washington D.C. established a timeline for the government to submit factual returns stating their reasons for holding the prisoners.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: cia, khalid sheikh mohammed, jose padilla, al-qaeda, clive stafford smith, reprieve, the guantánamo files, guantánamo bay, binyam-mohamed, u.s. justice department, bagram airbase

Andy Worthington is a writer and historian, and author of The Guantánamo Files.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
usterroristnation
Posted by: usterroristnation on Oct 17, 2008 1:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So there we have it - something we all KNEW but were powerless to do anything about because "documents" held by the British and American terrorist governments have at all times been kept secret from the "justice" system and due process - and even when those documents are - surprisingly (given the record of injustices presided over by US courts)- ordered to be released into evidence, we see that they are being forged and manipulated to protect the torturers and the kidnappers - the parties that are the REAL terrorists in all of these operations. So, it is clear :

America = terrorist nation
US court and justice system = no justice
Terrorists = US operatives engaged by govrnmnt
Truth = lies and deception
Corruption = entire bush administration
Democracy = Patriot Acts, HSPD 20 and NSPD 51

America .... the land of the free, the land of the brave, the land of truth and justice and equality for all men.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: usterroristnation Posted by: weathered
"Dirty Bomb" Charges Dropped Against Gitmo Prisoner Binyam Mohamed
Posted by: cafwriter on Oct 22, 2008 5:33 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In his story headlined "Dirty Bomb" Charges Dropped Against Gitmo Prisoner Binyam Mohamed, reporter Andy Worthington begins with the lede: "Mohamed was brutally tortured after being rendered by the CIA to Morocco. "We're going to change your brain," one of his captors said.

Is there any known way of torturing someone other than "brutally"? Why do reporters always describe acts of barbarism, including murder and rape, as "brutal"? Is there any necessity for including such a hyperbolic adjective?

Why turn this sort of story into something yellow or purple?

CA Frazier

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MEANWHILE, Americans cluster together & shriek about WHO IS AMERICAN
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Oct 22, 2008 8:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
& what it means to 'be a REAL American'.

Hey, here's a thought: MAYBE Americans don't get to DECIDE what portions of their nation's behaviours constitute, 'being American'.

MAYBE, because you go on & on & on about being a 'democracy' ... but the first time they see something that puts them in a bad light? "oh THAT doesn't count, because I didn't do it myself that really doesn't cut the mustard test.

the activities done BY THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT define 'what is American'.

Honestly, just because AMERICANS don't like knowing about what is done IN EVERY OTHER NATION ON EARTH to fuck over non-Americans... 'for the American Interests'... or 'for our own good'...

DOESN'T MEAN IT THOSE ACTIONS do NOT define 'being American'.

In fact, for Americans to declare 'who is American' is simply a joke.

Let's be honest, American is what AMERICA DOES.

In fact, just because liberal Americans CHOSE NOT TO KNOW or PREVENT the activities of the DEA, CIA & WHINSEC... doesn't make it 'un-American'.

It simply makes it the 'American Activities' you choose to not know or care about.

Who is American? ...honestly? who fucking cares? Sarah Palin be damned. Progressive 'liberal' Americans can whinge on about 'who is American', "REAL Americans, or being 'unAmerican'.

But that is simply arguing a moving target on the Republican's turf. That's just childish & ridiculous.

The real question is what are ETHICAL BEHAVIOURS... & those most able to answer the result of ethical behaviours -is not Americans- but the billions of non-Americans who have to put up with 'those Activities in the American Interest'.


IT AIN'T PRETTY, but is is JUST THAT WAY: you can't say unilaterally declare your 'philosophical approach'; but, decline to notice that your activities on 'The Others' or sub-human 'non-Americans are simply horrific.

You're paying the bill. You're hiring the Staff.
That is who you are. Period.

You ARE what you DO: its not all in your head.
- bombs
- coups
- illegal testing & experimenting on civilians
- wiretapping
- torture
- drug-running government agencies
- biological weaponry
- 'non-lethal' pain compliance toys to subdue 'domestic unrest'
- Balkanization
- black op military actions in 'undeclared conflicts'
- supporting viciously brutal dictators
- assassinating foreign union organizers
- nuclear bomb testing
- massive pollution
- undermining Global banking & investment stability through deregulation that permitted massive fraud...

seriously: THEY WERE TORTURING A MAN BY SLICING HIS COCK WITH RAZORS.

Think about that the next time you're off to make a puddle somewhere: because NON-AMERICANS will certainly remember what they've read about these & other abusees.

Trust me: we're not stupid, you just don't notice that we have long memories...

Spread Love, not corporate dependence...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
~~~
"... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice..." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
"Violence can only be concealed by a Lie, & the Lie can only be maintained by Violence." ... "Any man, who has once proclaimed Violence as his Method, is inevitably forced to take the Lie as his Principle" – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re
Posted by: zombo08 on Nov 3, 2008 9:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]