CIVIL LIBERTIES  
comments_image -

Why Are Convicted Felons in Battleground States Being Told They Can't Vote?

In states like Pennsylvania, misinformation by public officials could lead thousands of eligible voters to stay home on November 4th.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

At the end of the summer, in the wake of the presidential primaries, the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania began receiving some alarming phone calls.

According to the callers, county probation and parole officers had been telling some of their clients that as convicted felons they had lost their right to vote. In some cases, the ACLU contends, officers even threatened former offenders with a parole violation if they registered.

The boldness of the apparent intimidation tactic on the part of criminal justice officials is underscored by the fact that the claim simply isn't true. Under Pennsylvania law, felons who have been released from prison -- or who will be freed by the time of the election -- are indeed eligible to register and vote, and, unlike some other states where there is a waiting period, voting rights in the Commonwealth are automatically restored upon release.

Reached for comment, Witold Walczak, legal director for the ACLU of Pennsylvania, said that although he doesn't believe the errors were made out of malice, the fact that they were made at all is indicative of a statewide systemic breakdown.

"Pennsylvania law is clear about ex-felons' right to vote, and parole and probation officials need to be equally clear in giving people accurate information about this important right," Walczak said.

It's been more than eight years since the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down a five-year waiting period from the time of release before ex-felons could vote, yet the ACLU says a number of voter informational Web sites still state that former offenders must wait five years before they can register to vote.

Unfortunately, what happened in Pennsylvania may not be an isolated case. The Commonwealth is just one of several so-called "battleground" states that have changed their laws on felon voting since the 2000 presidential election, and experts say as the November general election approaches, confusion reigns. As a result, voting rights groups say that thousands of eligible voters around the country may be getting the wrong information about whether they can or can't vote this year.

State laws prohibiting convicted felons from voting have been around for more than a hundred years and have only recently begun to be repealed. Critics have long blasted the laws as being unfairly skewed to disenfranchise minority and low-income voters. What's more, it's widely known that felon voting laws have been used in partisan efforts to disenfranchise eligible voters.

In the 2000 presidential election, for instance, thousands of mostly Black voters were purged from election rolls in Florida after being wrongly identified as ex-felons. Writing for The Nation on the eve of the 2004 presidential election, investigative journalist Greg Palast, who had broken the Florida story four years earlier, concluded: "If you're Black, voting in America is a game of chance."

Despite the movement to reform felon voting laws, the Sentencing Project reports there are still an estimated 5.3 million Americans -- or one in 41 adults -- that have currently or permanently lost their voting rights as a result of a felony conviction. Minorities are especially impacted.

"As a result of the high proportion of minorities in the criminal justice system, felony voting restrictions have had a very disproportionate racial impact," said Marc Mauer, executive director of the Sentencing Project.

The group says as many as 1.4 million African American men, or 13 percent of all Black men, are disenfranchised - a rate seven times the national average. Given the current rates of incarceration among Black men, three in ten of the next generation of African American males can expect to be disenfranchised at some point in their lives.

According to Erika Wood, deputy director of the Democracy Program at New York University Law School's Brennan Center for Justice, since 1997, 16 states have reformed their laws to re-enfranchise ex-felons or ease the voting rights restoration process. Most notably, last year, Charlie Crist, the Republican Governor of Florida -- a state that had been known for some of the strictest felon voting laws -- issued new clemency rules ending that state's policy of permanent disenfranchisement for convicted felons.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | Washington Monthly

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]