Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rights and Liberties

Revealed: "Secret" Executions Being Carried Out in Saddam's Old Intelligence Headquarters

By Robert Fisk, Independent UK. Posted October 8, 2008.


Hundreds of "insurgents" have been executed since 2003, victims of the same summary justice they mete out to their own captives.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Like all wars, the dark, untold stories of the Iraqi conflict drain from its shattered landscape like the filthy waters of the Tigris. And still the revelations come.

The Independent has learned that secret executions are being carried out in the prisons run by Nouri al-Maliki's "democratic" government.

The hangings are carried out regularly -- from a wooden gallows in a small, cramped cell -- in Saddam Hussein's old intelligence headquarters at Kazimiyah. There is no public record of these killings in what is now called Baghdad's "high-security detention facility" but most of the victims -- there have been hundreds since America introduced "democracy" to Iraq -- are said to be insurgents, given the same summary justice they mete out to their own captives.

The secrets of Iraq's death chambers lie mostly hidden from foreign eyes but a few brave Western souls have come forward to tell of this prison horror. The accounts provide only a glimpse into the Iraqi story, at times tantalizingly cut short, at others gloomily predictable. Those who tell it are as depressed as they are filled with hopelessness.

"Most of the executions are of supposed insurgents of one kind or another," a Westerner who has seen the execution chamber at Kazimiyah told me. "But hanging isn't easy." As always, the devil is in the detail.

"There's a cell with a bar below the ceiling with a rope over it and a bench on which the victim stands with his hands tied," a former British official, told me last week. "I've been in the cell, though it was always empty. But not long before I visited, they'd taken this guy there to hang him. They made him stand on the bench, put the rope round his neck and pushed him off. But he jumped on to the floor. He could stand up. So they shortened the length of the rope and got him back on the bench and pushed him off again. It didn't work."

There's nothing new in savage executions in the Middle East -- in the Lebanese city of Sidon 10 years ago, a policeman had to hang on to the legs of a condemned man to throttle him after he failed to die on the noose -- but in Baghdad, cruel death seems a specialty.

"They started digging into the floor beneath the bench so that the guy would drop far enough to snap his neck," the official said. "They dug up the tiles and the cement underneath. But that didn't work. He could still stand up when they pushed him off the bench. So they just took him to a corner of the cell and shot him in the head."

The condemned prisoners in Kazimiyah, a Shia district of Baghdad, are said to include rapists and murderers as well as insurgents. One prisoner, a Chechen, managed to escape from the jail with another man after a gun was smuggled to them. They shot two guards dead. The authorities had to call in the Americans to help them recapture the two. The Americans killed one and shot the Chechen in the leg. He refused medical assistance so his wound went gangrenous. In the end, the Iraqis had to operate and took all the bones out of his leg. By the time he met one Western visitor to the prison, "he was walking around on crutches with his boneless right leg slung over his shoulder."

In many cases, it seems, the Iraqis neither keep nor release any record of the true names of their captives or of the hanged prisoners. For years the Americans -- in charge of the notorious Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad -- did not know the identity of their prisoners. Here, for example, is new testimony given to The Independent by a former Western official to the Anglo-U.S. Iraq Survey Group, which searched for the infamous but mythical weapons of mass destruction: "We would go to the interrogation rooms at Abu Ghraib and ask for a particular prisoner. After about 40 minutes, the Americans brought in this hooded guy, shuffling along, shackled hands and feet.

"They sat him on a chair in front of us and took off his hood. He had a big beard. We asked where he received his education. He repeatedly said 'Mosul.' Then he said he'd left school at 14 -- remember, this guy is supposed to be a missile scientist. We said: 'We know you've got a PhD and went to the Sorbonne -- we'd like you to help us with information about Saddam's missile project.' But I said to myself: 'This guy doesn't know anything 'bout fucking missiles.' Then it turned out he had a different name from the man we'd asked for, he'd been picked up on the road by the Americans four months earlier, he didn't know why. So we said to the Americans: 'Wrong gentleman!' So they put the shackles on him and took him back to his cell and after 20 or 30 minutes, they'd bring someone else. We'd ask him where he went to school and he told us he had never been to school.

"Wrong person again. It was a complete farce. The incompetence of the U.S. military was astounding, criminal. Eventually, of course, they found the right guy and brought him in and took his hood off. He was breathing heavily, overweight, pudgy, disoriented, a little bit scared."

On this occasion, the Americans had found the right man. The British and American investigators asked the guards to remove the man's shackles, which they did -- but then they tied one of the man's legs to the floor. Yes, he had a PhD.

Again, the official's testimony: "We went through his history, what he'd worked on -- he was obviously just a minor functionary in one of Saddam's missile programs. Iraqi scientists didn't have the knowledge how to make nuclear missiles nor did they have the financial support necessary. It just remained in the dreams of Saddam."

The scientist-prisoner in Abu Ghraib miserably told his captors that he'd been arrested by the Americans after they'd knocked on his front door in Baghdad and found two Kalashnikov rifles a woman's hijab, verses from the Koran and, obviously of interest to his captors, "physics and missile textbooks on his bookshelves." But this supposedly valuable prisoner was never charged or previously interviewed even though he admitted he was a rocket scientist.

"I don't know what happened to him," the former official told me. "I tried to tell the UK and the U.S. military that we've arrested this man but that he's got a wife, children, a family. I said that by locking up this one innocent person, you've got 50 men radicalized overnight. No, I don't know what happened to him."

For many of the investigators working for the Anglo-American authorities in Baghdad, the trial for the crime for which the Iraqi dictator was himself subsequently hanged was a fearful experience that ultimately ended in disgust. Through captured documents, they could see the dark, inner workings of Saddam's secret police. The idea of the Saddam trial was less to bring members of the former regime to justice than to show Iraqis how justice and the rule of law should operate.

"It was exhilarating to see Saddam being cross-examined," one of the court investigators said. "The low point was when he was executed. What drove me on was seeing how Saddam dealt with his victims -- I was looking at a microcosm of all the deaths that had taken place in Iraq. But when he was executed, it was done in such a savage way."

Saddam Hussein was hanged in the same "secure" unit at Kazimiyah where al-Maliki's people, in an echo of Saddamite Baathist terror, now hang their victims.

Iraq's death penalty

* The death penalty in Iraq was suspended after Saddam Hussein was deposed in 2003. It was reinstated by the interim government in August 2004.

* The United Nations, the European Union and international human rights organizations all spoke out against the reintroduction.

* At the time, the government claimed the death penalty was a necessary measure until the country had stabilized. Amnesty International claims that "the extent of violence in Iraq has increased rather than diminished, clearly indicating that the death penalty has not proved to be an effective deterrent."

* Saddam, left, his half-brother Barzan al-Tikriti and Iraq's former chief judge Awad Hamed al-Bandar were hanged at the end of 2006 for their part in the killings of 148 people in the mainly Shia town of Dujail in 1982. Illicit videos of all three executions later became public. Saddam's body could be seen on a hospital trolley, his head twisted at 90 degrees. Barzan -- Iraq's former intelligence chief -- was decapitated by the noose. Officials said it was an accident.

* According to Amnesty, there were at least 33 executions reported in Iraq last year. About 200 people were estimated to have been sentenced to death.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, iraq war, death penalty, saddam hussein, iraq occupation, capital punishment, nouri al-maliki, executions, kazimiyah

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
usterroristnation
Posted by: usterroristnation on Oct 8, 2008 2:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These happenings should have the world's civilised nations baying for America's blood ! No wonder bush and his fellow clowns had to sign out of the Geneva Conventions and Habeus Corpus and membership of the International Criminal Court. It behoves the world to gather together and insist that these criminals be tried for their sponsorship of torture, rape and murder .... nothing less will do now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Democracy"
Posted by: Ayuh! on Oct 8, 2008 2:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad the author mockingly wrapped "democracy" in quotes. Iraq is a theocracy, as anyone can see for themselves by reading its constitution. But of course, our intent was never to "spread democracy," so this is not surprising.

As to Saddam, as vile as he was, I must say that having seen the leaked cellphone video, it was like watching a Hollywood movie with a hero proudly facing the gallows. I'm not saying he was a hero of course, just that he died admirably. His contempt for his executioners was palpable, and infectious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I agree . . . Posted by: Scientz
So this is Democracy
Posted by: Shey on Oct 8, 2008 4:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "democracy" we (or rather, our sham government here in the U.S.) have brought to Iraq. Is this the kind of thing McCain is referring to when he keeps insisting that the "surge" has been a "success"? This is what our troops are dying for, while Bin Laden laughs his terrorist ass off, somewhere in the mountains that form the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan? (and not in a "cave", you can be sure).

This is a government, of our creation, with a multi billion dollar SURPLUS, and we continue to support it and send our troops to die for it, while our own country is in economic free-fall so severe that even congressional Democrats were forced to vote for what amounts to a bail-out for the very mega-rich corporations that got us into this mess in the first place. Although to their credit, they dug in their heels and insisted on at least a token amount of assistance for the middle class, and Obama continues to remind us that this was not a "solution", just a stop-gap measure.

I hope people were really listening when Obama said, in yesterday's debate, "what I don't understand is how we ended up invading a country that had nothing to do with 9/11.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not a Mistake when you keep backing the Terrorist Groups
Posted by: Purple Girl on Oct 8, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see, lets' just sitck with 'recent' applicable instances where the So Called 'US' backed a Murderous dictator or Terrorist...Saddam Hussein and Bin Laden both in the '80's.Saddam Was backed during his War with Iran and Binny was backed while being a 'Freedom fighter' in Afhgnaistan against the USSR?
Obama Gave Mac a Free pass last night Not pointing out WHO those Mac was Glorifying as 'Freedom Fighters'In Afhganistan in the '80's Actaully Were...Bin Laden and AQ!
One more Bridge to Nowhere Reference to Ayers should Cut the Ribbon to the Bridge from Mac to Bin Laden ( His anti Communist group membership)
I was concerned Obama Stepped into shit when he mentioned Credit card Corps Love of Delaware- What a major Faux pa. But Mac Saved the Day by Linking Himself to those 9/11 Attackers!Heckova Job Johnny boy! Cheney Must have Shit his Pants!
so Mac is there a Palm Island Called 'Hell' or is it just a Nickname Bin Laden calls it between 'Friends'.Because it appears your ability to 'Catch Bin laden' always stops at the Gates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US needs to get out of Iraq entirely ASAP
Posted by: Garvagh on Oct 8, 2008 11:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The neocons want permanent US miliary bases in Iraq to "protect" Israel (meaning to enable Israel to continue to oppress the Palestinians) even if the cost is taking the US toward bankruptcy. How many hundreds of billions of US taxpayer dollars do we need to spend yearly to "protect" Israel and allow militarists like Bibi Netanyahu (a darling of the Washington neocons) try to repress the Palestinians into perpetuity?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Have you noticed ...
Posted by: harryf200 on Oct 8, 2008 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... that even the US Army helmets look like those used by the Nazis in WW2?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only 7 comments? That says a lot about Alternet's readership, I'm afraid.
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Oct 8, 2008 4:02 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of it flattering. I think this fits in with the "I don't want to know about it" mentality of much of the U.S. public.

The brilliant author Douglas Adams (Hitchhiker's Guide) called this the "Somebody Else's Problem" effect - if the story was too jarring to someone's preconcieved notions, the person wouldn't even accept what was right in front of them.

A similar story is that of how Sunnis and Shias were set at one another's throats by the use of covert assassination teams. This is true - the basics of the issue were reported in a CNN interview with Bob Woodward just recently:

edition.cnn.com

"WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The dramatic drop in violence in Iraq is due in large part to a secret program the U.S. military has used to kill terrorists, according to a new book by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Bob Woodward."

"The program -- which Woodward compares to the World War II era Manhattan Project that developed the atomic bomb -- must remain secret for now or it would "get people killed," Woodward said Monday on CNN's Larry King Live."


The tone here is astonishing:
""It is a wonderful example of American ingenuity solving a problem in war, as we often have," Woodward said."

The truth is that they were not just killing terrorists - they were also using teams of assassins to slaughter innocent Iraqis, both Sunnis and Shias, in a manner that would cause the blame to placed on the opposite ethnic group. This was done to drive a wedge into the opposition to the U.S. takeover of Iraq, and it worked fairly well, as such things go.

If you were to take all this at face value, you'd have to conclude that the U.S. generals and the Iraqi government are something out of a horror flick about the Nazi occupation of Greece in World War II - that they are insane, evil, maniacal, with little remorse or even any basic moral compass.

Really, what Bush and Cheney are saying is this: "We want your oil, and we will kill and torture people until the Iraqi people let us do whatever we want with their country."

I recall a story about how during the Nazi occupation of Greece, 2 Nazi soldiers were killed, and the Nazis retaliated by shooting the first 50 people they could round up - no doubt using the argument that they were affiliated with "the terrorists." Echos of Falluja and Haditha? 'Fraid so.

That's how bad things have gotten within our government - really, really bad. The tide is turning, but Hunter S. Thompson was right when he said before his death that "we were the Nazis in this."

That's something that most of us Americans, who are very decent people, much loved by the rest of the world, just can't accept. "That's not me!", we say - and it's not, true.

What it is the expression of the true nature of the hate-filled, racist, psychotic brand of neocon Republicanism that's run our government for the past eight years - and Sarah Palin and McCain are part of that team.

However, as Bob Woodward demonstrates, their is no shortage of media apologists-supporters for the neocons and their agenda. The "liberal media" went hand in hand with the neocons into Iraq, no questions asked - remember?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

blumak827
Posted by: blumak827 on Oct 11, 2008 1:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am apalled and still not surprised. The brutish, lazy, incuriously ineffecutal, carelessly cruel nature of the monkey residing in the people's White House has infected every area of our government's activities.This neer do well coward has the most important job he ever got- and like every other job he ever got, he didn't earn or deserve this one either. And like every other job- he has made an awful mess- but this is the biggest mess he's ever made- because this time he's gone and messed up the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re
Posted by: zombo08 on Nov 3, 2008 9:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement