COMMENTS: 299
Thousands of Troops Are Deployed on U.S. Streets Ready to Carry Out "Crowd Control"
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email.
George Bush struck down Posse Comitatus, thus making it legal for military to patrol the U.S. He has also legally established that in the "War on Terror," the U.S. is at war around the globe and thus the whole world is a battlefield. Thus the U.S. is also a battlefield.
He also led change to the 1807 Insurrection Act to give him far broader powers in the event of a loosely defined "insurrection" or many other "conditions" he has the power to identify. The Constitution allows the suspension of habeas corpus -- habeas corpus prevents us from being seized by the state and held without trial -- in the event of an "insurrection." With his own army force now, his power to call a group of protesters or angry voters "insurgents" staging an "insurrection" is strengthened.
U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman of California said to Congress, captured on C-Span and viewable on YouTube, that individual members of the House were threatened with martial law within a week if they did not pass the bailout bill:
"The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and sustaining a panic atmosphere. … Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against this bill on Monday that the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points the first day and a couple of thousand on the second day, and a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted no."If this is true and Rep. Sherman is not delusional, I ask you to consider that if they are willing to threaten martial law now, it is foolish to assume they will never use that threat again. It is also foolish to trust in an orderly election process to resolve this threat. And why deploy the First Brigade? One thing the deployment accomplishes is to put teeth into such a threat.
I interviewed Vietnam veteran, retired U.S. Air Force Colonel and patriot David Antoon for clarification:
"If the President directed the First Brigade to arrest Congress, what could stop him?"
"Nothing. Their only recourse is to cut off funding. The Congress would be at the mercy of military leaders to go to them and ask them not to obey illegal orders."
"But these orders are now legal?'"
"Correct."
"If the President directs the First Brigade to arrest a bunch of voters, what would stop him?"
"Nothing. It would end up in courts but the action would have been taken."
"If the President directs the First Brigade to kill civilians, what would stop him?"
"Nothing."
"What would prevent him from sending the First Brigade to arrest the editor of the Washington Post?"
"Nothing. He could do what he did in Iraq -- send a tank down a street in Washington and fire a shell into the Washington Post as they did into Al Jazeera, and claim they were firing at something else."
"What happens to members of the First Brigade who refuse to take up arms against U.S. citizens?"
"They'd probably be treated as deserters as in Iraq: arrested, detained and facing five years in prison. In Iraq a study by Ann Wright shows that deserters -- reservists who refused to go back to Iraq -- got longer sentences than war criminals."
"Does Congress have any military of their own?"
"No. Congress has no direct control of any military units. The Governors have the National Guard but they report to the President in an emergency that he declares."
"Who can arrest the President?"
"The Attorney General can arrest the President after he leaves or after impeachment."
[Note: Prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi has asserted it is possible for District Attorneys around the country to charge President Bush with murder if they represent districts where one or more military members who have been killed in Iraq formerly resided.]
"Given the danger do you advocate impeachment?"
"Yes. President Bush struck down Posse Comitatus -- which has prevented, with a penalty of two years in prison, U.S. leaders since after the Civil War from sending military forces into our streets -- with a 'signing statement.' He should be impeached immediately in a bipartisan process to prevent the use of military forces and mercenary forces against U.S. citizens"
"Should Americans call on senior leaders in the Military to break publicly with this action and call on their own men and women to disobey these orders?"
"Every senior military officer's loyalty should ultimately be to the Constitution. Every officer should publicly break with any illegal order, even from the President."
"But if these are now legal. If they say, 'Don't obey the Commander in Chief,' what happens to the military?"
"Perhaps they would be arrested and prosecuted as those who refuse to participate in the current illegal war. That's what would be considered a coup."
"But it's a coup already."
"Yes."
Stay up to date with the latest Civil Liberties headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Oct 8, 2008 12:57 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Mindless drivel-kill obama
Posted by: compu
» RE: Mindless drivel
Posted by: kegbot1
» Senator Warner killed Posse Comitiatus and betrayed America and his beloved Virginia..!
Posted by: TJColatrella
» The troop level is too small to accomplish anything anyway!
Posted by: La Hedonista
» RE: The troop level is too small to accomplish anything anyway!
Posted by: Taylor Siluwe
» RE: The troop level is too small to accomplish anything anyway!
Posted by: donl51
» RE: The troop level is too small to accomplish anything anyway!
Posted by: peacefullaim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Oct 8, 2008 1:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Great Depression was caused by private owners and riggers of a private Fascist bank labeled the "Federal Reserve" Corp (not "federal" and minis ZERO "reserves") as Fed chair Bernanke admitted:
“I would like to say to Milton and Anna: Regarding the Great Depression. You're right, we did it. We're very sorry. But thanks to you, we won't do it again.”
Federal Reserve Governor Ben Bernanke (Conference to Honor Milton Friedman, University of Chicago 2002)
“The Federal Reserve [Corporation] definitely caused the great depression by contracting the amount of currency in circulation by one-third from 1929 to 1933.”
MILTON FRIEDMAN (conservative Nobel Laureate economist speaking on NPR. Quote 1996)
Well guess what? They HAVE done again. And in spades. The current crash is the outcome of allowing a parasite Organized Monopoly Corporate Crime State to rule over the nation for 100 years. This the serial monster that makes a killing joke of false "democracy" and "capitalism" worldwide.
The ramifications are not just economic but measured in mass murder genocide of sham 9/11 "war on terror" of a thousand lies .
The private "Federal Reserve" sham basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money to private “FED” banks. The “FED” creates money out of thin air, then loans it back to the government [ i.e. the people ] charging interest. The government levies income taxes to pay the interest on the debt.
This core truth is not something you will hear on any campaign trail where both "candidates" are merely actors for Organized Corporate Crime at a Washington-MSM circus.
Again, once you control money, you own all that matters including government, military-industry, and of course, the media and "education".
The coup occurred in 1913. Until it is reversed, the world will sink into further moral and mortal terror at the hands of a Fascist ruling class that owns and rigs the system at public cost for private profit. It's that simple and that complex.
“I believe that [private cartel] banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the [cartel] banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the [private cartel] banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”
PRESIDENT THOMAS JEFFERSON (a founder of America. In a letter to the Secretary of Treasury Albert Gallatin, 1802. Published 1809
“Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They are not…The sack of the United States by the Fed is the greatest crime in history…The truth is the Fed has usurped the government. It controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.”
CONGRESSMAN LOUIS T. MCFADDEN (Chairman, House Banking & Currency Committee. June 1932)
“This [Federal Reserve] Act establishes the most gigantic trust [private monopoly] on earth. When the president [Wilson] signs this bill, the invisible government of the money power will be legalized… The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill.”
CONGRESSMAN CHARLES A. LINDBERG SR. (on the privately owned “Federal Reserve” Corp monopoly. 12/ 23/ 1913)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: chuckjs
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Ayuh!
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: aonghus36
» Thomas Jefferson was remarkable
Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Ayuh!
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: dmaciewski
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Quannah
» Central Banks?
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Central Banks?
Posted by: Spot
» RE: Central Banks?
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Central Banks?
Posted by: deltadancer
» RE: Central Banks?
Posted by: Scientz
» i call bullshit on you.
Posted by: Spot
» Call it what you'd like, you're wrong.
Posted by: Scientz
» Central Banks are essentially OWNED by private corporate crime - you call that "independent"?
Posted by: PointMan
» I'm not even going to dignify that . . .
Posted by: Scientz
» "dignify" this...
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: "dignify" this...
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: "dignify" this...
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: "dignify" this...
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: "dignify" this...
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: "dignify" this...
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: "dignify" this...
Posted by: PointMan
» More of the expected from a message board thug . . .
Posted by: Scientz
» Chesty McCool gets self-image ruffled... (he doth protest too much)
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: Central Banks?
Posted by: Pooty T
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: thealltheone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: huricane on Oct 8, 2008 1:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: go back, read it again
Posted by: CosmoViking
» RE: go back, read it again
Posted by: helenwheels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: usterroristnation on Oct 8, 2008 2:53 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» So you mean the UFSA right?
Posted by: chuckjs
» RE: So you mean the UFSA right?
Posted by: StillStanding
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 8, 2008 3:05 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And to think, nearly a third of this country are so rib-ticklingly stupid, they actually believe that sending this idiot to the White House was a good idea. Come to think about it, I don't have to be a member of the House to deliver the message:
FUCK YOU, GEORGE.
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
Character and Distrations
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» FUCK YOU, BUSH, CHENEY, ROVE, et al.
Posted by: socialpsych
» RE: FUCK YOU, BUSH, CHENEY, ROVE, et al.
Posted by: CosmoViking
» RE: FUCK YOU, BUSH, CHENEY, ROVE, et al.
Posted by: kungfuma
» RE: "Message to George W. Bush: FUCK YOU!"
Posted by: Krain61
» RE:Eric Idle Rules!
Posted by: Shehova
» RE: ric Idle Rules!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: ric Idle Rules!
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: "Message to George W. Bush: FUCK YOU!"
Posted by: AuntBec
» RE: "Message to George W. Bush: FUCK YOU!"
Posted by: Tom Degan
» Thankyou Tom,my sentiments exactly!....Fuck you BUSH!!
Posted by: donl51
» From now on...
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Direct Democracy on Oct 8, 2008 3:09 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FREE AMERICA
REVOLUTION
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: Romantic Violence
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: Boatboy
» Asymmetric warfare
Posted by: andabottleof_rum
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: Rod
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: Krain61
» WoooHooo It's the Wild West
Posted by: eeezzz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Don Quixote on Oct 8, 2008 3:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: US troops for Crowd Control
Posted by: CosmoViking
» RE: US troops for Crowd Control
Posted by: Erin
» Ahhh - that actually took place about 25 years ago
Posted by: eeezzz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: agape on Oct 8, 2008 3:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "Renazican"
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: "Renazican"
Posted by: agape
» RE: "Renazican"
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Agape
Posted by: badkitty68
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FMABBI on Oct 8, 2008 4:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must demand that impeachment proceedings begin - even now with less than a month before the election - in order to deflate the power of Bush/ Cheney to insure that the next administration actually arrives at the white house.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: FMAinMass
Posted by: Rainstorm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whathaway on Oct 8, 2008 4:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we are all aware that Bush & Co has consolidated power in the executive branch and this of course is dangerous and could be seen as a coup of sorts. A more frightening possibility is it could even be that indeed our republic is already gone and while we sit this morning sipping our coffee and typing our little opinions it is all really gone.
What have we done...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: hmmm
Posted by: SufiLizard
» RE: hmmm
Posted by: tRANIS
» thanks...
Posted by: whathaway
» RE: see redstateupdate.net
Posted by: particle61
» RE: see redstateupdate.net
Posted by: whathaway
» RE: hmmm
Posted by: helenwheels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SufiLizard on Oct 8, 2008 4:23 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What are we going to do Nov. 5 if the worst happens? Knowing that massive protests will be dealt with by the U.S. Military?
Violence is clearly not the answer. It wouldn't be effective anyway.
However if Americans take to the streets everywhere, one Army division can't be everywhere at once. We need to plan mass rallies right outside the doors of local TV and Radio stations in every community in America so they CAN'T ignore us.
The situation is dire and our country needs us to act. First by trying to win this election, but if they steal it we need to be prepared to counter martial law.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Truly Frightening!!!!
Posted by: agape
» RE: Truly Frightening!!!!
Posted by: praedor
» RE: Truly Frightening!!!!
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Truly Frightening!!!!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» Try winning this election! Like the last two???
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Truly Frightening!!!! - and the gun lobby exposed
Posted by: Julian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: When In Doubt on Oct 8, 2008 4:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democracynow.org
and take a look at the RNC St paul event during their convention when Amy Goodman and two of her producers were arrested by a police force looking like they were from a sci -fi film...or like nazi Germany in the 1930's
I watched hours of that on tv
I knew then that fascism is here and now.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: When in Doubt
Posted by: helenwheels
» That stuff has been going on for 100 years
Posted by: eeezzz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bryangalt on Oct 8, 2008 5:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am deeply disturbed that we would even have to consider such an option, but fellow citizens, we cannot allow ourselves to be pushed into a corner so that secret armies can wonder the country and arrest us, jail us, kill us. THIS IS OUR COUNTRY, NOT THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH'S COUNTRY.
I can only wonder if the military would be so willing to dishonor their oath to defend the Constitution.
Republicans: you no longer have the right to ever say how much you love this country or it's people you hypocritical bastards. You should all be ashamed of yourselves for allowing us to reach this crossroad to hell.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: THE SHOT HEARD 'ROUND THE WORLD
Posted by: AlienSlave
» I can only wonder if the military would be so willing to dishonor their oath to defend the Constitut
Posted by: robert.noll
» RE: Military oath has changed
Posted by: Hachino
» RE: Military oath has changed
Posted by: kegbot1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: volscho on Oct 8, 2008 5:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On October 1, 2008, the DHS spy satellite program went into effect.
On October 1, 2008, the Brigade started its "mission"
Military personnel just received a 3.9% pay raise.
Roughly a year ago b/w October 15th-20th 2007, NorthCom participated in a 5-day long "martial law exercise"
One of the non-lethal weapons they will have "containerized" may be the ADS or Silent Guardian (manufactured by Raytheon).
Bush has issued the signing statement as Naomi Wolf reports. She may right on target. They may never let Obama be president.
What might they do? Stage rioting in "battleground states" and then send in the militia and then perform "recounts" that favor McCain.
Wolf also stated that at age 72 and with his history of melanoma, McCain may have 2-4 years life expectancy. Then what? Sarah Palin?
Troubling times indeed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Concerned Citizen
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: volscho on Oct 8, 2008 5:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Oct 8, 2008 5:47 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In November, kick out this Party.
Vote in SANITY, INTELLIGENCE and REASON.
Vote Obam/Biden '08
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How to End this BS
Posted by: agape
» How to Perpetuate this BS:
Posted by: leafsong1
» RIGHT - Your brilliance isn't working :.?
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: IGHT - Your brilliance isn't working :.?
Posted by: leafsong1
» Lookit, don't wait for me - get your gun and get out there!
Posted by: stellabloo
» US is revolution proof
Posted by: Tom Tele
» RE: How to End this BS
Posted by: michael1972
» RE: How to End this BS
Posted by: helenwheels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Oct 8, 2008 5:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Naomi sees the "writing on the wall" regarding the fascist takeover of this country. The bailout bill has a provision giving $100 billion to George Bush to use as he wishes. This bail-out Bill was pushed through Congress with threats of martial law if it was not passed. It was pushed through Congress just like the Patriot Act was pushed through Congress. Fear was the driving force. Fear is used by dictators to take control.
A military brigade from Iraq is being deployed on United States soil now to keep the peace. The Posse Comitatus Act, which forbade the deployment of military troops in this country to enforce the law, was thrown out by the Patriot Act. In 2006, when the Congress was taken back by the Democrats, the Democrats actually did something and reinstated this act. George Bush instead of vetoing it just signed another of his many " Signing Statements" Which Said That He Would Not Be Bound by This Reinstatement of the Posse Comitatus Act.
Prisons have been built across the country over the last several years by a subsidiary of Halliburton. Journalists were arrested at the Republican national convention. The Electronic Voting Machines Are in Place to Hack Another Election. The mainstream media is completely owned by five multi-national companies. The monetary policy of this country is controlled by international private central bankers which includes the Federal Reserve Bank and the Bank of England.
George Bush must be arrested for treason before it is too late.
Watch Naomi Wolf talk about the fascist take-over being in its “end game” stage.
Sincerely,
Joe,Webmaster, www.911insidejob.net
E-Mail:911insidejob@bushstole04.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Fascist Take-over End Game
Posted by: luzmejor
» Please just tell me, where are these prisons?
Posted by: eeezzz
» RE: Please just tell me, where are these prisons?
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Please just tell me, where are these prisons?
Posted by: badkitty68
» RE: Please just tell me, where are these prisons?
Posted by: Plexius2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mr. J on Oct 8, 2008 6:51 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: They can't stop us.
Posted by: scarlettm512
» RE: They can't stop us.
Posted by: peacefullaim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Maxemum on Oct 8, 2008 6:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a really good watch regarding the creation of the federal reserve and the tax-amendment that was never ratified there is a movie out there called Freedom to Fascism. This documentary was filmed by Aaron Russo before his death. The very same guy that brought us the lethal weapon movies. Unfortunately, the address is far to long for this site to accept. I would suggest typing in "From Freedom to Fascism" in your browser windows and viewing the whole thing. It's time for all of us to educate ourselves quickly.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There are those constitutional loving patriotic americans...
Posted by: alicelillie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Oct 8, 2008 6:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jiff
Whats hiding on your PC?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: alicelillie on Oct 8, 2008 7:03 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our founders, whatever else you think of them, were determined to add the Bill of Rights to the Constitution precisely because of situations like the one we are now in.
If the government gets out of line, it is not only our *right* but it is our *duty* to get it back in line, no matter what we have to do to achieve that.
And, they said, if all else fails and we absolutely have to use force, then we have to. And, this is reason number one why the citizenry needs to be armed. It is not pleasant to think about.
The number two reason is the fact that during chaos, some will stoop to the level of crime, and defense against that is called for too.
I just hope that we can change things in a peaceful, orderly way. Many view the upcoming election as a way to change. I personally don't as I am a Ron Paul supporter who plans to vote for Bob Barr, and I know full well he won't win. It is a matter of principle.
And, some view demonstrations and shouting out as a way to change. Maybe. Hopefully.
But, what if push comes to shove and someone is at your door saying, come along, you're going to a camp, and each family member is going to a different place?
Will you say "Yassir, yasssir, we go nicely, Boss" or will you be able to say, "No way, Jose" and make it stick?
It probably won't be that overt, but preparedness is key.
See my blog at http://www.alicelillieandher.blogspot.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Actually, you're gonna have to get past the guns and stand up to bad policies.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: YOU ON THE LEFT HAD BETTER RE-THINK GUN RIGHTS!!
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: YOU ON THE LEFT HAD BETTER RE-THINK GUN RIGHTS!!
Posted by: agape
» RE: YOU ON THE LEFT HAD BETTER RE-THINK GUN RIGHTS!!
Posted by: Malamute
» RE: YOU ON THE LEFT HAD BETTER RE-THINK GUN RIGHTS!!
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: YOU ON THE LEFT HAD BETTER RE-THINK GUN RIGHTS!!
Posted by: Malamute
» If the left thinks this thing is going away without a frontline, they are dreaming.
Posted by: yale
» RE: YOU ON THE LEFT HAD BETTER RE-THINK GUN RIGHTS!!
Posted by: badkitty68
» I HAVE HAD IT WITH THIS GUNS-RIGHTS BS!
Posted by: djnoll
» RE: I HAVE HAD IT WITH THIS GUNS-RIGHTS BS!
Posted by: yale
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kungfuma on Oct 8, 2008 7:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PrinceRobert on Oct 8, 2008 7:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Prince Robert
Posted by: helenwheels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Oct 8, 2008 7:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sarah Palin, Crowds, Brave New World
Posted by: cori
» Obama brought it on himself
Posted by: eeezzz
» Palin is a Pathological Liar
Posted by: munchkinpup
» RE: Obama brought it on himself
Posted by: helenahanbasquet
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PrinceRobert on Oct 8, 2008 7:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I'm at it, though, I have to say that Naomi Wolf is putting herself in extreme danger in the most courageous way possible. She needs our help. Her call for action is the most urgent call you will ever hear in your lifetime. Google her name and get involved in what she is doing. The internet is NOT organizing and it is NOT action. Start by getting the movie: "The End of America" from IndiePix Films. Have house "parties" to watch it and discuss what to do next. You'll think of something. Time is VERY short ! !
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Prince Robert
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Prince Robert
Posted by: Dboy
» She's a freakin fear -inciting loon
Posted by: eeezzz
» You are a snooze-inducing ... loon
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: She's a freakin fear -inciting loon
Posted by: helenahanbasquet
Comments are closed-
Posted by: furious genius on Oct 8, 2008 8:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Truth, Wisdom, and Cooperation will save the day
Posted by: SevenStarHand
» RE: Power in numbers
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Purple Girl on Oct 8, 2008 8:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paulson basically confessed to Treasonous acts with forethought and malice with that 2 1/2 page Ultimatium!
This Economic melt down has been on course since the '80's- ya think it's a coincidence McCain is smack Dab in the middle of this one too...Keating to Phil Gramm, Mac never stopped his sell off of his Senate Seat to Corrupt Banking and Big Oil (Gramm ties the Two neatly in a lil' package...Media should finally Put a Bow on this Gift and hand it to the masses!)
Reason Obama did Not get any real flack from the Public about 'clinging to Guns and Religion' because WE KNOW those are the ONLY TWO rights and Freedoms They have yet to Pry out of our hands!!
Having Been a avid anti Gun advocate most my life, this Adminsitration has given me a new Respect for the 2nd Amendmment. I have no intentions of being left with a Pitchfolk in my hand if Cheneycorp Tries 'martial law' ie A Hostile Takeover by Domestic enemies!
I far more admire the Image of 'Sarah Connors' in T2 with the Pump action Shotgun then Sarah Palin in Pumps and a Plane shooting wolves. Shit Granny from the Beverly Hillbilly's is a better archetype for that matter!Funny I don't recall Either Wearing Lipstick.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Religion is a deception, not a freedom...
Posted by: SevenStarHand
» RE: eligion is a deception, not a freedom...
Posted by: Dboy
» Religion is the opposite of God :.?
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: eligion is the opposite of God :.?
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: covalentbonded on Oct 8, 2008 8:19 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It's been nice
Posted by: Dboy
» Oh, please
Posted by: eeezzz
» RE: Oh, please
Posted by: badkitty68
» U Got IT! Halloween.......It's the perfect time to engage the RESISTANCE!
Posted by: common intelligence
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Oct 8, 2008 8:58 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice...
The people in the military and intelligence services are none too happy now and when all money fails, I wouldn't want to be a financial or political leader who tries to force them to do what they already know it wrong.
There is hope...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: asier said than done...
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: asier said than done...
Posted by: Shehova
» RE: asier said than done...
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: asier said than done...
Posted by: Dboy
» Maybe they gave all the troops lobotomies, or drugs!
Posted by: eeezzz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Shama on Oct 8, 2008 9:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Maybe it's the election
Posted by: JSquercia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: meria on Oct 8, 2008 9:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is nothing new. Since George Washington troops have been assembled to attack American patriots.
Wake up America- we've been in a huge propaganda experiment for decades......
break the spell, tune in to real media at www.Meria.net
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Old News
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: grkjr on Oct 8, 2008 9:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Like you're helping?
Posted by: stellabloo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 8, 2008 9:28 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Pure conspiracy theory BULLSHIT. Congress always pandered to the monied elites.
Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» RE: Pure conspiracy theory BULLSHIT. Congress always pandered to the monied elites.
Posted by: cdub
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sailor50 on Oct 8, 2008 9:48 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're 2nding what I said in 2003. LET"S DO IT!
Posted by: common intelligence
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oregoncharles on Oct 8, 2008 10:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to reach those people. They're probably just glad to be home; but what will they do if ordered to open fire on Americans? We need to get them thinking about that. Soldiers are trained to follow orders on reflex. Only prior thought could prevent that.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bobsays on Oct 8, 2008 10:23 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today's citizens have been so pampered, they are probably wearing Pampers. Most people have not felt any ill effects from this conflict. And most never will. Calling the US a fascist state is taking it too far.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Mindless, ahistorical hysteria
Posted by: praedor
» Thank you, Bob
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Thank you, Bob
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: Mindless, ahistorical hysteria
Posted by: cdub
» RE: Mindless, ahistorical hysteria
Posted by: grkjr
» Thank you for the voice of calm and reason!
Posted by: eeezzz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ava1984 on Oct 8, 2008 10:45 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The vast majority of 'we the people' would appreciate it greatly if more of our ELECTED (?) representatives would speak up and defy their corrupt, complicit leadership!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ava1984 on Oct 8, 2008 10:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The vast majority of 'we the people' would appreciate it greatly if more of our ELECTED (?) representatives would speak up and defy their corrupt, complicit leadership!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Reader11722 on Oct 8, 2008 11:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They violate the 1st Amendment by opening mail, caging demonstrators and banning books like America Deceived (book) from Amazon, Wikipedia and Facebook.
They violate the 2nd Amendment by confiscating guns during Katrina.
They violate the 4th Amendment by conducting warrant-less wiretaps.
They violate the 5th and 6th Amendment by suspending habeas corpus.
They violate the 8th Amendment by torturing at Gitmo.
They violate the entire Constitution by starting illegal wars without declaration.
Impeach them all (both parties) and save this great country.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: U.S. Constitution, R.I.P.
Posted by: leafsong1
» Impeachment
Posted by: Dboy
» The book is not banned from Amazon
Posted by: Ignatz deFyre
» RE: U.S. Constitution, R.I.P.
Posted by: RStorm49
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Godfather89 on Oct 8, 2008 11:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
- Riot, against critical military checkpoints.
- Revolt, against those who think freedom is bad.
- Protest, against all un-constitutional laws and martial law.
- DO NOT Destroy buildings. Get the people who own them, the ones who are supposed to represent the people and do the will of the people.
We the people tried to be nice, now we are revolting because, we know what they are up to. ORGANIZE The MILITIAS Now!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Their Goes The Neighborhood!
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: judette on Oct 8, 2008 12:51 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: judesedit
Posted by: Dboy
» Bush cannot be impeached no matter what, ever
Posted by: eeezzz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dboy on Oct 8, 2008 1:22 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most likely they would use APC's (armored personnel carriers) not tanks. Tanks tear up streets and roadways, and carry minimal personnel. However they would be good for psychological purposes. Nobody should be surprised about this, but of course they are. And this is what they are doing NOW. What will they do after Obama strips the second amendment away? The second amendment is NOT about access to hunting rifles! It's about decentralizing military power to serve as a check/balance against tyranny. Fool democrats will not understand this until they find themselves at their knees with a military rifle muzzle at the back of their heads.
dboy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Tanks
Posted by: cdub
» RE: Rifle Vs. Tanks or APC's? Yeah, right.
Posted by: QuestionAuthority
» RE: ifle Vs. Tanks or APC's? Yeah, right.
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Passacaglia on Oct 8, 2008 1:55 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Oct 8, 2008 2:01 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, and yeah. If you're confronted by a bunch of dangerous, rioting sh_theads, you file up two or three deep behind barricades and yell, "Back, Back, Back" while slowly advancing forwards to disperse the mob before they hurt themselves or others, at your civilian leaderships request.
You people amaze me. Get a clue. "Deployed + trained to line up and yell 'Back'" does not equal "Citizen, LAY DOWN" at every corner, no matter how your overly delusional mind would like it to.
What fantastic horse crap!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The forums . . .
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: What ditzy drivel.
Posted by: kegbot1
» Define "dangerous rioting sh_theads"?
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding!
Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding!
Posted by: badkitty68
» Exactly . . .
Posted by: Scientz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fetchcat on Oct 8, 2008 2:04 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Guns and gardens
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Xynyx on Oct 8, 2008 2:29 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the question we should have been asking for quite some time now.
It is very clear that anyone who would adopt the measures that Bush has been promoting clearly hates America.
It's funny that it would come down to that. Sort of like how one commonly accuses others of one's own sins or shortcomings, we now see that it is the Republicans that have hated America so much as to destroy its foundations.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why do Republicans Hate America?
Posted by: yale
» RE: Why Do Republicans Say They Love America But Hate Americans?
Posted by: ranchero42
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fetchcat on Oct 8, 2008 3:04 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another scary thing I've just heard from a friend in diplomatic circles is that American attaches/press are being pulled out of Iran. Has anyone else heard this? Could a bombing mission there be the October surprise that will indefinitely postpone the election?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Expect the surprise from Putin doing business with central and South Am.
Posted by: common intelligence
» You didn't get enough of surprise in September?
Posted by: stellabloo
» Internet
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ignatz deFyre on Oct 8, 2008 3:30 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously no society is immune, as this is happening in the USA today, and the citizenry is the proverbial frog in the pot being brought to the boil.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I used to wonder
Posted by: Malamute
» RE: I used to wonder
Posted by: Xynyx
» Stanley Milgram, anyone?
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: Stanley Milgram, anyone?
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tkress7 on Oct 8, 2008 3:54 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blogbooks on Oct 8, 2008 4:04 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, the government does.
Therefore, if the president issues an order that is unlawful, it is simply a matter of changing the laws to make them lawful.
Everything the Nazis did was lawful. Making it illegal for Jews to own property was lawful. Slavery was lawful. The purges in Russia were lawful. Dropping atomic weapons on Japan was lawful.
4,000 battle hardened killers just arrived on U.S. soil to perform "crowd control." Oh they'll control you all right, with a 50 caliber bullet to the brain.
This is an ominous sign of things to come. This isn't just Unabomber and nutjob conspiracy theory stuff anymore folks. This is real and this has ALREADY HAPPENED.
As fat, weak, pacifistic, and cowardly as most Americans are, do you really think there is anything to stop them at this point? You're the ones suffering from delusions, not the Congressman from California.
Freedom and Democracy are officially dead in America, and around the world.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's "official"
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Absolutely correct, the military obeys "lawful orders"
Posted by: kegbot1
» See, the Unibomber was right!
Posted by: common intelligence
» RE: See, the Unibomber was right!
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Oct 8, 2008 5:08 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» We don't want to get shot ...
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: faultyeyeball on Oct 8, 2008 5:28 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: general strike
Posted by: faultyeyeball
» RE: general strike
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: general strike
Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: general strike
Posted by: Dboy
» Do we HAVE to go through this survivalist BS
Posted by: eeezzz
» RE: Do we HAVE to go through this survivalist BS
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Oct 8, 2008 5:56 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: larue on Oct 8, 2008 6:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From WIki:
Recent legislative events
HR5122 also known as the John Warner Defense Authorization Act was signed by the president on Oct 17, 2006 John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007. Section 1076 Text of Hr5122 is titled "Use of the Armed Forces in major public emergencies". Removing the legalese from the text, and combining multiple sentences, it provides that: The President may employ the armed forces to restore public order in any state of the United States the president determines hinders the execution of laws or deprives people of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law or opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. The actual text is on page 322-323 of the legislation. As of 2008, these changes were repealed, changing the text of the law back to the original 1878 wording, under Public Law 110-181 (H.R. 4986, Section 1068,) however in signing H.R. 4986 into law President Bush attached a signing statement which indicated that the Executive Branch did not feel bound by the changes enacted by the repeal.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Posse Comitatus, Exactly Senator Warner betrayed America and his beloved Virginia..!
Posted by: TJColatrella
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kattfish on Oct 8, 2008 7:26 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thomas Jefferson
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The old guys had it right
Posted by: Dboy
» Too bad the American left is disarmed, pacifistic, and cowardly
Posted by: blogbooks
» In the old guys' day, the people hypothetically would fight the govt. with the same weapons on each
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eli_d on Oct 8, 2008 8:00 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The house of representatives did declare "martial law"! The "martial law rule" is the nickname Congress has for suspending certain procedural rules that slow down the passage of a bill (see here or here). It has nothing to do with troops in the streets. Basically, it let them pass the bailout bill on the same day it was introduced. Now I'm not saying that's a good thing, but it's a far cry from "the First Brigade arresting Congress"
Naomi Wolf should know better better. And she could have tried calling, oh, any Congressional office. It is articles like this that give citizen journalism a bad name.
I hope someone at Alternet eventually posts a correction
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Sorry eli-d. Your blind optomism is shallow. 'Ever try to call congress?
Posted by: common intelligence
» Slight correction
Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: Totally inaccurate article! - NOT!
Posted by: LipsMalloy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chris.morton on Oct 8, 2008 10:36 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This country is sliding into militarism. Bush and his sidekick have been working towards this for eight years - secrecy, the expansion of the power of the vice-president, the ability to make decisions without constitutional oversite, and so on. Now we have armed soldiers patrolling our streets. If McCain gets in, we will become a military/theocratic dictatorship - there is no doubt at all that this is what is happening.
True democracies don't need to augment their police with military units. This is the kind of thing we expect in South America and Africa, not in the United States. Why haven't the people been asked whether they agree to this? Obvious question - obvious answer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Creeping Militarism
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Animal on Oct 8, 2008 11:39 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Antidote To 1984 Is 1776
Posted by: Maxemum
» Not the American left, these people are cowards Donny
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: Not the American left, these people are cowards Donny
Posted by: helenahanbasquet
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bobsays on Oct 9, 2008 2:25 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The second time Canada used troops on its own people occurred in the early 1990s. An armed insurrection by Native people in Quebec led to a violent stand off with the Canadian Armed Forces. This involved a stand-off between heavily armed combat troops, and heavily armed native forces. Canadians watched in stunned (there is a lot 'stunned' in Canada) awe as troops attacked the armed camp in the middle of the night live on TV.
Compared to this, Bush has been the nicest, most mild and law-abiding dude you could imagine. Appreciate him.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You talking to ME?
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: You talking to ME?
Posted by: Bobsays
» Bob, that non-answer was worthy of Palin :.(
Posted by: stellabloo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Oct 9, 2008 6:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this country was born of pain in the asses, both American Indian and others... we wouldn't be here arguing back and forth without this DNA combo in our bodies... let's face it folks, no other country wants us...
for those that have set up home on this continent, the late great author, Vine DeLoria (Ihanktowan Dakota) wrote and this is a paraphrase... that you folks are now beginning to breathe the remains of your own ancestors just like we have been doing for thousands of years... time to start listening to the spirits of your ancestors and ours too...
every family has a story of either armed or unarmed resistance within it with the creativity and forethought from these stories for us to learn from...
time to think, reflect, study history to try to look for the future... people will always be people and technology usually is light years ahead of what simple humans can comprehend...
time to pull together and live in the present, who knows if we the people will have a second chance...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aria07 on Oct 9, 2008 7:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to Wolf, "George Bush struck down Posse Comitatus, thus making it legal for military to patrol the U.S.... He also led change to the 1807 Insurrection Act to give him far broader powers in the event of a loosely defined "insurrection".
What Wolf fails to mention is that ALL of these changes were rescinded in the 2008 Defense Bill, thanks to the efforts of Sen. Leahy. Leahy introduced an amendment that struck the changes to Posse Comitatus/Ins. Act & reinstituted the old law. This bill passed the Congress. Posse Comitatus is still law & the Insurrection Act was restored to its original form. I think Ms. Wolf should have included these incovenient facts into the article.
Source:
"In a difficult and highly unusual legislative achievement, Leahy also achieved repeal of the so-called “Insurrection Act Rider,” attached to the 2006 defense policy bill, which had made it easier for presidents to take control of the National Guard from governors and to use the U.S. military for domestic law enforcement. ... The repeal provisions in the newly enacted defense authorization act were drawn from another bill introduced by Leahy and Bond. The nation’s governors also unanimously supported the Leahy-Bond bill to repeal the Insurrection Act changes."
http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200801/013008b.html
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: POSSE COMITATUS STILL EXISTS!
Posted by: Maxemum
» RE: POSSE COMITATUS STILL EXISTS!
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: POSSE COMITATUS STILL EXISTS!
Posted by: Quakermom
Comments are closed-
Posted by: snideelf on Oct 9, 2008 7:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The upper middle-classes will be living in McMansion shanty towns.
They will barely get by.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: snideelf on Oct 9, 2008 7:22 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sending them out to put down an "insurrection" is not part of the American dream.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And yet, it will happen.
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: La Hedonista on Oct 9, 2008 7:55 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recommended book: Political Ponerology, the study of evil as applied to politics.
Wolf's job is to hiss "Natzees! Natzees!" until you're convinced we're under the iron thumb of conservatives. We are NOT. We're under the thumb of globalist plutocrat control freaks who control all sides of the political spectrum.
The NeoCons are not real conservatives. They are NEO-BOLSHEVIKS UNDER COVER. Just look at the pedigrees of their founders: Bitter, eastern-Euro and Russian communist exiles, most (but not all) of the Ashkenazi persuasion. They are control freak plutocrat wannabes. They have a sickness. They need HELP.
The sick fact that Naomi Wolf is to make your forget or not ever learn is that fascism is the screamy, spoiled, violent Damian bastard of the far LEFT. Our most murderous fascists in history - Mussolini, Stalin, Mao, even Hitler was Socialist - hail from the extreme left of the false right/left spectrum.
Right/Left in politics presents a false choice. The real struggle is between centralization of power into the hands of the FEW vs. decentralization of power into the hands of the MANY. Control freak plutocrat wannabes exist on both sides of the political spectrum.
If you never let this fact leave your minds you won't be fooled when the "saviors" swoop in with their "solutions" (invariably more central planning and control, which leads to fascism eventually no matter what you call it).
Mark my words: The Democrat "solutions" to getting rid of the Bush Regime will be as prebaked as the Patriot Act, which was written well before 9/11: More central control. I'm not gonna fall for it. Are you?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Naomi Klein plays the same game for the same team
Posted by: Bobsays
» The far right are supporting Bush too
Posted by: PaulC
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jameslyonsweiler on Oct 9, 2008 12:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No US Armed Forces Actions Against US Citizens
Petition text:
As American citizens, we declare that no US armed forces unit has the right to subdue us, imprison us, or take our property, in keeping with the spirit and letter of the US Constitution, including the Amendments, and especially the Posse Comitatus Act, a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385).
We urge our representatives in Congress to pass emergency legislation reasserting Posse Comitatus and to strip the President, George W. Bush, of rights he claimed in his 'signing note' appended to HR5122 (also known as the John Warner Defense Authorization Act) on January 28, 2008).
We assert that under no circumstances should US armed forces be used against US civilians, including and not limited to crowd control or to put down insurgency.
We urge every armed force personnel to refuse to obey orders if directed to act against US citizens. We the people will collect funds for such infantry and officer's legal defense and will hold them as heroes and defenders of freedom for any time served in the defense of the US constitution.
When President Bush swore to uphold and defend the US Constitution, he agreed that he would be subject to two years' time in prison for any use of US Armed Forces personnel against US citizenry. It's time for even more toughly worded legislation to protect the people of the United States from domestic tyranny.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SIGN THE PETITION - NO US ARMED FORCES ACTION AGAINST US CITIZENS!
Posted by: peacefullaim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beck on Oct 13, 2008 3:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joekutz on Oct 9, 2008 1:44 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A true leader does not react to events but rather creates the impetus to carry out the visions that transform events.
What this means is that even though things look bad and are being painted in the worst possible light by the news and this commentator in particular it doesn't mean this is meant to be. We all have the power to make things better and it starts by embracing and yes believing in a better future for us all.
Please do not think this is sticking our heads in the sand because yes there are forces in our country that seek to control it for their own malicious designs. I would submit to you that this has always been so. I would also remind you that our country and the greatness that is ascribed to it is because you and I work to make that future better by giving our attention to fixing the problems. This reporter is deservedly upset even frightened by the prospect of what could happen but I am here to tell you that it does not happen. We get out of this just like we always do.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: skepticmd on Oct 9, 2008 2:46 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jeff Greef on Oct 9, 2008 6:41 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MiamiJules1l on Oct 9, 2008 6:40 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Can This Really Be Happening?
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joseph_b26 on Oct 12, 2008 4:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What bothers me most is congress and the senate sit by and let this happen a month away from the presidential elections. This is seriously suspicious and should be confronted for what it imposes. I will not set by and let the Republicans and Bush steal another election. This is about the election, and don't be fooled it is anything else.
After I write this, I am writing my representatives from both houses and let them know in very specific terms this is a threat to our very way of governing. This is wrong and must not be pushed to the side. There is no time for wishful passive thinking this will pass. I have scene many signs the election will not go the way it has been designed. I can only say write you congressional representative. If my words appear loaded with fear, so what this must not stand.
Joseph
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FAITHCARR on Oct 12, 2008 4:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Some Say" next week? Here's hoping we are all wrong, wrong, wrong.
Meanwhile, I'm building a chicken coop, and planting winter vegetables.
Gotta be prepared. The only HOPE is that we are all WRONG.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whealeydj on Oct 12, 2008 6:34 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: truman on Oct 12, 2008 7:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bewitched on Oct 12, 2008 12:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Josesito on Oct 13, 2008 7:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Oct 13, 2008 2:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Steve_0 on Oct 15, 2008 10:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dumitru on Oct 27, 2008 6:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The U.S. Supreme Court makes this clear over and over again:
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury v. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491
"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton v. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it" 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177, late 2d, Sec 256
This is the empowering truth that we must use at every level to disillusion anyone who is violating our rights, or who is running in fear from impotent edicts. If anyone knows how to get this message to Naomi Wolf, please help her understand this important truth and spread the word.
Thank you.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zombo08 on Nov 3, 2008 9:21 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Oct 8, 2008 12:57 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Mindless drivel-kill obama
Posted by: compu
» RE: Mindless drivel
Posted by: kegbot1
» Senator Warner killed Posse Comitiatus and betrayed America and his beloved Virginia..!
Posted by: TJColatrella
» The troop level is too small to accomplish anything anyway!
Posted by: La Hedonista
» RE: The troop level is too small to accomplish anything anyway!
Posted by: Taylor Siluwe
» RE: The troop level is too small to accomplish anything anyway!
Posted by: donl51
» RE: The troop level is too small to accomplish anything anyway!
Posted by: peacefullaim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Oct 8, 2008 1:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Great Depression was caused by private owners and riggers of a private Fascist bank labeled the "Federal Reserve" Corp (not "federal" and minis ZERO "reserves") as Fed chair Bernanke admitted:
“I would like to say to Milton and Anna: Regarding the Great Depression. You're right, we did it. We're very sorry. But thanks to you, we won't do it again.”
Federal Reserve Governor Ben Bernanke (Conference to Honor Milton Friedman, University of Chicago 2002)
“The Federal Reserve [Corporation] definitely caused the great depression by contracting the amount of currency in circulation by one-third from 1929 to 1933.”
MILTON FRIEDMAN (conservative Nobel Laureate economist speaking on NPR. Quote 1996)
Well guess what? They HAVE done again. And in spades. The current crash is the outcome of allowing a parasite Organized Monopoly Corporate Crime State to rule over the nation for 100 years. This the serial monster that makes a killing joke of false "democracy" and "capitalism" worldwide.
The ramifications are not just economic but measured in mass murder genocide of sham 9/11 "war on terror" of a thousand lies .
The private "Federal Reserve" sham basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money to private “FED” banks. The “FED” creates money out of thin air, then loans it back to the government [ i.e. the people ] charging interest. The government levies income taxes to pay the interest on the debt.
This core truth is not something you will hear on any campaign trail where both "candidates" are merely actors for Organized Corporate Crime at a Washington-MSM circus.
Again, once you control money, you own all that matters including government, military-industry, and of course, the media and "education".
The coup occurred in 1913. Until it is reversed, the world will sink into further moral and mortal terror at the hands of a Fascist ruling class that owns and rigs the system at public cost for private profit. It's that simple and that complex.
“I believe that [private cartel] banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the [cartel] banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the [private cartel] banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”
PRESIDENT THOMAS JEFFERSON (a founder of America. In a letter to the Secretary of Treasury Albert Gallatin, 1802. Published 1809
“Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They are not…The sack of the United States by the Fed is the greatest crime in history…The truth is the Fed has usurped the government. It controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.”
CONGRESSMAN LOUIS T. MCFADDEN (Chairman, House Banking & Currency Committee. June 1932)
“This [Federal Reserve] Act establishes the most gigantic trust [private monopoly] on earth. When the president [Wilson] signs this bill, the invisible government of the money power will be legalized… The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill.”
CONGRESSMAN CHARLES A. LINDBERG SR. (on the privately owned “Federal Reserve” Corp monopoly. 12/ 23/ 1913)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: chuckjs
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Ayuh!
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: aonghus36
» Thomas Jefferson was remarkable
Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Ayuh!
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: dmaciewski
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: Quannah
» Central Banks?
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Central Banks?
Posted by: Spot
» RE: Central Banks?
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Central Banks?
Posted by: deltadancer
» RE: Central Banks?
Posted by: Scientz
» i call bullshit on you.
Posted by: Spot
» Call it what you'd like, you're wrong.
Posted by: Scientz
» Central Banks are essentially OWNED by private corporate crime - you call that "independent"?
Posted by: PointMan
» I'm not even going to dignify that . . .
Posted by: Scientz
» "dignify" this...
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: "dignify" this...
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: "dignify" this...
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: "dignify" this...
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: "dignify" this...
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: "dignify" this...
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: "dignify" this...
Posted by: PointMan
» More of the expected from a message board thug . . .
Posted by: Scientz
» Chesty McCool gets self-image ruffled... (he doth protest too much)
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: Central Banks?
Posted by: Pooty T
» RE: FASCISM for FASCIST ECONOMY = CRASH
Posted by: thealltheone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: huricane on Oct 8, 2008 1:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: go back, read it again
Posted by: CosmoViking
» RE: go back, read it again
Posted by: helenwheels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: usterroristnation on Oct 8, 2008 2:53 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» So you mean the UFSA right?
Posted by: chuckjs
» RE: So you mean the UFSA right?
Posted by: StillStanding
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 8, 2008 3:05 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And to think, nearly a third of this country are so rib-ticklingly stupid, they actually believe that sending this idiot to the White House was a good idea. Come to think about it, I don't have to be a member of the House to deliver the message:
FUCK YOU, GEORGE.
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
Character and Distrations
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» FUCK YOU, BUSH, CHENEY, ROVE, et al.
Posted by: socialpsych
» RE: FUCK YOU, BUSH, CHENEY, ROVE, et al.
Posted by: CosmoViking
» RE: FUCK YOU, BUSH, CHENEY, ROVE, et al.
Posted by: kungfuma
» RE: "Message to George W. Bush: FUCK YOU!"
Posted by: Krain61
» RE:Eric Idle Rules!
Posted by: Shehova
» RE: ric Idle Rules!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: ric Idle Rules!
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: "Message to George W. Bush: FUCK YOU!"
Posted by: AuntBec
» RE: "Message to George W. Bush: FUCK YOU!"
Posted by: Tom Degan
» Thankyou Tom,my sentiments exactly!....Fuck you BUSH!!
Posted by: donl51
» From now on...
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Direct Democracy on Oct 8, 2008 3:09 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FREE AMERICA
REVOLUTION
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: Romantic Violence
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: Boatboy
» Asymmetric warfare
Posted by: andabottleof_rum
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: Rod
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Bring 'Em On
Posted by: Krain61
» WoooHooo It's the Wild West
Posted by: eeezzz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Don Quixote on Oct 8, 2008 3:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: US troops for Crowd Control
Posted by: CosmoViking
» RE: US troops for Crowd Control
Posted by: Erin
» Ahhh - that actually took place about 25 years ago
Posted by: eeezzz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: agape on Oct 8, 2008 3:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "Renazican"
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: "Renazican"
Posted by: agape
» RE: "Renazican"
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Agape
Posted by: badkitty68
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FMABBI on Oct 8, 2008 4:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must demand that impeachment proceedings begin - even now with less than a month before the election - in order to deflate the power of Bush/ Cheney to insure that the next administration actually arrives at the white house.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: FMAinMass
Posted by: Rainstorm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whathaway on Oct 8, 2008 4:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we are all aware that Bush & Co has consolidated power in the executive branch and this of course is dangerous and could be seen as a coup of sorts. A more frightening possibility is it could even be that indeed our republic is already gone and while we sit this morning sipping our coffee and typing our little opinions it is all really gone.
What have we done...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: hmmm
Posted by: SufiLizard
» RE: hmmm
Posted by: tRANIS
» thanks...
Posted by: whathaway
» RE: see redstateupdate.net
Posted by: particle61
» RE: see redstateupdate.net
Posted by: whathaway
» RE: hmmm
Posted by: helenwheels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SufiLizard on Oct 8, 2008 4:23 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What are we going to do Nov. 5 if the worst happens? Knowing that massive protests will be dealt with by the U.S. Military?
Violence is clearly not the answer. It wouldn't be effective anyway.
However if Americans take to the streets everywhere, one Army division can't be everywhere at once. We need to plan mass rallies right outside the doors of local TV and Radio stations in every community in America so they CAN'T ignore us.
The situation is dire and our country needs us to act. First by trying to win this election, but if they steal it we need to be prepared to counter martial law.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Truly Frightening!!!!
Posted by: agape
» RE: Truly Frightening!!!!
Posted by: praedor
» RE: Truly Frightening!!!!
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Truly Frightening!!!!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» Try winning this election! Like the last two???
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Truly Frightening!!!! - and the gun lobby exposed
Posted by: Julian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: When In Doubt on Oct 8, 2008 4:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democracynow.org
and take a look at the RNC St paul event during their convention when Amy Goodman and two of her producers were arrested by a police force looking like they were from a sci -fi film...or like nazi Germany in the 1930's
I watched hours of that on tv
I knew then that fascism is here and now.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: When in Doubt
Posted by: helenwheels
» That stuff has been going on for 100 years
Posted by: eeezzz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bryangalt on Oct 8, 2008 5:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am deeply disturbed that we would even have to consider such an option, but fellow citizens, we cannot allow ourselves to be pushed into a corner so that secret armies can wonder the country and arrest us, jail us, kill us. THIS IS OUR COUNTRY, NOT THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH'S COUNTRY.
I can only wonder if the military would be so willing to dishonor their oath to defend the Constitution.
Republicans: you no longer have the right to ever say how much you love this country or it's people you hypocritical bastards. You should all be ashamed of yourselves for allowing us to reach this crossroad to hell.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: THE SHOT HEARD 'ROUND THE WORLD
Posted by: AlienSlave
» I can only wonder if the military would be so willing to dishonor their oath to defend the Constitut
Posted by: robert.noll
» RE: Military oath has changed
Posted by: Hachino
» RE: Military oath has changed
Posted by: kegbot1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: volscho on Oct 8, 2008 5:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On October 1, 2008, the DHS spy satellite program went into effect.
On October 1, 2008, the Brigade started its "mission"
Military personnel just received a 3.9% pay raise.
Roughly a year ago b/w October 15th-20th 2007, NorthCom participated in a 5-day long "martial law exercise"
One of the non-lethal weapons they will have "containerized" may be the ADS or Silent Guardian (manufactured by Raytheon).
Bush has issued the signing statement as Naomi Wolf reports. She may right on target. They may never let Obama be president.
What might they do? Stage rioting in "battleground states" and then send in the militia and then perform "recounts" that favor McCain.
Wolf also stated that at age 72 and with his history of melanoma, McCain may have 2-4 years life expectancy. Then what? Sarah Palin?
Troubling times indeed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Concerned Citizen
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: volscho on Oct 8, 2008 5:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Oct 8, 2008 5:47 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In November, kick out this Party.
Vote in SANITY, INTELLIGENCE and REASON.
Vote Obam/Biden '08
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How to End this BS
Posted by: agape
» How to Perpetuate this BS:
Posted by: leafsong1
» RIGHT - Your brilliance isn't working :.?
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: IGHT - Your brilliance isn't working :.?
Posted by: leafsong1
» Lookit, don't wait for me - get your gun and get out there!
Posted by: stellabloo
» US is revolution proof
Posted by: Tom Tele
» RE: How to End this BS
Posted by: michael1972
» RE: How to End this BS
Posted by: helenwheels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Oct 8, 2008 5:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Naomi sees the "writing on the wall" regarding the fascist takeover of this country. The bailout bill has a provision giving $100 billion to George Bush to use as he wishes. This bail-out Bill was pushed through Congress with threats of martial law if it was not passed. It was pushed through Congress just like the Patriot Act was pushed through Congress. Fear was the driving force. Fear is used by dictators to take control.
A military brigade from Iraq is being deployed on United States soil now to keep the peace. The Posse Comitatus Act, which forbade the deployment of military troops in this country to enforce the law, was thrown out by the Patriot Act. In 2006, when the Congress was taken back by the Democrats, the Democrats actually did something and reinstated this act. George Bush instead of vetoing it just signed another of his many " Signing Statements" Which Said That He Would Not Be Bound by This Reinstatement of the Posse Comitatus Act.
Prisons have been built across the country over the last several years by a subsidiary of Halliburton. Journalists were arrested at the Republican national convention. The Electronic Voting Machines Are in Place to Hack Another Election. The mainstream media is completely owned by five multi-national companies. The monetary policy of this country is controlled by international private central bankers which includes the Federal Reserve Bank and the Bank of England.
George Bush must be arrested for treason before it is too late.
Watch Naomi Wolf talk about the fascist take-over being in its “end game” stage.
Sincerely,
Joe,Webmaster, www.911insidejob.net
E-Mail:911insidejob@bushstole04.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Fascist Take-over End Game
Posted by: luzmejor
» Please just tell me, where are these prisons?
Posted by: eeezzz
» RE: Please just tell me, where are these prisons?
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Please just tell me, where are these prisons?
Posted by: badkitty68
» RE: Please just tell me, where are these prisons?
Posted by: Plexius2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mr. J on Oct 8, 2008 6:51 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: They can't stop us.
Posted by: scarlettm512
» RE: They can't stop us.
Posted by: peacefullaim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Maxemum on Oct 8, 2008 6:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a really good watch regarding the creation of the federal reserve and the tax-amendment that was never ratified there is a movie out there called Freedom to Fascism. This documentary was filmed by Aaron Russo before his death. The very same guy that brought us the lethal weapon movies. Unfortunately, the address is far to long for this site to accept. I would suggest typing in "From Freedom to Fascism" in your browser windows and viewing the whole thing. It's time for all of us to educate ourselves quickly.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There are those constitutional loving patriotic americans...
Posted by: alicelillie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Oct 8, 2008 6:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jiff
Whats hiding on your PC?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: alicelillie on Oct 8, 2008 7:03 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our founders, whatever else you think of them, were determined to add the Bill of Rights to the Constitution precisely because of situations like the one we are now in.
If the government gets out of line, it is not only our *right* but it is our *duty* to get it back in line, no matter what we have to do to achieve that.
And, they said, if all else fails and we absolutely have to use force, then we have to. And, this is reason number one why the citizenry needs to be armed. It is not pleasant to think about.
The number two reason is the fact that during chaos, some will stoop to the level of crime, and defense against that is called for too.
I just hope that we can change things in a peaceful, orderly way. Many view the upcoming election as a way to change. I personally don't as I am a Ron Paul supporter who plans to vote for Bob Barr, and I know full well he won't win. It is a matter of principle.
And, some view demonstrations and shouting out as a way to change. Maybe. Hopefully.
But, what if push comes to shove and someone is at your door saying, come along, you're going to a camp, and each family member is going to a different place?
Will you say "Yassir, yasssir, we go nicely, Boss" or will you be able to say, "No way, Jose" and make it stick?
It probably won't be that overt, but preparedness is key.
See my blog at http://www.alicelillieandher.blogspot.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Actually, you're gonna have to get past the guns and stand up to bad policies.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: YOU ON THE LEFT HAD BETTER RE-THINK GUN RIGHTS!!
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: YOU ON THE LEFT HAD BETTER RE-THINK GUN RIGHTS!!
Posted by: agape
» RE: YOU ON THE LEFT HAD BETTER RE-THINK GUN RIGHTS!!
Posted by: Malamute
» RE: YOU ON THE LEFT HAD BETTER RE-THINK GUN RIGHTS!!
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: YOU ON THE LEFT HAD BETTER RE-THINK GUN RIGHTS!!
Posted by: Malamute
» If the left thinks this thing is going away without a frontline, they are dreaming.
Posted by: yale
» RE: YOU ON THE LEFT HAD BETTER RE-THINK GUN RIGHTS!!
Posted by: badkitty68
» I HAVE HAD IT WITH THIS GUNS-RIGHTS BS!
Posted by: djnoll
» RE: I HAVE HAD IT WITH THIS GUNS-RIGHTS BS!
Posted by: yale
Comments are closed-
